Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

I'm concerned about the neutrality of this draft as only one candidate is named. If other candidates are already known please add them, if not it is simply too early for this article to be launched.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baltimore mayoral election, 2016 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Jordan Clarkson".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Jordan Clarkson}}, paste it in the edit box at , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using this infobox when you create new female basketball articles. This infobox is being phased out and Template:infobox basketball biography is now being used (same as the men). I have been trying to convert old articles so this box can be deleted and you keep adding new ones as fast as I can do it. Please see the talk page at Wikiproject Basketball for more details. Thank you. Rikster2 (talk) 02:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Synaptol, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Indian River Medical Center, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amador Aguiar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 02:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of career achievements by Bill Russell, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note you ONLY put that if the person is living, I've noticed you put the tag on a few people who are not alive. Wgolf (talk) 01:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a reference does not have to be in <ref> tags. A relevant, reliable source in an infobox, such as all of the NFL.com links, are references. They verify the information. By all means stick a {{no footnotes}} tag on it, even a {{BLP sources}} one, but don't put {{BLP unreferenced}} tags on those pages, it's just wrong. The-Pope (talk) 14:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Eric Moreland".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Eric Moreland}}, paste it in the edit box at , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Satanic film, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you've been adding several biographies such as Rosalind Ross. In the infobox you use {{birth date and age}} to specify the birth date. Please note that this:

• birth_date = {{birth date and age|mf=yes|1980|17|01}} – invalid month

is an error. The format is YYYY|MM|DD. So, if the birthdate in this example is January 17, the month and day are transposed. Please correct these, e.g.:

• birth_date = {{birth date and age|mf=yes|1980|01|17}} – (1980-01-17) January 17, 1980 (age 44)

Thanks! Wbm1058 (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Synaptol".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Synaptol}}, paste it in the edit box at , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "List of career achievements by Bill Russell".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:List of career achievements by Bill Russell}}, paste it in the edit box at , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Indian River Medical Center".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Indian River Medical Center}}, paste it in the edit box at , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:57, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gilimanuk, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 12/12/12 (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12/12/12 (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, I noticed on your user page that you have not received a service award. I checked to see what level you have reached, it's 2 years editing/8000 edits, so I thought you deserved to be able to display this in your userbox. These awards can be given to ourselves, but another editor can award them to you, so this is the level you have attained. Since you have over 24,000 edits, you will move up levels every 6 months until time catches up with edit count.

This editor is a Veteran Editor and is entitled to display this Iron Editor Star.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L235 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Colgate Raiders football players in the NFL Draft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Gilimanuk".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Gilimanuk}}, paste it in the edit box at , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been working on a draft article for Elizabeth Williams:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sphilbrick/Elizabeth_Williams

My draft is more complete than your article although I had not yet completed the high school and college sections. I also have a photograph of her that I took when I met her in Tampa Bay.

Would you mind if I replaced your draft with mine and then ask you to add your section covering the college aspects into my version?--S Philbrick(Talk) 23:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate that. I moved my draft into the article name and moved yours to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:User:Robert4565/Elizabeth_Williams_(basketball)

I would be happy to incorporate the text you included for the college years into the article or I can let you do it so you get credit let me know what you prefer.

I see that you’ve been active adding articles for players and the recent draft who did not have articles. I hope you’ll check out Wikipedia:WikiProject_Basketball/Women's_basketball --S Philbrick(Talk) 12:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reshanda Gray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bret Harte Middle School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted an earlier, also short version because it was created by a sock. He used K. Middleton| Ancestors, Power, and History in Madagascar [1] as a source, thought you might want it. I remember taking a date to the Fontainebleau in 1958 or 1959, when I was a teenager. I was really trying to impress! Doug Weller (talk) 18:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robert - As we have discussed, please use Template:Infobox basketball biography when creating articles for female basketball players and coaches. Template:Infobox WNBA biography is being phased out. Thanks. Rikster2 (talk) 13:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

there is already a redirect to the article cure --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, I don't know for sure what you're getting at with the question you left on my talk page. If I happen to come across an article and notice there is something that needs to be fixed, I fix it. It doesn't matter to me who created the article. I took a quick look at both of our edits over the past while to verify this, and I'm seeing other editors editing the same articles as you do a lot more than I ever did. Since the start of July, I'm not seeing any of your articles that I edited except for the one you thanked me for, but that doesn't even show up because another editor re-directed it. Same for the articles you created in June. It's also quite possible I edited an article you edited without even noticing that you had also edited the article, so I can honestly say no, I'm not looking at every article you created as asked on my talk page. Cmr08 (talk) 02:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis Borkowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Provost. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christy Smith (basketball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NCAA Tournament. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "List of WNBA career scoring leaders".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Women's National Basketball Association career blocks leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tina Charles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Angela Hamblin, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Angela Hamblin to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Stabila711 (talk) 03:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Baltimore mayoral election".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rich^T|C|E-Mail 19:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Medication event monitoring system has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 11:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fort Pierce Central High School, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting together List of Connecticut Huskies in the NFL Draft back in 2014. This was a list I was planning to work on for some time but didn't have/know the sources back in 2012. I've restructured the list and submitted it as a featured list candidate; feel free to add yourself as a co-nom if you wish since you were the one that put together the "meat" of the list. –Grondemar 05:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Stacy Clinesmith. I notice that when you did so you included the {{persondata}} template. I want to let you know that this template is deprecated. I didn't know this or at least not fully understand this until just a couple weeks ago and I was including them in articles I created until a couple weeks ago. In short the preferences to include such data in a Wikidata item. I just created one a few minutes ago and then removed that template. To see the wikidata entry, look on the left side bar and you will see a link to it.

