Welcome!

Hello, Memon KutianaWala, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 18:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sumbal Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sumbal Khan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, پاک آرمی زندہ باد! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sumbal Khan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need reception and notability for this film. Has it shown in festivals? Featured in major theatres? Won any notable awards? Need critical reception for the film and box office.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operation 786 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Operation 786, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:26, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation 786 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation 786 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My article went live two months ago it is based on animated film, it has news references & everything but now it has deletion notice, can u explain why? I can send you 10 animated films wikipedia from same country which has two or three references & it get accepted & not nominated for deletion. MemonBhai (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My article went live two months ago it is based on animated film, it has news references & everything but now it has deletion notice, can u explain why? I can send you 10 animated films wikipedia from same country which has two or three references & it get accepted & not nominated for deletion.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_786 MemonBhai (talk) 11:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

If the news of her death was false, reports of it are not reliable sources contributing to establishing her notability by our standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sumbal Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sumbal Khan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shahid Shabaz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 13:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even 2 or 3  WP:RS source that can prove WP:GNG IS ENOUGH. click on the link to understand what it means. --DBigXrayᗙ 19:18, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks but are you talking about those article which i nominated for deletion ?

I wrote the above in reply to your comment here [[1]]. And please stop commenting on the Talk page of an AfD. Please add your comment on the AfD page itself. read how to contribute there first at WP:AFD. regards. --DBigXrayᗙ 12:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. An edit request you recently made to Talk:Asif Ghafoor was empty and has been removed. Please see planning an edit request for more information on how to place a proper request. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, - FlightTime Public (open channel) 14:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Murder Of Three Boys In Kasur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

tragic as this is, it is not an encyclopaedia topic but a news article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karachi Folks High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karachi Folks High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. William2001^(talk) 20:24, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Swift Retort (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Swift Retort (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:27, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this :) will keep in my mind

and please don't change the reliable source as the film is updated in global village space which is showing in google and has enough reliable source if you have problem regarding this article you can put that request in deletion tag. http://globalvillagespace.com/operation-swift-retort-pakistans-befitting-reply-to-indian-aggression/

I was wrong when I claimed that the source did not mention the film - I apologise for that. The reason was that I had multiple tabs open at the same time, and looked at the wrong one. The source is still not independent (you may not have noticed this, but the text was written by the film's director!) so it does not show that the film is notable, but it's undeniably about the film. --bonadea contributions talk 16:16, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Filmdirector didn't wrote the article but submitted via blog it seems the article the news desk itself if you have seen the news desk author button. anyways it is a secondary source and not the optional one. Gulf news , the news , the news (newspaper) , something haute and brandsynario are reliable and few wikipedia page has those article.

Thanks.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DJ Kamal Mustafa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DJ Kamal Mustafa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 21:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Swift Retort (film), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Also please read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines as I have had to reformat all of your posts because they are very difficult to read. Please try and copy the way that other experienced editors use talk pages. Thanks Dom from Paris (talk) 16:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for this information i will follow that پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not reply to every single post at the deletion discussion for the article you created. This includes both posts that argue for deletion and those that argue for keeping the article. Read this for more information. --bonadea contributions talk 07:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thank you so much will keep that in my mind :)پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sumbal Khan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memon KutianaWala. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sumbal Khan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! 大诺史 (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The City Grammar School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The City Grammar School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 15:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fatima Sohail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima Sohail until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 13:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Beyond the Last Mountain. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baitul Mukarram Masjid (Karachi) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baitul Mukarram Masjid (Karachi) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 07:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, please do speak up at the AFD discussion. I already commented there with a "Keep" not-a-vote. :) --Doncram (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thank you @DoncramMemon KutianaWala (talk) 09:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Salaams, Memon KutianaWala, I have tried my best and spent some time trying to save your created article Baitul Mukarram Masjid (Karachi) from Deletion at the AfD Discussion Forum. I would like to encourage you to keep participating at that Discussion Forum because many of our better and senior Pakistani editors have STOPPED participating there. Definite lack of participation there right now. These Pakistani editors I respected and trusted who were helpful to me and encouraged me, when I started editing Wikipedia in 2012. They must have their own good reasons to make their choices. But the fact remains that all these 'fairly good' articles that people like you have spent time on keep getting Deleted and going to waste, if people don't participate on AfD.

