Hello, Phauly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia, How to edit a page, Help pages, Tutorial, How to write a great article, Manual of Style. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! . Shell ^babelfish 15:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry to take so long to reply to your message. It's convention at Wikipedia to leave new messages at the bottom of the page, and as I was moving country at the start of September, I didn't see your message until now!

Have you tried the updated URL, http://toolserver.org/~verisimilus/Scholar ? Let me know if you continue to encounter problems.

Glad you find the tool useful! Best wishes,

Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 01:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a test done by myself on signature formatting. --217.77.80.29 (talk) 12:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Phauly, how can I look up for templates here in Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Morail (talk • contribs) 12:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

test --phauly (talk) 15:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

f4deaba4ba4cb545a87cd1981772cbba —Preceding unsigned comment added by SamantaGhezzi (talk • contribs) 15:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you forgot the needle. --Flominator (talk) 17:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Now I understand how it works ;) --phauly (talk) 20:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi, thanks for your kind words. I am working in extreme time pressure to submit a long delayed book (ironically, also on timing in modern society) and I will zero in on Wikimania presentation at the last minute, alas :( Pundit|utter 15:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yes very ironical but I understand ;( I'm going to steal some more of your time by pointing you to this video I recently blogged about. It's about time  ;) http://www.gnuband.org/2010/06/15/the_secret_powers_of_time_how_to_present_effectively/ --phauly (talk) 18:04, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sciaoooooo. --Akoha37 (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Phauly,

Yea, and I realized that what the researcher has is not what I would like to have. I want to see the deleted content to possibly rebuild it, they can just see the history of deletion. Unfortunately, WP does not offer this right alone. Thank you for answering... although I'm curious, where did you see that? - Theornamentalist (talk) 11:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phauly. You have new messages at GorillaWarfare's talk page.
Message added 17:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yes, just say you're doing a survey! I'm sure the majority of people won't mind. We all fill out gender/race surveys all the time, at least in the U.S. Some people won't respond, but that's to be expected. And good luck! I'll be very curious to see the results of you research. (Oh, and add country of origin if you don't know already. I'd be curious to see the array of who's from where.) jengod (talk) 16:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jengod! I'll let you know the results as soon as I get something! About country, I agree this is an interesting bit of info but we don't want to put too much into the survey for now. Thanks again! --phauly (talk) 07:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.

Hi! I'm Liria Veronesi (User:Akoha77) and, together with Paolo Massa (User:Phauly), I'm starting an empirical research on "Gender and votes in requests for adminship". For this reason, we need to know the gender of Wikipedians who were candidated to become admins.

We tried looking for the templates User:UBX/male and User:UBX/female but only 4 admins use it. We also used the API for getting the gender field in the profile but, out of 1744 admins, only around 400 have filled this field. But we would benefit from a larger coverage, i.e. possibly knowing the gender of 100% of candidates.

So, after asking for advise to 3 admins and receiving 2 positive replies (1 and 2), we decided to try to ask directly to Wikipedians.

Thus, would you be so kind to write your gender [Male / Female / Other], together with a text comment if you want, on my talk page at User_talk:Akoha77? If you prefer to send me this information privately, you can send me an email, the information will be kept confidential and never shared.

Thanks! Akoha77 (talk) 12:34, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phauly. You have new messages at West.andrew.g's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

We're wrapping up the democratic rules approval process. Please see Wikipedia:Trading card game/Action plan/Phase 1:Rules/Rules approval‎ and review the ruleset. If no changes are made to it within 7 days, then we will proceed next week with the card nomination and approval process.

If you are no longer interested in helping out with the project, please remove your name from the participants list.

Thanks! Bob the Wikipedian ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that you've added yourself to our memberlist, but to the "inactive members" category (I am not sure if that was your intention?). You do quality for semi-active, I believe :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks ! iindeed it was not my intention! ;) I moved myself in the semi-active list, thanks! --phauly (talk) 10:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Phauly! I just created an userbox for couchsurfing wikipedians. I was wondering if it would interest you: {{User:UBX/couchsurfing}}

Cheers, Waldir ^talk 21:56, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks but I'm a dormient couchsurfing ;) --phauly (talk) 12:03, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I find cultural/epistemological differences across Wikipedia versions fascinating, so I was excited to stumble upon Manypedia. It's an great tool, and made for a very interesting class activity and subsequent assignment which you saw. Since coming across it I've wanted to make time to explore its seemingly great potential for research (both as a tool and object of study). Needless to say, I'd love to open a dialogue. Were there one or two articles in particular that caused you to see a need for something like Manypedia?

PS: I moved your original message from User_talk:RM395 to User_talk:Rhododendrites (the account I use for editing, research activities...really everything other than the class). --RM395 (talk) 04:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]