Like much useful info in the Wikipedia, my contribs to the following articles may be accused of original research or posting about what self published sources have said (not presented as truth but rather as a notable clue). Lumenos (talk) 18:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• My research on fraudulent capacities of audio/video players and flash drives, being sold on Ebay, was deleted, so I moved it to Wikinfo where original research is consistently allowed (as opposed to arbitrarily as here in the Wikipedia) and (a great many) self-published sources are notable enough for inclusion. (Not allowing such information does have its advantages, since it is not in the Wikipedia (therefore presumably will be viewed by less people) I feel less of a need to update everything.) Lumenos (talk) 18:35, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• The "speech recognition in Linux" article is hanging in there. Lumenos (talk) 00:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Ranish Partition Manager, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranish Partition Manager. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ipatrol (talk) 23:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Partition table (master boot record)‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Hermetia illucens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Pail

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The redirects Referata and Wiki-site have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether their use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on these redirects at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 18 § Referata until a consensus is reached. PleaseStand (talk) 11:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]