I'm not yet knowledgeable enough about them to walk you through how to create them. User @Dirtlawyer1: has been helping me and if you check out their talk page you'll see a discussion fairly specific about basketball players and coaches.

Thanks for what you are doing, please let me know if I can help with anything.--S Philbrick(Talk) 00:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @Sphilbrick: Just reviewed your newly created Wikidata profile for Stacy Clinesmith, and clearly you have figured out how to create a new profile page and enter the standard fields/parameters. When you get a chance, take a look at the tweaks I made. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 08:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Satanic film, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that when you create a new article for a WNBA player you are including the bbr entry in the INFOBOX template but you seem to be using the same one in each case. Perhaps you aren't sure how it's being used. In fact, until a couple hours ago it didn't work. It now does, but you have to use the bbr_wnba parameter along with the letter parameter.

Let me know if you need more information.--S Philbrick(Talk) 01:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of 1999–2000 NBA season transactions

added links pointing to Charles Jones, Johnny Taylor, Thomas Hamilton, John Starks, Steve Smith, Michael Smith, Jim Jackson, Chris Owens, Mark Davis, Don MacLean, Ben Davis, Michael Hawkins, John Wallace, Marcus Williams, Chris Carr, Carlos Rogers, Tony Smith, Dennis Scott, Terry Davis, Mark West, Michael Wright, Derek Hood, Derek Anderson, Joe Stephens, Jason Hart, Gerald Brown, Wayne Turner and Mamadou N'Diaye

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Amador Aguiar, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to, please take a look at the article Marie Serneholt, which is this weeks TAFI article. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 20:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Amador Aguiar".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. samtar ^{t} 20:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Colgate Raiders football players in the NFL Draft".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:45, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Millennium Plaza Hotel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stemulite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable product

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - HyperGaruda (talk) 09:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mac & Cheese: The Album, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fort Pierce Central High School, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Satanic film, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mac & Cheese: The Album".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Fort Pierce Central High School".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Azealia911 _talk 14:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Satanic film".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago ...

prose improvements
... you were recipient no. 550 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Six years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thanks for dropping by with your question. I checked out the two references in the article and the websites they lead to seem to be rather sensationalist. In particular, one states "The stories on Sword and Scale are solely meant for entertainment purposes and should not be assumed to be fact." This is a bit of a red flag. However, all is not lost: many missing person cases attract the attention of mainstream media organisations, with paid researchers and a commitment to fact-checking. I would start be searching the archives of such news organisations, and referencing them instead of the two private websites used here.

PS: In reality, I did little to research the Jamison family deaths article. Rather, when I came across it, it struck me that the sentence structure and paragraph order could do with some improvement, so I got to work on those.

Hope this helps! —BillC ^talk 18:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of years in Lithuania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List redundant to Category:Years in Lithuania and contains almost exclusively red links.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of years in Lithuania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of years in Lithuania until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Another Demonstration of the Cliff-Guibert Fire Hose Reel, Showing a Young Girl Coming from an Office, Detaching Hose, Running with It 60 Feet, and Playing a Stream, All Inside of 30 Seconds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This movie doesn't actually exist. It was a hoax made on IMDb in 2003 and only IMDb mirrors and user-generated lists refer to the movie at all. The sole review claiming to have seen the movie on IMDb is obviously sarcastic. Zero sources exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SnowFire (talk) 00:44, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Another Demonstration of the Cliff-Guibert Fire Hose Reel, Showing a Young Girl Coming from an Office, Detaching Hose, Running with It 60 Feet, and Playing a Stream, All Inside of 30 Seconds, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 19:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, SENX machine. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Digital scent technology and Electronic nose and Machine olfaction. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Digital scent technology and Electronic nose and Machine olfaction – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DrStrauss talk 19:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Robert4565. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 NBA Summer League, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:09, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Silverman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Silverman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 18:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of years in Georgia (country) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of years in Georgia (country) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:04, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of career achievements by Dwyane Wade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Dwyane Wade (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Bagumba (talk) 04:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of hospitals in Philadelphia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no citations, everything is duplicated in List of hospitals in Pennsylvania. This is really just a list of external links. I would propose a merge, but I feel like all the data is already replicated in List of hospitals in Pennsylvania. Fails WP:NOTLINK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -TG 22:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 8:46 (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#8:46 (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Bagumba (talk) 12:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 8:46 (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8:46 (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Bagumba (talk) 07:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of years in the Maldives has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnecessary list -- most of the articles are redlinks where the years had no particular significance to the country

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of years in North Macedonia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

another of the LISTPURP/LISTN-failing 'list of years in X' articles that are mostly redlinks without article potential

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 23:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of years in San Marino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

another of the LISTPURP/LISTN-failing 'list of years in X' articles that are mostly redlinks without article potential

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert4565. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Satanic film".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012 NBA Summer League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 NBA Summer League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User:Namiba 18:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of career achievements by Kevin Durant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Kevin Durant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 00:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of career achievements by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 00:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]