Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIDE Grand Prix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, NovaSkola. You have new messages at Acroterion's talk page.
Message added 02:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 02:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

I posted a sourced statement which proves what you said is false and you reject it (i post an interview with an Azerbaijani general who fought in the war and you post from a propaganda movie), i leave your statement and add mine and you still delete mine, i post pictures from an Azerbaijani source and you claim its not proof. Stop with your vandalism, just because you want to believe he killed Monte doesnt make it true. Ninetoyadome (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninetoyadome (talk • contribs) 01:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi there. I noticed that you recently nominated Azerbaijan Premier League and Neftchi Baku PFC for Good article reassessment. As this is something that it used for current good articles, and neither of those are listed as GA's at the moment, I believe that you wanted to nominate it for Good article nomination? If that is correct, you should remove the GAR-template at the talkpages and follow WP:GAN/I for instructions on how to nominate these articles for GAN. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Just to let you know. Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

The following sanction now applies to you (in accordance with the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions):

You are topic-banned (WP:TBAN) from everything related to Armenia or Azerbaijan for six months.

You have been sanctioned for the reason(s) set down in this Arbitration Enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. This sanction has been recorded on the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a topic ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeal. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal. If you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.  Sandstein  06:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating your Armenia / Azerbaijan topic ban with your edits of 2 June 2013 about Azerbaijani football,

you have been blocked from editing for 48 hours. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there.  Sandstein  06:07, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NovaSkola (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I've been user in Wikipedia long time ago, made over 20,000 contributions and never been given topic ban on Azerbaijani-Armenia relations few days ago by Sandstein. However, I think this ban is unfair as someone violated my IP and wrote some nonsense and as a result I've been unfairly blocked. Furthermore, looks like nobody given my account three-revert rule blocks I've demand to unblock me on charges of that 99% of my edits been trouble free, I've understand that in future I've take responsibility from my account as well as I will follow Wikipedia's guideline to make better community. --NovaSkola (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. The is an Arbitration Enforcement block, the details of which are currently being reviewed at a more appropriate venueJezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been mentioned here as a party [1] --Khodabandeh14 (talk) 03:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello NovaSkola! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

How is it vandalism when i am posting the Armenian side of the event? You claim the info i posted is one sided, have you read the article? There is no evidence in the article which proves Armenians were responsible and yet it claims Armenians were responsible. Like i stated in the summary of my revision the Armenian Genocide has a denial section because some people dont believe it took place so this article should have its own denial section as most people dont believe it happened. So you deleting it because you dont like it is an act of vandalism so i am giving you a warning here, if you keep deleting it i will report you. Ninetoyadome (talk) 18:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, NovaSkola. You re-added area and population in the article Azerbaijan Democratic Republic. I think information like should not be based on partisan sources. Can you please explain your point in the talk page? Thank you. --vacio 13:01, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Добрый вечер NovaSkola! Хотел бы спросить, правильное ли произношение слово Bakı здесь? hu.forvo.com/word/bak%C4%B1/#az Один мужчина из Турции, другой живёт в Бакы и говорят по разному. Хочу использовать на hu.wikipedia. Спасибо заранее. --Ilya Zhitomirsky (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Доброго дня. На английском как и на русском название города идет как Баку, а на Азербайджанском Бакы, на турецком идет как Бакю. Поетому для универсального использование юзать надо Баку, а если вы пользуйтесь оригинальное название города то Бакы. Надеюсь помог.--NovaSkola (talk) 01:12, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's relentless POV additions, lately in the Azerbaijan article.

This user constantly puts an inaccurate map about ethnic groups in Azerbaijan. Other users correctly remove it, but he puts it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.134.52 (talk) 17:55, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valley of the Wolves: Karabakh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley of the Wolves: Karabakh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 05:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.

These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend". Could all Azeri users prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.240 (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello,

There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Template duplications on the future use of navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how these templates are organized, named, and used in future, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC).

