Hi எ! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 18:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@InterstateFive Thank you! எ (talk) 18:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the welcome!

Desireofdogs (talk) 03:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Desireofdogs Thx :) எ (talk) 12:32, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plantman, I'd like to explain why I reverted your edit to Carbon tetraiodide. Whether CI₄ is organic or inorganic is something of a grey area. Some chemists require a compound to have a C–H bond or a C–C bond to be considered organic, whereas others do not. This is discussed at Tetrahalomethane and Organic compound#Modern classification and ambiguities. It is not unreasonable to consider CI₄ as inorganic, even if not everyone agrees. For that reason, I think it's better to keep it in Category:Inorganic carbon compounds as this helps people find the article. If you want the article to discuss the ambiguity, the best thing is to start a thread on the talk page and notify WT:CHEM.

Ben (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ben

Thanks for the message, I'll keep it in mind. Plantman (talk) 17:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I note your edit summary on Gag name removing the tag "disambiguation needed". If the link to Mike Hunt is meant to link to a specific person then please link to their article - if a link to the disambiguation is best then please follow the format at WP:INTDAB.— Rod ^talk 12:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed Plantman (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beryllium nitride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Base. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, some time ago you removed my picture of sodium bisulfite claiming that it is not a valid substance because it can only exist in a solution. I found it strange because I wouldn't have mistakenly photographed a substance. So today I went in lab to look for the original bottle from which I took it. I found the bottle, it's a bit old, but it's labeled as "sodium sulfite - acidic (NaHSO₃); pure." So I wanted to ask you for some possible explanations (not just because of removing MY photo, but also from a professional standpoint). If you would be so kind, could you also provide a source for your claim that sodium bisulfite occurs only in solutions? I apologize, but I'm currently only a high school-level chemist and especially I don't have expertise in inorganic chemistry. Thank you # Milda_444. Milda 444 (talk) 23:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies Milda, I used an unreliable source for my revert. You are right and I'll undo the edit Plantman (talk) 21:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your honest work. With best regards. Milda 444 (talk) 09:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

:) Plantman (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]