I just asked a member of Arbcom about Mathsci's current involvement in race articles, [1] since Mathsci has promised to permanently stay out of these articles was a condition for his topic ban being lifted in December. I feel that Mathsci's dominating of your noticeboard threads is unhelpful so I'm notifying some other people who have been involved in those. Risker suggested that this is dealt with in an arbitration amendment thread. I haven't been involved recently, so I don't think I'm the right person to request an amendment. But I think the rest of you might want to consider Risker's suggestion, if Mathsci continues to be this heavily involved.-SightWatcher (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Miradre. In connection to your current efforts at the SPLC article and talk page, if you go back into the discussion archive or do a thorough search on-line you'll discover that the SPLC failed an audit by a regional division of the BBB's Wisegiving Alliance ( One based, I think, in a Northern Virginia suburb near Washington D.C.) back in (I believe) the early 2000s. This may, but then, again, may not, help to explain why the Center hasn't been too cooperative with the BBB lately. Regards. Badmintonhist (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, fellow traveller. Would you like to talk sometime? Beresford 77 (talk) 14:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]