There is a limited amount of room on the Miramax Page. Please only include films that were actually PRODUCED by Miramax, not simply distributed like your Pokemon films. --TheGrza 16:16, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)

You noted on Haley Joel Osment that he was once considered for the role of H. Potter. I recall hearing that Rowling insisted that the entire cast be British... Cburnett 15:11, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

• I got it from the bloody trivia page on Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. --Ryanasaurus0077 18:16, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I revised your edits to the template. See the talk page for the television infobox: Template talk:Infobox television. --FuriousFreddy 14:09, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Let's hope that message doesn't have to damn me again. --Ryanasaurus0077 17:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you play by the rules and stop adding fictional information, you shouldn't have any problems. tregoweth 21:44, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks. --Ryanasaurus0077 22:00, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

While the IMDb is often correct, they are not infallible; I've just submitted a correction for the PG rating they have for Urusei Yatsura Movie (Remember My Love). tregoweth 22:10, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• So you're trying to---*the rest is jarbled*---a-t--k t-- - - - b, n--, --ght? --Ryanasaurus0077 22:12, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not leave deceptive comments on talk pages or in edit summaries (the "misspelling" I supposedly reintroduced to Pokémon: Destiny Deoxys).

Also, adding ratings for every listing on List of programs broadcast by Anime Network seems unnecessary. Listing ratings in a program's article should be sufficient. tregoweth 18:38, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

When editing an article, there is a small field labeled "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

It is highly recommended that you fill in the edit summary field, as it makes it easier for you and your fellow contributors to understand what has changed, and is helpful when going through the history of the page. If you have questions, I recommend reading Help:Edit summary as it explains it really well. Please let me know if you have any questions. (^_^) ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, but I only use it in special occasions. --Ryanasaurus0077 11:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox movie certificates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Ned Scott 08:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the template is up for deletion again, and this time I'm on the side of the keeps. You can find the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 August 2#Template:Infobox movie certificates. This time it seems more about WP:FILM attacking the concept of including any ratings data rather than being about the template itself. -- Ned Scott 02:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bob_Bergen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does "Image created for Crystal Acids" work? --Ryanasaurus0077 17:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:L3mdvd3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• "From an Italian Lupin site that's apparantly down at the moment" works, right? Because the site from which I got it might be down. --Ryanasaurus0077 12:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found out that the 1987 copyright date on Volume 1 of Disney's Sing-Along-Songs is a typo because my 1985 copy of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea says "Copyright MCMLV," but 20,000 Leagues came out in MCMLIV (1954). In case you were wondering. Imax80 15:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How the hell did you find their birthday information, that's pretty damn good!--Jack Cox 18:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I must've used a pretty good site to find their birthday information, because until now no one had known where to find that site! --Ryanasaurus0077 19:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Where was it do you happen to have that site?--Jack Cox 20:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Try searching for the birthday information for Milton James using this link. [1] --Ryanasaurus0077 21:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I love this tool, unfortunately I just refuse to pay money to find out birthdates however, it really helped find out lots of crap about people. If you wouldn't mind doing me a favor and going through some of this stuff an finding out where it would be useful. My feeling is the one on Kim Strauss is Incorrect. I just cant imagine that being a femine one. Go throught this link here [2] for all voice actors--Jack Cox 06:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I usually find birthdates the hard way, or, in my words, looking for the year, then month, then day, being careful not to skip a beat. --Ryanasaurus0077 13:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are dated after the closure of the Classics line in 1994. How do you that these are the actual dates? Imax80 20:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• They're actual release dates, I checked amazon.com, and would they lie about release dates? --Ryanasaurus0077 14:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe, they claim the 1994 Masterpiece Edition of Dumbo is 1998. --Imax80 00:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Probably they'd lie about Masterpiece Editions, but never about Spanish Masterpieces or Spanish Classics. --Ryanasaurus0077 19:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • I heard you mention a store called McKay's earlier somewhere, what is McKay's? My main video sources besides eBay is a rental store called Tommy K's Video, an exclusive rental store only in the state I reside in. Imax80 01:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • It's the local used books and videos (and CDs) store on Papermill Drive that I go to for my used videocassettes. --Ryanasaurus0077 13:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • • So how big is your WDHV collection now? --Imax80 20:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • • • Pretty small, but I'm looking for the other Spanish Classics (including Aladdin) and Spanish Masterpieces (including Blancanieves) after getting La Bella y la Bestia (Classics) and Los Tres Caballeros (Masterpiece). --Ryanasaurus0077 09:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved mine (1980s-mid 1994), it's still little though, but...

• Dumbo (1982, 1985, and 1991) ('82 printed 11/22/83) ('85 printed July 16, 1988)
• Alice in Wonderland (1982, 1986) ('82 printed 10/18/82) ('86 printed July 14, 1988)
• Davy Crockett, King of the Wild Frontier (1984-85)
• Robin Hood (1984 and 1991) ('91 printed June 6, 1991)
• Pinocchio (1985 and 1993) ('85 printed: 8/6/86) ('93 printed January 19, 1993)
• 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1985)
• The Sword in the Stone (1986) (printed October 4, 1986)
• Sleeping Beauty (1986) (printed August 11, 1986)
• Lady and the Tramp (1987)
• Cinderella (1988)
• Bambi (1989) (no video, just the clamshell)
• The Three Caballeros (1989)
• The Little Mermaid (1990) (printed March 25, 1990)
• Peter Pan (1990) (printed April 10, 1990)
• The Jungle Book (1991) (printed February 1991)
• The Rescuers Down Under (1991) (printed June 29, 1991)
• Fantasia (1991) (printed September 1991)
• 101 Dalmatians (1992) (printed 3/16/92)
• The Great Mouse Detective (1992) (printed April 30, 1992)
• The Rescuers (1992) (printed June 1, 1992)
• Beauty and the Beast (1992) (videotape only, clamshell artwork missing) (printed November 16, 1992)
• Aladdin (1993) (printed June 17, 1993)
• The Fox and the Hound (1994) (printed March 12, 1994)

• • to be continued with previews

Titles I am getting in the mail-

• Pinocchio (1986 tape re-master with white clamshell)

Since my birthday is approaching soon (Oct. 20), I'll use my birthday money to bid on videos from eBay, and I'll go around tag sales and used tape stores or rental stores and about 8-10 titles will be added to the list. --Imax80 22:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will you be getting Spanish Disney videocassettes? Please get the Spanish Aladdin as one of your 8-10 new titles. And please add print dates to your existing collection (and the previews on the tapes). --Ryanasaurus007 00:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately those three tapes are the only ones with print date stickers. And I am not sure if I want a Spanish release because I don't speak Espanol. --Imax80 00:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The tapes from 1986, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994 have the print date in ink. Look for a 6-number combination ending with 86, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, or 95. Besides, you have the English versions too, so once you watch the English and Espanol versions you'll get used to the Spanish dialogue, I think. --Ryanasaurus007 01:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I takes me forever to get used to a different language version of a film, I mean, I try to watch an undubbed anime show with subtitles, I stop watching it.

You'll understand Spanish better if you have a Spanish-English dictionary (I have 2 such dictionaries). --Ryanasaurus0077 23:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have one. I don't take foreign languages in school. --Imax80 02:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But I wish you could purchase a Spanish-English dictionary for those movies. --Ryanasaurus0077 10:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to get the print dates for you by Monday, since it's Yom Kippur that day and there is no school. What else do you plan to get for your collection in the future? --Imax80

• Aladdin (Spanish), Blancanieves y los Siete Enanos, The Black Hole (1980 fullscreen version; I have the widescreen version from Anchor Bay right now), The Love Bug (1980 version), Pinocchio (1985 black clamshell version), The Absent Minded Professor (1981 black-and-white version; I have the 1986 color version right now), The Devil and Max Devlin (1981 version with previews for Mary Poppins and Winnie the Pooh), Pinochhio (Spanish), and Pete's Dragon (1985 128-minute version; I have the 1980 108-minute version right now). --Ryanasaurus0077 23:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Holy schnap, you have the 1980 Pete's Dragon release, it's from March 1980, one Disney's first (since the stock number is 10).

Now here's my current collection.

