I noticed that you deleted your talk page. Why did you do this? Blanking your talk page is considered acceptable since the old material is available in the history. Now the history is removed. User:Maximus Rex, 18:47, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page. Optim 19:02, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)come back plz Best wishes, wherever life may take you.:) User:Jamesday 19:08, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Optim, I hope you reconsider and come back. User:Danny 19:12, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hey! don't go! (well, please...). In any case, best wishes. User:Pfortuny 19:30, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I see some people are uncomfortable with you deleting your own user and talk pages. Would you mind undeleting them, listing them at Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions saying you're departing, and leaving me a message on my talk page? Then I'll delete them for you. User:Jamesday 19:45, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi Optim, why are you leaving?—User:Eloquence 19:55, Mar 6, 2004 (UTC)

Hi Optim, won't you please reconsider? At least, please explain what's wrong and why you are leaving? If it's because of someone in particular, I feel that you can always ignore such people, and continue on to other articles. In any case, thank you for all the work you have done here, and you will be missed if you decide to leave for good. User:Dori 20:04, Mar 6, 2004 (UTC)

Hi Optim - I have been around for a short while only, but went through a lot of feelings on a broad scale, thinking this is absolutely silly and why waste any more second, to this is great, I may be contributing to something really worthwhile... May I consider you take a break, get a different perspective, and overall, be asured, that you are most welcome here. --Palapala

I hope you decide to come back. You are a positive influence on the work and the community - Texture 22:52, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Adding my wishes for you to reconsider. You are a good user, we need more of you - not less. Secretlondon 22:57, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

My thoughts correspond to Secretlondon's. More people deserve your WikiCookies/pastries, Optim. Chris Roy 01:54, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)

If you had never taken wikivacations, probably it is the good moment. We need the peace profond comments :-) ant

I echo ant's sentiments. I hope you'll be open to rejoining us after a break -- we'll keep the front porch light on for you. In any event, you're great and will be missed. Peace to you! BCorr ¤ Брайен 03:20, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC)

Hear, hear. I joined WP last month largely b/c of the goodwill and good-natured side projects of a few people I happened across -- and your flower-image and wiki-cookie projects were among them. I hope to see your smiling (well, upside-down) sig and hidden esoterica and peaceful aspect around here again, not only in the historical record. In peace, +sj+ 09:38, 2004 Mar 8 (UTC)

I will echo everybody's sentiment above. Please at least drop in for a nibble occasionally. Tuf-Kat 06:47, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC)

Best wishes. Thank you for all your contributions. I hope you return when you're ready. Isomorphic 07:12, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I dont know you per se, but I do know: you will be back. ;) -SVtalk 07:18, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I hope, after you had some time to sort out your feelings, that you will reconsider and return to our fold. →Raul654 17:39, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC)

Please consider coming back at some time in the future. My peace is a little less profound since I learned you left. :-( -- Cyan 20:13, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)

You will be sorely missed, and more than welcome should you return. In the intervening time, wherever you endeavor, may you find peace profound. Jwrosenzweig 20:51, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)

We miss you, Optim!! --Monsieur Mero 02:09, Mar 11, 2004 (UTC)

• Please come back!!! Peace Profound, Perl 03:08, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

• Aaargh, come back!!! Κσυπ Cyp   09:02, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

• Hey Optim, don't come back, come over to Wikibooks. That's where the real action in educational materials is. --karlwick
  • Come back to both! --Wulf 04:28, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Try TechTV or G4TechTV or The Riemann Hypothesis or Factorials or Minor Scale or Joseph Stalin or Microsoft Passport. Cuz I like them and if they got added to it'd be nice too. ;) Ilyanep (Talk) 20:42, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

And now I notice that you're gone...I hope you come back...you made some very helpful contributions to wikipedia. Ilyanep (Talk) 20:43, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. – Ram-Man ^{() (talk)}[[]] 14:43, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

A page that you joined to help with associate with other members of the Wikipedia community is on VfD. Please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Wikipedian citizens of the world, and the related page Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Wikipedian supporters of the sovereign nation-state. Cognition 09:50, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on being made a bureaucrat! I thought you might like to know of a javascript tool that may help in your editing by giving easy access to many admin features. It's described at Wikipedia:Tools#Navigation_popups. The quick version of the installation procedure for admins is to paste the following into User:Optim/monobook.js:

// [[User:Lupin/popups.js]] - please include this line 

document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' 
             + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popups.js' 
             + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>');

popupAdminLinks=true;

Give it a try and let me know if you find any glitches or have suggestions for improvements! Lupin 02:36, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user Optim, as I have seen editions of yours at the article Rosicrucian, I come to request your support to this article that I have just purposed for nomination at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Rosicrucian. May you may give a look into it? And, if you consider it acceptable, then may you support it? Thank you! :) --GalaazV 02:49, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I understand that you are either Greek Wikipedian or a Wikipedian living in/with an interest in Greece.

The category page Wikipedians/Greece has been replaced with Category:Wikipedians in Greece but your name still appears on the old list. You might considering moving it. You might also consider adding adding Template:Greekwiki to your user page.

