Hi Deku link! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 14:50, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Musée Archéologique de Dijon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Étaules. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unless anyone raises an objection, I am willing to make the change of user name you requested. If I do so you will find you can't log in under your old user name. That is no problem, you just log in with your new user name and the same password, but it can be confusing or alarming to suddenly be told you can't log in, so I like to warn editors before renaming. Please post here to show you have read this message, and if I am still online I'll go ahead with renaming; if not, I'll do it when I get back. JBW (talk) 20:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: Yes, please go ahead. Thank you. Deku link (talk) 21:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• As you requested, I have renamed your account from "Deku link" to "Paragon Deku". JBW (talk) 22:05, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deku: A fellow editor just posted today at DYK that 18 May is "International Museum Day". The plan is now to run several dedicated queues of museum-related hooks, and I wondered if you'd like to have your recently-promoted Musée Archéologique de Dijon added to that list (which would mean waiting until the 18th to run it). Absolutely no pressure – it's already scheduled to run in a few days, and can continue there if you'd prefer. But if you'd like to include it on "museum day", please let us know here. Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 20:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Paragon Deku. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 09:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Musée Archéologique de Dijon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Musée Archéologique de Dijon holds dozens of religious offerings to the pagan goddess Sequana? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Musée Archéologique de Dijon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Musée Archéologique de Dijon), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Senkyoshigo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mormon missionaries in Japan converse with each other in a specialized cant known as Senkyoshigo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Senkyoshigo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Senkyoshigo), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not very good at moderating my manner of speech by text (though I work on it), but I figured I'd let you know that I'm more of a Foul-Mouthed Goofball than an Angry Internet Warrior. If I say something to you that seems bitter and confrontational, I almost certainly don't mean it that way, it's just me failing miserably at sarcastic and funny. When I'm actually bitter and in the mood to set someone straight, I'm a right bastard of the "indef him immediately and pray to god he doesn't hack anyone" variety, so I tend to step away when I get upset.

I don't think anything you said reflected poorly on you, and I apologize if I gave you the impression that I did. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 21:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s quite ok, having had discussions with more aggressive Wikipedians lately has just put me a bit on edge. I realize what perspective you (and the article) are coming from now on this topic, and I’m not upset in the slightest. Thanks for taking the time to hash it out. Paragon Deku (talk) 21:45, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that quite well. I once got to the point of frustration with civil POV pushers where I said "fuck it" and doxxed one as a Neo-Nazi pedophilia advocate. He was blocked (of course), but I spent 2 years indeffed for doxxing. I'm not even exaggerating, check my block log and the collapsed bit at the very top of my talk page.

Believing in a goal like WP's necessarily carries some emotional investment, it's just the nature of being a Wikipedian. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 22:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - I've created Talk:Radio of Free Asia to try and work on improving this page. Having done a deep dive it's kind of driving me crazy all the links to various intelligence and religious organisations and I don't know what to do with it! Vladimir.copic (talk) 04:21, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely hear you, I was driven to the brink of madness attempting to study it and the other Radio Free Asia at the same time (that's why I made the page in the first place, to differentiate them). I must have screenshotted 20+ newspaper articles on my phone when I first went down a research dive. I really appreciate the work you've put in on it, I really think it's underdiscussed in historical sources. I might be able to eventually write up a proper journal article on the topic if I have the time. Paragon Deku (talk) 04:24, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I recently created a draft for an article on Vaush. However, upon seeing that an article on him was recently deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaush, I decided to put the article through the AfC process instead of moving it straight to mainspace. If you have any comments feel free to discuss the draft page at its talk page Draft talk:Vaush. Thanks. Alduin2000 (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

