Welcome!

Hello, Long Ben Every, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rklawton (talk) 03:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aftermath of World War II. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Lagrange613 (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response to above: Firstly, I have no intention of starting a 'Wikipedia war' with anyone. I have no idea who the subject writing team, or editors are, and it is not clear who I should contact to discuss my contribution. I am new to this form of web-contribution. Just to delete it or paraphrase the contribution, does need some explanation I would have thought? Long Ben Avery.

The article talk page (Talk:Aftermath of World War II) is the place to discuss edits to the article. The contributors to the article are in the article history (look for the "View History" tab at the top of the text to the left of the search box. If you are new to wikipedia editing, I suggest a read through Help:Contents/Getting started if you havent done so yet.GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Long Ben Every, I appreciate your willingness to work in good faith. On Wikipedia, the "team" is whoever wants to improve the article, so consider yourself a member of the team. The above warning just means that, instead of changing something back to what you want over and over, you should try participating on the article's talk page, as GraemeLeggett writes above. For more on editing on Wikipedia after GraemeLeggett's excellent suggestion of Help:Contents/Getting started, have a look at the tutorial. There's also more in depth discussion about editing and developing articles. I'd also recommend you look at the five pillars to get an idea of the overall ethos. If it's overwhelming or if you still don't feel you know where to start, consider requesting mentorship. Welcome to Wikipedia! Lagrange613 (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Long Ben every - thanks for your edits to Francis Brerewood. You need to identify a source though - where is your information coming from? Thanks in advance - Asteuartw (talk) 11:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Asteuartw - have now included references as suggested -although they are repetitive.

Hi Long Ben Every, thanks for that - the page looks much better now. And you are right, the citations are a bit repetitive, but it is still important to show where the material is sourced. This helps subsequent editors identify what is serious, sourced information that should not be deleted. You should really do the same for Thomas Brerewood, which suffers from the same problem. Happy editing and good luck! - Asteuartw (talk) 13:44, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Horst Weber.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to 'adding images' to Wikipedia, and was trying to attempt the process, but not progressing far. The image was to add to the Horst Weber Wikipedia file as relevant material. This image has been floating around the internet for some years and I am not clear as to copyright source at the moment. It must have been taken around 1943, he signed the photo so it suggests 'given to one of his admirers, friends or family', and he died in 2007. Probably a clear-out of old family effects? I suspect the image became part of post WW2 material that appears in 'image or postcard' exchange fairs for collectors. This is my speculation. Any suggestions would be helpful. The Horst Weber image is featured on the 'Gentleman's Military Interest Club' site -gmic.co.uk It's a Militaria Forum for the discussion of Military Collectables, Medals, Decorations and Awards. The actual page is: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php/user/4267-erichb/

Hi, Long Ben Every. As you have no doubt seen, I share your interest in improving this article. But, personally, I do not see the Notes column as the right place for extended info about individual escapes, or for the promotion of books (other than in citations, of course). I would suggest that a lengthier account, eg, of Campo 78, Sulmona, would warrant a separate article (cf. Stalag VII-A)—and that's the end result we should be aiming for. That way, the present article can remain as a handy and brief list, as intended, but with wikilinks to the fuller articles where appropriate. Your recent edits also tend to provide original research without citations, which should therefore be removed under Wikipedia guidelines. We can look for suitable references, but I still think you should be developing that content into separate articles in a sandbox (with a text file copied and kept on your own PC) for launching when they are ready. I plan to do the same with Campo 54, Fara in Sabina which especially interests me. If you are serious about contributing, you should also register as a user. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 00:32, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brian, Yes I agree with you. I was doing other research (see Vincigliata PG12) and added bits of material to Italian POW Camps -I should be more disciplined Kind regards Long Ben Avery.

