Welcome!

Hello, Pemilligan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  HighInBC 20:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Society for the Preservation of Beers from the Wood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Ravenswing  16:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Society for the Preservation of Beers from the Wood, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for the Preservation of Beers from the Wood. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  Ravenswing  19:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've uploaded File:SPBW shield.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: removing the einsiders.com citations in Wentworth Miller but leaving the cited quotes. I will note the quotes as unsourced. 842U (talk) 11:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that - I couldn't figure out for the life of me what was wrong with that reference! -Dewelar (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I could help. -- Pemilligan (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for continuing to watch and fix Collis Potter Huntington. Do you have any idea why a series of anonymous users, or maybe one user with different IP addresses, constantly puts CPH's birthday to April from October? Is there anything we can do about it? Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know more than what's on the talk page. Apparently there is some disagreement in available records, though there does seem to be a stronger case for October. -- Pemilligan (talk) 00:57, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to "the definitive biography" (Collis Potter Huntington, by Cerinda W. Evans, 2 volumes, Publisher: Newport News, Va. : Mariners' Museum (1954) ASIN: B0056PIFGU) which was written from family materials at the request of the family, it's October. I have no idea where the April date came from, it looks like an old typo that keeps getting repeated.Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:10, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Anonymous edited again. And left a message to my note on the previous ISP. I changed the page again... Checked that I got all the birthdays correct throughout entire document. Is there anyone to appeal to for help to stop this? Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found the page on disruptive editing, read the advice for dealing with disruptive editors, and made an entry at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents seeking help. Let's hope for the best. -- Pemilligan (talk) 02:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Ellin Beltz (talk) 09:19, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now archived here. -- Pemilligan (talk) 04:09, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If one or more unregistered users continue to remove "heckler" and registered users leave it alone, it might help to seek {{pp-semi}} semi-protection. I added a little local color from 1972 to the article. —Anomalocaris (talk) 04:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just for info, [1] page semi'd for one month. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 20:48, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I had seen it. Thanks. -- Pemilligan (talk) 00:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About this edit

That was not a good edit. Firstly it reverted other changes made too, and those were beneficial changes. Secondly you said "Text says Columbia but references give Ellicott City address and census map says West Friendship." - So why did you not cite new sources? The address "10910 Clarksville Pike (Route 108) Ellicott City, MD 21042" and the map http://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/dc10map/GUBlock/st24_md/place/p2419125_columbia/DC10BLK_P2419125_002.pdf (a stub sticking out "That says "Dist 3, West Friendship 90236" is the one that has the physical offices of the district and that is a part of Columbia CDP) show it as being in Columbia as of 2010 - While there is a West Friendship, Maryland it is not a CDP defined by the US government.

You should understand that USPS city names sometimes don't reflect the actual locations - the USPS city name says "Ellicot City" but the map shows it being in Columbia WhisperToMe (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I posted a query under the Village Pump. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#.22Image.22_display_anomaly. We'll see what happens there I guess (if anything). Having said that, they are having some kind of general display problem "until the 9th", but whether it affects this or not, I cannot say. Student7 (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pemilligan,

You will recognize me as the person who has recently edited the elder scrolls page. While I am new to Wikipedia editing, I would ask that you please explain to me your reversion of my edits to the elder scrolls page. I may seem unqualified to make such edits, but I am the son of one of the writers who worked under Emil Pagliarulo (who you may or may not recognize as the head of writing for Skyrim) and have had my fathers assistance in making these edits. I am not saying that your edits were made incorrectly (although my father is inclined to believe so) but I would at least like to know why. When your read this, please contact me at stevethemonkey42@gmail.com

Sincerely,

Stevethemonkey42 Stevethemonkey42 (talk) 04:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information should come from reliable published sources. What you added at the end of the article was unsourced and seemed like original research. What you're describing above sounds like primary sourcing, which should only be used with care. -- Pemilligan (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may not like my response, but a rude email (included below) isn't the way to respond.

From: Stevethemonkey42 <stevethemonkey42@gmail.com>

Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2014 12:10 AM

Subject: Wikipedia email

You fuck

--

This email was sent by user "Stevethemonkey42" on the English Wikipedia to user "Pemilligan". It has been automatically delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its contents.

The sender has not been given the recipient's email address, nor any information about his/her email account; and the recipient has no obligation to reply to this email or take any other action that might disclose his/her identity. If you respond, the sender will know your email address. For further information on privacy, security, and replying, as well as abuse and removal from emailing, see <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Email>.