A Wikipedia:Greek Wikipedians' notice board has been in existence for some time but is terribly underutilised. It would certainly benefit from your involvement.--Damac 12:24, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed the message saying you're a World Citizen, I would like to invite you to add {{User:1ne/Userboxes/User world}} to your user page if you wish to proclaim it in a more effective way, and this template will also add you automatically to the Wikipedians with World Citizenship category. :) --Mistress Selina Kyle 23:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MainPage-Mozilla-Optim.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MainPage-Voodoo1997-Optim.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MainPage-WebBrowser1997-Optim.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MainPage-ie6-Optim.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MainPage-Voodoo1997-Optim.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MainPage-WebBrowser1997-Optim.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on OMCE, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because OMCE is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting OMCE, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate OMCE itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The last page of the Internet, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The last page of the Internet (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 15:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Buddy (dog), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddy (dog). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TrUCo-X 00:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Univac20040113 300px.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

I have nominated Julie Scott, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Scott. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 01:58, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Optim! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Eleni Menegaki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

I put this template so some user on their free time or some other user can help me on my articles. I do not edit for over two hours or three during a weekday, when I respond, it will be around 11 PM-1 AM (UTC) when I reply and edit my needs for correct spelling. Da Desirer 2 (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what the help template is for; first, it is only for use on your own talk page, and second, only when you have a specific question. Dru of Id (talk) 00:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 22:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the bureaucrat policy that alters what you were told at the time of your decratting. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until February 1, 2013 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFB. Until February 1, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 01:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations Optim, your image Image:Bankofgreece-entrance-255px.jpg was the Random Picture of the Day! It looked like this:

Random picture of the day

The Bank of Greece headquarters

Image credit: Optim (talk · contribs)

Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 11:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, New Acropolis, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "New Acropolis" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 20:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am very nervous, I am and some are tired of what is going on in Greece. The ambitions there are partly stolen. It cannot continue. Most of the people don't want it to continue. France needs (uncertainly desperately) to be occupied as a punishment for the IMF to arrest ships from Argentina for not paying the debt at a large number in late 2012. There is no mind to make one economic crisis to a near critical level. The economic problems in Greece cannot be renewed or worsen. It makes us very very angry, it is absolutely unacceptable. It is absolutely an emergency. The closure of ERT on I think it was the 3rd, or the 5th of June made me depressed and very angry, the temper soared almost dramatically. It was absolutely very insane. It is strictly forbidden that the economic crisis in Greece along with Spain to continue, I favor that some abandoned homes in the South of France to be damaged as a punishment. We have a strong anti-French fervor in my area. This I think can be also put not only on a planned website but on Facebook as well. I will be likely to find another user here, Creative Commons or Facebook to talk if one is busy, when it deeply gets on my nerves, I will comment and explain. Don't make us angry just like the Incredible Hulk. I have no support on some of the French policies. France needs to be under foreign control.

On the other, we have no support on the merger of communal parishes in the city areas of municipalities of Portugal.

I will try to put messages on a non-encyclopedic site, Wikia, non-Wikia, Creative Commons and Facebook as well if it is an emergency only (that is related to the economic crisis in Greece). Da Desirer 2 (talk) 22:34, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Γεια σου. Είμαι steward. Μια νέα πολιτική που αναφέρεται στην αφαίρεση  "αυξημένων δικαιωμάτων" (διαχειριστή, γραφειοκράτη, κλπ.) έχει υιοθετηθεί με συναίνεση της κοινότητας πρόσφατα. Σύμφωνα με αυτή την πολιτική, οι stewards επιθεωρούν τη δραστηριότητα των διαχειριστών στα wikis που δεν έχουν πολιτική για τους μη ενεργούς διαχειριστές.   Εσύ πληρείς τα κριτήρια της μη δραστηριότητας (καθόλου επεξεργασίες και διαχειριστικές ενέργειες για 2 χρόνια) στο elwiki, όπου είσαι διαχειριστής . Από τη στιγμή που το elwiki δεν διαθέτει δική του διαδικασία επιθεώρησης για τα δικαιώματα των διαχειριστών, εφαρμόζεται η καθολική διαδικασία.   Αν επιθυμείς να διακρατήσεις τα δικαιώματά σου, θα πρέπει να ειδοποιήσεις την κοινότητα ότι οι stewards σου έστειλαν αυτή την επιστολή σχετικά με την απουσία δραστηριότητας από την πλευρά σου  και για να συζητήσετε το θέμα. Ακολουθώντας τη συζήτηση της κοινότητας σου, και αν η κοινότητα επιθυμεί τη διακράτηση των δικαιωμάτων σου, παρακαλούμε να επικοινωνήσεις με το  m:Stewards' noticeboard, και να παράσχεις έναν σύνδεσμο προς τη συζήτηση της τοπικής κοινότητας, όπου θα εκφράζεται η επιθυμία τους η συνέχιση διακράτησης των δικαιωμάτων, και  επίδειξης των διαρκών προϋποθέσεων διακράτησης αυτών των δικαιωμάτων.   Εμείς οι  stewards θα αξιολογήσουμε τις απαντήσεις. Αν δεν υπάρχει καμία απάντηση μετά από ένα μήνα περίπου, θα προχωρήσουμε στην αφαίρεση των δικαιωμάτων σου. Σε περιπτώσεις αμφιβολίας, θα αξιολογήσουμε τις απαντήσεις και θα στείλουμε μια απόφαση πίσω στην τοπική κοινότητα για τα σχόλια και τις παρατηρήσεις. Αν έχεις κάποιες ερωτήσεις, παρακαλούμε να επικοινωνήσεις μαζί μας στο  m:Stewards' noticeboard.   Θερμούς χαιρετισμούς,Rschen7754 06:18, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article African Unification Front has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG; tagged for notability for 7 years, unresolved.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article African Unification Front is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African Unification Front until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 12:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chie Sawaguchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chie Sawaguchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Servants of the Light has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable psychic group sourced from primary sources and promotional. zero WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nomen mysticum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nomen mysticum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mast303 (talk) 00:55, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! What has happened over your 20 years, and how was editing Wikipedia like? Cometkeiko (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]