• I deny that this song won Eurovision. I can find no sources on it.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 03:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited 2012–13 Azerbaijan Premier League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gabala and Tovuz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. The article 'Faiq Hasanov' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.turneulregilor.ro/index1.php?lng=en&id=013

• You added this in February 2010.
• The bot tested this link on 17 April, 19 April and today, but it never worked.
• The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello,

There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Recategorising on the proposal of recategorising following the rollout exercise of the new navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how articles are reorganized in future to provide an easier index system, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC).

Hi,

Do you have a source for theses players leaving? I ask as both featured in the squad against Khazar Lankaran^[1].

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the blue bar.

The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter

Home Talk Portal Newsdesk EUROISION * WikiProject News * Message from the Editorial Team Welcome to the revamped WikiProject Eurvision newsletter! Yes, we're back after a 2-year absence! After much deliberation it was decided to resurrect the project newsletter, so that everyone can be kept informed of the goings-on around the project cyber-house. This newsletter will be delivered to you on a monthly basis with news, reviews, and updates relating to WikiProject Eurovision. Please be warm-hearted in encouraging everyone to do their best to contribute to all Eurovision-related Wikipedia articles, and welcome our new members to the project. If you would like something to appear in the July 2012 Edition of the newsletter, then please inform us at the Project Newsdesk. Happy editing, Important News There is a RfC discussion in regards to article layout, taking place on the project talk page. Could all members please ensure that they participate in the discussion so that we can all agree on important article structure issues. If you don't take part, then you only have yourselves to blame if a consensus is passed that you disagree with. Project News When creating new articles about a performer or song, please remember to add sources either from Eurovision.tv, ESCToday or other reliable sources. If you're not sure a source is reliable enough, then ask the project for an opinion. Data tables of winners for OGAE and Marcel Bezençon Awards have been mass added under the radar across a variety of Eurovision articles without any consensus, which there should be for something like that. These sections have been badly formatted with various problems including inappropriate links in the section headings (discouraged in MOS:HEAD), no written explanation on what these tables mean, and most importantly, no sources. Remember to only add content to articles that is relevant to the article's main subject. Anything not in relation to the article may be questioned and/or subject to redirection to an article that would benefit it's inclusion. Again if in doubt, ask on the article or project talk pages for an opinion - communication is an important tool. On the subject of communication, please make use of the article talk pages. They are a vital tool in conducting consensus talks of additions of proposed new sections and/or removal of unnecessary section. If you don't use these pages to put across your views, then you only have yourself to blame if actions are taken that you disagree with and you end up wandering into edit warring territory. The 2012 season of Eurovision has drawn to a close, and we now start preparations for the 2013 edition. While things will be slow to start of with, now is the ideal opportunity to do a clean-up exercise across articles relating to the project. There's over 4,500 articles associated with the project. If you happen to see a Eurovision related article without the {{EurovisionNotice}} template on the article's talk page, please add it. You can also read Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment if you would like to help assess or reassess articles in our project if you see that they have outgrown their current assessment. There is currently one unassessed article. And finally... a massive thank you to all members of the project for your constant hard work on collaborating and contributing to Eurovision related articles. Keep up the good work team! Eurovision News Just in case you've been sleeping under a rock recently, "Euphoria", by Swedish singer Loreen won the 57th Eurovision Song Contest with a score of 372 points. The dates for Eurovision Song Contest 2013 have been announced as 14 May 2013 (semi-final 1); 16 May 2013 (semi-final 2); and 18 May 2013 (final) and will be held in Sweden. The host city is still to be announced; with Gothenburg, Malmö, and Stockholm being among the candidate cities so far. Junior News The tenth edition of the Junior Eurovision Song Contest is scheduled to take place on the 1 December 2012, in Amsterdam, Netherlands. Dance Contest News Eurovision Dance Contest - Glasgow were the hosts of the Eurovision Dance Contest 2008, and since then there have been no announcements of the contest continuing with a third edition. Eurovision Young Dancers - The next contest is scheduled to take place in 2013 - the host city is expected to be announced towards the end of 2012. Asiavision News Asiavision Song Contest - After several postponements, the first contest is now scheduled to take place in the South Korean capital of Seoul; on 14 October 2012. EUROISION Issue XIX: June 2012 Page Milestones News of Sweden's victory at the Eurovision Song Contest 2012 was published on Wikipedia's front page news section on 26 May 2012. Previous Editions Back Catalogue Requests Is there an article you think we should have? Make a request for it to be made here. Member News The project had 83 members, with eighty active, and three inactive members at the time of publication. Encountered an editor who is interested in Eurovision? Then why not place our invitation template on their talk page and welcome them to the project. New Members We would like to welcome the following new members who joined since the 1 January 2012. (in alphabetical order) BabbaQ (talk · contribs) Bleubeatle (talk · contribs) Davidcolombia96eng (talk · contribs) Dfizzles (talk · contribs) Grandmaster (talk · contribs) GRgeoGR (talk · contribs) Innano1 (talk · contribs) JoseDLG (talk · contribs) Karlwhen (talk · contribs)) MsigDK (talk · contribs) Raniee09 (talk · contribs) Stee888 (talk · contribs) Xelaxa (talk · contribs)

This Newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC). If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list.

WikiProject Eurovision: This is a reminder to all members of Project Eurovision, that there is still an ongoing RfC discussion taking place at the project talk page. It is vital that everyone participates in this discussion, as it concerns the future manual of style and article layout in regards to Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year articles. This is your ideal opportunity to contribute suggestions and ideas on a major issue, which will reflect on the way these articles will be written in future. Thank You! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Simurq PFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

User:MauriManya is relentlessly replacing in the infobox of the Azerbaijan article, the map "Azerbaijan (orthographic projection).svg" which shows Azerbaijan with its de-jure borders and is replacing it with the map "Azerbaijan with Nagorno Karabakh and region.svg" which shows Nagorno-Karabakh as a legitimate entity. The user is not impartial and neutral and is only and relentlessly doing this unilateral map replacement in the Azerbaijan article, but interstingly enough not in other articles of countries which are in the same situation as Azerbaijan. Could you watch this user and revert his unilateral map replacements of Azerbaijan in the country article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.142.52 (talk) 08:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Azerbaijan Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champions League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Azerbaijan First Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neftchala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

An article you edited is being considered for deletion. Please see the discussion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football referees
Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

It is not called the Nagorno Karabakh Oblast, it is considered "Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region." Ninetoyadome (talk) 06:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Read the history of that event, it was oblast back then and stop arguing.--NovaSkola (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

It's talking about the present time "Khojaly is a medium sized city in Nagorno Karabakh". Presently it is not called an oblast, it is called an Autonomous Region. If you want to talk about the past then change the sentence to "Khojaly was a medium sized city in Nagorno Karabakh Oblast". Ninetoyadome (talk) 07:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Please note that a thread has been opened at WP:ANI which discusses your activity in the project. Please participate in the discussion there.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Khojaly Massacre .

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Khojaly Massacre or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 18:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

You are now notified of the discretionary sanctions provisions of the Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 (AA) arbitration case:

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision.

In future, please take care to edit constructively on contested topic areas. When in disagreement with an editor over an aspect of article content, take the dispute to the talk page or to dispute resolution; do not use the revert function to repeatedly force through your preferred version of the page. Toddst1 (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FK Khazar Lankaran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Álvaro Silva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simurq PFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Football stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabala FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gabala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are inviting feedback to your articles. Well, an issue is that you delete talk page items. The convention is that you keep talk page items on your page for a while, and then you archive them. How would I know whether somebody else has already commented on the issue before? I don't want to have to go through your talk page history to find out.