-- Pemilligan (talk) 12:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed that you reverted my edit on Tri-City Suns twice now, and I was hoping that you could explain what was wrong with my edit, so we don't start an edit war or something. spiderjerky (talk) 14:10, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned in the previous edit summary, the Tri-City Suns never played in the American Professional Basketball League according to any reliable sources I can locate. The Atlantic Coast Professional Basketball League changed its name after they played, which I've added to the text this time. I also made a change I've been meaning to for some time, indicating that there are no sources I've been able to find that show they played at all after 2011. -- Pemilligan (talk) 15:48, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks. spiderjerky (talk) 18:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had a litle chat with Ferret and we cleared things out, you can see the discussion on his talk page, DONT revert this change unless you want to get reported too 90.144.32.15 (talk) 06:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you think something on Wikipedia needs to be reported, you should always feel free to do so. As to your first point, clearly Ferret does not agree with you any more than I do. -- Pemilligan (talk) 12:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See: Talk:History_of_Maryland#Timeline_of_Maryland. -- M2545 (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Wikipedia:Red link, on how red links indicate "that an article should be created for the topic because the subject is notable and verifiable". -- M2545 (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of websites, is Amazon.com really a work? Amazon.com is not italicized in its own article. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 04:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, Amazon.com and Peace Corps Online are the websites, not the publishers. -- Pemilligan (talk) 01:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pemilligan,

Perhaps you can help suggest relevant incoming links for Moveable Feast (organization) ?

Thanks very much for your ideas and input,

— Cirt (talk) 00:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an explanation of the edits:

• 1. Wikipedia pages are meant to document history, and the past. Keep in mind the school closed very recently (2016!)
• 2. Even though the school is not in Alexandria proper it had a postal address of "Alexandria, Virginia" (8333 Richmond Highway Alexandria, VA 22309) so the average person is going to expect that it be there.

Readers expect such information in their articles and I do my best to fulfill that demand. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Milacki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pemilligan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you're undoing all my changing of links from Pelham Parkway to Pelham Parkway (road) since the latter was a redirect. I've moved the page back to Pelham Parkway (road) in order to distinguish from Pelham Parkway (neighborhood), Bronx. This naming convention is seen in Gun Hill Road (road), so that is why the redirect exists. Thanks, epicgenius (talk) 02:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I moved it back because the parkway is the primary topic of the name "Pelham Parkway". epicgenius (talk) 02:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited California's 27th State Senate district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Pollock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, since you suggested it on Talk:Kevin Deutsch, I've headed back to ANI. Ugh, such a time burner, having to compile diffs and all... if you can comment as someone else who has observed the article, it'd be appreciated. SnowFire (talk) 04:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pemilligan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NHL outdoor games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notre Dame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for changing the color of the 2012 independent Senate candidate from Green to yellow. There was a libertarian in the race who got 1.2% of the vote. I have no strong opinion about whether or not that should be included in the chart. It's not inconsequential, but given the low performance (up from 0% in previous election), I wonder if it's necessary. What do you think? Activist (talk) 23:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that, too. I'd like to see it included, but I'm concerned it will make the table too cramped.--Pemilligan (talk) 01:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Gorman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Healy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew J. Ekonomou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State prosecutor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, South Philadelphia High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Pemilligan (talk) 03:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Pemilligan,

I was wondering if you could help me fill in some of the bare references for the Earl Holliman Wiki page. I tried myself but I'm having a bit of trouble, it would be much appreciated. Thank you for your time/consideration.Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 17:10, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Black BIC Ballpoint: OK, I've used the reFill tool on that page and it was able to combine some duplicate references and apply Template:Cite web a couple of times. It looks like there are further opportunities to apply templates, and the several references titled "Archived copy" should have their actual titles inserted. -- Pemilligan (talk) 03:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pemilligan.

You made an edit to the Schuylkill and Susquehanna Navigation Company article, the "See also" section. Your summary was "/* See also */ MOS:ALSO calls for "a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent" which none of this was..." The style manual notes that Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent, when the meaning of the term may not be generally known, or when the term is ambiguous. I am working on several early Pennsylvania canals that all tied in with each other. The Schuylkill canal article had what I thought was a very useful "see also' section that explained what the various other related canals were. The value to the reader was in the various canals that had part of the same name in them (Delaware and Schuylkill). I made changes to the other articles along the same lines as the Schuylkill canal article. The "see also" section in that article was created by User:Fabartus in 2016. There have been roughly thirty edits since then by other editors and it could be argued that the "see also" material passed consensus at that time. Since you are now an editor in this group of articles on early Pennsylvania canals, can we come up with a consensus on what type to use for this group of articles? I think some of the previous material is relevant and useful to the reader. It should also reflect the good judgment on the part of the editors as the MOS allows. Whatever changes are made to the Schuylkill and Susquehanna Navigation article should apply to the others.

