Hello. I really appreciate your contributions here, and I think you are learning about wikipedia very fast, which is a good thing. But after seeing a few of your nominations, and comments at AFD, I wanted to tell you this: if a person is involved in politics, then it is not necessary for them to WP:NPOL/be elected to have an article. They can have an article if they pass other criteria. Also, kindly see WP:ARCHIVE. Cheers, —usernamekiran (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, keep apreciating. As you know i'm still learning. My books and Wikipedia both. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 17:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

IvivekChoudhary (talk) 12:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed you've moved several articles from mainspace to draftspace but haven't notified the article creators or applied the appropriate cleanup to the drafts (e.g. adding {{draft article}} at the top and commenting out the categories). You might want to install the automated tool User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft which does everything you need to do automatically. Thanks! – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:55, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, actually i'm still learning. I'm installing this tool --- Misterrrrr (talk) 13:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr. Thank you for your work on Nafisul Hasan. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please try to add all articles to the relevant wikiprojects.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Misterrrrr,

The article The Generation of Evil cites five sources. Possibly, you have added

tag before the references were finished, in spite on my notes in the edits that this was still work in progress, with noted time of February 3rd UTC.

I always do my best to cite articles well. Please kindly consider removing the "unreferenced" tag. Thank you, 09:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC) Ttk371 (talk) 09:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I placed it before you added citations to it. You can remove it yourself too. Happy editing --- Misterrrrr (talk) 09:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Fayzur Rahaman. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 11:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sure, will add soon. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fayzur Rahaman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HouseBlaster^talk 17:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --- Misterrrrr (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The games in this page have a "Report" link in them which show the links of the results. This means that there are too many links in this page. Every game (except for two) result has a link to uefa.com. Can you please reconsider putting this page to draft?

Regards... Magawla61 (talk) 18:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)mgwl Magawla61[reply]

you should have to add references and then submit. Thanks --- Misterrrrr (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I think that you are missing one point here. The football scores do NOT need any references because the reference links are in the "report" section of the template. This is the report part of the template which contains the necessary links in it "|report=Report" And there are hundreds of such pages. Check please "1990–91 UEFA Cup" and "1992–93 UEFA Cup". Regards... Magawla61 (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)mgwl Magawla61 (talk)[reply]

I think you understood Wikipedia more than enough. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean with that? What is your point? I only explained what I did. I added some scores with references in the "report" section of the template. Magawla61 (talk) 20:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)mgwl Magawla61 (talk)[reply]

show some more examples --- Misterrrrr (talk) 10:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the examples: 2010–11 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase, 2010–11 UEFA Europa League knockout phase, 2009–10 UEFA Champions League qualifying phase and play-off round. (Almost all of the results of the matches in Wikipedia have this format. Some of them have "football box collapsible" but this is another story.) All of these pages have the links in their "results" field. They have the links in the embedded "result" scetion instead of having a format like i.e. <ref>. https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/history/clubs/52818--twente/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help).</ ref>. Regards... Magawla61 (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)mgwl Magawla61 (talk[reply]

Have a look to Wikipedia:FOOTBALLLEAGUE --- Misterrrrr (talk) 07:53, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the link. The match details of my page is not different with the page i.e. [[1]]. The citations/links are embedded in the result section of the "football box" template. Regards... Magawla61 (talk) 19:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)mgwl Magawla61 (talk)[reply]

Hello Misterrrrr, thanks for reviewing my article, and I completely understand the issues with it. I'd like to rewrite and edit it, but of course it is now deleted. Is the there anyway for me to see what was written previously so I can revise it? Hope you can help. --- Isaac Eva (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have to revise what you had written? Extract info and create a draft with full info and sources at all claims. Thanks --- Misterrrrr (talk) 07:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr,

