Archive (January 29, 2006 to March 16, 2006)

Archive2 (March 16, 2006 to March 26, 2006)

Archive3 (March 26, 2006 to April 5, 2006)

Archive4 (April 5, 2006 to April 21, 2006)

Archive5 (April 21, 2006 to May 3, 2006)

Archive6 (May 4, 2006 to May 21, 2006)

Archive7 (May 22, 2006 to June 5, 2006)

Archive8 (June 5, 2006 to June 22, 2006)

Archive9 (June 22, 2006 to September 8, 2006)

Archive10 (September 8, 2006 to December 23, 2006)

Archive11 (December 23, 2006 to June 26, 2007)

Archive12 (July 2, 2007 to May 31, 2008)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Rougey approves of your kindness to his ego. Just as long as you keep it up. :O Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 05:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

for cleaning the vandalism on my user page (and incrementing the vandal count)! A++. TN‑X-Man 03:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Care to discuss before you revert? I'd like to split the article between the office and the officeholder. I think there is more then enough room for both. Benkenobi18 (talk) 03:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I didn't look into it closely enough to see that it wasn't vandalism (and I saw that you'd just been reverted by AdamBishop). I actually edit conflicted with you while trying to revert myself. Ignore me... --Rory096 03:48, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment on my RFA. Even though I withdrew, it really means a lot to me. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 18:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support, and taking the time to contribute your opinion in the first place. I'll hopefully see yoy again in 6 months or so when i reapply :).

Thanks for the support, and taking the time to contribute your opinion in the first place. I'll hopefully see you again in 6 months or so when I reapply :).

I am not advertising anything and almost all links are to sites other than mine and as stated on the page I HAVE NO AFFILIATION WITH. I have been asked for this page so many times and just wanted to provide information for people coming to Tamarindo. I have even removed the name of my website from the title tags and almost all of the links to other pages in my website. This page is 100 times more relevent than * Tamarindo beachInformation about Playa Tamarindo and surroundings

Have a nice day and once again I couldnt care less about advertising for anyone I am just helping people out and thought i was doing something good. If it was seen the wrong way I have taken steps to minimize that appearance. It eeven has a great running map.. show me one website that has a running map of Tamarindo and people love running there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imblock (talk • contribs) 02:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rory. I don't believe we have met before, so I wish to say hi. On the basis of "too many co-nominators", I do believe it is a point which should be made. Although, I could have explained my position further by emphasising the aspect that it is only something minor. I have worded that part of the neutral badly, and have given a somewhat misrepresentation of my true decision. I included that as part of the neutral because I feel that not resisting co-nominations indicates a likely two things: poor judgement and also demonstrates a likely gap in their knowledge (i.e. not knowing that three is usually the maximum). This point has been brought up in quite a few RfAs, and I feel it should be taken into account. Regards, Rudget (logs) 17:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You posted a final warning to 24.45.22.130 for abuse/vandalism. I think it's time to have that IP (which, if memory serves, is (embarrasingly) Canadian; Rogers@home is the provider) permanently blocked, due to recent vandalism at Diana, Princess of Wales. I'm not sure how to make that happen.. I'm hoping you do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrinceOfCanada (talk • contribs) 03:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! We generally don't permanently block IPs, as the users behind them often change as the addresses are recycled, so we only block them for short periods of time when they're actively vandalizing. In this case, my final warning was over a month ago, so it doesn't really apply anymore (though it may be appropriate to start at a non-first level warning), and the IP only vandalized once today, for which he was appropriately warned. If it continues, or you see something like this in the future, revert the vandalism, give the user the appropriate warning template, starting at number one (or two, in this case, since the IP has a previous history of vandalism), and counting up to 4. Once you get there, if the IP vandalizes again, you can report it at WP:AIV for a block. Thanks! --Rory096 04:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thank you. And very useful to have the template! Sorry for not signing previous comment, btw. Thanks again, Prince of Canada ^{t | c} 04:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:24, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rory096, just to inform you, I've released a long-overdue upgrade to the cactions tool, which you should be able to see already (Ctrl-F5 if not). The tool should still work just as before, although you will need to update your JS to the new configuration system to keep the original tabs functionality; see User:Haza-w/Caction tool for the documentation. If you find any bugs or have any queries or feature requests, please get in touch. Thanks, and enjoy! haz (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:39, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:19, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 00:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered at 04:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Cannabis smoking, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannabis smoking. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Equazcion •✗/C • 21:50, 11 Feb 2009 (UTC) 21:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 5, Issue 7

Weekly Delivery

2009-02-16

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

• Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
• An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
• News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
• Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
• Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
• Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

• Books extension enabled
• News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
• Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

• News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
• Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

Unsubscribe · Single-page · Full edition »

  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a frequent editor of American politics, I would appreciate if you put your two cents into the debate over the conservative support for President Obama in Talk:Public image of Barack Obama. Thanks.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 22:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts. There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]