Finally! After months of hard work and toil, 2006 FIFA World Cup controversies was promoted to Good Article status. On behalf of everyone, I'd like to take the chance to thank you for all your hard work in improving this article. Thank you! Daniel.Bryant 07:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your welcoming message - but I did not quite understand it. I see that you removed my attempt to place the discussion about criticisms and responses in a less dichotomous context, and your note suggests I more closely observe NPOV, but I would appreciate understanding what aspects of my comment you saw as POV. I gladly submit to the better wisdom of the group on how to communicate this, but I think it is important to include in the article the fact that there is a variety of views of EGW and her visions both within the SDA membership and within the academic community. As currently written the article gives the impressions that all members who value EGW reject all criticisms, which is simply inaccurate.

I apologize if I did not sign my comments on the discussion page for EGW - I thought that I had.

Also, I think you should add the reference to *The White Lie* to the footnotes. Gogh 18:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I have not yet mastered the finer points of wiki editing. I noted that I had not properly referenced my contribution in my discussion post and provided the reference information hoping someone else could do it before I figured out how.

I note now that someone has reverted my edit, and the EGW article again has the Rea book coming before the Numbers book. This is clearly an error. Whoever reverted this did not explain the action, so I don't understand why they did it. When I have time I will see if I can fix it, but you might want to look into it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gogh (talk • contribs) 07:27, August 24, 2006

Hi NotBob, Sorry, but I'm technically hopeless when it comes to things like sophisticated templates! You may want to ask User:Kingboyk (Beatles project) or User:Kirill Lokshin (Military History), they were largely responsible for writing the fancier templates. However, your list looks just fine to me - can you tell me what the problem is? Thanks for using the bot, Walkerma 20:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the sandbox. It isn't considered vandalism. If you don't like to experiment, use some other article. --200.118.163.92 00:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Hi NotBob. I'm just replying to your invitation, which I just found. I haven't looked at my pages for ages. I'm not too familiar with the ins and outs of wikipedia, but if I can be of help, I'd be glad to do so. Stefanbs 03:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Back in May you signed up for admin coaching. You're now at the top of the request list. Do you still want it? Petros471 22:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, admin coaching would still be useful. Thank you for asking. MyNameIsNotBob 23:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, your coaches are Lar and myself. We usually ask you to set up an admin coaching subpage (e.g. User:MyNameIsNotBob/Admin coaching), where we can talk about what you want out of the program, what areas you need advice in etc. Petros471 08:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with the subpage idea. Sounds good. What do you want me to put on there? A starting point would be good. Thanks. MyNameIsNotBob 09:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken the liberty of creating that page (with it's associated talk page), mostly by recycling elements from previous admin coaching sessions I've helped with. See you over there! Petros471 09:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With a bit more recycling, there is some more for you to be taking a look at on your admin coaching page :) Petros471 20:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate it if you could look into the issue on the talk page. IMO the user, at least from their username, has been setup just to link to the commentary on the forum. Thanks, Ansell 07:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi NotBob! I recently stumbled upon Wikipedia's SDA articles, and couldn't help noticing that there was plenty that I could contribute. (I have lots of personal knowledge about the SDA church, having been brought up in an SDA family, and have done heaps of research into SDA doctrine). I've also noticed that you have been very involved with these articles, with Wikiproject SDA church, and are an aspiring editor. I'd be delighted if you could comment on my recent contributions, particularly to the investigative judgment, Seventh-day Adventist doctrine and Eschatology (Adventist) articles. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. cheers,Tonicthebrown 14:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NotBob... please see What next? and let us know what your thinking is... thanks ++Lar: t/c 14:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(poke)... Let us know, Bob... thanks! ++Lar: t/c 22:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I think we might have to retire this programme for me, I'm going to be fairly busy for the next month, and the Admin Coaching is not exactly on my high priortiy list. Sorry for the delay. MyNameIsNotBob 02:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my bad, I JUST got back to see this... sorry for delay at my end but let us call it a win for now. I'll update Esperanza stats accordingly.... Let us know if/when you decide to stand for admin! thanks for participating. ++Lar: t/c 21:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MyNameIsNotBob,

Just thought I'd let you know there is currently a proposal to expand WikiProject A-League to include all areas of football/soccer in Australia, including the NSL, A-League, Socceroos, state leagues and more. A more formal proposal page can be found here. Please indicate whether you support the idea or not at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject A-League, and also add your 2c about what the new project should be called. Cheers! – AlbinoMonkey ^(Talk) 04:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MyNameIsNotBob, as one of my Wikifriends I would like to wish you a merry Christmas. Thanks for all your good work with WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church. Enjoy the break!

All the best,

Colin MacLaurin 08:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Cheers and ditto on the good work MNINB...he he ----Maniwar (talk) 05:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm E.Shubee's adopter. My main goal I set when adopting E.Shubee was to reach a compromise between all three parties involved in this while mentoring the obviously frustrated E.Shubee. I hope to be able to teach him how to meet his goals while still following policy. I'll do my best to keep personal attacks out of this. I would like to play the part of a neutral third party in this whole situation, while still giving advice to E.Shubee. I hope that we can get this matter resolved. Cheers, -- THL^CCD 12:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to get this problem solved ASAP, so let us begin the process. I would appreciate you stating your view of this dispute at User:The Hybrid/Dispute. Cheers, -- THL^CCD 13:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MyNameIsNotBob.