• Pete's Dragon (October 21, 1980 and April 2, 1985)
• The Black Hole (October 21, 1980)
• The Love Bug (October 21, 1980 and October 27, 1985)
• Escape to Witch Mountain (October 21, 1980)
• Davy Crockett, King of the Wild Frontier (October 21, 1980)
• Robin Hood (December 6, 1984, July 12, 1991 and October 28, 1994)
• Pinocchio (July 16, 1985 and March 26, 1993)
• Dumbo (December 1, 1985 and October 28, 1994)
• The Sword in the Stone (March 24, 1986 and October 28, 1994)
• Alice in Wonderland (May 28, 1986 and October 28, 1994)
• The Happiest Millionaire (June 18, 1986)
• The Absent Minded Professor (October 7, 1986)
• Sleeping Beauty (October 14, 1986)
• Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah (December 23, 1986 and April 12, 1991)
• Flight of the Navigator (January 27, 1987)
• The Bare Necessities (October 13, 1987)
• Cinderella (October 4, 1988 and October 4, 1995)
• Fun with Music (September 28, 1989)
• Bambi (September 28, 1989)
• The Little Mermaid (May 18, 1990)
• Under the Sea (August 14, 1990)
• Peter Pan (September 21, 1990)
• I Love to Laugh (December 28, 1990)
• DuckTales the Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp (March 15, 1991)
• You Can Fly! (April 12, 1991)
• The Jungle Book (May 3, 1991)
• White Fang (June 12, 1991)
• Shipwrecked (July 17, 1991)
• The Brave Little Toaster (July 19, 1991)
• The Rescuers Down Under (September 20, 1991)
• Fantasia (November 1, 1991)
• The Rocketeer (February 5, 1992)
• One Hundred and One Dalmatians (April 10, 1992)
• Be Our Guest (June 19, 1992)
• The Great Mouse Detective (July 17, 1992)
• The Rescuers (September 18, 1992)
• Newsies (October 14, 1992)
• Beauty and the Beast (October 30, 1992)
• Honey I Blew Up the Kid (January 6, 1993)
• Heigh-Ho (March 26, 1993)
• The Mighty Ducks (April 14, 1993)
• Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey (August 13, 1993)
• Aladdin (October 1, 1993)
• The Twelve Days of Christmas (December 21, 1993)
• Hocus Pocus (January 5, 1994)
• The Fox and the Hound (March 4, 1994)
• Cool Runnings (April 13, 1994)
• Let's Go to the Circus! (April 22, 1994)
• Campout at Walt Disney World (April 22, 1994)
• The Three Musketeers (May 11, 1994)
• Pinocho (June 22, 1994)
• Alicia en el País de Maravillas (June 22, 1994)
• La Espada en la Piedra (June 22, 1994)
• La Bella y la Bestia (June 22, 1994)
• Iron Will (June 29, 1994)
• Disneyland Fun (July 17, 1994)
• Blank Check (July 27, 1994)
• D2: The Mighty Ducks (August 26, 1994)
• White Fang 2: Myth of the White Wolf (October 19, 1994)
• Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (October 28, 1994)
• Circle of Life (December 16, 1994)
• The Lion King (March 3, 1995)
• Angels in the Outfield (March 24, 1995)
• Blanca Nieves y Los Siete Enanos (April 14, 1995)
• Los Tres Caballeros (April 14, 1995)
• Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book (May 19, 1995)
• Squanto: A Warrior's Tale (June 20, 1995)
• Beach Party at Walt Disney World (June 30, 1995)
• Colors of the Wind (July 21, 1995)
• Man of the House (August 8, 1995)
• Heavyweights (August 15, 1995)
• Tall Tale: The Unbelievable Adventure (August 15, 1995)
• A Goofy Movie (September 6, 1995)
• El Rey León (September 13, 1995)
• The Santa Clause (October 25, 1995)
• Gordy (November 8, 1995)
• A Kid in King Arthur's Court (January 31, 1996)
• The Big Green (January 31, 1996)
• Pocahontas (February 28, 1996)
• Operation Dumbo Drop (March 19, 1996)
• The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (March 27, 1996)
• The Aristocats (April 24, 1996)
• Tom and Huck (May 1, 1996)
• Topsy Turvy (June 26, 1996)
  • To be continued... --Ryanasaurus0077 14:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Wow, yours is massive. Did you ever notice that Cinderella always comes out October 4? It came out October 4, 1988, October 4, 1995, and October 4, 2005. --Imax80 19:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Yes, I did. --Ryanasaurus0077 14:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • And my collection's still growing (I'm currently expecting 4 more titles in the mail)! --Ryanasaurus0077 15:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My collection is posted on my user page, complete with video descriptions. Feel free to look. --Imax80 23:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, could you please update my user talk page ASAP? It certainly would help. I'm posting my entire Disney collection on my user page ASAP. Feel free to look. --Ryanasaurus0077 13:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • You put some of my lines on there. However, I don't own the tapes you own. So how can I help? --Imax80 18:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • You could search eBay for some Disney Masterpieces and vintage Disney titles. That might help a lot. --19:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

I've deleted your user page for Skymac207. A troll he may be, but that doesn't necessarily mean you can put that on his user page. —tregoweth (talk) 15:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Just adding information on what kind of troll he is, not trying to defame him. --Ryanasaurus0077 17:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still, calling someone a troll on their user page is a bit much. —tregoweth (talk) 21:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, he's STILL the Walt Disney Black Diamond Classics Series troll. --Ryanasaurus0077 22:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, guess what. I finally got my 1986 Pinocchio tape in the white clamshell and guess what happened. When the Classics logo finished, it stayed there silent for 10 seconds before fading to black! --Imax80 18:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• WOW! That's the same thing that happened on the 1984 Classics logo on my 1986 Alice in Wonderland! --Ryanasaurus0077 14:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Funny, my 1986 Alice print (printed in 1988) has it snippeted when it begins and ends. --Imax80 21:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • It's also snippeted on my 1986 Sword in the Stone print. Also, it stays there silent for 10 seconds on Dumbo (I don't have the Dumbo print with that variation). --Ryanasaurus007 00:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have had with him. Look what he did to Walt Disney Classics anonymously. Although I edited the US section, just look at the archives and see what he did. He is really ticking me off now. What do you think? Maybe his next name will be Mr. Whacker. --Imax80 21:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe it might be Mr. Sailor. My twin brother mentioned that possible name on Tregoweth's talk page. --Ryanasaurus007 00:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just because a user is annoying you doesn't mean you can leave rude messages; one should still observe proper etiquette. —tregoweth (talk) 21:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The quotation marks around "f*** off!" in my response was a direct quotation of his message that irked me. I simply took a recording of that phrase from his post and used it in my message. Sorry, tregoweth. I just wanted to warn him that if he trolls again, he will be blocked longer. --Ryanasaurus0077 13:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You stupid people, I was telling the truth! There really was a vertical white label blank tape edition of Disney Sing Along Songs: vol.10: Be Our Guest I saw on ebay in September 2004! It was a promotion for the new Beauty & the Beast movie (there's probally a trailer on that tape) & they were still using white labels in 1991! So, leave me alone! Is that too hard to ask! Skymac207 11:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not questioning whether you own those titles; I reverted your edits because talk pages shouldn't be edited after being archived. —tregoweth (talk) 21:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I was just trying to make some honest revisions! --Ryanasaurus007 00:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • It's understood that archived pages are dated and not up-to-date. It's okay if they've become incorrect. Also, shouldn't your "twin brother" have a different name, and not just an added number? :) —tregoweth (talk) 22:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • We have to share similar names because we're twins! --Ryanasaurus0077 12:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask where you got those 1980 to 1982 Walt Disney release dates? They are not found very many places. For The Journey of Natty Gann, I have a note I made a long time ago that it was initially available in June 1986 and not the October date you indicated, although the price was probably reduced in October. Canadiana 03:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The Journey of Natty Gann used the dark red FBI warnings, the video dealer announcement, and the Sorcerer Mickey logo, while the Absent Minded Professor, released on videocassette one week before Sleeping Beauty, uses the red-orange FBI warnings and the Neon Mickey logo. If what you say is true, then pre-July 30 printings must've used the Neon Mickey logo. --Ryanasaurus0077 13:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • It's very possible that the master tape was changed when the price dropped, so the initial release may have had different fromt matter on the tape. I still want to know the source of the 1980 to 1982 dates. Canadiana 23:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Maybe the release dates were reasons to attract more customers. --Ryanasaurus0077 14:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • Maybe you don't understand. We need to be able to say where we got the dates from, so that people don't think that you just made them up. You said somewhere else "It's official". Official according to what or who? We need something to back up our claims in case of future disputes. Canadiana 17:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, guess what? I just got my 1985 copy of Dumbo today in its original black clamshell, and I watched the tape expecting the 1984 Classics logo, but guess what? It was 1983 Neon Mickey! Isn't that strange?! --Imax80 23:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any sign of the Classics logo? If not, we can post a message on the Walt Disney Classics page. --Ryanasaurus0077 13:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Not on the video itself. At the end of the video, oh my god was I surprised, that 1982 "Walt Disney and You" promo at the end of the video! --Imax80 19:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • GOOD GOD! How weird is THAT!? You see, I'll be expecting that on my black clamshell Dumbo VHS cassette now that you told me! --Ryanasaurus0077 13:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Maybe mine uses the 1981-82 tape master after the FBI screens and logos. When you get it, please tell me what's on it. --Imax80 19:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting, but I can't say it's a big surprise to me. Disney has claimed that the December 1985 re-pricing of Pinocchio was planned all along, but another source says that the full-price sales of Pinocchio were disappointing, so it seems that Dumbo and Robin Hood were added fairly late in the process of preparing that promotion, which was announced that September. They designed a new package design, but I don't think it was important to change the content of the video. After all, it was still the same Dumbo movie that they had sold before.

The fact that the content of the video stayed the same lends more support to the idea that this whole strategy wasn't decided all that far ahead of when they announced it. They actually announced the special sale price about 6 weeks after Pinocchio was released, resulting in a lot of angry customers, but there obviously wasn't very much time available for advance planning. Canadiana 20:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another weird thing: my 1985 copy of The Love Bug uses not only the 1980 tape master after the FBI screens and logos, but it uses the 1980 COVER ART! --Ryanasaurus0077 21:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you tell me to go to hell? --Imax80 19:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Or am I seeing things? Maybe it was an anonymous user who got your password and signed on as your username. The edit summary to Walt Disney Classics said something like this (Go to hell Mr. Live-Action Classic Man). What was that all about? --Imax80 21:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

101 Dalmatians is linked to the live-action movie with Glenn Close. The animated movie is listed under One Hundred and One Dalmatians, so that explains the comment (actually he was just correcting a bad link). Canadiana 00:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that Ryan, I owe you one. --Imax80 01:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Imaxination. I was going to apologize too for the unfortunate mix-up. Let's make sure that the link stays like this. Shall we? --Ryanasaurus0077 13:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. --Imax80 19:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My copy of Dumbo in 1985 maybe one of the only ones to use the 1983 Neon Mickey, and the 1981 tape master and WD and You promo (the print date is August 1985). And also remember that your US-Spanish releases use the 1986 WDHV logo. But they are still part of the Classics lineup. --Imax80 23:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out on my user page. --Imax80 18:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The original printing of Disney Sing Along Songs: Heigh-Ho in 1987 doesn't use any FBI screens and just the WDHV 1986 logo? Is that correct? --Imax80 03:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes. I think you should purchase the 1987 edition just in case the one I saw might be among the only ones with that format. --Ryanasaurus0077 21:32, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pete's Dragon. The exact March 1980 original on Beta! It has to be that version because the seller on eBay said it was 105 minutes. --Imax80 20:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• HOLY SCHNAP! That's AWESOME! Well, a while ago, I asked our good friend Canadiana to tell me about any rentals from pre-1984 on eBay. --172.152.60.214 20:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Canadiana didn;'reply to it yet. You also forgot to sign in. Check out my expanded collection, there are a few more I added. --Imax80 20:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You asked me about "pre-1984 Disney videocassettes that were former rentals". I didn't really understand because at any given time there are probably dozens of pre-1984 videos on eBay that have previously been rented out. Now I think you meant the "rental-only" kind. Those are very rare but sellers probably don't know to mention this. Anyway, I'm not a very good source for this information, because I'm ont on eBay very much. Canadiana 22:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't you search all over eBay monthly on the 4th of the month? --Ryanasaurus0077 17:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I could, but I'm not sure what I would search for. I suspect that once a month is not quite often enough. (P.S. Don't tease Skymac or you'll make him more annoying, and Skymac (I know you're reading this): If you don't want to be treated like a kid, don't act like one.) Canadiana 22:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For me-

• All the Fotomat titles.
• The Sword in the Stone (both 1986 and 1989 with the 1991 tape master)
• The rental versions of Dumbo and Alice in Wonderland
• Basically everything else from 1980-1987 that I don't have

--Imax80 00:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! You've got a great collection and lots of great detail.