What I wanted to let you know about is that your DYK nomination has been rejected. I suggest you read up on the DYK rules. Schwede66 23:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi NovaSkola! I just publicated a book about urbanism and architectur in Baku. I am photographer and dedicade myself to other projects than wiki even though I use it oftenly. As I worked together with Oriana Kramer a lot in Baku and invested a lot lot time into this book projekt in order to save one or the other old architecture in your capital. So please be so kind to take this book into consideration: http://www.sebastian-burger.de/en/photo/baku/book for any issue: contact me via that website. I guess that by february there should be some copies in Baku, too! All the best! Sebastian--92.224.157.47 (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your message on my talk page. Help:Archiving a talk page tells you how it's done. Personally, I use the 'cut and paste method', because it gives me control over the items that I want to keep on the page a bit longer. Others prefer the 'Automated archival' method. It's up to you. When you've decided what you want to do, feel free to get in touch again if you need a hand with this. Schwede66 17:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Hörmətli həmkar, dəyişiklik edəndə bir az ehtiyatlı olun. Elə şəkilləri silmisiniz ki, onlar tarixdə çox az bir xalqın yaddaşına yazılmış və bu qədər uğurlu alınmışdır. Vikipediya dəyişiklik edəndə digərinə xələl gətirmədən etmək lazımdır. İnanıram ki, biz bir-birimizi anladıq. Çox sağ olun. --Proger (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Mən indi bir dəyişiklik edirəm. Bir baxın. Sizin şəklinizi də əlavə edəcəm. Hamıya yer çatar. Bir dəqiqə, indi xəbər verəcəm. --Proger (talk) 11:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

OK, problem deyl.--NovaSkola (talk) 11:38, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Hazırdır. Sizdən çox və çox xahiş edirəm, tarimizdə olan və çox unikal şəkillərlə yadda qalan "Müstəqilliyin bərpası" başlığında olan heç bir şəkilə əl dəyməyin. Bu şəkillər unikaldır. Onusda heç bir yerdə göstərilmir, gözüm çıxdıya salınır, siyasi qısqanclıq ilə qəbul olunur. Bu bizim ən şanlı tarixlərimizdən biridir. Düzü orada Şuşadan olan məscidin şəklini istəməzdim görmək. Çünki müstəqilliyimizin bərpası çox gözəl illərdir. Böyük oyanışdır. Ancaq eyni zamanda yerləşdiyiniz şəkil də olmalıdır. Çünki müstəqilliymizi elə qanın içində qazanmışıq. Hər-halda şəkillər əlavə etməkdə tam hüququnuz çatır, bircə köhnələri silməmək şərti ilə. Bundan əlavə Rəsulzadınin çox erkən yaşlı şəklini dəyişdim. O orada çox cavandır. Hazırki şəkil daha nüfuzludur. Onun ən aktiv illərinə düşür. Xalqın atasını məncə bu yaşda göstərmək daha gözəldir. Hörmətlə. --Proger (talk) 11:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Basha dushdum. Men ora mecidi qoymusam ki, bu Qarabag hadisilerini nese eks etdiren bir shey olsun cunki Wikipediada ondan bashqa ancaq Azerbaycanli kockunlerin shekili var idi ve istemedim eynisheyi gosterem.--NovaSkola (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Lap yaxşı. Əccəb eləmisiniz. Gördüyünüz kimi mən də onu saxlamışam. Bu arada Ramil Guliyevin Türkiyəni seçməsi mənə məlum deyil idi. Ancaq bu onun Azərbaycanın ən məşhur yüngül atleti olduğunu şübhə altına salmır axı. O Azərbaycandan çıxış etdiyi dövr ərzində, həm Azərbaycandan həm də azərbaycanlı olaraq ən məşhur yüngül atletçimizdir. Rəşad Sadıqov isə yaxşı futbolçu olsa da hazırda bildiyim qədərilə bir nömrəli qapıçımız ondan da məşhurdur. Yox? --Proger (talk) 10:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Mən başa düşürəm :). Sadəcə dediyim kimi bu onu Azərbaycandan və azərbaycanlı olaraq ən məşhur yüngül atletçimiz olmaqda çıxarmır. Tariximizdə ən məşhur atletçimizdir :). Şəkil də çox uğurlu alınmışdı. Niyə qoymadın axı? :P. Çox xoşlayıram o şəkli.. Bilmirəm niyə bəyənmirsən. --Proger (talk) 22:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Hə, bu da var. Düzdür. Neynək.. Heyif.. Ancaq Sizdən çox xahiş edib, lütf edirəm ki, "Azərbaycanı satıb, gedib Türkiyə vətəndaşı olub" kimi cümlələri işlətməyəsəniz. İlk növbədə onu bildirim ki, hərənin öz baxışı var. Azərbaycan yüngül atletika var? :) Nə satmaq? :) Başqa ölkənin vətəndaşı olmaq satqın olmaq anlamına gəlmir. O qədər xarici ölkə vətəndaşı tanıyıram ki, AR vətəndaşından ən azı yüz qat daha vətənpərvərdir. --Proger (talk) 23:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Neft Daşları at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! cmadler (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Art of Azerbaijani ashiqs at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sorry that this is a belated notification -- I just now realized that you had not been notified earlier. --Orlady (talk) 16:28, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Please revisit your nomination's entry to clear up the remaining concern about "ashiq" and "ashig". Thanks, Cunard (talk) 10:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the article got rejected at DYK, as the lead is a copyvio of the UNESCO source. Here's a diff of my review; it got pulled off the page soon after that. Given that you have put all the effort into expanding it, are you happy to address the issue? I note that the copyvio started with the very first edit, i.e. you have nothing to do with it. You can reply here; I've watchlisted your talk page. If you are not interested in fixing this, that's fine by me, but just let me know so that I can tag the article accordingly. Schwede66 21:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, NovaSkola. You have new messages at Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry's talk page.
Message added 14:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks a lot for creating Azerbaijan Chess Championship. It would be great if you also could add references. Best regards. Voorlandt (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Salam.

