Welcome!

Hello, Rory096/Archive0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair 01:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was a bit knee-jerk, don't you think? Google would quickly have told you the notability of the Ruperts. I'll attempt to pad out the article somewhat, but at worst it only merited a cleanup, not speedy. dewet|™ 14:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You hadn't mentioned the part about them being billionaires at that point, I didn't know their significance. I apologize. Rory096 18:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your speedy deletion tag from this article. As the leader of a political party, that constitutes a clear claim of notability, so I stubbed it instead. Feel free, however, to nominate it for deletion if you wish. howcheng {chat} 18:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing my CSD typo, edit conflicted you getting it. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 03:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just to let you know that your work on speedy deletion of copyright violations is appreciated.

You should also be aware that you don't need to blank the page when you use {{db-copyvio}}, and the template {{nothanks-sd}} is better than {{nothanks}} if you are tagging a page for speedy deletion. The full text that you need to paste onto the user talk page is given at the bottom of the {{db-copyvio}} template. Stifle 19:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. As for blanking not being required, Wikipedia:Copyright_problems#Instructions says it is. Should I just not blank it anyway, since it's going to be deleted in a few minutes?

Thanks, Rory096 19:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that seems to be changed. I never blank the page since it's going to be gone soon anyway and it will help the admin verify that the page is in fact a copyright violation without digging into the history, but it seems that that's what the instructions say. Never mind me, then... :) Stifle 19:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for correcting the speedy tag. I was struggling to remember the word "neologism" for a while, so put "nonsense" knowing that wasn't right. It's too late for me to be doing this I think... hehe doktorb | words 23:43, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neologisms, while annoying, aren't in the criteria for speedy deletion. You can put them on AfD though.--Shanel 01:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a closer look at Wikipedia:Proposed deletion: removing a {{prod}} tag isn't vandalism. You are not supposed reapply the tag when someone removes it: if you feel the article should be deleted at that point, take it to WP:AfD. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to delete the online forum? You guys have democraticunderground.com listed. In addition, www.freerepublic.com is also listed. They are an online forum too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeChurch (talk • contribs)

Rory - before you can block an IP due to vandalism, you must first warn him/her. When the vandalism is blatant, you can use {{blatantvandal}} on the user's talk page. I blocked the IP and then, noticing you hadn't warned him/her, unblocked the IP and left a message for him/her. If the vandalism continues, leave a message on my talk page and I will block the vandal.