For right now, I have a suggestion for you. Please try to use the url (www.dawn.com/ for example) only ONCE in your Reference. Under newspaper title, we can use DAWN or Dawn (newspaper) and not the url again- whatever you prefer. Otherwise the Wikipedia software starts 'red flagging' it as an External link as it did for you on the above-mentioned article. Ngrewal1 (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Bro Thanks [User:Ngrewal1]] Memon KutianaWala (talk) 17:37, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shahid Shabaz (Musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unclear notability - sources given are all promotional from dubious origin.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 14:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shahid Shabaz (Musician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 15:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Wikipedia:Articles for creation for creating new articles. It seems you lack the understanding of the WP:Notability criteria especially WP:BIO. It will take time, but until you get enough confidence, Wikipedia:Articles for creation may help you. click on the link and then follow the link to start a new article. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahid Shabaz (Musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahid Shabaz (Musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 17:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr admin has removed the AFD tag and you're inviting those who have no knowledge first you guys said its promotional. Two tags were placed in last hour.Memon KutianaWala (talk) 17:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. I removed the request for a speedy deletion (a deletion without discussion), because the article didn't meet the listed speedy deletion criterion. The discussion above is different, it's a discussion that will take typically seven days, after which a decision about whether to delete will be reached. You should probably participate in the linked discussion. The tag won't be removed until the discussion is concluded. WilyD 17:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you let others decide :)Memon KutianaWala (talk) 17:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memon KutianaWala. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Shahid Shabaz (Musician), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 19:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dalia Hammoud, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 13:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Memon KutianaWala! You created a thread called Request to admin at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NahalAhmed was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This Article previous deleted via multiple time WP:AFD, also WP:G4 & WP:A7, it's fails WP:GNG, Already an admin salt this page. So, I request to grow up this article reliable source or after 1 year try it , re-again submit it. Thanks

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabeel Zuberi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nabeel Zuberi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Nahal^(T) 17:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fahad Abdullah.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Operation Swift Retort (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Swift Retort (film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DBigXrayᗙ 22:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. You have continued to repeatedly recreate promotional and afd'd articles. Stop. Praxidicae (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have stated that Operation Swift Retort is "your" film. Thus, you should not make any edits to any Wikipedia articles concerning this film. The article about the film must not be recreated as it has been deleted after a community discussion determined that it is not notable (and you cannot unilaterally decide that it can be recreated, even if you are not acting on behalf of the film maker), but note that the above final warning also applies to promotional editing such as this. --bonadea contributions talk 11:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--DBigXrayᗙ 22:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DBigXrayᗙ 10:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Please see several earlier notes on this talk page concerning your conflict of interest editing. bonadea contributions talk 11:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Memon KutianaWala, and thank you for your messages.

The article was initially deleted as a result of this discussion in September 2019. Please review the deletion discussion, in particular the analysis of its references, and more generally the English language Wikipedia's Notability guideline for films

You recreated that article 14 January 2020 - which as an administrator I can see.

I have compared the two versions of the article, and while they are superficially different, in my opinion the 14 January 2020 version did not address the concerns raised in the deletion discussion. In particular, the references included such user-generated content websites including but not limited to:

• https://www.ukfilmreview.co.uk/ - "We promote films and movie trailers from around the world and support indie films that are using #kickstarter to raise money"

Please let me know if you have any questions about this. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear respected sir I understand but there are two more references Geo Tv has said that only one animated film is released in 2019 which is Operation Swift Retort and telling about the film too and same as Dunya Tv so this two references are actually new which i didn't added in previously deleted article^[1].^[2]

Propakistani also mention about the film but they will briefly wrote the article about this film very soon.^[3]

