Hello Saguamundi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Khoikhoi 21:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Geoffrey Palmer is still featured in the article, just not where you placed it. He is further up, alongside other previously notable residents such as Roald Dahl and Robert Louis Stevenson. -- Roleplayer 00:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Saguamundi

I have been asked for a comment regarding the stub templates used for Turkish Cypriots, and I notice that you show an interest in these articles. I am the person that originally tagged the Cypriots as Europeans rather than Asians and I do of course agree that the island of Cyprus geographically is an extension of Anatolia and consequently a part of Asia, but I believe that most editors and readers will be more likely to associate the island with Europe rather than with Asia, so this was the reason for sorting the stub templates the way I did. Originally, we just used {{Politician-stub}} for all articles, but the material became so big that we broke it up by continent. I suspect that a stub template for Middle East politicians will eventually be split off from the {{Asia-politician-stub}} and if this happens I would like to avoid the risk of having to tag Cypriot material with templates for both Europe, Asia, and the Middle East all at the same time. :) AFAIK, WP:WSS has, simply for practical purposes, categorized Cyprus under Europe, but if you feel strongly about this issue, may I suggest that you take the matter up with WP:WSS so this issue can be debated and so we can ensure that all Cypriot material will be grouped the same way nomatter which solution is chosen? Happy editing. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 22:14, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saguamundi, can you please provide some explanation why you're adding Category:Turkish people to articles that already have Category:Turkish Cypriots in them? The latter is already a sub-category of the former, making it redundant. Khoikhoi 05:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that due to the way the category system normally works, an editor / reader familiar with other material will expect a biography labelled with "Turkish ..." to refer to an article about a person from Turkey. Grouping Turkish Cypriots in the same category as people from the Republic of Turkey goes against the normal system. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 09:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Slovetzian, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 17:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Category:New York City actors has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Geoff ^{T C} 23:56, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saguamundi. You have new messages at La Pianista's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Saguamundi. You have new messages at Glane23's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Brad Hawkins, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0370085/bio. As a copyright violation, Brad Hawkins appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Brad Hawkins has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Brad Hawkins and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Brad Hawkins with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Brad Hawkins.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Gilo1969 (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

None of the references for Judge Halil Suleyman Ozerden indicate the spelling that you keep inserting into the article. All evidence indicates that he, like many Americans with ancestry from non-English speaking countries, has "Americanized" his name by dropping the accents that his fore-fathers used to use. In other words, his name appears to be "Halil Suleyman Ozerden" and not "Halil Süleyman Özerden". Wikipedia policy is to use reliable sources and reflect common usage of names, so if you wish to use an alternate spelling, please supply a reliable source that indicates that that spelling (for him specifically and not just the name elements generically) is what is used. Studerby (talk) 17:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No actually he is from Ashtiyan which is a Persian speaking area and has its own dialect [1]. But he moved to Tabriz during the Qajar era.--Nepaheshgar (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't agree with such a category necessarily, then we have 50%, 25% and 1% and etc. But anyhow, if something is sourced or their wiki page says it, then it is probably okay. Sometimes there is mistakes though..--Nepaheshgar (talk) 16:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a Wikiquette alert [[here regarding issues in our recent interactions. Studerby (talk) 21:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, your note to Studerby crossed a line. Please assume good faith when editors disagree about content, and certainly do not call them racists simply because they disagree with you. Because it is important that all users here maintain a civil discourse, editors who breach these non-optional rules can be blocked from editing. Rather than edit-warring, use dispute resolution mechanisms. For example, there is a whole noticeboard devoted to content disputes over geopolitical issues such as whether to use Western or Turkish naming where you can seek the input of other neutral editors. THF (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you actually look at the article? The template automatically italicises the name Islas Malvinas, to highlight it. The Spanish wikipedia treats the name in exactly the same way. This not to deprecate the Spanish name in any way shape or form. Nor does it favour one side over the other, which appears to be your bad faith assumption.

As regards the Anglophobia article, you cut'n'pasted the text from another article including too much detail, it needed a precis which is what I did. Your edit is also incorrect as Argentina has not "relentlessly" pursued its claim, it has dropped it several time for it to be resurrected time and again. The language used was emotive, wasn't the best for English grammar and certainly did not conform to WP:NPOV. See WP:OWN, if you can't accept that people will edit and change your contributions then perhaps you need to rethink whether Wikipedia is for you. Justin talk 15:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I endorse this comment, and also note that there is a comment just above the first sentence in Falkland Islands specifically pointing out that we have gone over this at length before, warning that changes are liable to be reverted on sight without discussion, and advising that any overriding new arguments should be taken to talk first. Pfainuk talk 15:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nejdet Şahin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:V, WP:N and WP:ATHLETE as it contains no sources that establish the athlete is notable or has played in a fully-pro league

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jogurney (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of St. Stepanos Church, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: St. Stepanos Church, Smyrna. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles generaly need to be built from multiple soruces. In this case the article phraseing was clearly derived from it's source materials and as a result was a derivative work and thus a copyvio. Please be more careful in future.©Geni 21:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saguamundi, looks like you made a little mistake here. I have cut-and-pasted the article to Category:Mountain ranges of Azerbaijan (can't move between main and category namespace) and tagged it for deletion. Hope this is alright, kind regards, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 20:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saguamundi! Your comments on Istanbul's climate have had me search for better alternatives to Koeppen. As you know, under Koeppen Istanbul does come under the Csa (Mediterranean) zone, even though it has little in common with other areas within the same zone. Another editor has brought this study to my attention. You may already be familiar with it... I like the fact that, apart from the Macrobioclimatic zones, it has various levels of detail. It shows Istanbul in a Mediterranean macro zone, but in a unique sub-category, based on continental influences. Koppenlady (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Misty mountains-1-.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Forests of Azerbaijan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RichardOwen97 (talk) 20:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Omulazimoglu is suspected of vandalizing the editions you made in the Ankara article. I reverted to your editions. But could you watch out for his vandalistic "editions" and reverts. Thank you.

