Hello, Mics 777! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! TransporterMan (TALK) 18:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I'm a very frequent volunteer at DRN. I see that you've listed yourself as a volunteer there, then removed it. Unless you've had extensive experience editing prior to this point in time, perhaps under an IP address or under some other username, DRN is a pretty difficult place to gain experience in dispute resolution. While you're welcome to put your name on the list, I would not recommend trying to actually intervene in or moderate a case until you have a great deal more experience and a fairly broad knowledge of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. What you should do is to just edit for awhile — say about 1,200 to 1,500 edits — and, once you have a feel for that, try giving a few opinions over at the Third Opinion Project. After you've done that a dozen times or so and aren't getting much resistance from the parties in those disputes, then you can actively try taking a case or two at DRN. But even then, I'd recommend reading the DRN archives to see how cases are closed and handled. If you have any questions, please give me or whoever is currently serving as the DRN coordinator (currently it's Keithbob) a shout. We'd be happy to help, and I'll look forward to seeing you around. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC) PS: I just saw your user page and see you're a third year law student. I've been practicing law for over 30 years. Your skills in reason and analysis will serve you well here, and you may be able to get a quicker start than I suggested above since you have the ability to read the rules and jump into applying them without having to learn them through trial and error. Good deal, but DRN is probably still a bit too rough a place to start. Give Third Opinion a shot, first. (It's where I got my feet wet and I now work in both places and am also a member of the Mediation Committee.) TM — 18:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man, I think you're probably right. zthanks for the advice :) Mics 777 (talk) 19:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, greetings. Planning a GA nomination for Amrita Rao; a grammatical review would be appreciated. Thanks.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 16:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for giving your precious time. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 08:03, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for reviewing this article under GAN. You have it set to hold at the moment. I have addressed all your issues I think. So would you please look at it again? Myrvin (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could I add a gentle nudge for you to look at this please? Myrvin (talk) 06:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]