Archives

April 2008 – March 2009 March 2009 – August 2009

Thanks. I'll continue the review later today. Theleftorium 12:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Music. Sorry to say it, but I haven't been able to find anything on Lexus Nexus yet. I'll keep looking but so far, no luck. I think the DVD commentaries should be sufficient to satisfy notability and verifiability for the article (such sources have been accepted in the past for other articles) but I know people are anxious for secondary sources. I don't think there's any out here on Lexus that I've missed but I'll keep at it... — Hunter Kahn _(c) 14:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article was nominated for deletion and the consensus was to merge it with Seinfeld (season 2), so why did you remove the information about it? 209.247.22.164 (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The episode was controversial enough to warrant its own section. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 12:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it make the page look "hideous"??? Reducing such a controversial issue to just a couple of sentences in the production section diminishes its importance. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 12:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm always open to compromise. It's now a sub-heading in the Production section. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 13:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Music2611 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Music2611's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Music2611! Peace, Rlevse 00:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Music, thanks for nominating me for the Wikipedia day thing! That was an unexpected but pleasant surprise. Thanks for thinking of me, that was really cool! — Hunter Kahn _(c) 15:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry too that The Bet (Seinfeld) didn't work out. As I'm sure you guessed, I found no sources. At least it was merged instead of deleted tho... — Hunter Kahn _(c) 15:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On August 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Ex-Girlfriend, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 17:01, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

can you check family guy and tell me what i can do to make it better. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Music2611. You have been invited to join WikiProject Family Guy, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Family Guy-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Family Guy}} to your userpage. --Pedro J. the rookie 00:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)|}[reply] thanks for the help. --Pedro J. the rookie 18:54, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Music, look if you are not so many things to do can you help in fg again we are tryin to make it GA, we have been told what to do in the talk page, so if that is no problem can you help me out. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 01:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

aprriciate it Music. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 14:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you could help, it would help a lot, but i'll stilll help around the section . --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 15:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey i am working in Patriot Games (Family Guy) and you are very expirienced in that level, so do you think you could help tell me where to find good refrences, production and reception things. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! With reference to this I can help out with copy-editing if you still need it. WikiRoxor ^talk 14:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW congrats on getting North by North Quahog FA status! WikiRoxor ^talk 14:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've spent the past six weeks overhauling the hip hop dance article and now that I've finished I posted it for peer review here. I decided to invite you to review it because you reviewed the Stacy London article I wrote (well, heavily edited) in the past and your user page is a shrine to all the articles you've helped obtain GA/FA status. Perhaps you can add a GA/FA template for the hip-hop dance page in the future. Anyhow, you're familiar with this process so I would appreciate your feedback. Be forewarned that this is a long article. Not including refs/external links, templates, and categories it's 7 pages printed. If you accept my invitation to review you may want to print it first and make your edits that way. I found it easier to read and to correct when I did this. Although long, it makes for a good read during a lunch break, a bus ride, or pure boredom. I learned a lot myself while rewriting this article. If you like to learn, this could be an incentive for you. Gbern3 (talk) 17:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for your msg. Sounds great. I would really like another opinion. I've received two peer reviews so far and both reviewers felt it was "far from FA" and found fault with my sources. Something having to do with WP:peacock terms in relation to my references. I think they were trying to say that I was embellishing some points but that wasn't stated explicitly. One of them recently said I needed more. If/when you decide to tackle the article you may want to read what they had to say on the peer review page here. Maybe you'll agree, maybe you'll disagree but their feedback is throwing me off. I never expected there to be a problem with my sources. I would appreciate a third person to either confirm or deny. // Gbern3 (talk) 20:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Music2611,

Charlie Sheen, an article that you have edited in the past, is currently being reviewed with regard to its Good Article status. You may participate in the review discussion here.

Regards,   Cs32en  09:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll start in on it later today. MacMed^talk_stalk 12:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished up the copyedit, there wasn't really a lot to do. A few spelling errors and a run-on sentence or two, but that was pretty much it. I added one {{fact}} tag, on the end of a statement that I would personally want to see a citation for were I reviewing at FAC. In any case, good luck with the FA! Regards, MacMed^talk_stalk 21:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Music, your goodnatured response to the good article reassessment of Charlie Sheen, an article you had worked on very diligently, is greatly appreciated. Keep up the good work! Pete (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you had clearly done a lot of good work on the article -- I read through the initial review -- and a lesser Wikipedian might have been rather insulted by some of the comments that were flying around. Just appreciate how you took it in stride, is all. -Pete (talk) 20:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

North by North Quahog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Congrats! Cirt (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On September 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Revenge (Seinfeld), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