Sizin diqqətinizi bura ([2], [3], [4]) yönəltmək istəyirəm. Fikrimcə bu məsələlərdə yardımçı ola biləcəksiniz. Hörmətlə, --Verman1 (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi NovaSkola,

Sorry I didn't get back to you in a timely manner. About your post on my talk page about Twinkle, have you figured that out yet? WT:TW would be the place to go. Best, Airplaneman ✈ 14:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh, I see, you have been blacklisted. Yes, I'd inquire at the Twinkle talk page or ask the person who blacklisted you. Make sure you've addressed the issue that got you listed first. Airplaneman ✈ 14:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi, could you respond to the points I and others raised in August about use your of Twinkle to label edits you disagreed with as 'vandalism'? See [5][6] If you are willing to apologise for that prior use, you state that you have fully read the documentation, and you can show that you understand how your use of Twinkle was incorrect, I will restore it. Fences&Windows 18:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

You're off the blacklist. There might be a delay in gaining access again depending on server caching. Fences&Windows 18:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Just to let you know that I have declined your nomination for speedy deletion of Lezgistan under criterion CSD G3. As I note in my edit summary the article is certainly poorly-written, and may be politically inconvenient to some parties, but the term has a long-established currency, and can in no way be described as a hoax. Best. Jan1naD ^{(talk • contrib)} 13:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

I want to thank you for the star. I will try to do my best in the future.--KHE'O (talk) 01:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

     Hi, you can contact me via email: kamran0260@hotmail.com KHE'O (talk) 16:32, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Здраствуйте. Не могли бы вы из русской статьи Азербайджанцы перевести для Azerbaijani people об антропологии, что азербайджанцы официальны коренной малочисленный народ Дагестана об иранском происхождении азербайджанцев (в статье Iranian Azeris) это более широко описано, чем в основной статье, о том, что азербайджанцы являются частью пантюркизма и паниранизма и.т.п.

The article Qaya Quartet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A7 -- no indicia of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 05:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qaya Quartet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qaya Quartet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 01:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Just a quick note: I semi-protected the article, not with full protection, because according to the protection policy full protection is never used against vandalism. Just for future reference, and happy editing! Steven Walling 01:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dayirman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayirman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Do you have any sources to indicate which venues will be used? Intoronto1125TalkContributions 16:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Failure to engage meaningfully in discussions and to make drive-by reverts, as you just did on the Vank article, are grounds for sanction. There has been a (now stale) discussion in place for over three weeks now and no objections were lodged in regards to my proposals. You did not even bother to add your voice there and your sudden appearance only works to upset such the balance and such actions are all too reminiscent of Neftchi's edits. I caution you to refrain from making like edits in future.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 03:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MTV Azerbaijan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTV Azerbaijan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NovaSkola (talk) 01:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. -FASTILY^>Fireworks!< 05:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as MTV Azerbaijan, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NovaSkola (talk) 15:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi NovaSkola. If you make this kind of edit again, which is drawn from an independent third party source, and as far as my professional credentials can assess, represents an accurate view of the military balance in the region, without discussion, you will be blocked without further warning. Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 23:51, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Please read the actual reference, which is linked in the footnotes. Charles Blandy, a British military analyst employed at the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, is making some professional judgements based on what he reads from the Russian-language press and other sources. The general contention is also backed up by the linked International Crisis Group report, and finally and most importantly, it makes sense to me personally. The general situation has parallels with the Rwanda Patriotic Front experience and Israel; the Armenians feel they are isolated and outgunned by the military forces of Turkey and Azerbaijan, so they have a very high motivation to improve the functioning of their armed forces. According to all the data I have read, Azerbaijan's position is different, and the factors which impede the effectiveness of many post-Soviet armed forces are impeding the effectiveness of the ground forces. To be honest, I'm not so sure about the Air and Air Defence Forces; there is less data.

