Archives

1

Hello, Orekhova, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Konogonka, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Львівське (talk) 23:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for creating a bunch of articles about VR-politicians!!! You just seem not to have noticed that all Ukrainian party politicians have a wikipedia category; and not just the ones of the Party of regions; you van find those categories at: [[Category:Ukrainian politicians by party]]. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You also seem not to know about Category:Ukrainian people of Russian descent and the Category:People from .... categories; I don't want to give you extra work; but since you put in other categories you might as well put in these too ! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also don't please forget Category:Ukrainian women in politics. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:46, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article Oleg Bilorus in the New Articles list-- The content seems well-organized.It would be great if you could also add references to the related article Aleksey Baburin. Jipinghe (talk) 22:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add wikilinks on data as they do not need them. Instead of 27 November 1963, it should just be 27 November 1963 Bgwhite (talk) 06:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		Ukraine Barnstar
		I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for writing tons of new biographies of Ukrainian politicians on English Wikipedia the past/coming months! Thank you! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 17:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Viktor Bondarenko (Ukrainian politician). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. That's me! ^{Have doubt?} Track me! 09:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Orekhova, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Orekhova/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talk …stalk!) 12:46, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Orekhova/reftest and try it out.

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

You might want to consider using this tool - (tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py) - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well all by itself. For those it can't do by itself, it gives you a pull-down (or up) menu of templates to choose from, which you can then fill in manually. Often the problem is "No title found" - sometimes the title is obvious (especially if it's a pdf), bit, if not, just open the page yourself and choose something appropriate if there's not already a clear title there. Happy editing! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 12:46, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I thought it might be helpful to move all those old warning messages into an archive, so I created User talk:Orekhova/Archive 1 (and I added an 'archive box' at the top of this page).

If you don't like it, just undo my edit here. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  15:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Yelena Bondarenko (BYuT politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to People's Deputy

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Olga Bodnar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. France3470 (talk) 15:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article HarvEast Holding has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at User talk:Worm That Turned#Another RfA's talk page. Worm^TT · (talk) 12:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC) Hello. You have a new message at User talk:HJ Mitchell#Another RfA's talk page.—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 13:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm sorry I missed your earlier request on my talk page. I think Worm has given you some good advice, and you may also wish to read this essay: Advice for RfA candidates. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, there's a bit more at my talk page too. I do wonder if posting the same message regarding RfA on a dozen talk pages was a good idea, you are unlikely to get different replies Worm^TT · (talk) 13:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That, and seeing someone soliciting a nomination from 15 people will immediately make many people frown. It's like with politicians, those who want to be politicians may not actually be the most suited to be one.
Like Kupdung said elsewhere, focus on improving the encyclopedia, and if you are helpful and show common sense, people will approach you and make you go through an RfA. Amalthea 14:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Amalthea, will follow your (and others) advice --Orekhova (talk) 14:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)He does appear to have contacted pretty much everyone from the Request a nomination page. I'm curious to see who responds and what their responses are... Worm^TT · (talk) 14:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to echo the above. Listen to the advice Worm has given you and just keep trying to improve the encyclopedia.--v/r - TP 19:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The advice above and on other talk pages is very sound (unsuprisingly). I'm not sure we should be too fussed with exuberance and a desire to help out however, or to consider that a bad thing in and of itself - the fact that Orekhova went to lengths to request advice rather than launch a WP:NOTNOW RFA is clearly a good move; even if doing it 15 odd times was a little overkill. I do echo concerns that you shouldn't view adminship as a goal of working on the project. Just enjoy the place (i.e. stay away from WP:ANI tongue in cheek) and see where it takes you - and happy editing. Pedro :  Chat  21:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, thank you for your advices and positive criticism. --Orekhova (talk) 08:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orekhova. You have new messages at WilliamH's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, I was away on holiday when you previously left a message on my talk page at User talk:CT Cooper#Another RfA. Now that I'm back, I have written a reply. CT Cooper · talk 14:22, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Rinat Akhmetov. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Львівське (говорити) 16:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, unless you'll not be deleting the whole paragraphs that seem to be annoying for you - e.g., about philanthropy etc.--Orekhova (talk) 12:29, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I never deleted any paragraphs about philanthropy.--Львівське (говорити) 03:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleg Fisunenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleg Fisunenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Львівське (говорити) 03:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Opera Hotel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N, self promotion