According to my knowledge Geo News is one of the biggest tv channel of pakistan and they have mentioned the film so i guess it is passing the notability. If you have not check this then you must Sir , Dunya News sunday magazine has mentioned about the film and details too.^[4]

This all four references are new thats why i created the article on 14 Jan 2020. Memon KutianaWala (talk) 11:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear sir

Operation Swift Retort is an animated official film which ties with 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes therefore i have added a small text in exhibit and film section with three references added 1) Gulf News 2) Geo News and 3) The News International i hope this one is okay as all media channels have saying that the film is released on Youtube so it is at least notable and in a week when i will see new references i will let you know.

Thanks Memon KutianaWala (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turki AlMohsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turki AlMohsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Also pinging @Bonadea: who gave them a pretty clear warning last time. Praxidicae (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

i am not doing paid editing i don't know why you guys are on me , whatever i make you come and put deletion tag , i think i should leave wikipedia.

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 19:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I do not believe you. You are engaging in all the tactics that paid and conflict of interest editors do including uploading photos as your own work or saying they were sent to you privately. Read WP:COI thoroughly and then come back with your answer. Praxidicae (talk) 19:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have never said that sent to me , i sent the OTR , please you need to ping to the person who has a article he send me OTR , he sent email from official mail. i am not doing paid editing i am making article on even food street too. Memon KutianaWala (talk) 19:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
I agree with User:Bonadea, and the removal, discuss on the talk page. Do not WP:EDITWAR or you will be blocked. DBigXrayᗙ 19:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fahad Abdullah Alasaus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahad Abdullah Alasaus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Turki AlMohsen.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Syed Saim Ali, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Additionally most of these sources are unreliable and user generated, despite coming from otherwise reliable sources. About half are also black hat SEO sites or press release or even gossip. Please go through WP:AFC. Praxidicae (talk) 18:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thanks i have removed those who were having same word , added dawn news , tribune , the news , samaa tv , pakistan today newspapers & etc notable news magazines.

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to move Draft:Syed Saim Ali to article space, as I believe it meets WP:NACTOR. That said, more biographical material (from sources other than fan sites) would be welcome, as would objective critical assessment of his acting. Happy editing! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Saim Ali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Memon KutianaWala,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ayesha Chundrigar for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bᴇʀʀᴇʟʏ • ^{Talk to me}∕_{What have I been doing} 09:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ayesha Chundrigar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bᴇʀʀᴇʟʏ • ^{Talk to me}∕_{What have I been doing} 12:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

press releases don't denote notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waseem Shahzad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Waseem Shahzad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AaqibAnjum were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Passes notability a bit. But, fails in tone. See WP:Tone. It sounds to be promotion of the subject. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayesha Chundrigar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ayesha Chundrigar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 09:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aaqib

I have added the CNN reference & Geo Tv reference too but the article is still pending since 20th march. Memon KutianaWala (talk) 11:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!!! I'm Tanisha. And I wanna inform you that I'm a new user of Wikipedia. I have joined Wikipedia just 5 days ago . So I don't know much information about Wikipedia that how to use it or not . So I'm not aware of anything here. So if u r finding any problem or want to tell me , u can talk with me or discuss with me on my talk page . There is nothing much to complain like this on administrators page . I hope you got that . Tanisha priyadarshini (talk) 06:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tanisha

As admin have provide you the link of "where to start" you should have understand first before start advertisement. personal biography or personal bio is not allowed here.

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 08:43, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK Thanks..... Tanisha priyadarshini (talk) 15:15, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ayesha Chundrigar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 12:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sushant Singh Rajput, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please wait for more news agencies to corroborate that medical prescriptions were found Aaryan ^{📬 • 🥰} 10:28, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ref Wayne, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lapablo

Thank you for pointing out the mistake, i have recreated the article with new reference and now the article is passing WP:NPOV now i hope you will look into it.