WP:DYK 12:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated Category:Spin City ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this nomination from the FAC list because Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Ex-Girlfriend/archive1 was already running. You can re-transclude this one when the other nomination has been archived/promoted. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See here. Cheeers, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:53, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

if you can review family guy for ga. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 23:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And those patriots game looks like a good GAN. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 18:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On October 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Apartment (Seinfeld), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 06:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed a typo on your userpage. ceranthor 21:04, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. ceranthor 01:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of The Baby Shower (Seinfeld) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! –Katerenka (talk • contribs) 03:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to make this artical a GA can you help me. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 01:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

forget the before i see you where trying to make Gregory house an FA if you wish to try again i am able to asist and help. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

so what do you say.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:48, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worry, i am very young do not now when to shut up some times:D.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 21:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the chinease restraunt has become a ga.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Music are you a good peer reviewer?--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:31, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On October 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Baby Shower (Seinfeld), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (see the pageview stats(?)) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks ... Do think about one for Halloween! Victuallers (talk) 06:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I took care of your issues at the FAC for "Interactions (The Spectacular Spider-Man)" - except I do have one question left up there. I'd appreciate it if you'd come and look back at it. Thanks. The Flash ^{talk} 22:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't, though I do own volumes 2–5. Tezkag72 (talk) 13:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Road to Rhode Island" is on volume 1, which contains seasons 1 and 2. But I'll take a look at the commentaries for the other two and put info into their articles. Tezkag72 (talk) 21:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I'll try to get a few of them done this week. :) Theleftorium 14:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your concerns at Talk:Homer the Whopper/GA1 have been addressed. Theleftorium 20:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been a bit busy. I'll try to find something tomorrow. Theleftorium 21:03, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crap, I completely forgot about it again. I'll do it now. Sorry. Theleftorium 15:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I didn't find anything specific for "The Revenge". I'll just send my NewsBank access to you so that you can search more thoroughly yourself (and you can use it as much as you want in the future). I hope that's OK. :) Theleftorium 15:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. :) I've sent it to your email, BTW. Theleftorium 15:35, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your concerns toward the article has been fixed. --TIAYN (talk) 06:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure that i've done all your tasks now. --TIAYN (talk) 20:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --TIAYN (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've read it, and its pretty clear that i don't understand it. Can you please show my how to do it, and why it is so important to include it? I'm confused and stressed. --TIAYN (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Took an awful long time, but i did it. ;D--TIAYN (talk) 17:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Music. Sorry for not getting back to you before. Things have been ridiculously busy for me lately and I had to take something of a break from Wikipedia altogether for a while there. This week continues to be busy for me at work, but I will try to get you those Seinfeld references by Friday. If I can't, I'll definitely get them for you early or mid next week. Sorry again! — Hunter Kahn _(c) 02:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Alright. Sorry I dropped the ball on that one for you! — Hunter Kahn _(c) 16:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no I do not - all the info I got from the book was from Google Books, which actually contains most all of the book. Sorry I can't help more. The Flash ^{talk} 21:45, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the info must be on the dvds and Ctjf83 has almost every one of them.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you started Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Ex-Girlfriend/archive2 but didn't add the nomination to WP:FAC. I wasn't sure if this was on purpose, just giving you a heads up. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 00:17, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On October 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Phone Message, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 19:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Unfortunately, I am not be able to copyedit The Chinese Restaurant currently because I'm busy with school, among some other prior commitments for this weekend. I should probably note that in the listing for GoCE. I hope you can find someone else to copyedit it for you, and good luck with the article! talkingbirds 21:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mike Flaherty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 02:06, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Randall Winston.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 02:06, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI [1]. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Do you think you can review a Family Guy FLC? Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Family Guy cast members/archive1 needs a few more pairs of eyes. Thanks in advance, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Music2611. You have new messages at Pedro thy master's talk page.
Message added 18:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The article The Apartment (Seinfeld) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Apartment (Seinfeld) for things needed to be addressed. Mm40 (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review this artical Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Family Guy (season 5)/archive2.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 01:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your request for the Seinfeld episode, The Chinese Restaurant and am happy to help! I'll get right to it. Happy editing! ATC ^{. Talk} 21:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Please see my talk page. Regards, Airplaneman ^talk 22:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Music2611, I suggest fixing these two things and then I think I'm done. If you still want more help, you can ask at anytime.