I've moved the Spanish edition information from the Disney Sing Along Songs over to the Spanish language Wikipedia under Disney Canta Con Nosotros. Any other Spanish details should go there.

I've also questioned the inclusion of voice credits on every song when the song credits are clearly linked to the original movies. If "singer" credits must be included, shouldn't we add them to the original movie page?

Also, do you have any experience with citations on Wikipedia? I've not bothered, but the Disney Sing Along Songs page is asking for them... Azasakayi 17:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• You should go ahead and move singer/appearance credits to the appropriate movie pages before I just go ahead and delete them altogether. The Sing Along Songs page is getting overburdened with information, and unless we are going to break it down to 35 individual pages, then credits belong to the movies, not the songs. 206.172.173.149 15:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Well, go ahead! Delete them! Looks like my test was a failure. --Ryanasaurus0077 23:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Do not add voice actors for anything but the English and the original versions of animated series, as this is the English Wikipedia. Danny Lilithborne 23:20, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have good news for you, I was at my local participating video store, trying to get the May 1986 edition of Alice in Wonderland, but unfortunately, they had the October 1986 print of Alice. So, I settled for a backup idea & got the 1985 edition of Pinocchio & it had that Black Cauldron trailer, like your copy has! So, I finally saw the 1985 edition of Pinocchio, with The Black Cauldron trailer! Skymac207 23:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Good for you, Skymac! Hope you have good luck on your future Disney VHS searches! --Ryanasaurus0077 13:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not all, on December 22 2006, I saw the 1986 edition of The Sword in the Stone with the trailer of The Journey of Natty Gann. Skymac207 12:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Good God! You're getting real good at this! Have you found any 1980 versions of Escape to Witch Mountain on eBay or amazon.com? --Ryanasaurus0077 22:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think so, but they said "No Image Available". I can tell you this though, Imax80 told me on Youtube that his copy from 1986 had the red/white FBI warning, orange FBI logo, a bumper that said "Now on Walt Disney Home Video", then there's that same trailer of The Journey of Natty Gann from the other VHS, followed by the 1983 Neon Mickey logo & nothing else. He's willing to upload the trailer with the bumper. Also, he said he was 'gonna upload any old bumper, FBI warning & Feature Presentation logos. Should be awesome. By the way, does your copy of Disney Sing Along Songs: vol.9: I Love to Laugh have its tape master a vertical white label or horizontal silk-screnning? Mr.wheeler 22:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Horizontal silk-screening. --Ryanasaurus0077 22:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a picture on Microsoft Word on my computer of that tape with a vertical white label, which prooves that was the original printing of the tape & I believe it has the red/white FBI warning, orange FBI logo, 1986 HV logo & a trailer of The Rescuers Down Under/The Prince & the Pauper. At the end, the DSAS promo of vol.1-7+9.

• Could you please upload that picture? I really want to see it in the Disney Sing Along Songs page! --Ryanasaurus0077 23:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's uploaded. Skymac207 21:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Congratulations, Skymac! You have just now made the Wikipedia's most useful contribution EVER submitted by you! --Ryanasaurus0077 14:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He did it to mine too. He's trying to be funny. --Imax80 22:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you can't call me "Treggy." Also, you someone who uses at least two accounts should watch what they say about sockpuppets. (I don't mean to sound threatening; I'm just sayin'.) —tregoweth (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• At least my other account, who I like to call my twin brother, doesn't troll regularly (I myself am also an honest editor these days). In fact, I think he's becoming a bit less active these days (although he pops up to make useful edits and bust trolls every now and then). Oh, and by the way, have you changed "treggy" to "tregoweth" yet on my post on Skymac's user page? --Ryanasaurus0077 00:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • And here I am, his aforementioned "twin brother", in person! If you were wondering about that "treggy" junk, my "twin brother", Ryanasaurus0077, already apologized for calling you that and changed "treggy" to "tregoweth". Can he call you "Seňor Tregoweth"? --Ryanasaurus007 00:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Underthesea.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have it, and let me tell you, it is 10 minutes and has so much to offer. It shows all the promos surrounding the video release, all the TV ads, a preview of the film, the Classics logo, interviews with people (a black diamond is on the microphone), and several others. It's my user page. --Imax80 02:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiousity, what roles has Jessica Calvello done on Pokèmon? She is listed nowhere in the credits for any of Pokémon's productions. --PAK Man 14:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Have you checked Lucario and the Mystery of Mew? She's the voice of Agent Summers. --Ryanasaurus0077 09:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at the official credits from the DVD right now, and she's nowhere to be found. The only female voices credited are Veronica Taylor, Amy Birnbaum, Rachael Lills, Maddie Blaustein, Suzanne Goldish, Kayzie Rogers, Bella Hudson, Rebecca Soler and Lindsey Warner. Unless one of those is a pseudonym of hers, she's not in the movie. --PAK Man 16:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She's uncredited. Probably to throw the Wikipedia off track when they see the DVD. --Ryanasaurus007 21:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first version of the 1980 video release has Mary flying across a huge "Mary Poppins" logo. The other version shows her and the other characters. Is the second version from 1983? Because the video says, "VHS-STEREO" on the bottom. --Imax80 18:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Either that or it was just another 1985 re-issue. --Ryanasaurus0077 21:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everybody knows how Bambi was re-issued in theaters 1982, right? Well, if it did come directly to video in 1983, it probally use the 1978 HE logo, then it probally get remastered in 1984 with the 1983 HV logo, then become part of The Classics series in 1985. If it did come in The Classics series 1985, it still have the same tape master, but the film title would be in red & it say "Walt Disney's" on top. On the film, would be the 1984 FBI warnings, previews of The Black Cauldron movie & Pinocchio VHS release, then the 1984 classics logo, followed by the start of the film. Skymac207 20:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Could you please stop this? I'll let THIS one slide, but please don't do such a silly thing on my talk page again! --Ryanasaurus0077 12:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello. We appreciate your edits to Cammy, but information on Spanish voice actresses, unless the original series was originally in Spanish, should not be on the English Wikipedia. Consider putting that information in the Spanish article. Thank you. JuJube 01:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should be aware that your "Immense Collection of Disney Videos (1980-1997)" is not appropriate for your user page; see Wikipedia:Userpages:

"Generally, you should avoid substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal homepage. Your page is about you as a Wikipedian."

—tregoweth (talk) 01:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Tregoweth, I'll try my best at trying to expand my home page; the immense collection part (my first surviving addition) was inspired by User:Imax80 (not to be an informant, since he's already expanded his page), my next part will be posted as soon as I get the chance. Right now, I'm busy at the moment. --Ryanasaurus0077 01:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha. —tregoweth (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's so funny? --Ryanasaurus0077 01:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, My name is Luis Edgar and I'm the webmaster of a voice actor database, Can you tell me where did you get the info of the Mexican voice actors of Sakura Wars? because as far I know, the only Spanish dub of the series is from the TV series and the first OVA series and both series were dubbed in Colombia, not in Mexico --Luisedgarf 07:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Probably the Mexican dubs were rarely-seen co-productions with (ADV/Geneon/FUNimation) and Audiomaster 3000 (not its full name). --Ryanasaurus0077 23:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some info seems too weird: P.E. the voice actor who voice Sakomizu in Spanish is female, not male. Anyways, I'm going to talk with Gabriel Chavez this weekend (he's going to attend an anime convention in my town) to confirm the information. Are you sure that the info about the Mexican voice actors is correct? --Luisedgarf 03:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh dear. Then his role in Sakura Wars is contested (for now his role will have to be shared in authenticity with Mario Sauret. (I still think the rest should be correct, only ask Chavez about his "role", and if he shows otherwise, then it's safe for me to say that his role in the Mexican dub was really voiced by Mario Sauret.). Oh, and about Sakomizu, perhaps Cristina Camargo did a low-pitched voice? (Keiko Han did the same as the voice of Rowdy Gabriev in Slayers: The Motion Picture). --Ryanasaurus007 00:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if the topic bothers you or if you feel that I doubt about your information, but I watched the Sakura Wars Ecole de Paris OAVs, and Sakomizu sounds too "manly" in Japanese and I doubt that a female voice actress (in any language) could be able to match that kind of voice (It's like hearing Sylvester Stallone being dubbed by a woman :) ) --Luisedgarf 00:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Actually, Keiko did a bloody good job as the voice of Rowdy (I've seen the original Japanese version of Slayers: The Motion Picture). Her vocal performance there sounded so convincing to me I originally thought Rowdy was voiced by the late Kohei Miyauchi! After looking up the ANN, I found out that it was Keiko Han who was the voice of Rowdy. --Ryanasaurus007 13:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I managed to talk with Gabriel Chavez and Daniel Abundis, both actors told me they can't remember very well if they worked in any Mexican Spanish dub of Sakura Wars (since they voiced a lot of characters in many dubs for many years). The only chance to confirm the info is if Cartoon Network decides to broadcast the Sakura Wars movie in Latin America (since they already broadcasted the TV series and the first OAV series) --Luisedgarf 03:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Want to give me any dates? (i.e. when they were born and when they broke into the business) --Ryanasaurus0077 21:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to ask about specific dates, but I have some info about both actors: Both actors were born in Mexico City (althrough Daniel Abundis actually lives in Aguascalientes working as a theather director and he's semi-retired from voice-acting, but he plans to return to Mexico City next year, since he wants to be a voice actor again, after he failed to create a voice-acting academy in Aguascalientes. His debut as voice actor was in Beverly Hill 90210 as Scott Scallon)

