Archives

May 2006 - May 2007 May 2007 - Sept 2007 Oct 2007 - Nov 2007 Dec 2007 - June 2009 June 2009 - March 2010

Hallo: Bullitt is a film; Bullit (one t) is now a dab page. The user box at User:Mtmelendez/Userboxes/Bullit points to what's now a dab page (it used to be a redirect to the film from this wrong spelling). You might like to correct it? There are a lot of incoming links to the dab page, from user pages, and I think they're probably all from this userbox! PamD 22:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 04:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Would it be possible for me to use this image of yours: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Willemstad_harbor.jpg As a creative commons attribution only image? (Rather than a creative commons attribution share-alike image) I'd like to use it in one of my upcoming videos if that's possible. --CGPGrey (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Willemstad_harbor.jpg. I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.169.27.34 (talk) 17:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please unprotect User:Mtmelendez/monobook.js? Such pages can only be edited by the user to which they're attached or by administrators. Full protection adds no benefit. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yiye Ávila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primera Hora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I know it's a bit random, but I thought that approaching an admin might help. I've created an article which is nominated for deletion. In my humble opinion, it might not be the article of the year, but it doesn't deserve deletion. Other articles in its category are not displaying superior standards. Would you mind taking a look?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ilan_Shiloah

Thank you if you choose to help.

Glovex104 (talk) 21:43, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Glovex104[reply]

Did you really just edit through full protection adding unsourced info? I think you might want to self-revert. Toddst1 (talk) 16:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Admin editing through full protection. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there As an administrator you deleted the entry "the mountain firework company" back in 2007. I am hoping to reinstate the page. The mountain firework company is a UK band (2003 to current) and I am the Bass player. Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonastro (talk • contribs) 00:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there As an administrator you deleted the entry "the mountain firework company" back in 2007. I am hoping to reinstate the page. The mountain firework company is a UK band (2003 to current) and I am the Bass player. Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonastro (talk • contribs) 00:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hermano, I'm glad to see you around. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey hermano, the Wikipedia foundation put on their cover. Soy el viejo feo.

Tony the Marine (talk) 00:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Inauguration of John F. Kennedy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[http://www.jfklibrary.org/ John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inauguration of John F. Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inauguration of John F. Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes, I know... :(

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

While the article I am working on my slap some wrong I felt it was to different than BS and needed to be restored to its own article with much improvement and references which I am currently working on. After that guy showed up I was kind of frustrated he kept redirecting it while I was in the middle of working on it. My wifi connection with my neighbor is poor and unreliable so I save often to prevent loss of work. I believe my edit note made my point well. "It looks like horseshit right now but that will change and that is no bullshit. Try reversing those terms, it would not make sense." 172.56.11.217 (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC) PS I would join if more wiki editors were courteous like you have been but many are rude and obnoxious and I believe that turns many away from becoming an official registered editor.[reply]

You said to ask for help so here I am. I want to create a redirect for Rocking Horse Shit to Horseshit. I have no idea how to do that or if it can be done easily. The term is used in the US, Ireland, Australia and I have referenced it's use in the article multiple times. I also need to improve my references to include retreived dates but I can figure that out from other articles. Still a work in progress and now that it is not buried it may receive some more experienced editoral help. Thanks. Sorry my neighbors WIFI signal IP changes all the time so I have a different IP now. 172.56.11.19 (talk) 12:54, 5 March 2014 (UTC) P.S. Cool to see your from Puerto Rico I dated a beautiful girl from Puerto Rico named Eugènia years ago and went to San Juan, El Yunque rainforest, snorkeling and Luquillo beach of course. I also drank to much rum but I have learned since then to respect Ron Bacardi 151. We went to Club Lazer in San Juan but I guess it is closed now.[reply]

• Ron Barcardi also needs a redirect. Surprised that was not done already.

Then I suggest you create an account. Members with accounts can create pages and redirects. :) - Mtmelendez ^(Talk) 14:45, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If Target cannot keep stuff secure how can wiki? Not willing to take the risk. How would being registered allow someone to redirect? That sounds like an admin function. I was hoping you could do the redirect.

Creation of articles and redirects can be made by normal users. And if you are afraid about privacy, Wikipedia's servers are pretty secure. Come on, join the project. :) - Mtmelendez ^(Talk) 15:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Melendez, you seem to be familiar with Ponce and that's good we need people that can help with Ponce articles and the entire southern PR which seem to have been neglected quite a bit while you were gone. Since I am familiar with that region as well, perhaps it might be a good idea to keep each other in mind when making major revisions like the one at Cafe Rico. I reinstated the information you removed because WP:SELFPUB states that a SPS is an acceptable source as long as the information involved is information about theCafe Rico company itself.

That said, Cafe Rico's own website is an RS because (1) they are not making some outrageous claim (e.g., "We have made the world's best coffee for the last 200 years"); (2) they are not making a claim about a 3rd party (ex: "Maxwell House was fined by the Federal Government for not keeping clean production facilities"); (3) there is no doubt that the cited website is indeed Cafe Rico's corporate website; and (4) the Cafe Rico article is not based only on Cafe Rico's corporate website's information. Fundamentally, this means -among other things- that, for example, a list names of the Cafe Rico's company presidents does not violate WP:PRIMARY simply because it was published by Cafe Rico ("self-published"). On the other hand, the same list would be a violation of WP:PRIMARY if, say, Melendez walked into Cafe Rico's corporate office and was handed a handwritten list of company presidents by its front-desk receptionist from where Melendez then proceeded to populate the presidents' subsections of the Cafe Rico article. Hopefully we are in sync now.

