Moishe - please, contact me regarding Leuren K Moret; you are on target, but some Wiki editors seem determined to keep her up despite their being no support for the first sentence of the article and the rest being equally self-serving and probably written by Moret disciples. Roger DUSTorydashowneratyahoogroupsdotcom - I have done the most research into Moret of anyone but PGallert won't post my sources.Rhotel1 (talk) 12:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roger, I prefer not to communicate about wiki-issues via email. I have looked again at the article; it appears that one of the new sources is not reliable, and I will remove the items that have "citation needed." However, many of the facts as written -- that Moret was on the Berkely council, was terminated from said council, and that she lobbies internationally on fringe nuclear issues -- seem reasonable. Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moishe. Thank you, it is improved, but still makes Moret a "lobbyist". Moret is not a lobbyist. Moret is really a self-promoter and she uses Wikipedia to help her in that effort. I wish that you would contact me directly (I had to come to your talk page to see this) Rhotel1 (talk) 03:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch for your comprehensive editing on this page. It's close to looking like an actual article now. Keep up the good work. Pascal (talk) 09:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Wish I had time to do more... Someday soon. Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 23:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Fally Ipupa was created after I removed his name from the Kinshasa article. I don't feel it is worth fighting to keep people with WP articles off "notable" lists, so I let the reversion pass without comment. As to whether Fally Ipupa meets the notability criteria, I'm not sure, but as I removed his name from the Kinshasa article and was reverted (with a slightly misleading edit summary) by the same editor who created the Fally Ipupa article, I decided it would be best if I did not try to have the article deleted. -- Donald Albury 02:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now I get it. Seems reasonable... Thanks for the reply. Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 02:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moishe, I wanted to let you know that I was impressed with your review on this article. Nicely thorough in most areas, and you cover everything. I've done a little reformatting; if you place all your text flush left, the software puts it all together in a mass even if you put blank lines between it; it's usually best if you use the indents (colon or asterisk) so your formatting is retained. (I did combine a few things, to keep it from being so spread out.)

The only thing you may have missed is checking for close paraphrasing, which is when people don't take the material and put it in their own words, or don't do so well enough. There's a program called duplication detector, which helps you compare an article to its sources by using their URLs. (It works well with most web pages, but not at all well with Google books.) In this case, a spot check is all you can realistically do—a few articles at most—with the ones used most often first on your list. The second and twentieth sources are the obvious candidates here. Most of the seemingly duplicated phrases are ones that aren't a problem, like the name of a conference or school, or points/rebound/assists scores. However, the duplicated phrase "season due to a hip injury" from the second source caught my eye, as did "Michigan is the closest major Division I school to Stauskas' parents house in Ontario" from the other one, the only difference being "house" rendered as "home" in the article. I've just mentioned these in the nomination template. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thank you, BlueMoonset. I didn't know about the duplication detector; I do now, thanks. I read every source, and I remember that one -- I was thinking in terms of verifying that someone actually said that Michigan is the closest school to his house, since it's a claim that may not be true. I'll use dd for the next one.

And I couldn't figure out how to separate lines, but looks like your reformat should give me the right idea for next time. I appreciate the note.Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 02:44, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moishe, about Proposed deletion of Counter machine reference model. Yes, we can delete, I need to do something? --Krauss (talk)

Thanks, Krauss. No need to do anything - the prod template should take care of it. I just gave you a courtesy notification because you were a major contributor to the article, just in case. Thanks! Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 03:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the great Review and nice remarks about the article I created. I think the Promotor will want to see a signature for the person that did the Review - could you add. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crap, sorry, Doug. Thought I did that - Done now. Enjoyed your article. Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 13:21, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, thanks, & thanks! --Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 14:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moishe Rosenbaum. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Channing Foster, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moishe Rosenbaum. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sam Coffey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moishe Rosenbaum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Channing Foster".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:31, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moishe Rosenbaum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sam Coffey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Norwegian Wood (music festival), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]