1. The article says its the eleventh episode but according to the article's Entertainment Weekly episode list article, it says it was the 16th episode. See [2]. Is the source wrong or is it accurate? If it's right I suggest revising the episode #, and if not, find a reliable source or one in the article itself and I suggest adding it on the infobox, where the episode # is.
2. Also the caption for the pic is very long and should just give a premise. I suggest it say: Michael Richards, who portrayed Kramer, did not appear in the episode "The Chinese Restaurant". And eliminate everything else after it.

And sorry about some formatting issues; I thought some things looked a drop off. Good luck with FAC status and happy editing! ATC ^{. Talk} 01:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem. Also, just to point out that all the other stuff in the caption is in the article already, and sometimes if there are multiple problems in an article; even people at FAC don't pick up on it. It's up to you, though. Good luck!! ATC ^{. Talk} 06:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, that is total BS — I read three or four supports with only one open oppose. Not sure why it was archived, but I've supported nonetheless. The Flash ^{talk} 19:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the premature nominations; please work on the copyedit issues and renominate in a few weeks, once all issues are addressed. Also, please hold the attacks. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:07, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remember (directing at Flash) that FAC is not a vote. A delegate is not going to promote an article that previously accumulated multiple supports when a significant oppose was logged. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding this comment, the reviewers, not the nominators, decide when the issues they've raised have been resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:51, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: messages such as this are non-neutral and are considered canvassing, especially since you contacted only the supporters and not the other reviewers (such as Karanacs, who opposed). Please do not do this again. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:38, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I definitely do not hold a grudge against you, and wish you good luck with the article. Just urging you to be a bit more careful. Consider this the end of the discussion. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heads-up: Adrian Monk needs a clean-up in the "Trudy's murder" section following the finale on Friday. Sceptre ^(talk) 19:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re the header: it's a quote from part one of the finale. Sceptre ^(talk) 20:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Music2611. It's me, Artichoke-Boy.

I just wanted to thank you for your message. I just received it today due to the fact that personal matters have prevented me from editing for a while. I should resume casual editing soon, though, with Seinfeld articles being my top priority.

---Artichoke-Boy (talk)(sign) 00:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will be busy but I'll look at and copyedit The Ex-Girlfriend inbetween the middle of the week through the weekend. ATC ^{. Talk} 21:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Music2611. It’s me, Artichoke-Boy.

I just want to let you know that I’ve completeled a GA review on the Seinfeld episode "The Statue," which you nominated. It's my first one. Here it is, if you want to check it out. ---Artichoke-Boy (talk)(sign) 21:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Stepfather.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have just a few concerns with the GAC:

• I can't remember how much Peter's cut out of Kathy Ireland plays, but is it enough to include it in the lead summary?
• 2nd sentence in the plot, can you specify that Peter "kills" her, I think he does, but I don't wanna put it in cause i'm not 100% sure
• I would remove "and her children Jewish by heritage." Since Peter isn't jewish, how does that make the kids automatically jewish?

CTJF83 chat 01:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to let you now i have nominated Family Guy for FAC and informeing major FG contributers.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 18:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Policesquaddvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:11, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:JamesWilsonHouse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Music, long time no talk! I wanted to let you know I reviewed your Family Goy GAN. Let me know once you've addressed the suggestions! — Hunter Kahn 04:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Mey Music. Just wanted to let you know I reviewed The Deal (Seinfeld) as well, and there are just a few outstanding questions there. With the Wikicup and all I've been sort of slowed down lately, but I'm going to try to review your other noms in short order.. — Hunter Kahn 18:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've been fixing the article for a while now, but lately I haven't figured out too many things to improve on. Do you have any suggestions? Nergaal (talk) 23:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed. Just pinging you about it in case you're not on for a couple days or something. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the first season of South Park is ready for FT! As you were a participant, and will be listed as a co-nominator, I wanted to bring this discussion to your attention before I officially nominated it. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 00:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The FT passed! Congrats! — Hunter Kahn 04:36, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:58, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Music2611. I am here to tell you that Thirteen has a GAR here. GamerPro64 (talk) 22:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the article's delisted. Thank you for your input. GamerPro64 (talk) 16:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Police Squad! episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I already copy-edited the article on July 31st per your request during the Backlog Elimination drive. Were you looking for another? You may want to request another at the appropriate page; Diannaa or another editor will gladly take it in their hands. _EricLeb⁰¹ (Page | Talk) 16:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Francoise Cherry-Cohen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just having a job in the television industry isn't enough - what has she actually done that is notable? I couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 00:27, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you appear to be interested in House. A House WikiProject has been started to better format the articles surrounding House. You are hereby invited to join. Thank you.