Thanks ... Risk Engineer (talk) 11:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Risk Engineer: I wouldn't say that others not editing the sections indicates a consensus; I would call it an oversight. Regarding the style manual, to me the annotations were not brief. For the links themselves, coming in an article about canals and mostly ending with the word "canal", their relevance seems apparent, their meaning should be generally known, and they don't seem ambiguous. -- Pemilligan (talk) 21:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swoosie Kurtz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joshua White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have removed the Better source template that you had insert in the page because I have insert tweet of Barry Langford as source. Another tweet of Barry is used as source in the article who confirm the death, so i think it is a reliable source. P.S. Sorry for my bad english, my mother tongue is italian. --Scalvo98 (talk) 18:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I regret to inform you that the information you claim is correct, regarding Christ Church is Fort Meade, is indeed false.

Regarding the matter of Rev. C.E. Butler: after hours of research, it has been proven that the minister did not commit suicide inside Christ Church. According to the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, Friday, April 27, 1894, it is clearly stated that "Rev. C.E. Butler, an Epsicopal clergyman, was yesterday found hanging to a bedpost in his room at the Lockner house in Fort Meade, Fla." A second article of proof was found in the Abbeyville Press. The sentence stating that Rev. Butler has been again removed from the Fort Meade Wikipedia page as is was, again...not factual information. Also, this information is not prevalent to the history of Fort Meade.

Regarding changes to the Christ Church, Fort Meade, Wikipedia page: The information from the expansion of the article was taken from hand written documentation by the early founders of Christ Church, official church documentation from church vestry meetings, family historical documentation and from personal knowledge as a member of the congregation and the great-grandson of two of the founding members. Christ Church has been written about in a couple of books about Polk County, FL; however, none of that information was used in this article.

Thank you for your concern in this matter and for respecting our requests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrussellhancock (talk • contribs) 18:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Pemilligan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Cocodrilosky". The reason given for Cocodrilosky's block is: "Using Wikipedia for promotion or advertising purposes".

• Blocking administrator: Materialscientist (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Accepted. I see no overlap in your edits. Yamla (talk) 16:53, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pemilligan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating John D. (Jack) Bailey.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I'm not sure when you'll hear a "yes" or "no" about rather or not you're going to get autopatrolled. It's been taking a few days as of late.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:24, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: Thank you for contacting me. -- Pemilligan (talk) 17:39, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reformatting my edit! I had put another team's logo onto this page as a placeholder, but it was removed by bot because there was no fair-use reason for it to be there. Are you able/motivated to get the Starfires' logo artwork and include it on the page? Spike-from-NH (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. -- Pemilligan (talk) 02:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since you’re still active, I’m giving you a courtesy notice that I made some substantive changes to Robin Ficker in terms of organization. I also blanked a section that was poorly sourced and in violation of the WP:BLP policy and notified the BLP noticeboard. Regards. --That man from Nantucket (talk) 01:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@That man from Nantucket: Thanks for contacting me. Looks like you've made some worthwhile improvements. I take it the BLP issue is the first change you made. What concerns me is that you put "unsourced" in the edit summary but there was a source for at least the last part of it. I think that much could be restored. -- Pemilligan (talk) 00:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think so, because from the source that was used, it touched just a fraction of the cut text. Otherwise I would have done something differently.That man from Nantucket (talk) 11:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:50, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hardly a defender of Bill Richardson's behavior, but my edit was directly from the cautioning source: [2] "In ordering the documents released, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit also warned that the allegations contained within them are not necessarily proven." Activist (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Activist: The text was originally inserted in front of the Daily Beast citation, which did not support it. -- Pemilligan (talk) 15:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Richardson article can perhaps duplicate the material in the Wen Ho Lee article, but should not be isolated to the latter. This grotesque mishandling could not have occurred without Richardson doing his enthusiastic "Inspector Javert" imitation. Perhaps it needs a scalpel rather than a broadsword? Activist (talk) 23:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Activist: I still think that the extent of the duplication is too much. -- Pemilligan (talk) 15:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In my personal opinion, I think it is important, because the article is about Richardson's conduct and readers shouldn't have to go to Wen Ho Lee's article to read it. Richardson, who has in my personal opinion, done many questionable things in his life, tormented this poor man, but was absolutely unable to admit he was wrong to do so. As a result, those non-governmental actors in this tragic affair paid a high six-figure settlement to Wen, but Richardson couldn't back off at the price of publicly losing face, or whatever his problem was. Wen's legal bills were also paid, but Richardson made sure not a penny of the government's substantial payout went into Wen's pocket. Wen, after this horrific experience, pleaded guilty to a single, random, extremely picayune one of the 59 bogus charges that had been levelled against him, that had ruined his life, that had taken his earnings and his pension and his career from him, for no other reason than to make it appear that Richardson's actions were somehow justified or vindicated. Wen pleaded to the single charge so his torment didn't continue. We don't know if this was the reason Richardson did not get a cabinet-level post again, in the Obama administration, or if it was something else that was not disclosed to the public, but he did not get that job, nor would he in the line of presidential succession should some massive tragedy befall those who were higher than he on that list after the Vice-president, the Speaker of the House, the President pro tem of the Senate and other historically senior cabinet members who were not disqualified by either age or place of birth. Even President Clinton apologized to Wen. I would suggest to you that you go through the text and item-by-item remove what you think should specifically not be in the article, and retain that which should stay. I'll trust your judgment on this. Thanks for the discussion. Activist (talk) 17:25, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think that's going too far, though I wasn't going to do it, on the grounds that it's easier to destroy than to re-create. But the FCBL is sticking at 7 teams for 2020, without divisional play, and if they should go to divisions again, we can go back into the history for it.

