According to the MoS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Spelling_and_romanization), "if there is a common English form of the name (Tchaikovsky, Chiang Kai-shek), use that form instead." Sohn Won-yil is the case. It was romanized as since 1940s. See the caption for the picture of the following link as an example: https://www.trumanlibrary.org/photographs/view.php?id=25589

As the google search on the name shows, that romanisation for that name is not "common". Rhialto (talk) 11:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is because there are many 손원일s. But here we are talking about one unique person, 손원일 (born in 1909), who happened to spell his name as Sohn Won-yil. Do google search for Lee Seungman (이승만). there are 1,240,000 results. And do the same for Syngman Rhee, then there are 273,000 results. The number is smaller, but the president 이승만, did spell his name as Syngman Rhee, which is not a systematically romanized name. And the wiki article is under the name of Syngman Rhee.

Please discuss this on the relevant page for the article. And feel free to use a wikipedia signature. Rhialto (talk) 11:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice edits on that article. So do you like the song? :) Mushin^talk 16:12, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please indicate why you don't think it will be a blue-water navy in the future on the talk page. I have read plenty of reports that indicate it's going that way. Do you think the new DDH is just for fun? John Smith's 14:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made changes in the blue water navy discussion section. Check it out.

Describing Viraat as "old and unreliable" strikes me as both POV and probably less-than-factual in any case. On the other hand, describing her as "modernised and refurbished" is also an opinion and POV. Therefore, I think it would be more appropriate to term it a "2nd generation aircraft carrier," rather how FS De Gaulle or the Italian carrier (although she is older than those) is decribed. None of those units are possibly a match for Stennis or Truman and they dont claim to be, but they are powerful units in thier own right. Also, to be honest, you don't need a Stennis or Truman or even a De Gaulle to maintain air superority over Pakistan or Bangledesh , which is the primary function of Viraat Cheers V. Joe 14:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My original text was to note it as having been out of service for repairs, giving exact amount of time comissioned and amount of time under repair, and letting the reader form their own conclusion. Our Indian friend refused ot let that stand, saying it was too wordy. Since that level of detail is precise and neutral (no one has yet claimed it was pov), I7ll put it back that way. Rhialto 14:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with a WIKI arbitration on the India-Pakistan section of FN CHarles de Gaulle. There is a user who keep on reverting to claims that are (in my opinion) not WIKI rules. Please arbitrate. I do not know how to call for an arbitration. Thanks. 217.136.68.138 23:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm taking a break from anything to do with wet navies, and especially disputes, at least until after Guy Fawkes Night. Rhialto 23:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(If you wish) There is a Straw Poll in the discussion page of the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier, can you kindly participate and if you have other persons who can provide an unbiased opinion that can help. Thanks a lot. Natobxl

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Pace (measurement) Alembic Ancient Indus Valley units of measurement Ancient Persian units of measurement Obsolete Scottish units of measurement Shaftment Finger (unit) Peck Palm (unit) Hand (unit) Household deity Beard-second Macedonian cubit Sat.1 Digit (unit) Oba Formica (plastic) Yardstick Oya

Cleanup Saitama, Saitama Shunpiking New Utopia Merge God's Debris SI derived unit Ping-pong ball conundrum Add Sources Second happy time Cedilla HMS Vengeance (R71) Wikify Jimmy Wilde Unassociated measurement report Special Forces of India Expand Pegu Weights and Measures Special Duties Unit Cruiser Squadron