Gabriel Chavez, besides being an actor, is also a sci-fi writer and an astrology teacher, he has written some novels besides a book about his experience in dubbing Mr. Burns in The Simpsons. His debut as voice actor was in the Spanish dub of The Ewoks: The Battle of Endor as Skeletor. --Luisedgarf 21:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Interesting that soaps could make their way into Audiomaster 3000. --Ryanasaurus0077 21:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, Audiomaster 3000 has disappeared some years ago (It changed its name to Audiofutura S.A.) and merged to another voice-acting studion named Candiani. --Luisedgarf 00:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Huh? How long ago was that? --Ryanasaurus0077 21:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I can remember very well, Audiomaster 3000 closed its doors in 2003-2004. BTW, Do you speak Spanish? --Luisedgarf 22:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• ¡Sí! Yo sé hablar Español y Ingles. --Ryanasaurus0077 23:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; I know you weren't trying to brand me as a sockpuppet. :) —тяеɢощетн (talk) 22:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Nice font! I think I'll use it in my future posts! --яyanasauяus0077 22:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My copy of "Pocahontas" was printed in January 1996, and uses the Walt Disney Masterpiece Collection logo, not the Classics logo. Strange? --Imax80 19:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I guess the Classics logo was on Pocahontas UNTIL November 30, 1995... --Ryanasaurus0077 19:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You won't believe what I just saw, but I just saw a copy of Aladdin that had after the FBI warnings, a "Coming to Theaters From Walt Disney Pictures" logo in a different font, before The Lion King trailer. Skymac207 12:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I have just that print. (Not the copy, but the print with that screen) --Ryanasaurus0077 17:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My cousins have that copy. But, my copy has the older artwork & doesn't have that logo meaning its from 1994, while later copies in 1995 had newer artwork. Skymac207 7:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Skymac's been blocked. And, as you can see, users can't be "executed" by admins, just blocked whenever they show up. —tregoweth (talk) 19:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know; "execute" is just my euphemism for "block permanently". Now do you see what I mean by "execute"? --Ryanasaurus0077 20:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a comment here a few weeks ago re. migrating voice actor info where applicable from this page onto the pages of those characters who do have their own pages and have been waiting to see what your take on this would be, if you could please comment. Thanks.--BrokenSphere 20:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does your "Peter Pan" tape really have a vertical white label? Or does it have horizontal silk-screening? Could you upload a picture of the label for evidence? Gabrielkat 03:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• It's horizontal silk-screening, like most copies. --Ryanasaurus0077 13:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another question... how can your copy of Sleeping Beauty have its customized BV logo, when Disney kept off the BV and RKO logos on videos released between 1984 and 1991?! Gabrielkat 22:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Probably a CinemaScope related issue, although on my LatT, the customized BV logo is cut, but the music heard over the logo is heard over a black screen (the same thing happened with AiW 1986 Classics edition and 1994 Clásicos edition). -Ryanasaurus0077 23:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now wait just a minute! You told me you had a vertical white label edition of Peter Pan on my talk page. Skymac207 22:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I deny telling you that, you demon from Hell! I was talking about another tape! --Ryanasaurus0077 23:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but as you said you owned that tape, you also said you owned that tape label on Peter Pan (1990 Classics edition), Disney Sing Along Songs: Heigh Ho (1990 edition), and Disney Sing Along Songs: Under the Sea (1990 edition), meanin' that's your version and that there probally are vertical white label editions of Peter Pan. Skymac207 22:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• You've got it all wrong, Mr. Death Row Inmate! --Ryanasaurus0077 21:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, never mind. That was your twin brother that said that. But still, I bring you [[3]] to show you there is a vertical white label. Not being mean or anything, but I'm just showing you something you never knew before. Skymac207 23:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article was prodded because nothing is sourced. This is the story with a vast number of voice actor articles, which seriously diminishes Wikipedia as a whole. If you want to see them stick around, it would be a good thing to source the information, else they are pretty much subject to deletion at any time. Cheers! -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 17:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Some of them were from ANN. --Ryanasaurus0077 18:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ANN? Haven't a clue what that is, and even then, it isn't currently helping the voice actor articles that are still unsourced. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 18:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get a #$%& (pardon my language) clue! ANN stands for Anime News Network! --Ryanasaurus0077 18:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell? Please be civil, I don't watch anime or cartoons, so that acronym was meaningless to me. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 21:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just wanted you to cooperate with me here. Now please search animenewsnetwork.com for Gerardo Reyero. --Ryanasaurus0077 14:31, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really want to know more about the tape exteriors and the tape reels! I wonder if you could help me out in describing some of these exteriors and reels? Gabrielkat 22:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• My copy of Peter Pan was a Memorex tape. Some of my Universal, Disney, Columbia, Live, Paramount, Fox, CPM, and Pacific Arts tapes are also Memorex. Some of my Random House tapes were manufactured by RCA as were some of my other tapes from Paramount, Universal, CPM, Fox, and Live (and also a couple from U.S. Renditions and Dark Image!). Most of my Magnetic Video tapes from between 1978 and 1981 are Fuji tapes (as is my copy of Jailhouse Rock, my THX-1138, my My Blue Heaven, my A Rumor of War, my Pete's Dragon (1985), my Best Friends, my The Black Hole (1980), and some of my MCA and Paramount tapes), but a few are Scotch tapes (like some of my IVE, Disney, Thorn/EMI, Paramount, MCA, Warner, MGM/UA, Manga Video, Columbia, and Vestron tapes) or TDK (like some of my USA/IVE, Disney, Paramount, RCA/Columbia, MGM/UA, Streamline, and Orion tapes). --Ryanasaurus0077 22:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's cool, but I really wanna know more about the tape exteriors (you know, the pattern/texture surrounding the tape) and the tape reels! Gabrielkat 05:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • The tape reels are usually white or yellow, but on my E.T., they're green! On Memorex tapes, the exterior's like the exterior on the Under the Sea tape (see photo on Disney Sing Along Songs). --Ryanasaurus0077 11:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have NEVER seen the yellow or green tape reels! Could you upload a scan of the actual 1988 E.T. the Extra Terrestrial tape, as well as a scan of one of your tapes that has the yellow tape reels?

And what about the tape exteriors? I want some more descriptions of them, please! Gabrielkat 14:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Did you read my messages? I said that (a) I want you to upload a scan of the actual 1988 tape for E.T. the Extra Terrestrial (as well as a scan of one of your tapes that has the yellow tape reels), and (b) I want some descriptions of the tape exteriors, please! Gabrielkat 20:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about!?? You might want to check out Wikipedia:Civility before you make more bizarre and totally inaccurate accusations - illegal immigration concerns? I don't even have the slightest idea who these people are, where they live, what they do, etc.!!! Both articles cite the people of being "Latin American" - how does anyone know what nationality they are? And how does marking an article with "references' actually discredit the person? I don't see any "discrediting" of anyone by marking an unreferenced article such. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the person - and everything to do with the article.

If you'd take the opportunity to look at both of those articles, neither of them have any references whatsoever. It's nice that someone is making claims of these things in the articles, but as Wikipedia guidelines suggest, every article has to have references - see Wikipedia:Citing sources. The items cited in both articles are probably true, but they have to be referenced in some manner. Additionally Wikipedia:Verifiability states:

"The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that any reader should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed."

Additionally, look at Wikipedia:Attribution and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Theoretically someone could tag both of those pages to be deleted because of lack of sources. I didn't do that, I prefer to give the creators and other interested parties the opportunity to bring the articles into Wikipedia standards rather than wholesale getting rid of something. So, in fact, I was both following Wiki standards, as well as being "lenient", if you will, and not tagging either of them for deletion. If you have a problem with these policies, bring them up at the appropriate places. I think an apology is forthcoming for your "suspecting" me of discrediting anyone (which was not done). And, as a P.S. as a Scottish National, I'm more concerned about things in my home country, and really don't have any opinion on US/Mexican immigration policies. SkierRMH 19:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, for God's sake, I say Latin American not just for anyone! I meant they were Mexicans! And sorry if I was uncivil, I was just flustered by those petty Republicans... bloody Elephant lovers... --Ryanasaurus0077 20:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pbskids99 b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pbskids99 a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the purpose of the move was part of a general Wikipedia consensus to only list English and Japanese voice actors. The general consensus, according to the anime and manga and video game projects is to only list the English and native (if English is not the native language) voice actors. If we listed every voice actors for *every* language an anime or video game is dubbed in, then Wikipedia becomes a collection of indiscriminate information, which it is not. My motivations are following policy and consensus of Wikipedia, not the imagined prejudice you think I have. If you want to list Mexican voice actors, I suggest you do so on Spanish Wikipedia, where it's more relevant. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 14:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The names of voice actors who provided the voices of specific characters are clearly not indiscriminate information, "NeoChaosX" (what a ridiculous name, BTW).

A mint copy of the 1992 101 Dalmatians tape, which has Sorcerer Mickey on the tape label! I also have the 1992 The Great Mouse Detective video, which is also in mint condition! Both videos have some inserts! Isn't that awesome? Gabrielkat 00:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, don't you find that awesome? Gabrielkat 20:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just started a thread on WP:ANI concerning you and your twin brother. To view it, go here Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Meatpuppets_by_two_Ryans

---BH (T|C) 22:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have added details of Latin-American voice actors for many of the 'Thomas' characters. It would be nice if we had suitable references for these, but the main reason for writing here is that you have added the information inconsistently.

I would guess (from the dates) that these actors were involved with the various seasons of the television series, rather than the 'Thomas & the Magic Railroad' movie. Is that correct? The reason I ask is that your edits have been placed in various sections, but most usually in the 'movie' section of the page.

EdJogg 17:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only those who had a role in the 1998 season appeared in the movie (i.e. Yamil Atala, Eduardo Garza, Jorge Arvizu, Gabriel Ramos, etc.).

Ryanasaurus0077 10:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, it's very helpful. I'll remember this when adjusting the articles. EdJogg 13:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnet99.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Note, this may also apply to all the other WNET ID screencaps you've uploaded. Change them to TV Screenshot instead of Film Screenshot, AND put proper fair use rationale (see the WNBC logo for an example on how it's done) on each one you've uploaded. ViperSnake151 13:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnta60s.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnet77.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnet71.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On some videos with a horizontal (or vertical) silk-screening label from 1990 to circa 1995, they feature a white drawing of Sorcerer Mickey next to the WDHV text. Do any of your videos feature that label? Gabrielkat 04:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, do any of your videos have the label I mentioned? Gabrielkat 09:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been deleted because though it was an urgent message at the time, it can now be considered "junk mail". --Ryanasaurus0077 17:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Watv.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Alondra Hidalgo, by Shoessss (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Alondra Hidalgo seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Alondra Hidalgo, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fake VHS Tapes:

• E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial

The first tape uses is from 1983 and uses the 1981 MCA Videocassette Warning and the 1980 MCA Videocassette logo and there will be a test pattern at the end. The second tape will be from 1992 and uses the 1991 MCA/Universal Home Video warning and the 1990 MCA/Universal Home Video logo.