In addition, "non-notable website" is not a criterion for speedy deletion. I have AFD'd the page instead. --M@thwiz2020 21:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the IP vandalized after being warned so he/she is susceptible to blocking. I was about to block the IP when another admin beat me to it. --M@thwiz2020 21:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, anonvandal works but blatantvandal can be used for either user names or really obvious vandalism. The message means that the IP can continue constructive edits but that he/she will be blocked if he/she vandalizes. --M@thwiz2020 21:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. It's nice to know that someone can start and article, and while they step away to continue their research, not even ten minutes later the article is completely deleted. I seriously think some caution should be used in just deleting things. What am I supposed to do with the half page of material I just researched? The two examples I made? I'd appreciate a little more caution in speedying things into deletion. Why was this deleted so quickly? Ten minutes is not enough time to assume an author is finished working, and I think we should give a little breathing room in that regard. --DanielCD 05:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure it's deleted? I put a {{prod}} tag on it, which takes 5 days, so it couldn't possibly be deleted that fast. --Rory096 05:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, you're right. I have no idea why that happened. Try asking UninvitedCompany, as he's the administrator who deleted it. --Rory096 05:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out. Sorry, I assumed you did that; and I apologize in that regard. I'm going to find out WTF is going on. --DanielCD 05:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite alright, I'd be angry too. -Rory096 05:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey -- just wanted to let you know, I took down the speedy tag on this page; this band does seem to meet the notability requirements on WP:MUSIC. [1] is coverage of the band in Billboard magazine, and Jeff Tweedy counts as a member of a very notable band. Not that I blame you -- I'd never heard of them either! Mangojuice 17:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still playing and learning but thanks for note... you a Gilmore Girls fan? Oneiromancer 21:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, no, my real name is Rory. By the way, remember to sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~), which automatically puts your username and a timestamp on there. Rory096 21:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, really? It isn't short for anything? If so, what? In the show it's actually, somehow, short for Lorelai, cause other main char. named her daughter after herself like guys do with junior, if short whats it short for? Ever seen the show? I assumed it was trash cause of subject matter and channel until I read a great review from favorite TV critic Heather Havrilesky on Salon.com who had same bias reported it as amazingly possessed of excellent writing and character based humor, and I agreed.. just FYI. Though last season was a little weak, this one seems better, but starting from begginning is always my preference... abc family runs reruns I think, or Netflix it. Anyway, thanks! Oneiromancer 21:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it's just Rory. I'm even a guy. I've seen the show, but I don't really watch it much, no time (and I'm too busy being a Wikiholic). My brother does though. And no problem :) Rory096 21:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, yes, I hadn't scrolled down in your user boxes that far (male), which I just did looking for country of origin, as Rory does ring a bell as a male name, but I think a british one or something? Not sure. Anyway, thanks! Oneiromancer 21:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's like Scottish or something, but I'm not really sure why my parents named me Rory, since I'm not Scottish at all. Rory096 21:25, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Err, did you manually crosspost to my userpage, or is there some automatic way/feature it goes there and/or I get notified new messages wherever someone addresses me? If I didn't write this *here* would you get new message post? Shrug, sorry, sure I could find manually somewhere, just noticed latest one was in both identically... Oneiromancer 21:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Err, maybe my above things cross posted to my page too, sorry for clutter... Oneiromancer 21:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did it manually, and it notifies you automatically whenever there's an edit to your talk page (and, conversely, it notifies me whenever there's an edit to my page). Rory096 21:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised to see you welcoming many users while I was going through the list, especially considering I just met you a day or two ago (see the xoxoth incident above). Anways, I was curious as to why you greet all users, even those who have not edited any pages. Another Wikipedian once asked me the same question, so now I welcome only new users who have edited Wikipedia (and check their edits, too, to make sure they are not vandalism). I don't have a problem with what you're doing - it's just that, if you have a legitimate reason, I'll start welcoming all users, too. Thanks! --M@thwiz2020 22:32, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It just seems like a good idea. Plus, if they see right when they join that there are people to help out when they're making/editing an article or something, then they're more likely to do it, and when they do it, it'll be more likely to be a good article, rather than some vanity page. Right now, we're giving newbies links to things helping them to create an article after they've made a useless article. We should be proactive and give them the links beforehand, so they make worthwhile edits. Rory096 22:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your insight. --M@thwiz2020 22:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, thanks for the welcome greeting. That's a nice thing you're doing. I'd been hanging around for awhile making miscellaneous edits here and there before I decided to finally create an account, but all those links are quite informative and I appreciate your thoughtfulness. Uncle Sammy 23:55, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added you to the access list at #wikipedia-en-vandalism, so you should be autovoiced next time you enter the channel. // Pathoschild (_admin / ^talk) 06:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I am writing this in regards to "Nazi Mysticism". I reverted it to a version that was actually verified by fact and more worthy of an encyclopedic entry, as opposed to presenting pseudoscientific fiction (without sources) as established fact which was the version to which you reverted back. Please read the article before reverting back to an entry which is clearly more fiction and fantasy than cited and referenced accuracy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.7.166.171 (talk • contribs) }