Thank you for creating Ashis Das.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating. Can you find a substitute for"myneta.info"?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Reading Beans}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Reading Beans (talk) 10:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans: Myneta extracts information from the affidavit filled by the fighting candidate. It is launched by Association for Democratic Reforms. Is there any problem with it? I use this because affidavits are in pdf format. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 11:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Misterrrrr, thank you for the clarification. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 06:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome --- Misterrrrr (talk) 13:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rohtas Wikipedians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Misterrrrr (talk) 03:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Akhruzzaman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Swarajya Sanghatana, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Razer(talk) 18:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User:Razer2115. Can you please add more reason why you moved it to draft? It meets WP:GNG for sure. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 03:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your continued contributions. Just wanted to let you know that you should not be relisting here. Firstly, per WP:RELIST an AfD is relisted after seven days, not six (the AfD was opened at 16:52, 3 February 2023 and you relisted at 15:37, 9 February 2023). Secondly, relists are similar to closes in that they should follow WP:NACD. This clearly suggests that Do not close discussions in which you have offered an opinion, or for a page in which you have a vested interest (i.e. a page that you have edited heavily). In this case you are the AfD nominator, and have certainly offered an opinion, so you should not be deciding whether to relist or not, which should be left for uninvolved administrators. Please keep this in mind for the future. Thank you! VickKiang (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Sorry --- Misterrrrr (talk) 04:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just want to reinforce what VickKiang has said. Don't relist or close a discussion where you have participated, especially as a nominator and you also relisted a full day early. But I've found that conscientious editors usually make mistakes like this once and then don't repeat them. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I Understand This --- Misterrrrr (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, User:Liz They blocked me without knowing if i'm really a sock or not!!! I hope you understand me. got a great gift from Wikipedia. --- 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 06:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Pakbara, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Misterrrrr, as you have requested the page Rahul chimanbhai mehta for deletion, I want to ask you that please check new references about the subject added by me, also u can verify them as they are from reliable sources and in my opinion the subject passes the WP:GNG as it have significant media coverage from different reliable media sources that are independent from the subject. Info.apsharma (talk) 11:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear @Info.apsharma, I just added the article up for deletion via Article for Discussion. editors are looking and expressing their views there. let's wait and watch. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 15:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Misterrrrr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Are you CheckUsers feel Ok? I'm an Independent user who is connected to no one across the world regarding wikipedia. I'm here just for my Hobby, i.e. Writing. I had reviewed some articles submitted by Shabir Mallick doesnot proves that i'm a sock of them. moreover, i'm editing via my laptop and those blocked accounts are editing via mobile web edit. can't you admins look into it? the fact is that, i'm blocked because a team is against me on wikipedia. whom i played a vital role in blocking. and there is no reference which shows i'm a sock. thanks. i would ask for good decision, a right one. take care --- 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 2:13 pm, Yesterday (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

As уou can see, another checkuser confirmed your sockpuppetry. Since this is a checkuser block, ordinary administrators may not unblock without checkuser permission to do so. If you still maintain your innocence, the only option is to contact the WP:ARBCOM. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're blocked because of technical evidence, not your behaviour - it was only after I made the connection technically that I realised you had accepted some of the other socks' drafts at AfC. To the reviewing cu - there are some notes about the connection here. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't check what's written there. I can check only This wiki is used as a private workspace for Wikimedia volunteers with CheckUser access. --- 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was previously added into GermanKity sock too, but Good CheckUser understood and didn't block me. i would ask for same this time too. I'm not from those accounts ranges too. I just reviewed articles in draft does not mean that i'm a sock. i know you are such a experienced editor, you will understand a new user well. its clear, if i will be a sock then will never had made more than 2500 edits so far. thanks --- 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The note about cuwiki wasn't directed at you, it was intended for the checkuser who reviews your unblock request, so they can quickly find the evidence this block is based on. There really is no point denying what we can see in the technical logs. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Girth Summit It's really disappointing for me. You blocked me without any connection. Well, Thanks. Nice to meet you and contribute to wikipedia. --- 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 06:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• {{CU needed}}. Can another chackuser review the technical data? Vanjagenije (talk) 09:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Vanjagenije: Based on Girth Summit's (excellent (thanks!)) notes and my own checks, the CU connection here is slightly complicated, but strong. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MC Stan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MC Stan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AngusWooFGreat joke, I am being paid by a BB winner, haha. --- 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 06:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ronak Kothari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lawn Ki Masjid, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ronak Kothari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohammad Abdul Hai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sabzibagh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pakbara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pakbara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Molana Hidayat ur Rehman Baloch is now elected member of Balochistan Provincial Assembly from Gwadar. Please write a page about him that we let know more about him. Thank you. @Ibne maryam Ameen Zakariya (talk). 10:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]