My very best wishes (talk) 03:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What page have I edited related to Eastern Europe? Paragon Deku (talk) 04:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Totalitarian architecture because it involves USSR, Nazi Germany and Italy. My very best wishes (talk) 18:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing… Paragon Deku (talk) 18:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
254		History of zoophilia (talk)	Add sources
612		Aurora, Colorado (talk)	Add sources
3,471		Xinjiang (talk)	Add sources
3,046		Voice of America (talk)	Add sources
25		Book of Moroni (talk)	Add sources
241		Elgin, Moray (talk)	Add sources
628		Xinjiang conflict (talk)	Cleanup
16		Third Nephi (talk)	Cleanup
79		Reinhard Marx (talk)	Cleanup
783		Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (talk)	Expand
1,565		Xinjiang internment camps (talk)	Expand
57		Glossary of archaeology (talk)	Expand
147		CIA influence on public opinion (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
153		History of Xinjiang (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
236		Sanxingdui (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17		Raiders (comics) (talk)	Merge
257		Effects of pornography (talk)	Merge
30		Mordred (comics) (talk)	Merge
51		Rushan Abbas (talk)	Wikify
76		Doombot (talk)	Wikify
492		Slang (talk)	Wikify
12		Architectural propaganda (talk)	Orphan
65		Rayhan Asat (talk)	Orphan
2		Catoma Creek Site (talk)	Orphan
337		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
16		National Quantum Initiative Act (talk)	Stub
67		The Good Old Naughty Days (talk)	Stub
141		Human–animal marriage (talk)	Stub
7		I, Robot (Cory Doctorow) (talk)	Stub
8		Guanyindong (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Long Bow Trilogy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pamzeis (talk) 09:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Long Bow Trilogy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that films from the Long Bow Trilogy depict the same village and villagers mentioned in Fanshen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Long Bow Trilogy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Long Bow Trilogy), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

firefox, anti-cap, mtg and 'tism! Nice :D Heyallkatehere (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's literally dozens of us!!! Paragon Deku (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Paragon Deku,

Thanks for re-nominating the article. That said - and mentioning this on the talk page rather than the AFD because maybe you just got distracted in the middle - per WP:CANVASS, if you want to inform previous attendees at an AFD about a new AFD, you need to inform either all of them or none of them. You can skip obviously retired accounts, and Andrew Davidson is topic-banned from AFD so you can skip him too, but basically you should be sure to ping keep voters like Piotrus and BD2412 too. SnowFire (talk) 02:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I was too focused on informing page editors and people immediately on the talk page that I got distracted, I'll remedy that ASAP. Paragon Deku (talk) 03:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Totalitarian architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Totalitarian architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Primefac (talk) 20:38, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

?????? Paragon Deku (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@USER:Primefac would you care to elaborate on why I was blocked and what exactly the violation was? Paragon Deku (talk) 20:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would have figured the now-undone-and-hidden edit to your userpage, which you have been warned about before, would be a rather large clue. Primefac (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It truly is unfortunate where priorities lie. Paragon Deku (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paragon Deku (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

While I have reservations about the enforcement of WP:BLP around specific topics regarding The Troubles, upon reflection I can concede that my violation was stupid, hasty, disruptive, and inflammatory. There was no excuse for it given prior warning, and it was ultimately simply a bad move. I will be the first to admit that I have a tendency to angle towards WP:SOAP style confrontations that are neither beneficial to my argument nor to the project, and deciding to put such information on my user page was obviously both a faux pas and completely unproductive. I will gracefully accept punishment for my action, given some time off would allow me to keep a cool hand on the issue, but I believe it would be more prudent for this to manifest as either a shorter site-wide block or as a topic ban on issues relating to The Troubles. I believe I have shown a career of non-disruptive and productive editing related to other contentious topics, and I have demonstrated contributions in less contentious areas consistently. I regret my negative and snarky reactions towards administration who were simply enforcing current policies and hope that this can be alleviated. Paragon Deku (talk) 21:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Now an arbcom block. See template below for information about how to appeal. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:19, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

---

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

Hello, Paragon Deku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Totalitarian architecture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Totalitarian architecture instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Totalitarian architecture and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paragon Deku! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]