You did nothing but delete half of the theories, and make the others hopelessly POV. I agree that they are not true, but that's why they're theories, and not facts. And all of those theories are equally crazy, and so they deserve equal representation. In addition, we can't point out how stupid these theories are and call our statements facts, we can only refute them if we clearly note them. Things like "It has been wildly speculated" are things we can't do. Rory096 02:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for reverting my user page. It appears that a supporter of the Adelaide University Engineering Society has an axe to grind.Blnguyen 03:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, no problem. Rory096 03:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how do you get access to the thing that does Reverted edits by blah to previous by blah if you aren't an admin?? I would like to use it rather than clicking on the past edits and manually doing things. Regards, Blnguyen 03:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I believe it's somewhere in here. It's called God Mode Lite. I believe Alphax's script has it, but I'm not positive. Rory096 03:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Wellness for the discussion if you don't agree with the redirect. --CDN99 04:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There should be a consensus before you just redirect a large article. You shouldn't just do it without talking about it first. Rory096 04:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The three of us agreed on the redirect. If you don't agree, please join the discussion. --CDN99 04:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I won't get involved, but did you at least merge the content into the new article? It shouldn't just be deleted, that's a waste, it should be merged. Rory096 04:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but most of the information is duplicated between the two wellness articles. Added some to health [2]. --CDN99 04:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Rory096 04:52, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your revert on WP:AN/I. Sorry, I don't think that actually was vandalism :-). someone wanted us to block a Jimbo Wales impostor. I mistook it for vandalism at first too. Keep up the good work, Alhutch 05:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I really shouldn't be trying to fight vandalism at 12:30 am, it makes me think some crazy stuff. Thanks for reverting it. --Rory096 05:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping an eye on the article, but double-check what you're reverting next time, please. "Skills" was a section I was adding by request for Featured Article status. RasputinAXP _{talk contribs} 12:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean to delete the entire "Honours and Accolades" section? Rory096 15:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I merged them into the body of the article. RasputinAXP _{talk contribs} 15:22, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A big thank you for reverting Ksenon's edits on this page, I've been trying to reason with him but he won't discuss the changes he makes, he just deletes any cited criticism of this conroversial station.--Milicz 17:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi rory - you asked about a source for the sister cities of NYC. An official list can be found here: official NYC government sister cities page. These are also listed on the NYC wikipedia page. The idea is to build up each city's sister city section. 206.15.139.192 02:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for that. I'll revert the edit I made in Jerusalem. Rory096 03:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that page attracts some rather aggressive skepticism. I've cited the references in the reference section, and discussed the concerns on the talk page, pledging to provide page numbers and so forth for specific contested passages, but not until after tomorrow's midterm exam ;) Sam Spade 19:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your vote on AfD Joi Gordon [3] I've presented some evidence about her notoriety under WP:Bio guidelines. Would you be kind enough to review the evidence and consider changing your vote? ---J.Smith 05:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

replied on my talk. —Charles P._(Mirv) 07:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit? It creates an ugly table because of two picture codes that weren't finished? There was a picture with an unfinished picture code sao it said something like blahblah.jpg|left but didn't show the picture. When I finish the code it linked it to a picture higher up (that didn't have an ending making it a table. I re-edited it to get rid of it and you reverted it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark jedi requiem (talk • contribs)

The problem with what you did, is that you just put "Prime Minister," which can refer to many people. Anyway, I fixed that whole formatting problem, but the old caption is still there. Rory096 05:01, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll remember that, thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark jedi requiem (talk • contribs)

Hi again Esperanzians! Well, since our last frolic in the realms of news, the Advisory Council has met twice more (see WP:ESP/ACM2 and WP:ESP/ACM3). As a result, the charter has been ammended twice (see here for details) and all of the shortcuts have been standardised (see the summary for more details). Also of note is the Valentines ball that will take place in the Esperanza IRC channel on the 14th of February (tomorrow). It will start at 6pm UTC and go on until everyone's had enough! I hope to see you all there! Also, the spamlist has been dissolved - all Esperanzians will now recieve this update "newsletter".