About a year ago you were involved in a peer review of Hurdy gurdy in which you were fairly pessimistic (justifiably so) about the article as it then stood and you provided some useful feedback. Since then a number of people have put in a fair amount of work on the article, and I would be interested in your feedback on the article now versus then. If you could take a few minues to look at it again and provide feedback on the appropriate peer review page, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. +Fenevad 00:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward5

I am posting this at a couple other pages. I have to be careful and not break the WP:3RR on Seventh-day Adventist Church‎ because of some biased edits. I would like to ask a few of you to help monitor it. I've basically been following protocol of other pages I edit. The editors will not allow links unless they lend value to the article and I am sticking to this with the Adventist article as well. There is a current discussion, however two editors feel compelled to usurp the consensus and stick in their edits. If you wish to weigh in and keep control, I welcome it. I must step back as I wish to not break the 3RR rule. Thanks--Maniwar (talk) 03:19, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Birthday	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing MyNameIsNotBob a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

> Kamope < 00:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MyNameIsNotBob,

I was wondering if you would give me some feedback about my user page. I am trying to develop it to be appealing in content and also aesthetically attractive. Writing about religious topics is always controversial, and I would like to know if you think anything would be offensive to anyone, or could be improved. I have also invited a few others. Please reply here. Cheers, Colin MacLaurin 13:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you all are being quiet on the Amazing Facts article and the articles talk page. Don't know if you've been watching, but I've been fighting a few POV edits and loaded sentences. Can you add anything to the conversations in lieu of a consensus? I think that would quell the issues. Thanks! --Maniwar (talk) 01:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just noticed that a template you created, Template:Welcome-au/temp, is unused and appears to be abandoned. I've marked it as deprecated, meaning it'll be deleted in two weeks' time if nobody objects. If there's a reason to keep it please leave a note at Wikipedia talk:Deprecated and orphaned templates and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. Thanks. Bryan Derksen 05:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 22:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

• FROM YOUR FRIEND:

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Birthday	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing MyNameIsNotBob a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

--Nadir D Steinmetz 12:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:38, 17 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

I remember you not believing my testimony that the Creation Seventh Day Adventist Church is a hoax. You should then find this interesting: It appears that the Creation Seventh Day Adventist Church has admitted in court to only having three members. See Case 1:06-cv-01207-JDB Document 70 Filed 06/11/2008 page 3. Doesn't that prove the central thesis in Walter McGill and the Creation Seventh Day Adventist Church Hoax is true and therefore that Creation Seventh Day Adventist Church is not notable and therefore should be deleted? --e.Shubee (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean to link this to your user page while re-timing that users comment?. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 06:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the IP in question was my own, I forot to sign in. Read the edit history! MyNameIsNotBob 06:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just read it. Also, I have replied to your post on my talk page. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 06:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have denied the unblock request. If you are interested in getting him unblocked, by all means, start a dialogue on his talk page. However, I highly doubt any admin would ever unblock a person based on a third-party's view. At the very least, if he is interested in not playing around, he can request an unblock. While the comment was juvenile, his other edits do not remotely indicate someone who wants to be an asset to the project. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And, there is absolutely no trolling involved with my dealings that very editor. If you recheck the users talk page, you'll see that I have replied to you on that talk page. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 07:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, MyNameIsNotBob. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- wwesockssign 05:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wwesocks^sign 05:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MyNameIsNotBob! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Silas Atopare - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:04, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IT IS SO ORDERED this, the 6th day of January, 2010, that all persons acting in concert with Defendant (WALTER MCGILL, d/b/a CREATION SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH, et al.,)… are hereby ENJOINED from using or enabling the use of such domain names and websites:

www.creationseventhdayadventistchurch.ca www.csdadventistchurch.co.cc www.csdachurch.co.cc/ www.csdachurch.0adz.com www.creationsdadventistrelief.to www.csda-adventistchurch.to www.creationsdadventistrelief.to www.adventistry.org www.creationseventhdayadventist.org.rw www.creationsdarelief.0adz.com www.seventhdayadventistsda-v-creation7thdayadventistcsda-uslawsuit.net www.seventhdayadventism.org www.7thdayadventism.org/ www.whypastorwaltermcgillisnotaffiliatedwithgcsdaadventistchurch.net www.csdachurch.wordpress.com www.csda-korea.org www.creationseventhdayadventistreliefprojectsint.ltd.ug www.seventhdayadventistchurchfoundwanting.us www.home.comcast.net/~7thdayadventist www.home.comcast.net/~csdachurch www.home.comcast.net/~creationsda www.home.comcast.net/~creation-adventist www.binaryangel.net www.thefourthangel.net www.home.comcast.net/~creation-sabbath www.home.comcast.net/~barbara_lim www.home.comcast.net/~crmin

s/ J. DANIEL BREEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at [[Talk:Seventh-day Adventist Church/GA1]. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion on the future direction of WikiProject Association Football in Australia. To view the discussion see here. You have received this message because you are listed as a member of the WikiProject. Hack (talk) 06:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Bob,

If I could have your input on the SDA template, I would greatly appreciate it. Thx...Simbagraphix (talk) 19:02, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link to it..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Seventh-day_Adventism

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 11:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

• From the Editor
• What are You doing For Lent?
• Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
• Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

---

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Wishing MyNameIsNotBob a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 22:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saw you had a good impact on our community and then simply left. I've added you to the page above to commemorate your work here, but if you don't want to be listed, please remove yourself and use an edit summary to state you would like to be left off (that way when someone checks your contributions to see if you can be added to the page that edit summary will always be at the top of the list and they won't bother adding you). Alternatively, if you come back, please remove your name anyway to show you are not missing. God bless, LazyBastardGuy 20:50, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MyNameIsNotBob. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MyNameIsNotBob. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]