Scroll down past the boxes for threads :)

• MexFin (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Disinformation research ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello!

I am writing to understand more about your decision to reject the draft of disinformation research. I am writing this here because the template used to reject the submission is a bit unclear, and I would like to have more clarity on the precise issue so I can correct it. The template emphasizes three problems with the draft: Informal writing, neutral point of view, and reliable sources.

- Informal writing. Could you please help me understand what exactly you see as informal writing? I would like to know how to correct it.

- Neutral point of view. I even included a section on criticism of this line of research precisely to make it neutral.

- Reliable sources. Could you help me understand which sources are not reliable? I included 38 academic references, all of them from peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

Thank you so much for your help. MexFin (talk) 07:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MexFin I have responded on the AFCHD thread. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 02:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheTechie,

I was just working on closing nearly two dozen AFDs that you had opened at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 3 and am hoping that I can persuade you to not post a deluge of AFDs over the course of an hour or two. Please pace yourself and don't post so many on the same day. Maybe 3 or 4 a day over the course of a week. Remember that every single AFD you post has to be reviewed by a closer and, typically, several commentators.

Also, your deletion rationales are very insubstantial and poor. It's not evident from reading them whether or not you have conducted a thorough WP:BEFORE which is required. Look for sources that might not have been found yet before nominating an article for deletion. Thank you though for your contributions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I support the above comments. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

So I noticed that you had tagged the Vikasa Soudha page for the lack of a lead. I have added lead to the article now, but my main inquiry is the second tag, that is the notability tag. The notability tag us for geographic features, but the Vikasa Soudha is a man made structure. Do I just revert it? AlvaKedak (talk) 13:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vitorperrut555 (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mate, there's an ongoing discussion about album reissues and remixes at WikiProject Music. Please do stop by and leave your suggestion Thank you. dxneo (talk) 18:12, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cornelius Pass Road you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]