Hey listen, facts are facts, regardless if you can play the video or not. Frank Zappa did in fact perform the song in 1981 so it is kind of silly to delete factual information all bc you cannot play a source video.

Also there are videos you can only play on YouTube and no other website and sometimes it is easy to just assume that a certain video cannot be played where in fact it can only be played on YouTube and nowhere else. Not saying you don't know that ofc, but I made that mistake too, so it is just a friendly reminder. -Cm09181992 (talk)

A million thanks for creating pages about those two songs. I couldn't believe there had been no article on "Don't Eat the Yellow Snow" for such a long time. Could you please make an article on "Jewish Princess?" --Sow-crates (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I also recommend making pages for "Dirty Love," "Zomby Woof," "Dinah Moe Humm," and "San Ber'dino." --Sow-crates (talk) 08:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Advance Romance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advance Romance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:34, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have a history of contributing to Frank Zappa-related material and articles. If I proposed a Wikiproject centered around Frank Zappa as a way to make articles on the subject more organized, would you support my proposal? Friginator (talk) 00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a wonderful idea. I think a big part of the project should be to have articles for all of Frank Zappa's singles. Zappa has so much information on him that I'd totally support him having his own project. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 00:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! If you could add your name to the list here, that would be great. Friginator (talk)

Good. I've contacted several other editors who have helped on Zappa articles in the past. I'll give it until next week to make a proposal, but it's good to know you'll support it. Cheers. Friginator (talk) 00:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you could add your name to the list here, that would be great. Remember, we need the involvement of as many users as possible. If you know anyone who would be willing to participate, send them along! Cheers. Friginator (talk) 22:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any relationship between you and MrMoustacheMM (talk · contribs)? Your usernames are far too similar for me to think it coincidence. --IllaZilla (talk) 02:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

His profile says he likes grindcore, death metal, and blackmetal (I like none of these) though industrial is cool. Also Mr. Moustache is a song by Nirvana (If you see the Bleach album) so it makes sense that others may have similar profile names . --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah-ha, I didn't know it was a song title. That explains it. You may want to consider adding {{distinguish}} to the top of your userpage so others will know you're not the same person (as recommended by the username policy). --IllaZilla (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorry, no titties!) Thanks for the heads-up re the FZ project. I am an intermittent editor but will offer what support I can. Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Give me back my Chrissy! No but seriously thanks for the support. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 02:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Cocaine Decisions. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:09, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not really good at making perfect citations, if someone could help and convert them that'd be great. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mrmoustache14. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Mood for a Day, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, or is not a musical recording. Thank you. Theopolisme 21:24, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CSD#A9 for more info on what specifically falls under A9 -- namely, the article's artist must not have a page on-wiki in order for it to be speedy-able. Theopolisme 21:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I too remind you that none of "it is not notible, a stub article, not a single, has no awards, is poorly wirrten, and has no citations" is a reason for speedy. And once someone other than the original author has removed a csd tag, you may not replace it. Use AfD for this one. DGG ( talk ) 02:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrmoustache14. You have new messages at Theopolisme's talk page.
Message added 22:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks, Theopolisme 22:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'Nother one. Theopolisme 04:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For writing Advance Romance :). Ironholds (talk) 01:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I'm not actually that familiar with him, I was just impressed with the quality of the article :). Ironholds (talk) 01:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article I'm the Slime has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musical release. A single review. No evidence of charting. No evidence of awards.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 October 8 and add it at the top. Friginator (talk) 18:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrmoustache14. You have new messages at Category talk:Greek Wikipedians.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for uploading File:IkeWillis2.0.jpeg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:30, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CoolioxWonder.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Screaming Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.
Firstly, I'd like to thank you for asking help for filling in the citations and the editor's barnstar. I've filled in the citations with corresponding templates. I hope that works. (I really liked your work on that article by the way) - Myxomatosis75 (talk) 19:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not dead, just in case you were wondering. I've posted a response on the proposal page describing the current state of things. Cheers. Friginator (talk) 17:50, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, It's been long enough where I wasn't sure when you'd be back so when I found out this administrator liked Zappa, I felt it necessary to ask him for the help on the project. I'm sure you have a busy life so I didn't want to keep bothering you about it, but thank you for responding. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

We've been confused with an issue regarding the origins of alternative rock with another user and currently we are not able to reach a proper concensus. Our debate continues on our talk pages [1] [2] and unfortunately we're yet to carry on this debate on the talk page of alternative rock. Please feel free to join us to reach to a consensus. I thought that you could help us on this topic, as I rely on your knowledge and skills due to your brilliant work on alternative articles and C'mon Billy.

