Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

The article Karagarga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Exorcist Vengeance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews were found in a BEFORE, and promotion material was the only thing found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 04:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Francis Murphy (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Francis Murphy (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ploni (talk) 23:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Spirit Halloween: The Movie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 18:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerian Gârlă, you stated that you would withdraw if you could, but you can. See WP:WITHDRAWN, where it states, "While the nominator may withdraw their nomination at any time, if subsequent editors have suggested an outcome besides keep or added substantive comments unrelated to deletion, the discussion should not be closed simply because the nominator wishes to withdraw it." In other words, you are allowed to withdraw and even strike your deletion rationale if you'd like. The only caveat is that the discussion cannot be closed as Speedy keep, because a delete !vote exists from another user. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Northamerica1000: Thank you. I was looking at WP:WDAFD and wasn't quite sure on the procedure. I've withdrawn my nomination. —Matthew - (talk) 13:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good. This makes it easier for a closer to determine how the discussion has transpired as time goes by. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please change back the title of the Muybridge GIF animation on Nope (film) and also change the current line about the claim that it would be from The Horse in Motion? It is simply NOT from The Horse in Motion (1878)! Nor do the movie characters claim so (or at least in the part that's in the trailer they don't)! The specific quote that I used is from the trailer and it unfortunately contains some mistakes, but not the mistake that is in the current Wikipedia article (see also my entry on the article's talk page). The images used in the trailer and the movie are from Animal Locomotion (1887 — 9 years later and much clearer than the 1878 images), see the citation that was there before you changed it. The current citation is not a very reliable source (note that it uses very different images), or at least it's less reliable than the info from a museum that holds an original print (my ref). Maybe it's not that bad that the claims of fictional characters in a sci-fi horror flick aren't entirely correct, but I believe it's quite important that Wikipedia gets this part right. Joortje1 (talk) 11:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Matt, just wanted you to know I have been working on revamping the article on Leatherface. Been a long time in the making but someone had to do it. I was thinking that if you wanted to after I am done with the article you and I could do a much needed revamping on the article on the original film cause the production section is very poorly developed. I also wanted you to know I have a little surprise for you later but in the mean time happy editing mate. Paleface Jack (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MatthewHoobin Thanks for creating an article about this obscure movie. I am the person who has been researching about this film for the last year and a half and I am currently trying to convince the producer's family to release it. I also have added a lot of info (from my own research) to the Lost Media Wiki articles both in English and Spanish. I just wanted to let you know that we currently have a lot of info about the status of the movie. It is not lost, it's rather unavailable. If you haven't checked the articles, you might consider add the info to the Wikipedia article. Vidalch93 (talk) 15:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vidalch93: Thank you for your work, and I hope it gets publicly released! I should note, though, that Wikipedia has stricter guidelines than the Lost Media Wiki when it comes to the inclusion of material. Namely, that articles aren't supposed to contain original research, and that information should be published by independent, reliable sources before being added to Wikipedia: "Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." —Matthew - (talk) 18:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I should have known about this. In any case, I would like to thank you for paying attention to this lost media case. It's great to see this particular movie receiving some attention from outside the Spanish-speaking sphere. Nonetheless, the LMW articles also have academic books as sources , which depict in detail several aspects from the movie such as the plot and the production process. Vidalch93 (talk) 18:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vidalch93: I'll have to take a look at those! Thank you! —Matthew - (talk) 18:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mike Schank, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gus Stavros, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 20:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re your , I've been blocked from ITN. It's a long, sad story. – Sca (talk) 23:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pokémon Fossil Museum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a travelling museum exhibition in Japan displays "life-size" renditions of Pokémon skeletons alongside the fossils of actual prehistoric animals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pokémon Fossil Museum. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pokémon Fossil Museum), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MatthewHoobin Thanks for your work on this article, and for your efforts getting it DYK'd. I was glad to discover something so fun! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 08:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Haitian crisis, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 01:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boggy Creek Monster (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the documentary Boggy Creek Monster, about the Fouke Monster, had its first screening at a middle school? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boggy Creek Monster (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Boggy Creek Monster (film)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you by any chance have a copy of this 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray of Tremors by Arrow Video? See, I'd like to use the pages containing the original press kit in the booklet to expand that article. If so, could I please ask you to photocopy them for me? Your help would be greatly appreciated. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 07:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: I'm afraid I don't own or have access to a copy of that at this time, no. However, if I do get my hands on a copy, I'll let you know. —Matthew - (talk) 20:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brain Damage (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that real calf brains were used during the production of the 1988 comedy horror film Brain Damage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brain Damage (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brain Damage (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to come by and say good job on expanding the Production section of the article. Great details and well sourced! Mike Allen 20:35, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MikeAllen: Thank you! I really appreciate that. —Matthew - (talk) 05:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MatthewHoobin. Thank you for your work on Spacy (film). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work on Ghost (1984 film)