• Ghostbusters

The first tape is from 1986 and uses the 1982 RCA/Columbia Home Video warning and the 1985 variant of the RCA/Columbia Home Video logo. Unusual test pattern at the end. The second tape is from 1995 and uses the FBI warning and 1993 Columbia TriStar Home Video logo. Has a normal test pattern at the end. The third tape is on DVD and released in 2003. Logo is the short 2001 Columbia TriStar Home Entertainment logo and previews for upcoming releases.

• The Blue Lagoon

From 1981. Uses at the end the 1978 CPHE FBI warning. The second copy, from 1992 (The same time the sequel was released) uses the FBI warning and 1992 C-T Home Video logo. Test pattern at the end.

• Oliver and Company (9/24/93)

The tape would have the green FBI warnings, the "Coming Only to Theaters this 1993 Holiday Season" screen (with music), a teaser trailer for The Nightmare Before Christmas, the lilac blue "Coming to Theaters" screen, a sneak preview trailer for The Lion King, the lilac blue "Coming to Videocassette" screen, previews for Aladdin, The Muppet Christmas Carol and Bambi, the lilac blue "Original Theatrical Trailer" screen, a trailer for Oliver and Company, the lilac blue "Special Previews" screen, the lilac blue FP screen, and the 1992 distorted Walt Disney Classics logo. Film logo is 1990 Walt Disney Pictures logo. After the film, it would have the lilac blue "Now on Videocassette" screen, previews for Peter Pan and Pinocchio, and the lilac blue "Look Out for Future Releases" screen.

To be continued...

I have some fake VHS tapes ideas myself.

• Another One Rides the Bus

From 1981. Uses the 1978 WCI FBI warning and the 1978 WCI Home Video logo. Film logo is Orion Pictures 1981. Opening funding credits announcement (feat. KCET 1968 logo): "KCET Los Angeles presents Another One Rides the Bus, made possible by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (1979 logo)." Closing funding credits announcement: "This video EP has been made possible by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (1979 logo)." End credits music: "Another One Rides the Bus" by "Weird Al" Yankovic. Closing logo: PBS Everymen (1971-1984). Tracks are "Another One Rides the Bus", "Happy Birthday", "Gotta Boogie", "Mr. Frump in the Iron Lung", and "Yoda". The second tape, from 1985, uses the 1984 Warner FBI warning and 1981 Warner Home Video logo. The third tape, from 1991, uses the 1988 IVE warning and 1990 Carolco Home Video logo, which repeats itself at the end. The fourth tape, from 2002, uses the 2000 Disney FBI warnings and 2001 Walt Disney Home Entertainment logo. The PBS Everymen is replaced by the 1999 PBS Kids "Dash" logo (1st variant).

• "Weird Al" Yankovic

From 1983. Uses the 1981 Thorn/EMI warning and 1981 Thorn/EMI Video logo. Film logos are Orion Pictures 1982, Thorn/EMI Film Distributors 1978, and Carolco 1982. Opening funding credits announcement (feat. KCET 1968 logo): "KCET Los Angeles presents WEIRD AL YANKOVIC, made possible by the National Endownment for the Arts. Additional funding provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (1979 logo)." Closing funding credits announcement: "This video LP has been made possible by the National Endownment for the Arts. Additional funding provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (1979 logo)." End credits music: "I Love Rocky Road" by "Weird Al" Yankovic. Closing logo: PBS Everymen (1971-1984). End previews: One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, The Lord of the Rings, The Best of Benny Hill, Heartland, Death on the Nile, Rockshow, and The Tubes Video. Followed by the 1982? Thorn/EMI Video promo with the relaxing music. Test pattern (Low G note) at the end. Songs on this video LP are "Ricky", "Gotta Boogie (remake)", "I Love Rocky Road", "Buckingham Blues, or, Chuck and Diane", "Happy Birthday (original)", "Pac Man", "Stop Dragging My Car Around", "My Bologna (original)", "School Cafeteria", "The Check's in the Mail", "Another One Rides the Bus (LP-exclusive remake)", "I'll Be Mellow When I'm Dead (original)", "Such a Groovy Guy", and "Mr. Frump in the Iron Lung". The second tape, from 1986, uses the 1985 Thorn/EMI/HBO warning, the 1986 HBO/Cannon Video logo, and a preview for the first five "Weird Al" Yankovic video LP's (though Another One Rides the Bus is an EP). The LP itself is unchanged. The third tape, from 1990, uses the 1988 IVE warning followed by the 1990 Carolco Home Video logo and a preview for the first six "Weird Al" Yankovic LP's (plus the bonus Another One Rides the Bus EP). The 1990 CHV logo repeats itself at the end. The fourth tape, from 1995, is the same as the 1990 tape, except the CHV logo is replaced with the Avid Home Entertainment logo on both ends, and the tape itself is in EP mode. Test pattern at the end. The fifth tape, from 1995, uses the 1988 IVE warning, the 1995 Live Entertainment logo (silent), and a preview for the first eight "Weird Al" Yankovic LP's (plus the bonus Another One Rides the Bus EP). The 1995 Live Entertainment logo repeats itself when the program ends (and the 1971 PBS Everymen is replaced with the 1992 Orange CGI P-Head). Test pattern at the end. The sixth tape uses the 1988 IVE warning, a preview for the first nine "Weird Al" Yankovic LP's (plus the bonus Another One Rides the Bus EP), and the 1998 Artisan Entertainment logo, which repeats itself at the end. The PBS Everymen is replaced with the 1996 PBS Kids logo, and on the Artisan logo at the end, the P Head dog from the PBS Kids logo, goes by the Artisan logo, stops at the bottom right corner, and says "Arf!" again before disappearing on the right side of the screen. The seventh tape, from 2002, is the same, except the 2000 Disney FBI warnings and 2001 Walt Disney Home Entertainment logo are used, and the preview at the beginning is replaced by a new preview for the first ten "Weird Al" Yankovic LP's (plus the bonus Another One Rides the Bus EP), but the P Head dog remains to say "Arf!" on the Artisan logo at the end.

• Enter Arsene Lupin

From 1979. Uses the 1979 Thorn/EMI Video logo and 1979 Thorn/EMI warning. Film logo is Universal Pictures 1937. Test pattern (High D-flat note) at the end.

I have some fake tape ideas as well:

• Little Audrey, Volume 1

From 1988. Uses the 1988 Paramount Home Video logo and the 1988 Paramount warning.

• Note: All cartoons on this tape will have their original opening and closing Paramount titles.

• Cartoon listing:

• Santa's Surprise (1947)
• Butterscotch and Soda (1948)
• The Lost Dream (1949)
• Song of the Birds (1949)
• Tarts and Flowers (1950)
• Goofy Goofy Gander (1950)
• Hold the Lion Please (1951)
• Audrey the Rainmaker (1951)

• Little Audrey, Volume 2

From 1989. Uses the 1989 Paramount Home Video logo and the 1989 Paramount warning.

• Note: Like the previous tape, all cartoons on this tape will have their original opening and closing Paramount titles.

• Cartoon listing:

• Law and Audrey (1952)
• The Case of the Cockeyed Canary (1952)
• Surf Bored (1953)
• The Seapreme Court (1954)
• Dizzy Dishes (1955)
• Little Audrey Riding Hood (1955)
• Fishing Tackler (1957)
• Dawg Gawn (1958)

• Little Lulu, Volume 1

From 1985. Uses the 1984 Paramount warning and the 1982 Paramount Home Video logo.

• Note: All cartoons on this tape will have their original opening and closing Paramount titles.

• Cartoon listing:

• Eggs Don't Bounce (1943)
• Hullaba-Lulu (1944)
• Lulu Gets the Birdie (1944)
• Lulu in Hollywood (1944)
• Lucky Lulu (1944)
• It's Nifty to Be Thrifty (1944)
• I'm Just Curious (1944)
• Lulu's Indoor Outing (1944)
• Lulu at the Zoo (1944)
• Lulu's Birthday Party (1944)

• Little Lulu, Volume 2

Also from 1985. Uses the 1984 Paramount warning and the 1982 Paramount Home Video logo.

• Note: Like the previous tape, all cartoons on this tape will have their original opening and closing Paramount titles.

• Cartoon listing:

• Magica-Lulu (1945)
• Beau Ties (1945)
• Daffydilly Daddy (1945)
• Snap Happy (1945)
• Man's Pest Friend (1945)
• Bargain Counter Attack (1946)
• Bored of Education (1946)
• Chick and Double Chick (1946)
• Musica-Lulu (1947)

• Little Lulu, Volume 3

From 1986. Uses the 1984 Paramount warning and the 1982 Paramount Home Video logo.

• Note: Like the previous two tapes, all cartoons on this tape will have their original opening and closing Paramount titles.