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there; I am sorry, I had no wish to offend you or anyone else. As the edit log shows, I did wait six minutes before adding the tag. May I respectfully suggest that, if you are creating an article which may involve some pauses for thought, you insert at the top of the page the template {{underconstruction}}? This will indicate that you are still working; I am sure you are aware that a lot of less serious editors do create articles of only a few words with no intention of adding to them. Happy wikying.--Anthony.bradbury 21:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted on the article talk page about why I tagged the article. Kncyu38 05:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied there. Kncyu38 13:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took our discussion into consideration and boldly edited the article, please have a look and let me know if you're happy with it. Kncyu38 07:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work with the table on Light_year! Kncyu38 23:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only units named after an individual such as Newton, Pascal, Amp, Volt etc are capitalized. All others are lowercase. 23:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Over on Conversion of units, the bot converted cental (a unit name) to central, which isn't the same thing at all. Rhialto 03:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rhialto, I'll make a note of it so it doesn't happen again. Cheers, Cmdrjameson 09:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I write to you because I have read your contributions for the RfC for the name of the article Case Closed/Detective Conan (Currently archived at Talk:Case Closed/Name dispute discussions#Comments. A page move request has been made to move the page (and 11 related pages) to Detective Conan; please comment it on Talk:Case Closed#Requested Move.--Samuel Curtis^{Shinichian-Hirokian}-- _{TALK·CONTRIBS} 13:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to inform you that the maltese Wikiproject is up and running. You signed at the wikiproject proposals, so, if you are still interested, you would be a valued addition to the project. Please sign here if still interested. Thanks, Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 01:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rhialto, I would like to thank you for joining WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort that aims to improve, write, expand and organise material related to the island nation of Malta. We currently need as many members as we can get, and you are a valued addition to the list of members. Please see our To-Do list if you would like to further contribute to the project, or help construct our project page. If you have any questions, or require assistance, then please contact me at my talk page. Thankyou, Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 06:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC) (founder)[reply]

On the basis of the discussion at WikiProject Council, I have been BOLD and set up WikiProject Measurement. I hope you are still interested and that you will join the discussion as to how to progress from here. Best wishes, Physchim62 (talk) 11:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In the process of adding a foreign language link to the light-year page, your bot seems to have randomized the alphabetical order of the foreign language links. Rhialto 14:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm afraid it's you who randomized it by your changes. My bot put the links in a strictly alphabetical order... Have a look at the page now please .Benoni 00:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The current version looks sorted because I edited it. Here's some of teh source from your bot's last version...

ang:Lēohtgēar ar:سنة ضوئية ast:Añu lluz bn:আলোক বর্ষ zh-min-nan:Kng-nî be:Сьветлавы год

I fail to see how zh fits between bn and be in alphabetical sorting order.

Rhialto 05:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was sorted before you edited it. Now it is not sorted anymore!Benoni 15:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

zh-min-nan:Kng-nî is for Ban-lam-gu... It is not the code which is important but the name of the language.Benoni 15:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as how the name of the languages are written in a multitude of different scripts, it makes no sense to sort by that data field. Russian/Chinese/Arabic/Thai characters cannot be meaningfully be sorted amongst English letters. [[1]] suggests that sorting by the 2-letter code is a perfectly valid approach. Rhialto 16:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, but you should read it entirely:

"There are numerous way to sort the interlanguage links. The preference is for sorting according to either the two-letter language abbreviation or the name of each language in that language. The vast majority of articles are currently sorted the second way: by order of alphabet, based on local language, as described at m:Interwiki sorting order, so new articles should be sorted in that way." And all the bots on this wikipedia (and in the other languages as well) are programmed to sort that way. So the next bot going on this page will sort it again the way my bot did...Benoni 23:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fine then. ill leave sorting to the bots, since they are obviously more intelligent than me Rhialto 07:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear member of WikiProject Malta, I'd like to invite you to participate in an ongoing Article for Deletion debate about St John's Square in the capital of Malta. We'd like your input about whether the article should stay and go (and if you want to expand the stub, that would be great too!) All the best, Eliz81^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - got a bit carried away, and didn't want to make a further edit re: WP:3RR rule
Mariya Oktyabrskaya 16:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

like... oh my god! how come you reverted ALL of my edits to the maltese language page? im sure that it was not possible for all of them to be wrong! omg i spent ages on that! you cant just get rid of the whole lot Iamandrewrice 19:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In a book i have. release of 51, in Russian, it's called Russian Premiership: History of Russian science, they notice that a Russian system existed since ancient Rus. They haven't invented during Peter, but only adjusted it to the English. In the version you reverted to you get the impresion that they simply copied it from the English. Look what i wrote there. Log in, log out (talk) 12:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that revision looks fine. Rhialto (talk) 12:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently an ongoing debate about whether the articles on Maltese villages should be given their English names. Kyarichy has already gone and renamed a bunch of articles such as as Kalkara citing these changes from an old obsolete paper and http://www.geody.com, even though these names are no longer in use.

The naming conventions clearly state that foreign location names commonly used in English should be used as the article names.