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 05:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ref Wayne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 19:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ref Wayne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ref Wayne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Turki Almohsen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turki AlMohsen. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 12:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Turki Almohsen while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 13:35, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo Raguso, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae you are putting wrong tag here, i was the one who put the deletion tag on the article which was on es.wikipedia, the page is deleted on my request so i think this should not be on my talk page, i was the one who put the deletion tag so its not my article.

Thanks Memon KutianaWala (talk) 12:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is english wikipedia and there is no such article, which means that there should be no AFD page for it. Praxidicae (talk) 12:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicaeyes i know and i deleted that tag as i realized it, i nominated the page for deletion https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelo_Raguso so the page is now deleted on my request by spanish wikipedia admin.

Thanks Memon KutianaWala (talk) 12:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so what is the issue with my tag on this clearly irrelevant unneeded AFD page you created? Praxidicae (talk) 12:55, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae It's ok was just confused. Memon KutianaWala (talk) 12:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You proposed a draft article for deletion. The proposed deletion procedure is only intended for use on articles, that is, pages in article space, also known as mainspace. Drafts should not be proposed for deletion. If you think that a draft is not ready for article space (and it is not in article space, but is only waiting for review), you may decline it, which tells the author to rework it. Drafts may also be nominated for speedy deletion, but only in accordance with a reason for speedy deletion. Drafts may also be nominated for deletion, but it is best not to nominate drafts for deletion until you are famliiar with how draft space is used. If you have any more questions, the Teahouse would be a good place to ask them, and to get answers from experienced editors. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Misbah Mumtaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misbah Mumtaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John B123 (talk) 15:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, to start a new deletion discussion, you would have to start Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iffat Rahim (3rd nomination). Let me know if you need help starting it. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thjarkur

Thanks brother yes i need help for nominating this article for AFD because there are no notable links found in short fails WP:NMODEL but the strange thing how it get approved? there are many models who have been mentioned in guardian and bbc got their pages deleted. Memon KutianaWala (talk) 18:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iffat Rahim (3rd nomination). You should probably go through the first and the second nominations and point out what was lacking in the previous two discussions. I added {{unsigned}} to your post, feel free to edit it and sign it as you want. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ThjarkurMemon KutianaWala (talk) 18:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Wrenn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 21:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your campaign to delete articles which clearly fit our notability and inclusion guidelines. Continued editing in the form that you have done so far will be viewed as intentional disruption and vandalism. This could lead to blocking. --Saqib (talk) 23:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Wrenn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Wrenn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 23:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bin Swelah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bin Swelah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 23:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pakistanpedia, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Saqib (talk) 10:54, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah do it Mr @Saqib: You will be fail as i am not using any other accounts you are doing it because you have been warned by different editors and administrators. I am taking this complaint to Wikipedia higher authorities of yours the way you are doing mass deleting my and other pages. Memon KutianaWala (talk) 10:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I do not appreciate being harassed and pinged off-wiki for you to insult and complain about me because "I could have write to you on talk page but i didn't want to argue with you. If you have an issue here, you bring it up on-wiki. Further, your insinuation here that I had anything to do with some sort of attack is an attack in and of itself. I suggest you redact it and remove it from the AFD entirely as it has nothing to do with the deletion discussion. If you do not, you need to provide diffs. Praxidicae (talk) 11:18, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ::::@Praxidicae: I will do that later but first of all you need to investigate me a user SAQIB think i am using multiple account so first thing first kindly investigate my account Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pakistanpedia I am not using multiple accounts as you know it too. it all started from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wahdat i put the deletion tag to that page and the user SAQIB has not able to provide proofs so in next hour my two pages got mass put on AFD Nick Wrennand Bin Swelah which was accepted by editor and administrators. Memon KutianaWala (talk) 11:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't need to do anything. The only thing that needs to be done here is that you need to refrain from personal attacks and off-topic digressions in an AFD. Praxidicae (talk) 11:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same applies to you kindly don't make personal comments on me like "I am deleting pages in revenge" at the time of nominating the page the article had weak references so you shouldn't say that i am doing this in revenge. You need to be understand that you nominates my pages for deletion too but when i send you list of those pages who have weak or no reference you do nothing. I am not hired by anyone here, you are a sock puppet investigator too if admin won't find that i m not using multiple then what? my reputation degraded from up to down. anyways i have removed your name there kindly you should not say this again that i am deleting pages in revenge. Memon KutianaWala (talk) 11:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you pinged me about this and I don't have any particular desire to get involved but if you want to file a complaint asking administrators to take action against someone then the usual venue is WP:ANI. This is for conduct issues only, nobody there will rule on content issues such as whether topics are notable or not. Hut 8.5 11:47, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maya Alhawary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Alhawary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about another user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors will result in being blocked from editing. ST47 (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – bradv🍁 22:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Memon KutianaWala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First of all i didn't knew that legal threats or legal action is not allowed but i am disappointed by the Wikipedia. Why i made legal threat?? the reason is i have received several emails by whom i nominated of threat. He was using bad words about my mother, calling me swine and gave personal threat to me. That is not enough in 2018 i got the same by them but thanks to the emergency team who rescued me. Later my personal information such as name and emails were leaked on Wikipedia after that i changed my username to prevent them to abuse me. It all started from a page which i nominated 'Wahdat' a person who call himself a editor from Pakistan have put my articles to mass deleting, later it was rescued by some old editor. he warned the nominator not to do it, a nominator then started a new game against me that i have multiple accounts but it was fail by you if u look closely to the IP address you will understand. short thing is if i recieve one more threat to my email or here unfortunately i will involve Federal Investigation Agency and Pakistan Telecommunication Authority and i have all the legal rights to do it, and it doesn't matter if this account remains block or not but only if administrator didn't take action against the person too. According to the Emergency team and CA including VP of Wikipedia "we are investigating it against the user who are giving threat to the email". This is not over yet before blocking me will Wikipedia adminstrator block the person who has using abusive language on Wikipedia the evidence has been sent to the emergency team??? If a person is sending me abusive email then what action i have remaining? i am still in shock that after a numerous complaint by Wikipedian users why any Administrator has not issued a single warning to the person?? Anyways i will withdraw from the legal action and take my words back only if he stop sending me emails and making personal comments. for more information on what he did to me on Wikipedia read here kindky it is said by the other Veteran Editor too.Memon KutianaWala (talk) 9:53 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