• Cartoon listing:

• A Scout with the Gout (1947)
• Loose in a Caboose (1947)
• Cad and Caddy (1947)
• A Bout with a Trout (1947)
• Super Lulu (1947)
• The Baby Sitter (1947)
• The Dog Show-Off (1948)
• Alvin's Solo Flight (1961)
• Frog's Legs (1962)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnet71.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Heighho.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 07:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Underthesea.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 00:06, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Steve Areno, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Accounting4Taste 17:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject:Anime and Manga is discussing the removal of non-English non-Japanese dub information of all articles within its scope. While I do agree with this removal, I know you to be a strong advocate of the Spanish dubs for your efforts in trying to create a "mexican voice actors database" in English Wikipedia. If you wish to join the discussion, go here. You have until September 15.--Nohansen 15:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sampson bites his thumb.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Falcorian ^(talk) 06:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some people have nominated The "list of media using the wilhelm scream" page for deletion. Know you have contributed greatly to this article and should know. To opine go to the page and follow the link in the nomination. Then go to the pages nominated on sept 11. Viperix 02:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AFD is up for deletion review. I thought since you participated in the discussion you might wish to participate in this process as well. Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 September 17

Also, I have learned that "per others who voted" doesn't really count since its not a vote. They view it as a discussion and weight the arguments. Thought you might want to know in case you participate in further AFD's Viperix 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Avid Home Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Grassfire 23:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Not anymore. Smashville 02:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sampson bites his thumb.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Abram catches Sampson biting his thumb.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Daisaku Chiba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{MeMyEarsMyMouth}-timed 14:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Daisaku Chiba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pete's Dragon front cover (1980 release).JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Robin Hood front cover (1984 release).JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm trying to do some clean-up on the page, which I notice you started. No sources are included for any of the roles listed, and while many can be verified, a good number, especially regarding The Terminator and Worf, are widely contradicted (and the information mostly seems to appear only on the Spanish Wikipedia page, which was translated from this version initially, sites that copy that one, and the like). A page from Primedubb.com, the website for a leading Mexican dubbing studio, contradicts the Conan the Destroyer claim (unless it was another dub), and Doblaje en Espanol (not infallible, but usually right) likewise contradicts many of the claims, and Doblaje Disney has screencaps of credits from Pete's Dragon, as well as information on the date of that dub, which disproves the Doc Terminus claim, again unless it's a redub and you can source it. Til then, I'm taking those items out and adding those verified either directly by Primedubb or on the Doblaje en Espanol site, or from DVD credits I have access to. -- Aleal (talk) 03:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Oscar Flores, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:L3mdvd3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What does ryansaurus mean by "unusual test patterns"? 71.121.72.7 (talk) 16:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Test patterns on tapes from Columbia, Paramount, MCA, and Thorn EMI with a tone other than B or C. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 00:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Watv.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnta60s.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnet71.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnet77.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnet99.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you haven't updated it for months! Gabrielkat (talk) 13:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• You're right; I think it's time I updated it! --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 20:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • I noticed that your 1989 tape of Star Trek III: The Search for Spock has the 1984 update of the 1979 Paramount warning. Shouldn't it be using the 1987 Paramount Home Video logo and the 1987 Paramount warning instead, like your 1989 tape of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan? Gabrielkat (talk) 15:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Could be that Search for Spock was printed earlier than Wrath of Khan. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pbskids93.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pbskids99 a.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pbskids99 b.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Edward Mannix, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Mannix. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Clarityfiend (talk) 07:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article WNET idents, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Madcoverboy (talk) 18:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? And don't mention about the argument like that in any article! King Shadeed 21:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I was just a bit surprised when you didn't change the year (approximmte) CBS stopped distributing TriStar films on home video back to 1992. The thing is, I noticed a copy of The Muppets Take Manhattan that looked like a full-box version of the artwork on the CBS/Fox edition, and I believe that therefore it was distributed on home video by Fox Video in 1991 or 1992. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Trish Ledoux requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:21, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cristina Hernández, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of cars with automatic seat belts, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cars with automatic seat belts. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. [ roux ] [x] 07:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In AfD you said: "the first car with an automatic seat belt was the 1975 Volkswagen Rabbit". Can you provide a citation for that? The article on automatic seat belts (which is mistitled with an s on the end - titles are singular if possible) says: "The 1972 Volkswagen ESVW1 Experimental Safety Vehicle presented passive seat belts [1]. Volvo tried to develop a passive three point seatbelt. In 1973 Volkswagen announced they had a functional passive seat belt[2]." I have no idea what passive seat belts are. Are they passive or the driver? Also no mention of the Rabbit. - Mgm|^(talk) 16:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Precisely: see this. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 18:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox movie certificates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:28, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox TV ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gabriel Ramos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no independent reliable source

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Descíclope (talk) 13:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of things different on Chinese Democracy compared to earlier studio albums by Guns N' Roses, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Original research. This is sort of listcruft gone nuts.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. eaolson (talk) 20:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noté que creaste varios artículos de actores de doblaje mexicanos, pero pusiste en muchas de ellas información rotundamente falsa acerca de doblajes como Ouran Host, Azumanga, Mew Mew Power, Suzumiya Haruhi, etc. Por favor si vas a agregar ese tipo de información corrobora que sean verdaderas ya que se difunde demasiado la mala información, aunque la verdad no sé de que fuente pudiste sacar tantos "errores" (Aparte de Anime News Network, fuente nada confiable), en fin, gracias al menos por crear los artículos. Clau444 (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]

BRIAN OVERTON: What are you saying? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.119.71 (talk) 19:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A year too late, but the automated translation of the above is: I noticed you created several articles of Mexican voice actors, but put many of them outright false information about stunts like Ouran Host, Azumanga, Mew Mew Power, Suzumiya Haruhi, etc. Please if you add that kind of information corroborates that are true and that spreads misinformation too, although not really know what source did you get so many "mistakes" (Aside from Anime News Network, unreliable source), in Finally, thanks at least to create the items. Hope this helps, Best, --joe decker^{talk to me} 23:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Seasons in the Abyss, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Cannibaloki 23:51, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Seasons in the Abyss. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cannibaloki 00:38, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ryanasaurus007 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Cannibaloki 03:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Greg Snegoff, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Snegoff. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ryanasaurus0077! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 49 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. David Povall - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Lara Cody - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Shannon Settlemyre - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Joyce Kurtz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Belinda Martinez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Benjamín Rivera - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Gabriel Chavez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Patricia Acevedo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Mónica Manjarrez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Enzo Fortuny - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marta Sáinz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage per WP:N found. BLP unreferenced for 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joshua Scott (talk) 04:35, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4/3 was my birthday. I got some DVD sets, a Lego set and 3 VHS tapes. I got 2 Nickelodeon tapes and 1 Pokemon tape. Isn't that awesome?24.44.119.71 (talk) 13:46, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me edit this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_theatrical_film_production_companies to follow the same format as the distributors page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Theatrical_Film_Companies? It is a lot of work and I would appreciate your help.

The article Yamil Atala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long term unreferenced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 05:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Edson Matus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long term unreferenced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 05:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eduardo Tejedo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

According to IMDb the only actor by this name is a composer. Many of the credits seem to be outright fabrications (In the Star Trek movies, Riker was played by Jonathan Frakes). WP:HOAX

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  --Joshua Scott (formerly LiberalFascist) 14:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spaceketeers back cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I noticed an anon removed the image from List of Artisan Entertainment video releases without telling why. I just put it back on the page on those grounds. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 21:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mario Filio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable voice actor. Unreferenced BLP since 2007.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gobonobo ^{T C} 12:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Víctor Mares Jr. has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J04n(talk page) 13:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Raedon Home Video requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 02:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Alan Miró, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Miró until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Arturo Mercado Jr., which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arturo Mercado Jr. until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Wordsmith^Communicate 06:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Diego Armando Ángeles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:ENT. This has been an unreferenced BLP for 3 years and has even been deleted on Spanish wikipedia es:Diego Armando Ángeles Also two redirects to delete Diego Fernando Morales and Diego Armando Angeles

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Polargeo (talk) 07:20, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pilar Escandon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has been tagged for some months but remains unreferenced and no evidence that the subject meets the notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 17:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Diana Pérez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP of voice actress who doesn't appear to meet WP:CREATIVE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jclemens-public (talk) 18:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leyla Rangel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Roles listed (mainly voices for Spanish versions of films/TV series) do not meet WP:ENT, and no significant coverage available.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. January ^(talk) 14:26, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Guillermo Sauceda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability concerns. I can verify some of the information, e.g., but there's no significant coverage that I've been able to find in reliable, secondary sources. But reliable sources, as always, welcome if you've got 'em!

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. j⚛e decker^talk 04:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Giusy Di Martino is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giusy Di Martino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 20:34, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mónica Villaseñor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mónica Villaseñor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CharlieDelta (talk) 20:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blas García has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N, WP:V Can't find reliable, secondary sources in order to verify the existence or demonstrate the notability of this dub artist.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker^{talk to me} 05:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mónica Manjarrez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find reliable, secondary sources providing in-depth coverage of this dub artist necessary to meet WP:GNG/WP:BASIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker^{talk to me} 15:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mariana Ortiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N -- Can't find reliable, secondary sources providing in-depth coverage of this voice actor, nor verification of any putative claims to notability under WP:NACTOR. Attempted various Google searches including the Anime/Manga custom search, note several other folks with the same name who are more notable do make the search a little more subtle than it might otherwise be.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker^{talk to me} 16:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jorge Ornelas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N -- Can't find reliable, secondary sources providing in-depth coverage of this voice actor, nor verification of any putative claims to notability under WP:NACTOR. Attempted the usual various Google searches including the Anime/Manga custom search.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker^{talk to me} 17:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ana Lucia Ramos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N: Unable to find reliable, secondary sources to verify or evidence the notability of this voice actor.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker^{talk to me} 16:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana Santos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Santos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe decker^{talk to me} 23:47, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Debra Jean Rogers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Jean Rogers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Courcelles 05:24, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mónica Estrada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability. Sources not found in Google News, only refs to this article, facebook, etc on Google web.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ariconte (talk) 08:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry hotshot and no I'm not a wiki admin but if you wana write a summary you need to see the episode first(cardinal rule). Also I'm the new wika admin of the Pretty Cure Wiki where I've had great big discussions and fighting "Cure Beat" info for several months even before I adopted it. I believe in a new cure but I don't trust the name so far so it was first teased it a fake magazine scan but we'll see when 21 airs unless you can translate JP websites for me. Darkcat1 (talk) 19:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I've got a source on LiveJournal. Unfortunately, last I heard it was infected with viruses that are only activated on Windows computers (I'm using one right now, and to make matters worse, it isn't even mine!). I'm putting the summary back for now, and once I'm able to use a Mac (which is immune to LJ's viruses, as I learned during their most recent DDoS scare) I'll put the source in. Deal? (Of course, if you still don't agree with my logic feel free to remove the summary again until I'm able to put the source up, but if you do agree with me, then fine.) --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 19:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maru Guerrero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maru Guerrero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 21:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ana Lobo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Lobo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe decker^{talk to me} 17:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Circe Luna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has already been deleted from es.wiki and lacks any significant coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 14:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocío Prado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocío Prado until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 16:00, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alondra Hidalgo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to prove notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 15:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please take the time to read Wikipedia's notability criteria. You continue to create large amounts of articles on individuals who do not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. In addition, many of the articles are completely unsourced, which is against our policies on biographies of living persons and verifiability. The net result of this is that a lot of editors need to take the time to review your work, initiate deletion proceedings, and ultimately many of the articles are deleted. This really cannot continue. Have you ever considered seeking a mentor who could assist you with your editing? I would strongly suggest that you be mentored until you get a better understanding of notability and sourcing requirements. If you continue to create unsourced or poorly sourced biography articles, it may be necessary to temporarily restrict your editing in order to give you the opportunity to seek mentorship and/or review these very important Wikipedia policies. You must be frustrated that the majority of your contributions are deleted, and it is frustrating and time consuming for editors and admins to have to do the reviewing and deleting as well, so for the sake of improving both your editing and and creating articles that are kept, heed the advice offered here. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 14:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A thousand apologies. My memory might be fuzzy, but I think the last time I created an unsourced or suspected-as-unsourced page under this account was around 2 years ago. And yes, I would like a mentor. However, I feel like since my last unsourced or suspected-as-unsourced page I have mellowed quite a bit (though this account hasn't seen much action recently, I'm sorry to say). If you still think I need a mentor to re-walk me through editing, I will gladly put {{subst:dated adoptme}} on my own userpage. Again, thanks for reminding me yet again of how there still may be many unsourced pages you still might have to clear out (at this point, not even I know how many there really are!). --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 03:20, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My sincere apologies, I did make a mistake with the dates based on the new deletion notice on your page. My concern was that you were making the effort to create all of these articles, only to have them deleted as non-notable or unsourced. It seems that you have certainly learned from that experience! Would you be interested in starting some new articles? If so, you could begin them in your own userspace (example User:Ryanasaurus0077/Insert new article name here). When you feel it is ready to be moved to mainspace you could request feedback, or ping a trusted fellow editor to review if you prefer. Just make sure they meet the various notability criteria for inclusion and include sources for verification, and you should be fine! It takes a little longer, but it is certainly more rewarding to not have your work speedily deleted. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 14:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll try to find the time to create new articles as I go along. I think I'll start with Judianna Makovsky. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 20:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, she certainly is notable, I'm surprised she doesn't have Wikipedia article yet. Google news has a lot of good referencing material available on here as well. Good luck! Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 20:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Ryan, how can you tell if a VHS or Betamax tape was manufactured by RCA, TDK, Memorex, Scotch, Fuji, Sony, JVC, or BASF? Gabrielkat (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Just by looking at the tape shell design and other factors. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 21:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• For example, VHS tapes manufactured by Maxell would have a grid-like pattern of squares on the tape shell, and some tapes would also have the Maxell logo on the left of the tape guard. Also, VHS tapes manufactured by Memorex would have 9 columns of 8 lines on the top and bottom of the tape shell, as well as a white release button for the tape guard. Although, some tapes would only have 7 columns of 8 lines on the bottom.