It would be appreciated if you could assist us in this discussion. ~ ► Wykebjs ◄ (userpage | talk) 11:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't indiscriminately delete when you haven't been following the history of the discussion. That taklk page has been plagued by an anonymous IP ranter about the genetic inferiority of evil European Jews for a number of months, and it would have been much better to just revert his recently-added rant, rather than deleting a whole section which contains some perfectly legitimate comments. AnonMoos (talk) 14:33, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's your opinion on adding the Russian Navy into operational blue water navy?Chanakyathegreat (talk) 13:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In which article? Rhialto (talk) 15:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean Blue-water navy, then no. Ballistic missile submarines are effective tools for controlling land (or at least, for control foreign policy with threats of ballistic missile strikes), but not for controlling contested waters. Their sole aircraft carrier has a history of reliability issues. Rhialto (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rhialto! Could you maybe help me out: I would like to know if the Maltese language exhibits any roots with five or more consonants – also if they only exist only in slang. If it does, are these roots inflected as verbs, as nouns, as adjectives etc.? Are these inflections problematic? How does the National Council for the Maltese Language address these roots? How do speakers of Maltese regard these roots? Any information (and many examples!) would be greatly appreciated! Please write me . Thanks very much, Dan ☺ 12:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this because you have commented on either Autogynephilia, Homosexual transsexual, or Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence theory in the past two years; all such commenters have received this notice. It has been proposed to merge these three articles to eliminate WP:Redundancy, WP:UNDUE, WP:POV, and to keep the focus on the specific Blanchardian theory of M2F transsexuality (in contrast to Transsexual sexuality, which would be to focus on the subject in general). Please feel free to comment on the proposal at Talk:Autogynephilia#Merger proposal. -- 70.57.222.103 (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is regarding my change that you have undone on Feb 20th with comment "Undid revision 596300596; actually, it does: http://www.iau.org/science/publications/proceedings_rules/units/" -

The content of this IAU site is either inaccurate or more likely obsolete. As an example - Astronomical Unit has an exact definition in metres (149,597,870,700m as of 2012) but the site shows old incorrect approximate value. It has the same inaccurate data for Parsec. So, my comment is accurate that lightyear and AU have exact definitions in metres. That is not (yet) true for Parsec. Even PI (3.14...) Parsec is approximately (but not exactly) equal to 180x60x60=648000 au, because Tan(1sec) is approximately (but not exactly) equal to 1". This makes AU and lightyear different from Parsec in terms of exact vs. approximate value in SI metres. Let me know if you still disagree or need more information - Wikipedia pages on AU and lightyear have accurate data and substantiating evidence and I can provide more if needed.

Please revert your-Feb 20th-undone and add my comment back into the page. Thanks.

--- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.71.214 (talk) 02:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no fault with your recent correction to the parsec article - in English-language countries, 10^12 km is indeed a "trillion km" and not a "quadrillion km" although it is a "quadrillion (or 10^15) m". The problem is that, in most countries where English is NOT the principle language, a quadrillion is 10^24 instead of 10^15, a trillion is 10^18 instead of 10^12, and a billion is 10^12 instead of 10^9, as noted in long and short scales. Hence the recommended solution is to use either an appropriate thousand / million combination (such as "31 million million km") or, even better, a less-wordy SI prefix as is already done in the next paragraph ("30.857 petametres" or Pm). In fact, the Spanish, who in numbers use a period for our comma and vice versa, call the parsec "30.857 mil millones kilómetros" (30,857 thousand million km). Although admittedly, you'll still see the American press refer to Congress as currently dealing with a "$14 trillion" deficit and neither a "$14 million million" or a "14 teradollar" deficit. Those reporters are not the Wikipedians we are. —— Glenn L (talk) 12:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. I really feel those people who don't have English as their first language have every opportunity to use localised versions of WP in their own language. The English WP is written for people whose native language is English. WP is primarily a facts repository, not a language-learning tool, and so should not need to be simplified to account for non-native speakers, especially since WP also exists 9or can exist) in many other languages, including theirs. Rhialto (talk) 20:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your recent change to the TEU article, I wonder whether it might be better to use a consistent number of significant figures as below rather than the currently inconsistent 1 or zero decimal places since, as is stated in the article, "the TEU is an inexact unit, and hence cannot be converted precisely into other units."

