You are shilling for your company, which is prohibited by Wikipedia.

I've openly represented myself as affiliated with Webloyalty in accordance with Wikipedia guidlines. As explained before, my objective is simply to add some background and updated information about Webloyalty so that the article is more neutral and factual which is the objective of Wikipedia. At the very least, a few more facts should be cited about Webloyalty so that readers can recognize the Webloyalty programs when they come across them online (see Bloomberg Business Week,DMNews.com June 10, 2008 and DMNews.com July 30, 2008) and updated information should be added with Webloyalty's response to the Senate Commerce Committee report that was cited seven months ago in the "Criticism" section (see CBS8.com). I hope we can collaborate and reach an agreement on the addition of more facts so that the article is more neutral and more updated.Mary,Webloyalty (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Mary,Webloyalty[reply]

Because you work for Webloyalty, you have a conflict of interest regarding it. This doesn't mean you can't edit its article, but users will be inclined to see your edits as promotional, and major edits to the article are strongly discouraged (although I doubt anyone would care if you fixed spelling). Instead of editing the page itself, I would suggest using its talk page to discuss any significant changes. Even though you work for Webloyalty, you can still get the article changed if your suggestions are supported with reliable sources and follow a neutral point of view. Bart133 ^{t c @} 17:52, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bart133. Thank you for your comments and recommendations. They are very helpful and I truly appreciate them. Mary,Webloyalty (talk) 22:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Webloyalty, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:41, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello UKexpat. Thank you for taking the time to post this information on my Talk page. I am now fully aware of Wikipedia's Conflict Of Interest policy and will be collaborating with other Wikipedia's editors on the Talk page to recommend edits that would give the Webloyalty article a more neutral and objective point of view. Best regards, Mary,Webloyalty (talk) 22:49, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Mary,Webloyalty[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Mary,Webloyalty, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it mentions the name of the company you work for, so it could be seen as promotional. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Bart133 ^{t c @} 17:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bart133, thank you for your welcome. My sole intent in using Mary,Webloyalty as my username is to comply with Wikipedia's Conflict Of Interest policy of being open and honest and disclose that I am an employee for Webloyalty when suggesting edits to the Webloyalty article and any other articles related to Webloyalty.Mary,Webloyalty (talk) 22:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Mary,Webloyalty[reply]

Irresepective of your intent, your user name is a clear violation of our user name policy. – ukexpat (talk) 01:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't realize it was a violation until now. No problem, I'll take care of getting a new user name that meets Wikipedia's policies. Thanks for the information. Mary,Webloyalty (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a few moments to create a new account with a username that represents only you. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may ask for a review of this username block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}. Thank you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 02:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mary,Webloyalty for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. GorillaWarfare ^talk 14:17, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]