Menikure —Preceding undated comment added 14:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

No vandalism, just POV-pushing and edit-warring. [|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|] 00:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saguamundi. You have new messages at Retro00064's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

[|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|] 00:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:National parks of Azerbaijan" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:57, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't care what title is used on wikipedia ref the English Tower or the Tower Monument on English wikipedia. However, I would decline to make the move you requested without a consensus.

According to the history page, it was moved per consensus to the commonly used name. If you wish to change that may I suggest you use the move request on the talk page and establish a new consensus.

Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 23:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please hold on for a bit regarding moving Montreal street names. Has consensus been reached about this on some talk page somewhere? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Not to my knowledge. No, not all. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember this discussion either.--MTLskyline (talk) 22:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Anna. In addition, what you are doing is a violation of the Wikipedia Policy on Article Titles, its subsection Foreign names and anglicization, and Wikipedia Guideline Naming conventions (use English).   — Jeff G.  ツ 23:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Anna. North8000 (talk) 02:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right, specifically, we have Wikipedia:CANSTYLE#French_names that also addresses this matter. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that link, Shawn.   — Jeff G.  ツ 02:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viriditas and I have moved the pages back and restored the leads to how they were before. I might have missed one or two. Saguamundi: please, next time discuss mass moves first. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify in case it's unclear, Wikipedia is not bound by what's considered the "official" name or by official language considerations. Our core rule on here is to use whatever can be documentably shown to be the most common name for the topic in actual English usage, regardless of whether that name is official or unofficial, regardless of whether it's French or English. So moving some street names isn't necessarily out of the question — but it's a question of showing sources to demonstrate whether English-language sources actually use "avenue des Pins" or "Pine Avenue", not which name is formally correct in the province's own official language.

Just as another example, our article about the capital of Russia is located at the English spelling Moscow, not the officially correct Москва́, and our article about the capital of Poland is located at the English spelling Warsaw, not the officially correct Warszawa — because we're an English language reference, we use the form that's actually seen in English language sources whether it's the place's official name in its own official language or not. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 23:47, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You once again mass moved pages related to Belgium, including the page La Monnaie in several other languages. Remember to discuss moves that you think might be controversial before you do them instead of acting unilaterally. Oreo Priest ^talk 23:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was much more constructive than I expected, often those who move pages with no discussion are not interested in consensus or are pushing an agenda. Sorry for my earlier tone if too harsh, and sorry for forgetting to link the naming conventions (here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Belgium/Brussels naming conventions). At any rate, I think your concerns line up pretty well with what we came up with for the naming conventions. In every case, the alternate name must be mentioned (unless it appears in a link), and both names must always be in bold and in the infobox. If when reading them, you're wondering why it seems like Dutch is taking a back seat to French, it's because A) English speakers almost always use the French, and B) writing two names all the time was thought to be messy and inappropriate. The goal was still neutrality, but it's neutrality from an English speaker's point of view. If you have any questions, let me know, and I look forward to your further contributions. Cheers, Oreo Priest ^talk 19:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is done. Someone else had made this type of comment, so the articles have been wikified in this regard. They are in sore need of inline references. Thegreatdr (talk) 15:10, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saguamundi. You have new messages at Tuscumbia's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tuscumbia (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You and User:Fisher654 need to stop reverting each other and discuss your concerns about Visa requirements for Turkish citizens on the article's talk page. Continuing to revert is edit warring, and can lead to being blocked. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I appreicate your last edit as it show that you are willing to compromise on our minor dispute. However, the "Baku Institute of Peace and Democracy" is not an academic source. Hence, within the info box, it would be incorrect to place this source amongst the academic estimate. I'm not quite sure why you wish to remove the source so much. I understand that the BIPD is not in operation anymore but that does not mean it should be removed... that's like removing an academic citation once the academic has died.Turco85 (Talk) 10:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the fact is that even the NATO Parliamentary Assembly seems to find the Baku Institute of Peace and Democracy reliable enough as it does cite it.Turco85 (Talk) 10:34, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.223.212.72 (talk) 23:08, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Azerbaijani writers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a rehash of Category:Azerbaijani writers

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 11:36, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Azerbaijani scientists and philosophers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phenomenology and Cognitive theory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Saguamundi. You reverted an edit by User:Ynhockey on the Israel Railways article. I am in favor of Ynhockey's formatting for the following reason: In the version to which you reverted, the photos (maps) on the right side push down the rest of the article creating empty white space. In Ynhockey's version, the maps remain on the right side of the table no matter what size window the reader uses. The problem of images pushing down text creating white space is a common problem on Wikipedia. Do you know of a different (or better) solution than what Ynhockey did? Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 10:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Israelophobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israelophobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk • contribs) 04:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It may well be true that Azerbaijanis in Azerbaijan are predominantly Shiites - I don't know one way or the other - but the claim that Azerbajainis in Canada, Germany or the US are predominantly Shiites must be supported with a citation from a reliable source. Please do not revert again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serkan Öksüz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serkan Öksüz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 08:48, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is Ramscheid (talk · contribs) another sock of yours? Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rii--ight. After looking a bit more closely into that account, it appears quite obvious that you have again been using it as a revert-warring-only sock, on several occasions. In doing so, you have broken both the general WP:SOCK policy, and the specific restrictions you were put under [2]. I am blocking your account for six months. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And another one: LCXX (talk · contribs). For that, I have just indeffed this account. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 19:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]