Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In particular, please note Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons. We generally prefer fewer icons and too many can clutter a page. DrKay (talk) 17:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much DrKay. I am new to editing the wikipage. I've been adding the ribbon bars to the awards and decorations of the top people. I wish to know if it's alright and looks fine. --Oritsu.me (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)-[reply]

You could ask for opinions at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons, then you'd get more than one responder hopefully. DrKay (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add "ribbons" in biography articles as per this consensus. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please do not include unsourced material or ribbons. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 14:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You've been asked multiple times not to add ribbons, but you're still doing it. It is disruptive to continue with edits after being asked to stop. DrKay (talk) 15:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of titles and honours of Charles, Prince of Wales, you may be blocked from editing. You've just added ribbons again[1] after being specifically and clearly asked multiple times not to do so. Please undo all these edits. DrKay (talk) 20:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Modi ministry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaushal Kishore. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Padma Vibhushan award recipients, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hindustani and Dhamar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just commenting on your table, unrelated to whether it's necessary for the page or not. I remember that Neelam Sanjiva Reddy's term lasted into Indira Gandhi's second PM tenure through 1982, but it doesn't go that far in the table you've designed, only through 1980. V.P. Singh also has an extra set of brackets next to [NC].

Just passing through, have a nice day! SuperWIKI (talk) 14:28, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperWIKI: Hi! Actually the parameters I have added mentions correctly that President Reddy served for two yrs with I. Gandhi, but the table sadly doesn't show that. I have tried a lot, but it did not work. If you can help, I'd be very happy! With regards - --Oritsu.me (talk) 15:08, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the years on it, so I did understand from the beginning. I tried hacking at the table myself but didn't manage to fix it. SuperWIKI (talk) 15:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some parameters worked correctly, so don't. I don't understand! Oritsu.me (talk) 15:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that I understood from the start that President Reddy served until 1982, two years with PM Gandhi. Good luck though! SuperWIKI (talk) 15:17, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamirpur Lok Sabha constituency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gujral ministry

added a link pointing to M. Arunachalam

Second Vajpayee ministry

added a link pointing to Ministry of Information and Broadcasting

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Noraini Jane. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 09:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fakhruddin Ahmed ministry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caretaker ministry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 11:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oritsu.me. Please don't add flag icons and links to the section headings of articles such as List of honours of Brazil awarded to heads of state and royalty because doing so can create MOS:ACCESS issues for certain Wikipedia readers using assistive devices as explained in MOS:HEAD and MOS:ACCIM. It's also preferable to avoid adding links, particularly WP:PIPEd links, to section heading for similar reasons and instead it's better to use WP:HATNOTES at the beginning of the relevant section for links. In addition, to links and flag icons, you also seem to be using WP:PSEUDOHEADings in cases where it's inappropriate to do so. Generally, it's much better to simply use regular section heading syntax, except in certain cases.

Some of the articles were previously cleaned up to make sure they were inline with the above mentioned Manual of Style guidelines, but you indirectly reverted the changes and restored the articles back to their non-compliant forms. It's OK if you didn't notice the edit summaries that were left explaining why the changes were made, but please don't re-add the flag icons and links to the section headings now that you do.

If you've got any questions about this, feel free to ask. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I will be removing them at the earliest. Oritsu.me (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oritsu.me. Thank you for your work on Order of the Defender of State. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from ms:Mohamed Hashim bin Mohd Ali to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Clearfrienda ^💬 01:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Despite all the warnings, you are adding ribbons again: [2][3][4][5][6]. It is disruptive to continue edits against community consensus after being asked to stop. DrKay (talk) 06:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop citing content to images, as you have been doing at awards articles for royals. Stock photos are not reliable sources and it is OR to identify award regalia from them. Blog sources like Royal Watcher, Royal Central, and the Court Jeweller are also unacceptable. I just had to remove over 50kb of content attached to such sources rather than simply adding CN tags because individually culling all the Getty Images links would be a nightmare. I see you've had multiple recent warnings about your edits to nobility articles so I'm pinging @DrKay in case sanctions are on the table. JoelleJay (talk) 05:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JoelleJay: Thanks for letting me know. Regarding the article on the Dutch honours, you seem to have wiped away all the information on the Dutch recipients. Does that imply that all the names that I add were false or incorrect and should not be listed on the list of recipients? Oritsu.me (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That information should not be added unless it is cited to reliable sources explicitly stating what the honor is and to whom it was given. Per WP:V, readers should be able to verify the information in our pages, and simply linking to images where the subject is wearing certain regalia that some editor identified does not achieve this. The burden is always on the editor wishing to add content to demonstrate that it is accurate. Additionally, even if it is all correct and verifiable, that does not mean it is suitable to include on WP; if there are not IRS sources significantly discussing the topic as a group, it is unlikely the list is notable enough for inclusion and individual honors may not be DUE on the honorees' articles. JoelleJay (talk) 05:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have responded 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 16:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To create * List of deputy chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata Party and List of longest-serving indian deputy chief ministers 2409:408D:EC0:40A2:0:0:2C8:F07 (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll consider working on them. Thanks for the idea. Oritsu.me (talk) 18:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate AffairsCommerce and IndustryConsumer Affairs, Food and Public DistributionCoalMinistry of Science and Technology you have to complete 2409:408D:3C1E:76C3:0:0:208:AB02 (talk) 16:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will complete. Please don't rush me. Some are there on my sandboxes. I'll figure out when its best time and then finish it up. Oritsu.me (talk) 08:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please update cm and DCM quickly 2409:408D:3398:E691:4C42:5D6A:CAA:A3C2 (talk) 18:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create template for deputy speakers Raagamjanaki (talk) 07:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update the Leader of opposition in lok sabha Raagamjanaki (talk) 16:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oritsu.me. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noraini Jane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Party shading/Indian National Congress requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_30#Template:Party_shading/INC. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lop of lok sabha and President of india and chief justice supremecourt list Jeevangandhi97 (talk) 12:11, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oritsu.me, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Tunku Abdul Hamid Thani, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunku Abdul Hamid Thani.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]