Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Siamese crocodile has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Siamese crocodile was changed by Pescavelho (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958112 on 2016-07-04T12:16:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 12:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My citations were taken directly from the Wiktionary page about the etymology of "Éire", they're not "original research" by any stretch of the imagination. Pescavelho (talk) 12:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary is an open Wiki and as a result is not a reliable source. Canterbury Tail talk 13:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not using Wiktionary itself as a source, I'm citing the sources cited in that Wiktionary page, which are from reputable dictionaries (better than the current source used in Republic of Ireland, which cites a tourism website). I don't get what the issue is (actually I do, you saw that I made a sizeable edit and reflexively reverted it, under the admittedly noble intention of wanting to stop potential vandalism) but if you need more sources I can provide more sources, or better yet, taking it to the Talk page of the respective articles. Pescavelho (talk) 13:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zoroaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magician. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pescavelho. Thank you for your work on Bkashag. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this variant spelling isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First you placed the spammed sources wrong, it's for "Assadist Syria" which isn't prominently used (also dubious sources imo). Otherwise, the Syrian regime has almost same usage as the Assad regime (see talkpage ngrams). Syrian regime was a synonymous derogatory term to the Assad regime. So reconsider your edit imo. Beshogur (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

look Beshogur (talk) 22:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly: the name "Assadist Syria" and the multiple sources backing it up were already in the article, I simply shuffled them to the appropriate place instead of them being all crammed at the beginning, so you're barking at the wrong tree. I don't mind "Assadist Syria" being removed from the article, if anything I support it given both a lack of usage and the fact that it seems to imply that "Assadism" is an ideology like Baathism is.

Secondly: my main objection is that the term "Syrian regime" is too vague. All it does is denote incumbency, if the new government sticks around for as long as the Assad regime did, who's to say people won't start calling it the "Syrian regime" as well? Pescavelho (talk) 01:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that user just took all sources mentioning "Assadist Syria". No single newspaper have used this since years maybe. Beshogur (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pescavelho

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bunnypranav and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Yemen-Taizz, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 20 § Yemen-Taizz.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bunnypranav}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]