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Львівське (говорити) 03:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Valery Bondik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Львівське (говорити) 03:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irina Berezhna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irina Berezhna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Львівське (говорити) 03:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Volodymyr Bondarenko (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Львівське (говорити) 03:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article ESTA Holding has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Львівське (говорити) 03:11, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

привіт! Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, and it was during one of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links on the page), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swallingwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I'm not sure when I'll work on the article again but if you think there are BLP violations you can raise those instances at WP:BLPN. Jesanj (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orekhova. You have new messages at Sleddog116's talk page.
Message added 05:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sleddog116 (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.0.87 (talk) 21:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of SCM Group subsidiaries, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: SCM Holdings. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you have a look at the article on Renat Akhmetov. The article has been tagged {{POV-check}} since March, and as a result various editors tried to make it more neutral. The article has been fairly stable since late May. I was wondering whether the {{POV-check}} is still appropriate.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that could be taken off. I would rather discuss your late edit on SCM assets value in 2011 - the official website of SCM shows 28,446 $ bln... http://www.scmholding.com/en/investor-relations/financials/ Orekhova (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

>the official website of SCM shows 28,446 $ bln

But not in the table on the page cited as source,[1] which was last updated updated: 20.01.2012 and still gives the 2010 figure of $22.788 billion.

Confusingly, if you hold the cursor over the bar chart marked 2011, it shows the figure you say. I hope they finish updating that page of the the website soon.

It does give the figure you say on [2].

I sent a message asking the IP editor asking him/her to provide a source for his/her figures, after I made the revert, after I checked that the source had not been updated to show the 2011 figures.--Toddy1 (talk) 07:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orekhova,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ravil_Akmaev should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravil_Akmaev .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Viktor Kalinin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Andrew Kurish (talk) 22:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. Thanks for your edit to the article on Renat Akhmetov. Please could you "cover" the URLs. You will see that the rest of the citations in the article give name of publication, article title, date, and author (if known). Please could you do the same with the citations you added.
2. Thanks for the lovely article on Princess Maria Tenisheva, please could you add citations. You must have had sources for the article. Please cite them.--Toddy1 (talk) 07:56, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your support, I will try :) --Orekhova (talk) 13:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rinat Akhmetov. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please explain the insertion, and edit waring taking place of original research content which is backed up by primary blog sources; which may not qualify as reliable or neutral. Львівське (говорити) 18:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Kropivnitskiy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dumas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ivan Bahrianyi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, for notifying me. I thought it was strange, particularly for mosque-builders to have Jewish roots, but these days you never know. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olena Pinchuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olena Pinchuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep 21:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oleg Fisunenko, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 06:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! In this edit, you claim that the Israeli version of Forbes retracted some claims about Akhmetov. Have you got a more specific citation for that retraction, so that other editors can verify the retraction? —C.Fred (talk) 17:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your message. Here's for instance link for current list of richest Jews at Israeli Forbes, where neither Akhmetov or Poroshenko are mentioned http://www.forbes.co.il/rating/list.aspx?en6v0tVq=FK --Orekhova (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't looking for Poroshenko, but I didn't see Akhmetov on the list either by his age or net worth. (Google wouldn't translate the page, so I was visually pattern-matching the name where I expected him to be on the list.) —C.Fred (talk) 17:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HarvEast Holding is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HarvEast Holding until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orekhova. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nikolay Bagrayev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you find that a citation has a link that does not appear to work, please mark it with the {{dead link}} template. There are bots that can find archived copies of the links. Please do not go around deleting cited information merely because the links did not work on your computer/internet link.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Rinat Akhmetov has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:59, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing the article on Rinat Akhmetov. In your edit today[3], you claimed that "information mentioned in deleted sentence is not mentioned in the book". But it is mentioned on page 10 of the book. You have done this before - deleting information from sources giving false reasons in your edit summaries.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For once you did a good edit to the article on Rinat Akhmetov. Thanks. Please could you use template:cite to cover the bare URLs.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Oh, you broke the law and just copied stuff from another website. That is not very smart. You had a whole load of bare URLs - you could have used those to write content.-- Toddy1 (talk) 01:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add copyright material copied from other websites to Wikipedia. Everything you contribute needs to be written in your own words please. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukrainian Pharmacy Holding is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian Pharmacy Holding until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. lovkal (talk) 17:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orekhova. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spartan UK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spartan UK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mitte27 (talk) 12:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Astelit Mobile Communications is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astelit Mobile Communications until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mitte27 (talk) 15:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TOCHKA.net is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOCHKA.net (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kline | yes? 20:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mining Machines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 23:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]