Hi Mydreamsparrow/Archive 3, would you be willing to fix the infobox you have made in the article Edakochi? It has a broken format as seen in the page. Bekkadn (talk) 11:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Bekkadn -- DreamSparrow ^Chat 07:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!-- Bekkadn (talk) 10:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Justice K. Sukumaran.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 09:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Kanayi Kunhiraman Image.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 13:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Lavender waxbill (Estrilda caerulescens).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 04:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Superb Contributions. kudos Manujanardhanan (talk) 07:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mydreamsparrow,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mydreamsparrow,

This is to let you know that the featured picture File:Justice K. T. Thomas.jpg, which you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 30, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-01-30. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

K. T. Thomas (born 30 January 1937) is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India, known for his strong opinions on Indian socio-political matters. He was selected as a district and sessions judge in 1977, and became a judge of the Kerala High Court in 1985. A decade later, he was appointed a judge of the Supreme Court, on which he served until retiring in 2002. He was awarded the Padma Bhushan by the Indian government in 2007 for services in the field of social affairs. Photograph credit: Augustus Binu Recently featured: Aminah Cendrakasih List of equipment of the British Army Yellow badge Archive More featured pictures

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Muhammad Mahdi Karim per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Muhammad Mahdi Karim. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  - TheresNoTime ^😺 09:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mydreamsparrow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

OMG! I am surprised to see that my account is blocked for Sockpuppetry. As explained by Muhammad Mahdi Karim, we knew each other and he encouraged me to contribute to Wikipedia and I have contributed as much as I could by way of images and articles. You can check the entire contributions, all are either of politicians or connected to Judiciary of India as I am a lawyer by profession. Only deleted articles are of my budding time. It is true that, I have motivated many to contribute to Wikipedia in the same way I was motivated. User:Blacknclick is my friend and User:Orator1989 my colleague. They are few of the contributors I have motivated to contributed to Wikipedia. Last few days User:Blacknclick was with me and that time again he started editing Wikipedia. Even he has created some article and asked me to review it and I reviewed it naturally. I never know whether any monetary benefits involved in it. As far as User:Orator1989, he is always in my office and we use common wifi for browsing. Even I have no idea about the benefits, if any, or kinds of edits he made. Moreover, both of them are no way related or known to Muhammad Mahdi Karim as he is in Tanzania and we all are here in Kerala, India. In addition, you can have a look at my contributions, all are genuine and neutral and I always stick on that because I am contributing to Wikipedia for last few years and of course I am by experience refined by myself about the contributions and policies of Wikipedia. If at all any related edits I made with the above mentioned users, it just natural and only a support to a fellow Wikipedian and no intentional malefieds involved in it. I am not a fan of paid contributions or vandalism. I always try to improve my contribution standards. Recently, if you verify, most of my contributions are related to Indian Judiciary. As explained above, I may not be punished for the reason I have never dreamt of. And I will make my internet connection private and stop using the same by any other for avoiding any such situations in future. I request your kind-self to be an active Wikipedian by unblocking me thereby allow me to contribute to Wikipedia many more valuable contributions. I will be much more cautious in future.DreamSparrow Chat 16:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Unblock granted after consultation with the blocking checkuser. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised your appeal to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Muhammad Mahdi Karim and Mydreamsparrow. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:41, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a moment to respond to an inquiry regarding your relationship with Blacknclick and Orator1989 at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Muhammad Mahdi Karim. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mydreamsparrow,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

The article Al-Ameen Educational Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources nor any sources establishing notability used. Article fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Al-Ameen College of Pharmacy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources nor any sources establishing notability used. Article fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Al-Ameen College of Law has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources nor any sources establishing notability used. Especially when referencing other Wikipedia articles. Article fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Al-Ameen Arts, Science and Commerce Degree College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources nor any sources establishing notability used. Article fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Al-Ameen College of Education has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources nor any sources establishing notability used. Article fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Al-Ameen Institute of Management Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources nor any sources establishing notability used. Article fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Al-Ameen Institute of Information Sciences has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources nor any sources establishing notability used. Article fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Al-Ameen Pre University College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources used. Article fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Al-Ameen Primary & High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources nor any sources establishing notability used. Article fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]