I added some cites you requested, and will expand the biblio info later today as my real-life time allows. If you are also saying that, ideally, we should have more citations for the entire article, I would be the first editor to second that.

Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mercy. I've been away from the project for a while, trying to get back to full form again. My edits to Cafe Rico were made in good faith in keeping with Wikipedia's policies. I do not agree that the article meets the WP:SELFPUB criteria, in many of its aspects. The criteria, clearly states:

• "the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;"
  • I would argue that several claims within the article, which use the company's own website as the source, try to do just that:
    • "It was the first agricultural cooperative union in Puerto Rico."^[1] (That is a notable claim, but who else backs it up?)
    • "It is the only coffee packaged in a vacuum, a technique used to preserve the coffee's aroma." (sounds like an advertisement)
    • "This will make the Las Americas location "the largest coffee roasting location in Puerto Rico" and the facility "the most modern coffee roasting facility in the Caribbean."^[2][3] (Big claim with a big problem: those two statements are not in the source it refers to, so where did they come from?)
    • "The company has $10 million in resources, with reserves of $4 million." "During fiscal year 1962-63 the total volume of the cooperative was $35 million." "In the 1930s, the company had over $300,000 in escrow at the bank of Baltimore." "Annual 1965 sales are over $8 million." (this information should not be in the article, unless it is publicly distributed in reports, which are usually audited, or are reported by fiscal and credit agencies, such as SEC, Moody's, Fitch, etc. Any company can claim how much it earns and owns, but it needs to be backed up with independent sources. And why include financial information from the 1930s and 1960s in different parts of the article?).
• "it does not involve claims about third parties;"
  • By saying it was the first to do something, or is the biggest at doing something, it indirectly states that it is better or more notable than its competitors, and therefore subtlety making the article as a sort of advertisement. To remove this concern, such information should be supported by independent third-party sources.
• "the article is not based primarily on such sources."
  • This is my real concern. There are two main sources to this article: the Perla Del Sur article, and the company's website. The only two notable claims that the Perla article states is (1) that the company's products represent 60% of Puerto Rico coffee sales and (2) that the company renovated its Ponce facilities to consolidate its manufacturing there, and (3) that he company owns the Cafe Rico, Cafe Rioja, and Cafe Yaucono brands. Now, the first claim is a very important one, requiring equally important sources. I'm not sure if the author of the article and the newspaper investigated that claim, but assuming they did, we can leave it in the article. The second and third claims are not controversial, so obviously they can stay. All other claims and information in the article are either unsourced or use the company's website as a source. If the information is self-verifiable and non-controversial (per WP:SELFPUB), such as the company's locations, list of products, its headquarters, and its past presidents, then I'm okay with the information staying in the article. However, the claims that I stated above clearly do not meet the WP:SELFPUB exceptions, and constitute red flags ("surprising or apparently important claims not covered by multiple high-quality sources"), so I removed them.

Apart from that, I also removed the Past Presidents and Board of Directors list because I do not deem them necessary in a company article. Most articles I've seen only discuss key people related to the company, not its entire governing body, past and present. What information does this bring the reader of a Wikipedia article? If they want to find that information, its better they access the company's website. I'm ok with leaving the past presidents list, but the Board of Directors list should be removed.

Finally, my edits to the article also tried to fix up all the referencing format errors in the page. Since the article only uses two sources, as above, the References should use the "ref name" style to improve the MOS, but your revert now lists duplicates of such references, which aren't even consistent in the way they were included (compare this to this). Please, next time ask me to revert my edits so I can do it manually and leave the good stuff intact while re-inserting the removed content.

I'm sure we can find a consensus on this article, but it definitely needs work. Its current condition, to me, is not good for Wikipedia. - Mtmelendez ^(Talk) 02:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melendez, I took a quick look at your response above. I am currently tied up with a real-life commitment and wont be able to get back to this until the weekend. Please go ahead and tag the article as/where you deem necessary. I will find sources for what can be backed up via a 3rd party RS. Then we will decide the anything still in dispute. Fair? Thanks. Mercy11 (talk) 06:33, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melendez, I added some more cites. Take a look at it when you have a chance and tag stuff you still feel needs tagging. Thanks. Mercy11 (talk) 13:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could look at the changes I made to the info box on the article and see if it's better. I showed sources for the causes of the protests and updated a few things. Thanks for you help on the article! --Zfigueroa (talk) 02:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,I'll take a look. - Mtmelendez ^(Talk) 02:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss with this user WP:FORUMSHOP. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 02:57, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro Delgado Hernández, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Rican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dupont Plaza Hotel arson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheraton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Puerto Rico for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 22:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~ Anastasia (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If u have some spare time, I would like your input on this discussionLbertolotti (talk) 17:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 18:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 00:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MoS:MATH. Since you had some involvement with the MoS:MATH redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 18:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Puerto Rico Health Reform is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puerto Rico Health Reform until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zubin12 (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Edit count. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 6#Edit count until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caribbean School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caribbean School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 17:50, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Compliance requirements has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 10:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cerro Maravilla murders has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 08:53, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]