User talk:Rorshacma
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Good luck
A barnstar for you!
|
The Half Barnstar |
| You have good votes in AfDs so I am giving you this. Cupper52 (talk) 17:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Bold redirect
Hello – I saw that you recently boldly redirected Olivia Johnson – her information should have been moved over to List of Hollyoaks characters (2005) to preserve information. I'll assume good faith since I guess you're not a soap editor, and perhaps didn't know this article didn't exist. Just something to note in case you boldly redirect another soap article in future. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 01:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for that! You are correct, I did not see that particular list, and so just assumed the "Past Character" list was the correct one to redirect to. Rorshacma (talk) 01:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Delsort
Hello, wanted to ask you if you would know why my delsort stopped working. You showed me how to set it up and it was working great until a few hours ago. It suddenly stopped working so I do not know if I did something wrong. I tried a computer restart, a different browser, and nothings seems to work. Looks like nothing has been changed here: User:Lightburst/common.js. Thank you Lightburst (talk) 00:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Lightburst. I think you may have me mixed up with another editor. I actually don't know much about it. Sorry I can't be of more help! Rorshacma (talk) 01:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Doh. Thanks you are right Lightburst (talk) 01:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Re: Covenant
Mind detailing which sources you're talking about here? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 20:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, User:David Fuchs. I was actually talking about some of the sources already present in the article, largely in the "Analysis" section. As those sources are from actual peer-reviewed scholarly journals, and had substantial coverage on the topic, my point was that Piotr's concerns that the article may be AFD-able probably wouldn't work, as those sources would likely be enough for the subject to pass the WP:GNG. I wasn't able to find any good additional sources, unfortunately, but I just was making the comment that the current sources were probably enough that an AFD would probably not succeed. Rorshacma (talk) 20:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. Was hoping you had stuff on hand to make my life easier. :P Cheers! Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Link Force
Morning; I have reported the user here Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, as I don't believe there is any hope of rehabilitation. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 06:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up! Rorshacma (talk) 06:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
List of people on the pastage stamps of Italy
Thankyou for your very helpful and constructive contribution to the discussion on the possible deletion of the article List of people on the postage stamps of Italy.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| For your valuable input at AfDs, I present you The Tireless Contributor Barnstar. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Krakoa for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krakoa (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Nekivik (talk) 04:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
The Magical Moment has been nominated for deletion
The article, The Magical Moment, has been nominated for deletion. You may comment on the nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magical Moment Donald Albury 22:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ZipZoomFly
ZipZoomFly.com aka GoogleGear.com was an important part of early internet history and a popular place to shop before newegg was founded. The lawsuit between them and google.com (alphabet) was a noteworthy case of parody vs trademark. The page is worth keeping because their are lessons to be learned from it's downfall. 47.198.232.143 (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I motion we keep the page active. 47.198.232.143 (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
WMF Research Team
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
WMF Research Team
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Can you reread the Emily Prentiss article?
Just wanted to let you know that I have rewritten much of the Emily Prentiss article in response to your feedback. I'd like to ask if you'd be able to re-evaluate the article to see if it meets the criteria to be kept now. I added a reception section for the article as well.
Emily Prentiss DocZach (talk) 23:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
What do you think about a redirect to Homes for the Homeless? Bearian (talk) 04:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- I was actually considering that myself, but since its not mentioned on the Homes for the Homeless article currently, I figured that a straight redirect should not be done without adding information on the camp to there. And the sources for the camp I could find were so scant, I ultimately decided against it. I am not super opposed to the idea, though, so I am completely open to that being done instead of deleting it. Rorshacma (talk) 04:51, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
This one might be controversial. Just a heads up. Bearian (talk) 04:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)