Thank you, Myxomatosis75 (talk) 00:58, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a strong opinion on whether those songs should have separate articles or be merged into Paranoid (album), I just felt that they shouldn't be deleted outright since they're at least potential search terms. I'm also generally against prodding an article twice, especially when its deletion could be controversial (and given how famous Black Sabbath is, that's probably the case here). TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 03:59, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from deciding that the Ron Davies song page should redirect to Ziggy Stardust. The song has been covered many times, by major artists. And it is a "Ron Davies" song, not a "David Bowie" song. Frank Lynch (talk) 12:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the page over seven years ago, with it consisting of a single line of nonsense. It wont affect the new article in any way. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zappa's Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conductor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Roger12Pete.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

The image you uploaded does not meet WP:NFCC criterion #1 because the fair use image has living individuals, and all images of living individuals (unless under extreme circumstances such as the individual not being available to photograph), the image is replaceable. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 05:14, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, a lot of people don't understand the policy on non-free images. Most websites that take photographs like that are copyrighted to the publisher or the photographer. Notability turns out to have little to do with the policy. For images of living individuals, the picture must be released under a free license, because Wikipedia doesn't take images of living people that are copyrighted. When you visit the site, it says "Photo by Larry Busacca/Getty Images for Clear Channel". If it is marked as by Getty Images, then it's copyrighted unless stated otherwise. For the article, we can probably add images of the performers from their main articles since those images are under free licenses. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 05:27, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mrmoustache, when you add an AfD to a delsort page such as you did with Soma (song) at Albums and songs, you need to tag the AfD by adding the relevant tag, in this case {{subst:delsort|Albums and songs|~~~~}} , which will inform editors that it has been listed there & avoid it possibly being listed more then once. Regards ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 05:00, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:44, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a worthy endeavor to delink song titles that link to their relevant albums because they do not have articles of their own. Unfortunately, there do not seem to be any existing guidelines on the matter, so I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs#Linking songs without articles to try to set one up. Personally, I think allowing links to albums are a good way to (1) get information about a song, even if it's not fully notable enough to have its own article; and (2) disambiguate which song with a given title is being referred to. You are welcome to way in on the discussion, obviously, but I would suggest that your time would be better spent doing tasks other than de-linking song titles that link to albums. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 03:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I only delink them if it brings me to the album page instead of a song page. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 03:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
We are having a difficulty in reaching consensus regarding the genre of Kyuss, which we are discussing here. The discussion also includes the credibility of Allmusic. As you are a skilled and a reliable contributor, we'd be grateful if you could participate in our discussion and help us to reach a consensus. Thank you. Myxomatosis75 (talk) 17:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing. I have replied on the Grunge talk page with an apology and will also place an apology on the IP editor's talk page and hope they pick it up. I was led astray by the directions in the hidden comment in the article and the historical precident in prior reversions. However, I deserve the scolding and will subject myself to a day of bubble-gum music. All the best. Fylbecatulous talk 12:50, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited By Crooked Steps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:27, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I've filled in the references in the Electricity (Captain Beefheart song) article. Thank you. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 09:46, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have a good judgement when it comes to grunge-topics so your input would be appreciated. Thanks.--DrumstickJuggler (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Round numbers are easier to process and remember. I would rather learn that Michael Jackson sold over 1 million copies of a certain single than learn that he sold 1,000,083 copies of the single. The precision of the extra 83 singles doesn't do much. OnBeyondZebrax (talk) 22:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AskingforIt.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At least use them like so (Launchballer at English Wikipedia) or better using Template:Cite web. Thank you.--Launchballer 00:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... Mrmoustache14 (talk) 00:39, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FinntheHuman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:54, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for your edits and efforts on alternative music articles (especially recently on Nine Inch Nails-related ones!) Myxomatosis57 (talk) 20:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hesitation Marks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Copy of A]]", available for free to download. On August 22, 2013, "Find My Way" was released on [[Youtube] and other review websites. <ref>http://pitchfork.com/news/52011-listen-nine-inch-nails-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slow the Rain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I'll See You in My Dreams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
The lead section of the main article for Nine Inch Nails lacks any information on the end of hiatus, Hesitation Marks or the new record label, Columbia. Can you update it, please? Thank you. (I'm not sure whether I can do it without messing up the whole lead section.) Myxomatosis57 (talk) 20:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pastimedisc.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Quebec (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | title14 = The [Argus

