Archives
User talk:MrHarper/Archive 1

Feel free to leave comments.

Why did you remove this section without any explanation other than "unencyclopedic"- waht does that mean?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrdlu junction (talk • contribs) 04:10, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Braefield, New South Wales, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.allescapes.com.au/c/InfoBrowser.browse/Braefield,_New_South_Wales. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like you are having a battle with info going into the CityRail platform boxes. I originally created and added most of them to CityRail station platforms, and feel as you seem to also, that too much fine detail about individual services has been added to them and agree with your thoughts about the trackwork information that's been added. I sort of regret that I created the boxes in the first place. Good luck, i have been in a few edit wars myself and they are pretty unsatisfying. It can be hard to get admin support. Endarrt (talk) 10:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give North West Rail Link a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Please move the article (North West Metro) rather then copying and pasting it to North West Rail Link Bidgee (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 00:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, what do you actually think on this?? before I get involved in the discussion again. I can see the point of the nominator because the piped links on the assoc. articles are pretty ugly. I started the renames of V/Line services in Victoria (see Albury-Wodonga V/Line rail service et al): by that convention the lines in Sydney, if they are to be moved, should include the word CityRail eg CityRail Northern Line; That I would accept as that is what they are known as and appear on timetables etc, but I am hardly enthusiastic (the suggested renamings dont appeal to me at all). Pity the lines in Sydney dont run in straight lines as they do in Melbourne. Regards Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CityRail Western has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the table option (?) for s-line / s-rail showing on stations north of ben lomond (which doesn't have) starting Glencoe

this is new to me, i don't do much editing the s-rail displays with preceeding and following in the 'wrong' order preceeding would be towards Central for a NSW line where is the data stored ? as it's sparse in the edit page and are you (or OP) right or am I ? asking, as ... i dunno, apart from rather keen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave Rave (talk • contribs) 13:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Closed stations. Since you had some involvement with the Closed stations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sw2nd (talk) 05:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TfNSW.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inner West railway line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South railway line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, you have made Template:Strathfield platform box unreadable with my screen reader, you need to insert |alt= with alternative text, or even better, render this with css. Frietjes (talk) 14:49, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

fixed, by switching to use {{Sydney Trains T}}. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 15:54, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Your new icon doesnt look quite the same though, with square corners etc. MrHarper (talk) 06:27, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

which browser? it's using template:border-radius which should round the corners in most all browsers. if the example in template:border-radius does not have round corners, then it's a problem with your web browser. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Editing Template:S-line/Sydney Trains left/Inner West and South requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Racklever (talk) 19:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on S-line/Sydney Trains left/T2Circle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bgwhite (talk) 06:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Regents Park railway station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Infobox station

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sunnyside railway station, New South Wales A baby of yours, apparently the small size of a page like this doesn't satisfy notability. I just failed at Draft:Warialda railway station Maybe I should have just created it instead of user article and submit for review ? --Dave Rave (talk) 16:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sydney Buses B.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the map of the goods railway, you've transposed the Domestic and International stations at the airport. They should be the other way round. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.203.250.2 (talk) 02:30, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was just looking at the map you made for the Metropolitan Goods railway page, and was wondering if it was out of date? The page seems to mention a stretch between Fleming and Homebush and a stretch between North Strathfield and Rhodes, yet your map doesn't show these sections as being part of the railroad. It'd be nice if someone updated the page with a "today" section to describe the current routes the railroad exists on. Is it that it doesn't exist anymore as an entity so there is no defined Metro Goods railway, anymore? Perhaps, someone could change the title of the page of "freight railroads in Sydney" or some such thing and then simply include Metropolitan Goods as a subsection, because it seems that the Metro Goods page seems to cover Metro Goods but freight rail in Sydney along with it, and it's pretty confusing. --Criticalthinker (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore this. I've read the article a few times, and it's probably clear enough considering the complicated history of the railroad. --Criticalthinker (talk) 16:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 August 8 if you are interested in preserving them.

• File:CBD rail link.png
• File:Indicative map of proposed west Metro routes in Sydney.png
• File:Sydney cbd protected corridors.png

Thank you. Mqst north (talk) 14:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your suggestion from seven years ago that this shouldn't be a stand-alone page. So I've rewritten it as a single article about all the announced and cancelled metro proposals of 2008-10 and proposed that the others be merged into it. Mqst north (talk) 14:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sydneyferrieshoplogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bowenfels 1954.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bowenfels 1954.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/Sydney Trains left/AirportEHpeak has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gareth (talk) 09:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/Sydney Trains right/AirportEHpeak has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gareth (talk) 09:42, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/Sydney Trains right/SouthCircle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gareth (talk) 06:18, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/Sydney Trains left/BankstownCircle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gareth (talk) 20:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Inner west line map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gareth (talk) 21:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ssc logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nundah railway station, New South Wales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nundah railway station, New South Wales until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paisarepa 01:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I noticed you created some really good maps of the historical boundries of the City of Sydney. Is there any chance you would be willing to make one that showed the current boundaries? With everything going on now, I bet a lot of people would find that useful. Dauwenkust (talk) 11:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Enmore map.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Closed Lines has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 13 § Closed Lines until a consensus is reached. Jenks24 (talk) 09:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]