The other major notice I need to tell you about is the upcoming Esperanza Advisory Council Elections. These will take place from 12:00 UTC on February 20th to 11:59 UTC on February 27th. The official handing-over will take place the following day. Candidates are able to volunteer any time before the 20th, so long as they are already listed on the members list. Anyone currently listed on the memberlist can vote. In a change since last time, if you have already been a member of the leadership, you may run again. Due to the neutrality precident, I will not vote for anyone.

Yours, as ever, Esperanzially,
--Celestianpower ^háblame 09:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(message delivered by FireFox using AWB on Celestianpower's behalf)

User:Tawker wishes you a happy and fun Valentines Day

• This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Rory096 05:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You sent me a message.

I don't understand it.

grazon 17:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

I was using WP:AWB to substitute templates, and that message was generated to let you know that I substituted templates on your page. --Rory096 19:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Based on what I've seen from you on AfD, I think that you might have something to add to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cart00ney. I'd appreciate you weighing in on the matter in either direction. Savidan 18:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You voted "Merge to Internet slang". The content has recently been added to List of internet slang. Would you consider changing your vote to delete? Savidan 21:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge implies deleting after the content is merged. --Rory096 03:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for handling that revert with 220.*. (He has actually done it 4 times in the last few hours, if he does it again, I'm going to call 3rv on him). JoshuaZ 04:24, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about, but no problem. :) --Rory096 04:25, 16 February 2006 (UTC) (I revert way too much, I should take a wikibreak)[reply]

Hi Rory, thanks for your support in my RFA, which succeeded. If I can ever improve or help in any way, please let me know! :) —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-02-16 12:12Z

I have chosen to withdraw from the project. The 3RR had been punished with a block without warning, and in a very unfair way. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Blocked_unfairly Since it is already some time ago I have the full right to get my pages speedy deleted. 84.59.79.243 17:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC) (formerly Get-back-world-respect)[reply]

Do not edit my user and talk pages. Address me on relevant article pages. Thank you in advance. 68.110.9.62 00:15, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't address you, I reverted your vandalism to your talk page. You're not allowed to erase your warnings. --Rory096 00:17, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Hello Rory096/Archive0, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 98/2/0. If there is anything I can do to help you, please leave me a message on my talk page! -- xaosflux Talk

Thank you!

Hi Rory096/Archive0. On behalf of my right eye, I'd like to thank you for giving me your support on my recent RfA. It ended with a final tally of (73/2/2) and therefore I have been installed as an administrator now, and I'm ready to serve Wikipedians all over the world with my newly acquired mop and bucket. If you have any questions, do not hestitate to forward them to my talkpage. Once again, thanks for your support. SoothingR 20:57, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please consider this edit:[4] I think you warned this user before! Bitola 19:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With apologies for the impersonal AWB-ness of the message... Thanks for your support on my recent request for adminship. It passed at 91/1/0, and I hope I can continue to deserve the community's trust. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you, and if I make a mistake be sure to tell me. My talk page is always open. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're using it - do you like it, and would you suggest improvements? haz _(user talk)^e 20:23, 2 March 2006

I love the tool, really useful. One thing that could be added is a diff tag, immediately going to the last diff, rather than having to go into history and then loading the diff. Just a thought. --Rory096 23:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rory! You reverted an edit to Rockman Strategy and warned the editor about vandalism. In fact, the editor in question had posted about the change on the article's talk page - as we request they do. So it wasn't vandalism (although I believe it was a mistaken edit and have questioned the editor accordingly). Please be careful not to bite the newbie when vandal hunting! We need a constant supply of newbies, and they need education, not whacking! If you have any questions or need any help, please let me know on my talk page. Thanks! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:50, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can you block me for that? it was a valid point on keeping player's of runescape safe from viruses. I guarentee all runescape players will end up searching goole for cheats, and 99.9 percent of those are trojens. I am only keeping them safe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.119.148 (talk • contribs)

It's unencyclopaedic information on cheating, which consensus agrees should not be there. You're also repeatedly adding it under different IPs after being reverted- clearly showing that all you want to do is get your information on cheating into the article. --Rory096 03:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