Figured since you were active in the last one you might be interested.Talktome^(Intelati) 04:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Francoise Cherry-Cohen, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francoise Cherry-Cohen until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Too often great editors like you are overlooked and not given the credit deserved for all their great contributions. So I am awarding you this barnstar to let you know I greatly appreciate all you do for Wikipedia, and please keep up the outstanding work!! CTJF83 chat 03:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Music2611. Just wanted to bring your attention to this and this. — Hunter Kahn 03:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have nomiated this image for speedy deletion, because the fairuse rationale is invalid.·Maunus·ƛ· 17:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on May 8, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 8, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 20:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Adrian Monk-small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Michael Tritter. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Theoppositesex.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fishinadrawer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox movie quote has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory House, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gemini Award.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:30, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:20, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are reciving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the first message sent out in September, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The current deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. A third and final message will be sent out during the last week of the clean-up before the deadline. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

• WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech

Hi there, I'm notifying you as I noticed your impressive work on the GA Quality article, PTV (Family Guy). If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

1. List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
2. Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
3. Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
4. Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
5. Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 22:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the past two messages sent out in September and October, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. This will be the last message sent out before the deadline which is in 2 days. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

Template:Muppets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:49, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A 'Request For Comment' for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found here. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) here. At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support. If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread. Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal.

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 01:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed between 12-14 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the initial messages I sent out went to only WikiProject members and users that had over 15 reviews). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. Now, one of the most important criteria is that you have at least 15 independent reviews. If you are reading this, you are likely 3 (or less) reviews short, so if you review another couple nominations, you can become a recruiter! If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". NOTE: If you are interested in becoming a recruiter but do not meet the 15 review requirement, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters and put your status as "Not Available" until you have reviewed enough nominations. Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 21:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions03:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! A GAN Backlog Drive will begin in less than 4 days! In past Backlog Drives, the goal was to reduce the backlog of Good article nominations. In the upcoming drive, another goal will be added - raising as much money as we can for the Wikimedia Foundation. How will this work? Well, its pretty simple. Any user interested in donating can submit a pledge at the Backlog Drive page (linked above). The pledge should mention the amount of money the user is willing to donate per review. For example, if a user pledges 5 cents per review and 100 nominations are reviewed, the total donation amount is $5.00. At the time this message was sent out, two users have submitted pledges for a total of 8 cents per review. All pledges, no matter how much money, are greatly appreciated. Also, in no way is this saying you must make a pledge. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or leave a message on the Backlog Drive talk page. And remember, there are less than 4 days before the drive starts!--EdwardsBot (talk) 03:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on December 31, 2013! If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive! If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them here--EdwardsBot (talk) 00:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:

• This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
• Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
• The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
• An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fred Gwynne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:15, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Living in Harmony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Music2611. I saw you was the one who promoted Adrian Monk to GA. Thus, I came here to ask for your help. I've worked on Mr. Monk Takes Manhattan but had difficult to find info on production. If you own it and if you have time, could you tell me if Monk: The Official Episode Guide would be helpful here? (If you look at the article you'll see that I cite it but I only took that from Trudy Monk). Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 02:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Music2611. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Louie/archive2.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Wikipedical (talk) 04:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the GA Cup, from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing Good article nominations; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers. Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type? Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high. It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! Sign-ups will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the four judges. Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply] To receive future GA Cup newsletter, please add your name to our mailing list.

Thank you for uploading File:DexterPilot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DexterCCad.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Austronautsoundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Austronautsoundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Music2611. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Harrisontable.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cleavon Little.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TV IV-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to give you the bad news, that there was some socking on the supports for this FA. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FAR coordinator User:Casliber has nominated House (TV series) for a featured article review here. This is a procedural review of its FA status due to the discovery of socking at its original FAC. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. The instructions for the review process are here.

If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that I've scheduled Volcano (South Park) to appear on the main page as today's featured article on August 27, 2018. If you need to make tweaks to the blurb, it is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 27, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TV series

Thank you for quality articles about TV series and their characters, such as Volcano (South Park), List of Dexter episodes and Michael Tritter, for GA reviews, for goodnatured responses, for "working on wikipedia as both English lessons and a fun activity", - Dutch speaker, repeating (21 August 2009): you are an awesome Wikipedian!

We miss you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golden Calf for Best Short Film is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Calf for Best Short Film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ^{[Username Needed]} 12:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Music2611. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional chiropractors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 23:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject House has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive The March 2021 GAN Backlog Drive begins on March 1, and will continue until the end of the month. Please sign up to review articles and help reduce the backlog of nominations!

-- For the drive co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Harper (Two and a Half Men) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Harper (Two and a Half Men) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nakedguntrilogy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lost to-do has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Police Squad! theme.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Scary Movie Trilogy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Practice Title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]