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 00:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ween page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Collection (Black Sabbath album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supernaut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, could you give your input for the addition of alternative metal to the infobox at The Hunting Party? There's been disputes over genres lately, so I'm trying to establish a consensus for alternative metal to be listed alongside the current genres (hard rock and rap rock). Here is the thread for the poll: Talk:The Hunting Party (album)#Genre Poll Kokoro20 (talk) 09:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the special barnstar! I'm really glad that you liked the articles and I believe that we can collaboratively improve PJ Harvey-related content on Wikipedia. --Myxomatosis57 (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see no mention of this song ever charting anywhere, any awards won, or notable cover versions. Simply being released as a single and having 3rd party sources doesn't automatically mean it's notable enough for a standalone article. Caper454 (talk) 23:59, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "Songs and singles are probably notable if...". I guess it all depends on how one chooses to interpret the guidelines. Caper454 (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For PJ Harvey, please find a primary source which is a quote from PJ Harvey. We need an excerpt of an interview from Harvey and wp:STICKTOSOURCE. All the sources present in this '"Comments from other artists section" are primary sources with quotes from those artists. Woovee (talk) 17:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding "Category:LGBT Jews" and "Category:LGBT male actors" tags to the Justin Berfield page until and unless you have first added some solid WP:V sources to the article identifying him as gay. Right now there is nothing at all in the article on this topic, and adding such tags to the page without solid sourcing is a severe WP:BLP violation. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 11:08, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ViolentSOAD.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for adding the citation. I'm new to wikipedia, and I don't know yet, how to do it. Forgive me! Bernd Lorey (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TuxdeoChum.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:KarenW.I.F.E.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Freefoursingle.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, sir. U2fan01 (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Would you be willing to weigh in on this RfC regarding genres at Axis: Bold as Love? There's been little input, and the RfC's been relisted a few times to encourage more discussion. Dan56 (talk) 17:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrmoustache14. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I am inviting you to join the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Rock music/Garage rock taskforce which focuses on obscure garage and punk music predominantly from the 1960s. By the way since your page asks, I created an article for the Zappa song "Help, I'm a Rock" awhile back. Hope you can join!TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Would you care to review or comment at my nomination of House of Music for featured status? The previous nomination did not gather enough commentary, so anything at all would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 23:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrmoustache14. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrmoustache14. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Worry'bout.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi hii. Would you care to review or offer comments to this nomination? Apart from one substantial review, it has been relatively stale so far. Dan56 (talk) 14:39, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:IMightbewrong.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 04:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't cite the IMDb or copy its data into Wikipedia. Its content is user-generated and thus not considered reliable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NeverSayDieSingle.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AfterForever.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TooManyPuppiesCover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More sources say Afrobeat than Afrobeats, and you should not "correct" them as that is WP:OR because it is not in the source. Regardless, the album includes a collaboration with famous Afrobeat artist Fela Kuti's son Seun Kuti. I think the sources mean to say it's Afrobeat rather than -beats. "With breezy R&B melodies and roomy Afrobeat arrangements to guide her", "The music likewise combines different styles: Afrobeat, reggae, ska", "Age of Pleasure derives influences from afrobeat and reggae", "Touching on dancehall, lover's rock, Afrobeat, '70s disco", "blends Afrobeat, reggae and laidback soul" and "overlaid with bursts of Afrobeat horns"... this isn't just mistaking one for the other. Please WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Thank you. Ss112 06:19, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pastimedisc.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All the Love in the World (Nine Inch Nails song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All the Love in the World (Nine Inch Nails song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JeffSpaceman (talk) 12:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FreedomOf'76.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]