TEU capacities for common container sizes

Length	Width	Height	Approximate Volume	TEU
20 ft (6.1 m)	8 ft (2.44 m)	8.5 ft (2.6 m)	1,360 cu ft (39 m3)	1
40 ft (12.2 m)	8 ft (2.44 m)	8.5 ft (2.6 m)	2,720 cu ft (77 m3)	2
45 ft (13.7 m)	8 ft (2.44 m)	8.5 ft (2.6 m)	3,060 cu ft (87 m3)	2[1] or 2.25
48 ft (14.6 m)	8 ft (2.44 m)	8.5 ft (2.6 m)	3,264 cu ft (92 m3)	2.4
53 ft (16.2 m)	8 ft (2.44 m)	8.5 ft (2.6 m)	3,604 cu ft (100 m3)	2.65
High cube
20 ft (6.1 m)	8 ft (2.44 m)	9.5 ft (2.9 m)	1,520 cu ft (43 m3)	1[2]
Half height
20 ft (6.1 m)	8 ft (2.44 m)	4.25 ft (1.30 m)	680 cu ft (19 m3)	1[2]

Your thoughts would be appreciated over at Talk:Twenty-foot equivalent unit. Thanks. Longwayround (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we should expand other navies.. Srikar Kashyap (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The class=wikitable has another problem, with the narrowed width reduced to 98%. I have updated the essay text and added an example in essay "wp:98 percent table width anomaly". If wikitables are nested, then the 98% width leaves margin space for an outer table. However, for large tables, the 98% width should be overridden by style="margin-right:0" or such, to allow more space per WP:ACCESS for readers with narrow windows and larger text size. Thanks for asking about this issue. -Wikid77 (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.

• Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent.
• If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
• Credo would love to hear feedback at WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
• Show off your Credo access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Credo_userbox}} on your userpage
• If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name here

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Adepts of Hermes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – MrX 17:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes delete. It was created by a strange accident involving clumsiness and a cat. Rhialto (talk) 18:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.

• If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
• If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com

If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see that you are a member of WikiProject Malta. I've found a few non-RS that state that Madeleine Collinson has died. I'd like to include her death in the article but would also like a reliable source to back it up with. Her article states that she moved back to Malta at some point. Do you know of a Maltese reliable source that might mention her death? As I said, I can't find one in English. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 06:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was not put in as a reference. WP: 3rr. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

wp:el ;-) Rhialto (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you're well meaning enough, but it does create less needless work for the rest of us if you look things up before you "correct" them. "Stade" is not only an English word, it's four separate ones. (Of which the primary is the anglicized form of the Greek stadion which is not identical to the Old English furlong, which was based on a separate rod/acre system.) Granted, it's increasingly common to simply leave the Greek untranslated, but go run the numbers at Google Scholar and ngram and post it to the talk page. — LlywelynII 15:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"stade" exists only as an archaic and obsolete anglicisation of the ancient Greek unit that nowadays is translated as the stadion. It has no more place in a modern encyclopaedia as words such as "verily" or "forsooth". Which is to say, only when writing an article about the word itself. Rhialto (talk) 13:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * A traditional [[Kan (Korean unit of length)]] unit of length and/or area]] used in Korean Joseon Era buildings

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Wikid77 (talk) here. Thank you for noting how {{convert}} is very difficult for showing precise conversion definitions ([2]). Per the discussion, I have created a prototype template {xconvert} to show exact conversions, as User:Wikid77/Template:Xconvert. For precise conversions, this "xconvert" will show 1 inch as 2.54 cm, 1 US gallon as 128 oz, 1 mile as 1.609344 km or 1 metre (39.370078740157 in), and 1 mile (160,934.4 cm) not as now "160,000 cm". Other examples for the proposed "{xconvert}" template:

• {{xconvert|1|m|ft}} —>
• {{xconvert|1|uspt|ml}} —>
• {{xconvert|1|km|mi}} —
• {{xconvert|1|atm|psi}} —>
• {{xconvert|14.7|psi|kPa}} —>
• {{xconvert|1|AU|km}} —>

See more examples at: User:Wikid77/Template:Xconvert. -Wikid77 (talk) 18:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found your name at Category:User js (probably because you posted the corresponding userbox on your user page), in the level-unspecified list of JavaScript programmers.

I was wondering how experienced you are at JavaScript, and whether you might be interested in getting involved with developing user scripts, hobnobbing with other JavaScript programmers, and organizing and improving JavaScript articles and support pages.

We do all of that and more at the JavaScript WikiProject.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library. If you know of any good ones, please add them.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 16:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]