Old talk has been deleted -- if someone wants to see it they can always look at the history SJK (talk) 12:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vu Digital (2nd nomination), you supported deletion and the AfD was closed as "delete". At Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 November 30#Vu Digital, I asked for the community's permission to restore the history under the redirect so I can merge material to C Spire Wireless, the parent company.

I will only merge material sourced to TechCrunch, Mississippi Business Journal, Broadcasting & Cable, and The Clarion-Ledger, which all pass Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. I will not merge any material sourced only to press releases or sources that fail Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Would you support this? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 19:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on UNICOM Global, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SJK,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Éditions des archives contemporaines for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Shootingstar111 (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look I'm trying to re-write the article that handles "written as advertisement" tags and was nominated for deletion. If you want to help please either re-write it yourself to remove COI and biased opinions and help with independent links people can actually read. I don't get your point in reverting my changes just because you like old version better. It clearly has issues and that's put into header tags. Thanks! :) APS (Full Auto) (talk) 12:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it's going to be kept it should be made vendor neutral. At least links to company sites removed because now it's a link farm: vendor pages, dead links (Virsto), and PR articles (ESG and TechTarget). If article will be kept I can try to re-write it / modify. Let me know what you think. Thanks! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 19:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SJK!

I'm a current undergraduate student at Duke University and I'm taking a class on memory. External Memory is one of the topics we have covered in class. It is a topic discussed by many psychology researchers and a topic of conversation among social scientists as well. I think this topic is equally important to that of 'external memory' from a technological perspective. I do not believe an immediate redirect to auxiliary memory is the answer. Googling 'external memory', the first thing that pops up is still auxiliary memory making it easy for those who are looking for the USB/CD/hard drive definition to find it.

I ask that you give me some time to work on this page from a psychological perspective. I also propose a section with a link to auxiliary memory instead of an immediate redirect.

Thank you for your input and time,

(Stephanie Parrado (talk) 21:30, 17 April 2016 (UTC))[reply]

@Stephanie Parrado: Since the phrase "external memory" is used in two different senses (one psychology, the other computing), let me suggest another course of action: (1) You create a new article external memory (psychology) and put your content there; (2) the existing external memory page becomes a disambiguation page linking to both external memory (psychology) and the redirect target of auxiliary memory. Doing this would also make it clearer that you are actually creating a brand new article, whereas modifying a long-standing redirect page doesn't make this clear. SJK (talk) 10:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Stephanie Parrado: I turned external memory into a disambiguation page. I suggest you create your intended new article as external memory (psychology). SJK (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone keeps adding this stuff. I don't know if Oliver and Simon are notable either, I think they're a UK thing, so I've let them stand. Even if notable it might be undue emphasis. Peter Flass (talk) 22:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Flass: I wonder if the "someone" is either Ken Dakin himself, or someone associated with him (a friend or family member). Can't be proven, but it's very plausible. I had a look at IBM OLIVER (CICS interactive test/debug) and SIMON (Batch Interactive test/debug) – lack refs, couldn't find any substantial coverage in reliable sources, so I've PRODed them. SJK (talk) 22:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am the Ken Dakin referred to. I don't seem to be able to find my user talk page and cannot remember the password I once had for Wikipedia. Please could SJK or someone else at Wikipedia contact me via my registered email address (or via Wikipedia's Mark Hetherington who is a Quora member and has replied to one of my questions/answers - * see below for Quora Q& A link). I wish to retrieve deleted Wikipedia articles I created some time ago for publication elsewhere

The articles are:-

1. Works Records System [1] 2. IBM OLIVER (CICS interactive test/debug) [2] 3. SIMON (Batch Interactive test/debug) [3]

(there may be others but I can't remember any more at the moment)

All I want is the Wikipedia marked-up texts for these so that I can perhaps publish them in another WIKI (or another medium entirely) Since these articles were deleted, I have found some source material in the form of actual printed marketing materials and a Computer Weekly advert etc supporting these products/ software programs.

• For reference [4]

2A00:23C2:8604:AC00:855B:B015:DCD9:BA1 (talk) 08:39, 8 August 2019 (UTC)Ken Dakin[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Coffey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Louvain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Stuart Mill. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Lists. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dual norm. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Horizontal line test. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Serial killer. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James Hopwood Jeans. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Constant of integration. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Papal ban of Freemasonry. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Windows 10. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Earthquake prediction. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SJK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, SJK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Milky Way. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! They are trying to delete again the article about heteropatriarchy. Could you help to improve the article or to take part in the discussion? Thanks a lot! DaddyCell (talk) 13:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Although we're arguing for different results, I found your statement to be well considered, collegial, and productive. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SJK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SJK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(sent out exact copy to all AfD participants - apologize if you are aware) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heaven for the nobles, Purgatory for the townspeople, Hell for the peasants, and Paradise for the Jews which you were involved in is in discussion at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2018 December. Input there is welcome.Icewhiz (talk) 07:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WikiPediaBugs. Since you had some involvement with the WikiPediaBugs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:45, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 16:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, in your User:SJK/common.js, you've attempted to directly install a single Twinkle module. That doesn't work — if you want to enable Twinkle, head over to the gadgets section of your preferences. That specific module is sysop-only, so it doubly won't work. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	RetroBreads (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Parishes of Queensland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:40, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SJK! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamiat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamiat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan da Cunha has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:15, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]