But I still can't really tell if a VHS or Betamax tape was manufactured by those other companies mentioned... how can you tell by the tape shell design and other factors if a tape was manufactured by those other companies I mentioned? Gabrielkat (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Those are just the basics. The basics for the others:
  • Fuji tapes, particularly from the '70s and '80s, will have a rounded rectangle of smoothness around the reel windows and face label area.
  • TDK tapes are similar, but the edges are a wider rectangle.
  • JVC tapes tend to have a rough outer shell surface.
  • The shells on 3M/Scotch tapes are notoriously varied; particularly, on older tapes, you receive fair warning in the form of the word "Scotch". Early tapes had shells resembling the old Fuji design (as mentioned earlier), but many others used a modified version, either with the smooth rectangle more vertically thin and/or vertical lines in the rectangle or wider rectangles on the surface (though not as wide as on TDK's tapes).
  • RCA and National/Panasonic were two distributors of Fuji tapes (Fuji distributed their own tapes as well); as such, their tapes resembled Fuji's.
  • Sony's design was typically similar to Fuji's design, except the pattern used not small squares like on Fuji's tapes, but small circles approximately the size of those squares.

I won't talk about BASF because frankly, I don't know much about their tapes. In any case, my earlier information on tape manufacturers might've been flawed, so I need to double check myself. (BTW the squares on the Maxell tape shell design are actually diagonally arranged). --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 21:49, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sonny Byrkett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dismas|^(talk) 10:29, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Susan Byrkett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability issue since 2011. One line.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Caleb Crabb 05:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spaceketeers back cover.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eduardo Fonseca has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J04n(talk page) 18:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eduardo Fonseca is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Fonseca until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 12:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eduardo Fonseca is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Fonseca (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 01:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marc Matney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ryanasaurus0077/Princess Leia, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryanasaurus0077/Princess Leia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ryanasaurus0077/Princess Leia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ryanasaurus0077/Obi-Wan Kenobi, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryanasaurus0077/Obi-Wan Kenobi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ryanasaurus0077/Obi-Wan Kenobi during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Manuel Rosano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Manuel Rosano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 02:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you want to get more Aussie VHS openings? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C8:C001:8A3A:4CCA:F3D8:B451:EA (talk) 14:41, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wait! The first release of Mad Max in Australia used the same warnings, Roadshow Home Video, introduction scroll, and Sneak Previews bumpers from The Fifth Musketeer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C8:C001:8A3A:591C:A4F7:483C:312F (talk) 15:12, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ryanasaurus0077/Star Wars, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryanasaurus0077/Star Wars and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ryanasaurus0077/Star Wars during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carlos Hugo Hidalgo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Hugo Hidalgo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gekijô-ban Wiadaru Yankobiku: Bureru no baka! Ni juzô hoyûsha daikussen. Since you had some involvement with the Gekijô-ban Wiadaru Yankobiku: Bureru no baka! Ni juzô hoyûsha daikussen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Araceli de León has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article may not be eligible for Template:Prod blp, but it is not supported by any sources despite being tagged as such since 2009. Article is basically one unsourced sentence followed by a long filmography with no sources provided to show that this individual satisfies WP:BIO let alone WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your message ^(permalink), see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nate_Speed. --JustBerry (talk) 02:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• So it seems I was correct in my initial assumption that Nate has no one to blame but himself for the stuff being removed from the DWC page. Does that mean I or someone else can readd that info, then? Just making sure before proceeding with anything. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 02:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of HBO video releases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of HBO video releases (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --woodensuperman 14:06, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just happened to see this. There is an informal use of shingle to mean a sign (or in this case a banner) one uses to announce a business or practice. Not sure if you know the TV show M*A*S*H, but surgeon Colonel Potter once talked about what he'd do when he returned from the war, and he said something about going home and hanging a shingle on his door, implying that he'd be happy to have a small, informal medical practice at home. The imagery might be that you'd paint your name on a scrap of wood and hang it. You're correct that it's too obscure/slangy a term for the article, though. Hope that helps! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I want to help to do more of PBS in the schedule. --73.184.6.244 (talk) 02:00, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks. By the way, I get my sources mainly from Broadcasting Magazine, issues of which can be easily found on the American Radio History website, and Christian Science Monitor. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 02:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1971–72 United States network television schedule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firing Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Carlos Moreno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Carlos Moreno until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryan, I want to help you with the creation of Magnetic Video's successor on TVTropes. It's called "CBS/Fox Video" and the trope also compoments of 20th Century-Fox Video titles and spawned two pages Key Video and Playhouse Video on TVTropes. --2601:C8:C001:9AF0:6196:2E35:FEA0:98EE (talk) 04:17, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ryan, I would like to tune in to an ABC affiliate to watch The Oscars tonight, and after the reveal of the winner of the year's Best Picture, I would like to make a page on TVTropes.com. It's called "Paramount Home Video" and it was a subsidiary of Paramount Pictures. Catalog numbers will be revealed on the page. --73.184.6.244 (talk) 21:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May I earn the International Video Entertainment page on TVTropes.org. Consists of wave titles from Family Home Entertainment, U.S.A. Home Video, Caballero Control Corporation Home Video (until 1986), Monterey Home Video (from 1982 to 1986), Thriller Video, Sybil Danning's Adventure Video, U.S.A. Sports Video, The Video Late Show and King Bee Video and a joint venture with TV syndicator RadioVision International, Inc., RadioVision Video. Their catalog numbers will be revealed. Their Digital Piracy is Evil trope, which consists of the word "WARNING" blinking on the FBI warning screen, and especially the first version in 1982 shows a Caballero Control Corporation copyright. --73.184.6.244 (talk) 02:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryan, can you make the Embassy Home Entertainment page on TVTropes. It was formerly known as Andre Blay Corporation. Its initial wave of the titles ran under the Blay Video name. The Digital Piracy Is Evil is Yes, they have a FBI Warning. --73.184.6.244 (talk) 10:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ryan, I agree that I would like to create a page called "Vestron Video" on TVTropes and like the Thorn EMI Video page, there's one of title libraries that was divided, US Library, UK Library and Australian Library and it was all about Vestron Video. --73.184.6.244 (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryan, I hope I could go to TVTropes.org and view the Media Home Entertainment page to add "Wave 2" from 1979. In addition, there's a page for various Australian distributors, like Roadshow Home Video and UK-related pages like Guild Home Video, as well as Goodtimes Home Video, VCI Home Video, Mogul Communications, Lorimar Home Video, Vidmark Entertainment, Starmaker Entertainment and Video Treasures. --2601:C8:C001:9AF0:105B:5DB7:F50E:648D (talk) 01:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. --2600:1:C41A:8734:A104:9F20:FB2C:D93C (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryan, I would like to unlock and create the Paramount Home Video and Vestron Video page on TVTropes.org It was also creating the Studio Entertainment page (as well as Off Hollywood Video and Shooting Star Video labels, which Ryan bought in the future) as well as VCX (and VCII), VCA Pictures (whose company Magnum Entertainment was originally owned by VCA), 10th Ave. Video, Roadshow's rivals Communications and Entertainment Limited and Video Classics, Guild's rivals Palace Video, Entertainment In Video and Video Instant Picture Company, MCA Video Distributing Corporation's successor MCA Home Video, CIC Video (international distributor for Paramount and MCA content), International Video Entertainment's successors Live Entertainment and Artisan Entertainment, Thorn EMI Video's successors (US distributor HBO Video and international distributor Cannon Video), the releases of Walt Disney Home Video (plus some of the 80s labels including Muppet Home Video, Western Theater and '50s Theater), Prism Entertainment, Star Classics, Kartes Video Communications, Edde Entertainment and Pacific Arts Video! --73.184.6.244 (talk) 14:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I do. Agree. Unlock and make the Paramount Home Video page and put "%% Creator/ProgramHunters" and "%% Creator/WorldvisionHomeVideo" on TVTropes' Home Video Distributors Page. It’s Digital Piracy is Evil on Paramount tapes had no proper FBI warning just the text "Licensed only for non commercial private exhibition in homes Any public performance other use or copying is strictly prohibited. All rights under copyright reserved." behind the background such as:

