Welcome Paulwa66!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Covington, Cambridgeshire

added links pointing to Molesworth, Kimbolton, Staughton and Brington

Catworth

added links pointing to Molesworth, Ellington and Brington

Brington, Cambridgeshire

added links pointing to Molesworth and Ellington

Ellington, Cambridgeshire

added a link pointing to Ellington

Molesworth, Cambridgeshire

added a link pointing to Ellington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hail Weston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toseland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buckden, Cambridgeshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parish council. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Burnthouse, Cornwall

added a link pointing to Penryn

Butteriss Gate

added a link pointing to Penryn

Calvadnack

added a link pointing to Settlement

Carlidnack

added a link pointing to Falmouth

Edgcumbe, Cornwall

added a link pointing to Penryn

Halabezack

added a link pointing to Penryn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to let you know there is a problem with this edit that I partially reverted. The {{OpenDomesday}} template does not have a |url= parameter as this is constructed from the |OS= and |name= parameters to the template. Keith D (talk) 17:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Great Stukeley

added a link pointing to Parish council

The Stukeleys

added a link pointing to Parish council

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Farcet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yaxley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

... for all your work on Cornish places. It is appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 09:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scunthorpe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ashby and Frodingham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Killinghall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page B&B. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am Emily Morris and I am a student at Portsmouth University. I have been working on the Easton article since January as part of my course (there is a banner about this on the article's Talk page). Before we started, we checked that nobody had worked on the article for three years. So far you have been writing about different things from what I have been preparing, but what are your plans? A lot of what I will be writing about is information about the parish from modern and old censuses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emily.JMorris (talk • contribs) 15:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emily, I am sorry that I didn't spot the banner on the Easton (Cambridgeshire) Talk Page. My plan is generally to improve the quality of the geographic articles relating to the old county of Huntingdonshire. At some stage I would have loaded some census information into the article, but I don't have any specific material at the moment. I will try to remember to not edit the article for a while.Paulwa66 (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul, thank you very much that would be greatly appreciated. I will be finished working on this article by the end of April and hope this isn't too much of an inconvenience for you. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emily.JMorris (talk • contribs) 12:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Montel Billo-Conteh, a student attending Portsmouth University, and I am currently editing the Toseland, Cambridgeshire wikipedia article for my coursework assignment that was commenced on January. In order to make sure this could be carried out we made sure that the article was left unedited for a period of at least three years. The problem at the moment is that you have been editing information that is dissimilar to the information I plan to add. What I want to understand is what do you aim to add into the article in the near future as I am adding information on the parish from modern as well as older censuses.

Hi Montel, I am sorry that I didn't spot the banner on the Toseland (Cambridgeshire) Talk Page. My plan is generally to improve the quality of the geographic articles relating to the old county of Huntingdonshire. I am afraid that I added some census data into the article a couple of weeks ago. I won't be offended if you have to re-work it for your course. In the meantime I will try to remember to not edit the article for a while.Paulwa66 (talk) 16:27, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does "accessdate" really only apply to online sources with URLs? If I read something in a book today and cite it, wouldn't that have an accessdate of today? BMK (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell accessdate does only apply to online sources. I presume it doesn't really matter when one reads something in a book and then cites the reference in wikipedia since the content of a book changes infrequently and then only with a new edition. But for something on the web, the content can change much more frequently and the accessdate parameter gives some sort of reference-point as to when the web page contained the information that is being cited. Paulwa66 (talk) 21:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's sound reasoning. There is the situation where the citation to the book might be taken from the web (say, from Bookfinder) instead of being taken off the physical volume itself, and an accessdaye might show that a later edition was being used, but, of course, the acccessdate doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the publishing date of the book (I can read a book published in 1900 today, and an accessdate of 2016 doesn't provide evidence that I'm actually reading the 1995 reprint) - so I guess I've answered my own question. Thanks for your time, sorry to bother you with what turned out to be such a trivial question. BMK (talk) 00:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paulwa, do you know if Warley Town which you recently worked on, is the "town of Warley" mentioned in the description of Room at the Top (novel) and thus the place where this story is situated? If so, would you consider it relevant to add this connection? Then the currently unlinked "Warley" in the Room at the Top article could/should direct to Warley Town in return. Kind regards from Germany --88.76.34.152 (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Hele Bay. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paulwa66. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]