However I would invite you to continue to carry on this discussion on the talk page; this is a key issue for the article. Buckshot06 (talk) 10:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

In accordance with the above warning, following your recent edits to the article, in which you tried to use the IISS Military Balance 2011 to hide the fact that your source was a Azeri online newspaper account, I have blocked you for two weeks. I would advise strongly that you avoid editing these kind of articles in the future. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:07, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi NovaSkola. You may already be aware of User talk:Buckshot06#NovaSkola, but suffice to say that I have unblocked you in accordance with others' counsel. Be aware however that I have been advised that I should have actually initiated arbitration enforcement against you in accordance with WP:ARBAA2#Amended_Remedies_and_Enforcement. Please, as I have asked in my e-mails, read the actual CSRC report, take a look at the ICG report as well, and then feel free to come back to me. Buckshot06 (talk) 19:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the chess barnstar - I appreciate it. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 02:35, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome and thank you for the barnstar. If you need another logo done in the future feel free to let me know. Argyle 4 Life^talk 15:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Ravan Baku is done. Argyle 4 Life^talk 18:27, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello

This is to let you know that your report to AIV has been refused. This is because the IP has only ever edited once before, and hasn't received any warnings. Therefore has not received the 4 warnings we would normally require before even considering a block. If we blocked someone who has no warnings after 1 edit we would be assuming bad faith. Any questions please ask me on my talk page.--5 albert square (talk) 23:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision is currently suffering from inactivity, despite having a large number of active users as project members. It is recommended that you add the project talk page to your watchlist if you have not already done so, since there are a number of proposals on this talk page which will significantly impact on the project that should be of interest to you.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC).

Thank you for using {{cite web}} to reference content in Eurovision Song Contest 2012, since this makes things easier for everyone. However, there are some issues with the references that are being added such as this one. I went through the article yesterday and corrected some issues and have now just fixed the reference you have added. To save time in the future, please note the following points:

• work= parameter is for the name of the website, e.g. 1news.az.
• accessdate= is for the date you (the editor) accessed the article. Note that this is different from the day the article is published, which uses date=, and both should be specified where possible.
• language= parameter should be used for any source which is not in English.

If you need further help, please see the documentation at Template:Cite web. Thanks and happy editing. CT Cooper · talk 14:25, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the eurovision barnstar! I feel yery honored. Redpower94 (talk) 10:29, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Azeri football, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Azeri football and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Azeri football during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – PeeJay 12:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note that there have been some changes to operations surrounding Eurovision articles, these being that:

• Template names have now been standardised, for example Template:Countries in the Eurovision Song Contest and Template:Countries in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest have both been moved in order to be consistent. If you are planning to create a new template, please keep the standardised titles in mind.
• {{WikiProject Eurovision}} now accepts importance ratings as well as quality ratings, and the project now has a formal assessment department which gives details on how to assess articles, and provides a place for contributors to request re-assessment. Feel free to add the {{WikiProject Eurovision}} template to the talk page of any new Eurovision articles you create.
• The Eurovision Song Contest now has its own stub template at {{Eurovision-stub}}. Please only use this on Eurovision Song Contest stubs, with {{Music-stub}} and {{Dance-stub}} being the appropriate template for other Eruovision contests.

If you have any questions, please ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:12, 26 August 2011 (UTC).