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 10:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Asparagus (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during its run of screenings at the Whitney Museum, the 1979 film Asparagus was shown rear-projected onto a set that appears in the film itself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Asparagus (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Asparagus (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Barrett Strong, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Spacy (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1981 Japanese experimental short film Spacy is made up of 700 still photographs of a gymnasium? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Spacy (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Spacy (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gary Clark Jr. has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. I've updated it to Devil Story... which happens to be one of my favorites. BorgQueen (talk) 10:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MatthewHoobin. Thank you for your work on Heaven and Hell: A History of the Afterlife. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hellraiser, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please see WP:SD40. You're welcome to trim other parts of the short description if you wish. DonIago (talk) 19:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joanne Marrow, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a university student sought counseling from his pastor after attending a guest lecture on sexuality by lesbian and former novice Joanne Marrow? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joanne Marrow. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joanne Marrow), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a blanket ban on using Indic scripts in leads and infoboxes of India-related articles per WP:NOINDICSCRIPT policy. So, I believe you need to remove it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: I was not aware of that. Thank you! —Matthew  / (talk) 19:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome . I've previously removed it in this rev, I should have informed you then. Anyway, it shouldn't be in the infobox either [1] per the policy. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IPA is allowed though, but I don't think would be necessary. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For your Shot-on-video film article. Thank you! 1TWO3Writer (talk) 19:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Magic Island, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1929 book The Magic Island by William Seabrook is considered the first popular English-language work to describe a zombie? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Magic Island. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Magic Island), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MatthewHoobin

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Podróże pana Kleksa, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FULBERT (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MatthewHoobin. Thank you for your work on The Unspoken (film). User:The Night Watch, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|The Night Watch}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

The Night Watch (talk) 17:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MatthewHoobin, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! œ^™ 05:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

saw your recent edit on Akuji the Heartless. Think you could do more? I mean, as I understand it, collecting every ancestor in the game unlocks a bonus post-credits scene. Visokor (talk) 12:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard Roundtree, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:33, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Monsters Crash the Pajama Party (1965) print ad.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jilly Juice, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jilly Juice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Hex Maniac has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 4 § Hex Maniac until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Puerto Rican luthiers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article An Act of Conscience you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SafariScribe -- SafariScribe (talk) 08:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article An Act of Conscience you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:An Act of Conscience for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SafariScribe -- SafariScribe (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my friend! I have a question, do you know Wirt from «Over the Garden wall»? I think this subject need to be an article in English Wikipedia, because the character is very famous, do you think else? If you think that can you please delete redirect page of it? because I want to create an article about it. And do you see English Wikipedia has many redirect pages about characters which are articles in other wikipedia languages? And thank you bro🙂. علي العالم (talk) 18:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I do know Wirt, yeah—I've been fond of Over the Garden Wall for years, and I've even cosplayed the character! If you'd like to create an article for Wirt, you can actually just do so by editing that redirect page. See here if you want to know more about writing an article, and try to follow the guidelines on writing about fiction (and also see Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)). And regarding your last point, do you have some examples of articles for fictional characters that, while redirects on English Wikipedia, are fully-fledged articles on other languages' wikis? —Matthew  / (talk) 03:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s good! But when I create an article to a redirect page, I always delete it and create it after that, because if I don’t delete it, it will be an «edit» not a «create», so if you can delete it, please do, and if you cannot, tell me to take the help from another friend. And yes, I have many examples, many main characters in «Detective Conan» have articles in other wikis but they don’t have any article here, Rigby from «Regular show» has an article in 2 wikis, which are Portogous and Arabic, and many secondary characters in «Harry Potter» have articles in other wikis and don’t have in English Wikipedia. I have many other examples, but these which I said are enough. And thank you my friend🙂. علي العالم (talk) 10:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may have to get help from someone else then, because I don't think I have grounds to delete the redirect page as it is right now, per WP:R#CRD. And if you're thinking of creating fully-fledged articles for characters like Rigby from Regular Show or Detective Conan, etc., try to make sure they meet the notability guidelines. Best of luck! —Matthew  / (talk) 15:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GreedoStarWars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Jason Voorhees for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 12:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Telephone Book (1971) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Thanks for your great work. Would you be able to help me with this draft? FloridaArmy (talk) 15:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randy Kehler, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Kehler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Not Human has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are either brief mentions, non-independent, or database type material. I am unable to find better source material (even with searching by both the "Not Human" and "Ombis: Alien Invasion" names, so I do not think this subject is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Template:Films directed by Judith Ehrlich has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 14:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Little Panda Fighter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Panda Fighter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CoconutOctopus talk 10:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey! i know it was a while ago but i was curious what part of the article specifically led you to add an original research tag to the production section? most of it seems pretty well-sourced. unrelated but you seem like a nice person, thank you for all of your contributions! Plifal (talk) 03:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]