K, well for one thing this is the only time I posted it. This was actually originally written by somoene else, in an internet forum who just posted what he had contributed, and I noticed it was removed. Fine i'll keep it out, but I don't agree with the "consensus." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.119.148 (talk • contribs)

If you don't agree, then post why on the talk page under the appropriate section. May I ask what the link to that forum is, by the way? Thanks, Rory096 03:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, why did u revert my edit ? SirIsaacBrock 10:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was just a link to an e-store, clearly violating WP:SPAM. --Rory096 18:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for participating in my RfA. It passed with a final tally of 98/13/10, just two short of making WP:100. If you need my help with anything, don't hesitate to ask.

Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, you're probably right. Guess I'm a little old-fashioned about the way I use AfD. :-) Can they be merged, or is it too late now that people have voted? FreplySpang (talk) 04:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I have no idea. I assume you can merge them with a little note in front of each of the votes. It's not like it's a matter of vital importance. --Rory096 04:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that seems to be the lot. Since there's only three, I'm not going to bother. But I'll keep it in mind the next time I run into this situation - thanks for the tip! FreplySpang (talk) 04:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) --Rory096 04:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He forgets to log in much of the time and edits as an anonIP. At least that's my judgement from style and obsession with Rani Mukerji. But I'm just as glad you restored all the scolding -- it's not right for him to try to cover his tracks. Zora 00:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism from my user and talk pages. Rarely have I seen such a tantrum. I've requested the author's web site get a special mention at m:Spam blacklist.-gadfium 03:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) --Rory096 03:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the mistake before you did :) Aucaman^Talk 03:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I saw the mistake right after I saved it. It is now fixed. You still think you had me? Aucaman^Talk 03:56, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Damn Curps bot! --Rory096 20:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to unblock you but Firefox beat me to it... -- Curps 20:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

K, but we have a problem. I ended up getting past your filters. See: User:FireFox --Rory096 20:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do I reply to this person who I think removed my link? —This unsigned comment is by 12.214.202.204 (talk • contribs) .

You mean the link you added into RuneScape, after clearly seeing that it wasn't allowed, and even editing the message telling you that you shouldn't enter links? --Rory096 03:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop blocking me Rory. Make this fair.

You have no reason to block me.

This isn't a forum, people just come here to praise you. —This unsigned comment is by 12.214.202.204 (talk • contribs) .

First of all, I can't block. Second, if you were blocked, you couldn't say anything on my talk page. --Rory096 03:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who decides to grant the ad running site special wiki status? —This unsigned comment is by 12.214.202.204 (talk • contribs) .

I don't know what you're talking about. --Rory096 03:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am talking about the Runescape link. Look at all 5 Runescape fansite links. They all sell ads. Someone wrote, only these 5 can be here. Who decide on those 5 sites that sell ads on how to get rich?

Look at your first post, now do you know what I am talking about? You seem to be the cop here, the one that pulled my link.

Who wrote the message? The one saying don't change it? For all I know, the owners of the money making site wrote it. —This unsigned comment is by 12.214.202.204 (talk • contribs) .

Consensus of editors decided to have those sites, and only those sites, on that article. I am not a cop, nor was I even involved in the original discussion. I've also seen you add your sites to other articles; please stop doing that. --Rory096 03:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was going off what the consensus seemed to be. List of Presidents of the United States, a featured article, is titled similarly, and many of the other List of Governors were titled as such. If it should be lowercase, than all of the lists need to be moved and other similar articles need to be moved. Pepsidrinka 22:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--143.92.1.33 06:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You blanked Pornography, as shown here. --Rory096 06:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. But I didn't do that. I love porn. This is a TAFE computer with lots of possible users of the IP.--143.92.1.33 06:24, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah its an Onkaparinga Institute of TAFE SA in Mount Barker, but its all good.--143.92.1.33 06:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]