• 1979-1980: Blue background
• 1980-1989: Changing colors
• 1989-2006: Paramount wallpapers. --2601:C8:C001:9AF0:545D:6077:4BD0:3C5B (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All agreed tomorrow. --2601:C8:C001:9AF0:45A2:B529:3C6A:2B6A (talk) 01:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All agree on [4] --73.184.6.244 (talk) 14:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryan, can I make pages for music-related videos: MusicVision (RCA/Columbia), CBS/Fox Video Music (CBS/Fox Company), Music Media (Media Home Entertainment). MCA Music Video, Vestron Music Video (Vestron), Sony Video Software and music labels named "Sony Video", Picture Music International and Warner Reprise Video on TVTropes.org? Add PolyGram Video, which title catalog included US and UK and Australian label Hoyts PolyGram Video will be included. Add one thing to Media Home Entertainment page on TVTropes, that they picked up the Morgan Creek library. A few Australian labels including King of Video, Delta Home Video, Hollywood House Video and Seven Keys Video and even UK labels like Rank Video, Electric Video/Electric Blue, Videomedia and Heron Home Entertainment may be included. --73.184.6.244 (talk) 14:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir. --73.184.6.244 (talk) 12:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you need pages for VideoVisa (a Spanish VHS distributor), plus Vista Home Video (owned by the Vista Organization), Raedon Home Video, The Congress Video Group, Harmony Vision, Orion Home Video, Pioneer Entertainment, these Argentian video labels, Video Rodven (a Venezuelan video distributor) Continental Video (aka Planet Video Inc., Cinema Group Home Video and Palisades Entertainment), Academy Entertainment, DreamWorks Home Entertainment, Imperial Entertainment, New World Video, Monterey Home Video (covering post-1986 catalog), Fries Home Video, Video Gems, Classic Family Entertainment, Republic Pictures Home Video, Cineplex Odeon Home Video (formerly Pan-Canadian Video Distributors), French label Gaumont/Columbia/RCA Video and UCG Video, Super Video, Time-Life Video, Virgin Video (and U.S. label Virgin Vision), M.C.E.G. Home Video (and Forum Home Video) and the two companies Virgin and M.C.E.G. merged M.C.E.G. Virgin Home Entertainment, Action International Pictures, Star Classics, Paragon Video Productions and Simitar Entertainment plus the Walt Disney Home Video title library on TVTropes.org! --73.184.6.244 (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You agree and take me to TVTropes.org tomorrow and look at the Home Video Distributors page. Pages hadn't been created yet had been marked with "%%". --73.184.6.244 (talk) 02:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And I would like to do more Wizard Video titles and create the Harmony Vision page tomorrow after school! --73.184.6.244 (talk) 00:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of guitar tunings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s now talk about Sunday morning schedules. --2601:C8:C001:9AF0:5458:BDD2:EB9C:F0E7 (talk) 16:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s agree. Network represents NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox starting in 1996 and before that in the early 50s, DuMont. Check any newspaper or Broadcasting Magazine. --2600:1:C43D:F59E:71FF:6BB:2C3E:D497 (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Gama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Gama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Мандичка^YO 😜 04:51, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rudolf Nureyev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sainte-Geneviève-des-Bois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of PBS member stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WPXN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ryan,

I’m looking ahead to get Canadian newspapers from the fall of 1999, stating that Global still had the 1998-99 carryovers on Thursdays: Friends, Jesse and Frasier. I think CTV aired Roswell and I presume Global aired Harsh Realm. What Canadian network is airing Popular, Stark Raving Mad and Action. And the 1999-2000 Canadian TV schedule will be created. --2600:1:C40A:9800:FD3D:89A8:68C7:D764 (talk) 15:14, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan, have you ever watched western movies? --2600:1:D41D:989C:1CE0:98EE:D035:A270 (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to do something about Spshu, the United Artists page and his/her false claims that the real UA today was UA Digital Studios and not UA Releasing. United Artists Releasing is the official resurrection of UA as opposed to the quieter previous revival of the name as a digital studio, which was unofficial. Can you please look at my messages to him/her and believe them? 88.84.156.102 (talk) 05:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Ryan, please see WP:LTA/NS. You're dealing with someone who hasn't had anything better to do for many years now. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just now found out about this message. I'm seriously considering asking for a level of protection for this talk page so that only registered users up can leave messages. --Ryanasaurus0077 (talk) 01:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fist of the North Star: La Película. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 10#Fist of the North Star: La Película until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 01:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff Winkless is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Winkless until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:22, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ultra NES. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 23#Ultra NES until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ultra Donkey Kong. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 23#Ultra Donkey Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's a bunch of misinformation saying that United Artists currently exists as a digital production studio. It's not true, because United Artists currently exists as two companies: United Artists Corporation, a legal entity under MGM that owns the UA trademarks and some copyrights for the James Bond and Rocky franchises; and United Artists Releasing, which is basically a resurrection of UA in general because it's a US theatrical distribution joint venture of MGM and Annapurna Pictures that was expanded in 2019 and it's not only using the UA name, but also continuing and building on the original UA's legacy and heritage as a distribution company for independents. United Artists Digital Studios is just a separate, short-lived production unit under MGM that only used the UA name unofficially and isn't related to UA in general, plus the original Annapurna/MGM joint venture isn't called Mirror when it was formed in 2017 (and it was in October, not December). The news articles didn't say that. It just wasn't named until its expansion in 2019 and it was a test that saw MGM invest in Annapurna's one-time theatrical distribution arm in exchange for having its team release certain MGM movies in the US under the MGM banner. "Mirror" was just a separate banner under the venture for third-party movies only. Can you please apply these changes here? 213.231.55.186 (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of guitar tunings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hurt. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When you created the Alejandro Illescas Wikipedia article in 2007, you listed this as one of his roles:

• Ataru's father in the Urusei Yatsura TV series (1992-1997) and movies (1992-1997)

There is currently no evidence anywhere of a Latin American Spanish/Mexican Urusei Yatsura dub existing. Do you know where you might have taken that information from? Hegsareta (talk) 09:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Irwin Daayán has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JayJay^{What did I do?} 05:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Augustin Tamare. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 18#Augustin Tamare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Although his CLG Wiki username is IlCattivo25, I understand that we have to ask if I need an upgrade on the Buena Vista Television page. Judging by a Broadcasting Magazine issue, it was originally named Walt Disney Domestic Television, the 1st logo debuted, in fact on Today's Business in the August of 1986, not 1985. Others followed this show afterwards with Siskel & Ebert and Disney Magic I. Same goes for the Buena Vista International Television page. The 1st logo debuted in 1987, and the 2nd logo debuted in 1990. That is the fact. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:A858:CA6E:50F0:17D7 (talk) 02:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another factual error is on CLG Wiki, for the Metromedia Producers Corporation page. The 4th logo actually debuted in 1984, not 1982 as far as Ryan concerned. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:B960:17A2:8B37:7A5C (talk) 03:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another factual error is shown on the Republic Pictures page on CLG Wiki Miraheze. The 2nd logo ended in 1988 and the 3rd logo started in 1988, not 1990! By far as I'm concerned, the Republic Pictures Home Video page shows off things that are inaccurate. The 2nd logo is mostly not used, but it is most likely only used in Brothers in Arms, as most tapes by that time simply used the standard Republic Pictures logo as a de facto home video logo. The 3rd logo started in 1989. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:2101:3228:3645:94FB (talk) 21:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. Now go to the “Home Video Distributors” page. Let’s talk about Time-Life Video, It was a video distribution company that was operated, and from 1978 to 1982, distributor of mainstream films on videocassette. Also had an agreement with Columbia Pictures to release 20 films on videocassette in 1979, including The Deep, but the relationship didn't last long, and then formed Columbia Pictures Home Entertainment. Several Time-Life assets went to Vestron Video in 1981. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:1951:404D:C65:17D7 (talk) 15:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have to talk. Any info on Time-Life and VidAmerica should be added to the Home Video Distributors page on TVTropes. Time-Life is the distributor of the first 20 Columbia Pictures Home Entertainment cassettes, like The Deep, before going to its distribution arm. VidAmerica distributed a plenty of United Artists titles before Magnetic Video took over. --172.127.114.25 (talk) 13:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Nightmare on Elm Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evergreen Cemetery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, it turns out there are some factual errors on the Dick Clark Productions page on CLG Wiki.

A majority of the shows, like American Bandstand, continued to use the 1964 logo, so that the 1977 logo would be only used on telemovies. There's also a version of the 2nd logo on the page here.

There's also, a Dick Clark Teleshows logo that was to be added to the page, which is from 1973-1980. It can be found here. It was primarily known to appear on TV specials.

The 3rd logo's theme from 1980-1983 is the same as the 1973 Dick Clark Teleshows logo. There's another 1970s Dick Clark logo that appeared at the same time.

Turns out that the Dick Clark Video theme originated as the first theme for the Dick Clark Productions logo, but it was apparently from the logo's first year. Proof here.

--172.127.114.25 (talk) 14:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look up into any 1984-88 issue of Variety and Daily Variety. It seems that Silver Pictures appeared to be on the Fox lot until 1987, when it was moved to Warner Bros.. --172.127.114.25 (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, I'll set up a sandbox for a new Wikipedia page "New Century Entertainment", using sources/references taken from Variety and Daily Variety, plus a new page "Vista Organization", which was simply went to a redirect to Carolco Pictures, which also utilized sources/references from Variety and Daily Variety. --172.127.114.25 (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jamiebuba (talk) 19:34, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryanasaurus0077. Thank you for your work on Space Fortress Macross. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This appears to be some pilot episode compilation of the first few English episodes. As it is not mentioned in the article, I'm tagging it as not mentioned

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 20:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 21:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 08:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 15:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boleyn (talk) 12:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]