Separately, I've updated the franchise map in Template:FCBL Labelled Map, though patching a PNG file is not the same as having the same sources to work with. This template should use the recommended templates that would let the dots be overlaid onto the image, rather than requiring the image to be redrawn every time a franchise moves/dies/is born. Spike-from-NH (talk) 01:25, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Spike-from-NH: Thanks for updating the map.

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NCAA Division I baseball venues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franklin, Wisconsin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Griffith (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Griffith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cox (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Cox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to say thanks for making my expansion of the Macon Bacon page look better. I'm fairly new at Wiki editing, and will note the comments you made on your edits for further use. Dcb1986 (talk) 23:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Terwilliger Brothers Field at Max Bishop Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're amazing DickLittleHat (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pemilligan. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ike54321 (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I prefer using the short form of the citations for most edits, excluding citations for books, etc., and don't know if policy dictates otherwise. I run into a lot of longer form citations that have not been filled out with often helpful information (such as the dates edits have been made). I'm presuming that the short form, that I've been using for fourteen years, is still appropriate. I hope I haven't missed some policy change. I see you've converted some of my cites to the longer form, and I have no problem with you doing that. Do you know of the status? Thanks. Activist (talk) 16:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. I'm just going with my preference. -- Pemilligan (talk) 00:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'll continue and thanks for getting back with me and all the work you do. Activist (talk) 07:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pemilligan, thank you for finding a reference for Robert Colbert's "Put me in a dress and call me Brenda..." anecdote. I've been meaning to order Linda's book about Jack Kelly for years now. We go all the way back to "Sandra's Maverick Page" back in the 20th century, if I'm not mistaken, and both occasionally contribute comments to the enormous Jack Kelly website "The Tall Dark Stranger There," written by a mutual internet acquaintance from Sandra's site. Did you read her Jack Kelly biography? Was it entertaining? It's interesting that he was first overshadowed by an actual sibling (his movie star sister Nancy Kelly) then eclipsed again by a fictional sibling, James Garner as Bret Maverick. Kelly certainly wasn't a great light comedian like the wondrous Garner (who was in the same league as Cary Grant and Jack Lemmon) but he was really excellent when acting directly with Garner. And a lot of women really adore Jack Kelly to this day. I wish Netflix would cherry-pick the best episodes (which are laid out on the series' Wikipedia page under "Notable episodes") and throw them up on their site to generate a larger audience for Maverick. George Raft Has Risen From the Grave (talk) 01:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I haven't read the book. I just googled the quote because one of the wiki pages marked it "citation needed". -- Pemilligan (talk) 02:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

my apologies on the careless edit in the Guilfoyle article. Anastrophe (talk) 01:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ron DeSantis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're right that moving something from the wrong place beats undoing it, but I can't cut, copy or paste on this thing and typing is slow. I'm hardly going to memorize and retype something from someone who just essentially impersonated me, especially if I find the questions unimportant. Thanks for restoring it correctly, though! InedibleHulk (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Colt Brennan, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 06:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to share a note of thanks for this clarity - I have been doing this improperly and this is the first nudge I've gotten to not include {{small}} in the infobox. Appreciate it! --Engineerchange (talk) 17:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Northern League (NL), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why did you revert my edits? i added source for opening night, stupid idiot — Preceding unsigned comment added by TNF1200 (talk • contribs) 02:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I saw you on my user page. you seem to have a good track record on Wiki. I'd like to invite you to establish a consensus on the Aaron Coleman talk page. I believe this individual has done questionable actions, and while the accusations are well sourced, the page is more of a sin list and there's little talking about his political positions to balance the article -- therefor violating the neutrality.