We cannot accept a conditional withdrawal of the threat. Since you are not completely withdrawing it, I am going to revoke talk page access. You will need to conduct any future attempts to have your account access restored through our WP:UTRS. only (talk) 02:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Read https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Saqib#Bad_faith_in_AfD_discussions Memon KutianaWala (talk) 01:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So Wikipedia administrators want me to withdraw my legal complaint or what you are calling legal threat but not able to take action against the person who sending me threat on email? it's not a conditional it's Adminstrators job to make happy to both of the disputed company. I have forwarded the threat emails to emergency team i am waiting for them to take action against the user first if they didn't then unfortunately i will not withdraw the legal complaint.

Thank you Memon KutianaWala (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Memon KutianaWala, We aren't discussing the other party's behavior, but yours. It's not like you were threatening the user you're making claims about. You decided to threaten someone whom hadn't even remotely wronged you.

You will not be unblocked until either your threatened action reaches completion, or you unambiguously withdraw your threat, and agree to abide by WP:NLT going forth. I will keep an eye out on UTRS, or you can contact me via IRC as you have a couple times now. SQL^{Query me!} 02:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Just a quick comment. Yes, of course you are allowed to take legal action against Wikipedia or against Wikipedia editors. But while you are doing it and/or while the threat of your doing it is open, you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia. As for whether/when action will be taken on Wikipedia against anyone alleged to be making email threats against you, I, and other admins who are not privy to the contents of your complaint, can't answer that. We can not address what we can not see. You will need to take it up with those to whom you have forwarded your complaints. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The section is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Interaction ban proposal -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memon KutianaWala. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dalia Hammoud".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memon KutianaWala. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Waseem Shahzad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memon KutianaWala. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Waseem Shahzad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]