Hi Rushtheeditor! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! TheImaCow (talk) 18:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KyleJoan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, A Little Late with Lilly Singh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 03:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Late-night talk show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:13, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liza Koshy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamar High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Good Morning Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTV News Channel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canadian Radio Music Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VidCon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Charles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change the title of the article at Retaliation (2017 film)? Even though it released in the US under that title, the UK title is Romans and it is a UK film. We don't default to the US title. BOVINEBOY2008 17:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did that because that is the new title of the movie, even Katy Perry tweeted about it. It was re-released in the US under the new name. IMDb changed the page to Retaliation and so did Rotten Tomatoes. I don't understand your confusion.

Did it change names in the UK? IMDb and RT will default titles to the US release title no matter what, but that is not the convention we typically follow on Wikipedia. BOVINEBOY2008 18:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure it did but it is up to you to check.

No it's up to YOU to provide a reliable source that the name was changed in the UK; RT and IMDb are not reliable sources for names changes in the UK. And even IMDb indicates that it is titled Romans in the UK. Sundayclose (talk) 18:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok the movie name could be renamed to Romans.

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, as you did at Romans (2017 film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 18:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Manu Feildel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] Unverified Facebook pages are not quality references, and thus, are unsuitable for inclusion. See WP:RS. Quickly. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 9th Canadian Screen Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9th Canadian Screen Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dvwn, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rithvik Dhanjani, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at India's Got Talent (season 8). Sundayclose (talk) 15:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Chill-out music. Sundayclose (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 9th Canadian Screen Awards. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Simmi Singh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at How to Be a Bawse: A Guide to Conquering Life. Sundayclose (talk) 00:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article REDIRECT to Lilly Singh#A Little Late with Lilly Singh, Sketchy Times with Lilly Singh and other ventures (2019–present)

Reason: Content already in the main article. Please note: "Wikipedia's licensing requires that attribution be given to all users involved in creating and altering the content of a page". See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. If redirect is disputed please post discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

  // Timothy :: talk  07:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simmi Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simmi Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO - YouTube is not an acceptable or reliable source/reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simmi Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simmi Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at TheOdd1sOut. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dvwn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dvwn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 10:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ionmars10. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on TheOdd1sOut, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Ionmars10 (talk) 17:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm EN-Jungwon. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Omar Alghabra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. EN-Jungwon 14:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The senator from California is resigning her seat at 12pm EST. Please don't jump the proverbial gun. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 44th Canadian federal election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Fromm.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Greta Thunberg. Sundayclose (talk) 02:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have received numerous warnings for disruptive editing, but you obviously are not taking the warnings seriously. You could be blocked immediately. And you will be blocked if you make one more unsourced edit. If there's something about Wikipedia's requirements for sourcing that you don't understand ask right here, right now. Otherwise you will blocked after your next unsourced or disruptive edit. This has gone on long enough. Sundayclose (talk) 02:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KOZ Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KOZ Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dvwn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dvwn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simmi Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simmi Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a heads up that I reverted your edits over at deputy minister (Canada). Deputy premiers and the deputy prime minister is not the same thing as a deputy minister. The article is about the civil service position that is responsible for the non-political operations of departments. A more appropriate article for your additions is: deputy premier (Canada). —WildComet ^talk 05:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Got Talent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Badshah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on Bids_for_the_2026_Commonwealth_Games. Here's some tea so you can keep up the good work! CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you !! Rushtheeditor (talk) 17:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor

Thank you for creating 2022 Canadian federal budget.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ! Rushtheeditor (talk) 21:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rushtheeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions that appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 13:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you recently removed content from Iqaluit without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The City's web site lists Bell as Mayor. Why are you removing him? Meters (talk) 19:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see that his resignation has just been announced. I'll add it with a source. Please don't make unsourced changes such as that. Meters (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies! I thought it was added, turns out I didn't look closely enough. Rushtheeditor (talk) 20:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No biggie. Quickly fixed. Meters (talk) 20:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legislative Assembly of Alberta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brooks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Carr, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 04:55, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. MOS:INUNIVERSE Aaron Liu (talk) 14:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. There's been no consensus (yet) to have the term dates changed from January 3, 2023 to January 7, 2023. Note: January 3 is used for all the Congresses post-20th amendment, even though they didn't all officially convene on January 3. GoodDay (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hazel McCallion, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Jama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tarek Fatah, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. El_C 07:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Parkash Singh Badal, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 04:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Marc Lalonde, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 11:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kacper Tekieli, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

23rd IIFA Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 23:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You had marked the ITN nomination for Sarokin as "ready". However, there was no consensus for posting yet, so I removed it. Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 09:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You added Hindutva in the ideology section of Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance saying SS (UBT) has it. UBT hindutva is defined as secular hindutva by Uddhav Thackeray himself.^[1] Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC) Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And that is a big tent Alliance. Things in ideology can only be mentioned if it is common in multiple parties. Otherwise the Infobox will get too long. Hope you geeting my point.@Rushtheeditor Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

understood. Rushtheeditor (talk) 17:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing your creation of Andrea Hazell as a redirect to Mitzie Hunter was a big oops! :) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrea_Hazell&oldid=1167485105 Nfitz (talk) 02:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was. Brain fart on my part. Rushtheeditor (talk) 02:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Disqualification of Rahul Gandhi did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Andre Braugher, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 02:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ed Broadbent, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor. Thank you for your work on Next Alberta New Democratic Party leadership election. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rushtheeditor, I have some suggested updates for the Dahua Technology article regarding the company's involvement in various sports competitions. I noticed you show interest in editing articles related to athletic events and games, and thought you may be interested in reviewing my edit request on the Dahua Technology Talk page. I'd appreciate your input and assistance with the edits. Thank you, Caitlyn23 (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Northern Moonlight 18:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article KP Sharma Oli, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 10:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 August 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sheikh Hasina, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andy Fillmore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Savage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. We don't use outgoing in either the intro or infobox of lame-duck office holder, such as Blaine Higgs. We just wait until they've left office. GoodDay (talk) 01:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Honveer Singh Randhawa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 01:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Brennan Day. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 01:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kristina Loewen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 01:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Raladic (talk) 07:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rushtheeditor. Thank you for your work on 2025 Nunavut general election. Another editor, Hey man im josh, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Not mentioned at the target at all.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hey man im josh}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hey man im josh (talk) 17:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rushtheeditor

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Damehar, Himachal Pradesh, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 4 § Damehar, Himachal Pradesh.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:22, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. We don't add Yoon as Han's predecessor, just like we don't add Han as Yoon's successor. Yoon is still the president of South Korea, until he's removed from office. For now, only his powers & duties are suspended. GoodDay (talk) 04:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rahul Gandhi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]