Hope you'll give it a shot. Or can direct me in the direction on how to establish the consensus OsagePizza72 (talk) 03:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is embarrassing. I saw a photo of Greensboro's World War Memorial Stadium, the old baseball stadium, with an article about A&T using what was being called Truist Stadium. Knowing that was the name of a baseball stadium in Winston-Salem, I immediately checked to make sure everything was right. Forgot one thing. I didn't actually read the newspaper article, which doesn't say the baseball stadium is the one A&T is using. Thanks.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Independence League has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:10, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you had the SF Gate access as "subscription." I don't subscribe, though I registered with the site some time ago and use it as a source. Am I misunderstanding a restriction? Thanks. Activist (talk) 07:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where? -- Pemilligan (talk) 07:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Spuhler Field. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derrick Evans (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carol Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your interest. I've posted comments at Talk:Talbot County, Maryland#Environment. Moreau1 (talk) 01:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:LEADCITE, the "reached number 9 in Canada" section does not need to be cited, as it's already cited further down the article under "charts". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting that. -- Pemilligan (talk) 13:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you user pgmilligan for correcting a copyedit error I made on the above page. Somehow my eyes transposed the word “also” from the prior sentence and put it into the sentence you edited (which is why I believed its original ending with “as well” following “also” was redundant).

I believe the grammar you chose has a superior meter to it (as a bonus). 2601:196:180:DC0:1C51:5FC8:344F:EC22 (talk) 20:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I could help. Thanks for the note. -- Pemilligan (talk) 20:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help on the Mosby page.[[3]] This is a complex and unusual litigation matter, with a lot in the sources that probably needs to make its way into the article. There have been some comments (via video) from the governor on the case, which seems especially notable, but how to handle these cites is unclear. DownEastLaw (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to apologize for the edit summary...it was WAY out of line for me to resort to that personal attack; adding the source should have been enough to abate my frustration. But trust that I will be more careful with that I say in the summaries, and things like what I said will NOT happen again. Tom Danson (talk) 18:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ik it's not a newspaper. It's called updating. I wouldn't do this if someone had made a page about the 2024 Season. The opening day thing would've been removed in a couple days anyways because it really served no purpose after the 27th. Aj631314 (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think Talk:Northwoods League is the place to discuss this. I've started Talk:Northwoods League#2024 season sections. -- Pemilligan (talk) 02:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kaitlin Stone did name the mascot Slugger after winning a contest in 1999. 2600:6C5E:4300:7AD7:5D82:798B:D682:591 (talk) 23:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the information because it was added without a source to that confirm it is true, and because it really isn't that important who won a mascot naming contest twenty-five years ago. -- Pemilligan (talk) 05:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited H. Wayne Norman Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I apologize if I did things incorrectly, but I am the owner of the burning River buckets how do I go about getting you the accurate information about the status of my team? We have not folded and there is some updated information that placed on our page and information deleted from our page thank you for your help. Absolutely no rush. I was just thinking about it today. C.A. Buttons (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The primary issue with your edits so far is that Wikipedia relies on material sourced to published independent reliable sources. As the owner of the team, you aren't independent of this subject, nor have you cited anything published.

However, a larger issue is your close relationship to this subject which runs afoul of Wikipedia's confict of interest rules. Editors with a conflict under this policy are strongly discouraged from directly editting such articles; they are instead encouraged to suggest edits on the article's talk page by using the {{edit COI}} template.

I'm not experienced at giving detailed advice on these subjects. A good place to ask questions is Wikipedia:Teahouse. Reviewing the policies at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Reliable sources will probably be helpful, too.

-- Pemilligan (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pemilligan. Please avoid edits that only consist of changes that are not visible to readers like this whitespace change at Honeysuckle Weeks. Edits of this kind unnecessarily fill up editors' WP:Watchlists. Also, note that your addition of whitespace at Honeysuckle Weeks will be automatically removed by anyone editing the infobox using the Wikipedia:VisualEditor. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Just a heads up: I used the Maryland State Archives page as the citation for her divorce because it doesn't mention her being married. If she was married, it would mention it there, as it does on other legislators' pages (e.g., Bill Ferguson). I doubt we'll ever get a better cite, so this is the best we've got. Y2hyaXM (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]