I see, yes, you've done a lot of work there. May I suggest that you could have a separate main article titled, say, "Campo 12, Vincigliata" and link it in as per this example? (I notice, too, that this in turn has a main-article spinoff for escapes!) That way you could avoid 'drowning' the distinguished castle subject in its 1941-43 POW history. Just a thought. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 15:48, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please continue to improve this article. Get it to the level of the Italian version please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Standard2211 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC) This is work in progress to improve English version page Long Ben Every (talk) 11:35, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you improve the article soon, it will be tagged for deletion. Very nice progress !! Thank you. You might want to add categories in the end so that it is easier to find Standard2211 (talk) 16:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Thank you. I'm working on this. Kind regards Long Ben Every (talk) 16:37, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Long Ben Every[reply]

Thanks for you addition to the article on Michael Gambier-Parry which is valuable. Please could you reference it to the source (which I assume is MI9 Escape & Evasion) and in particular the page number(s) in the source. Otherwise valuable details like this will have to be deleted. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 22:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC) I'm glad you found the addition material useful. However I have already referenced the books and page numbers in all my contributions to the page?Long Ben Every (talk) 23:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)(User talk:Long Ben Every)[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Riccardo Fedel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Eighth Army, Bulow

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have done as requested, thanks for pointing it out. Long Ben Every (talk) 13:32, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The message above was posted by a 'bot' - an automated agent that checks articles for common problems. In short, you've replied to a computer. I thought you might want to know. Rklawton (talk) 13:42, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that it is entirely inappropriate to copy and paste material from other websites into Wikipedia. Rklawton (talk) 03:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What a patronising and unkind response. Is that all you can say? What material are you referring to? It is inevitable that some material relevant to some Wikipedia subjects such as 'Derek Bond' are featured on the web. However they are clearly referenced and linked. It could have done with further editing which I was working on - but to delete the entire material apart from some basic copy is 'high -handed' to say the least. I understood Wikipedia was built on consensus. What right have you to do this? Long Ben Every (talk) 11:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC) The original page had (and now does) a note at the bottom stating 'This article about an English actor or actress is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it' That is what I was doing in good faith. A lot of research work went into that. Long Ben Every (talk) 11:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Long Ben Every. Re your edits to Derek Bond: the trick with copying and pasting text from 3rd party websites is to re-word it. You can keep the substance of the text, but just make sure you re-write it so as not to be in breach of copyright. It takes more time, but that way your edits won't get reverted. All is not lost! Good luck and happy editing Asteuartw (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC) Thanks for your kind and helpful comments. I will note that in future. Long Ben Every (talk) 13:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would define "patronizing" for you and explain why incivility isn't appropriate here on Wikipedia, but that would be patronizing. Likewise, I think it should be obvious that copying and pasting text from other websites doesn't fly, either. You are new here, so expect to make a few mistakes, so ask for help when you need it, listen, and learn. Editing Wikipedia can be fun - or frustrating, depending on your approach. Rklawton (talk) 13:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr Lawton, your point is taken. However, you do have an unfortunate manner trying to explain things, too clever by half, -see above comments and learn. Long Ben Every (talk) 13:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing here nine years, and I'm an administrator. If you walked into a pub for the first time and started doing things all your own way and then smarted off to the regulars, I think you could expect to be tossed out on your ear. While I have the authority to do that, I'd rather just help you learn the ropes. Rklawton (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr Lawton, clearly you are very important person with the power of life and death over a new boy like me. My point was, and still is, -if in the first place you'd explained as an 'Administrator' I needed to change or edit the copy for the 'Derek Bond' page, I would of course have done it willingly. Perhaps giving me a little time to do it. Just to delete without much explanation was not a way to help me, as you say you wish. That is why I challenged you. The independent explanation from 'Asteuartw' (see above) was helpful and I've leant from that. Incidentally not all the material was 'cut & paste' -many factual items were sourced from written sources. I will attempt another edit of Derek Bond and I would ask you to put away your 'six-shooter' for the time being.Long Ben Every (talk) 18:25, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your previous edits are still available in the article's edit history. You can look them up and copy/paste them into the newest version without having to recreate your lost work from scratch. But by all means, avoid any edits that were copy/pasted from another website. Rklawton (talk) 19:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mr Lawton for telling me where the copy 'body' is buried. I'll remember your advice when I exhume it.

No worries. These ease of access to prior edits is the main reason we're comfortable removing potentially problematic edits - restoring worthy edits requires very little time and effort. Rklawton (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Guy E Ruggles-Brise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:30, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies I will amend accordingly Long Ben Every (talk) 17:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In HMS Sabre (1918), you recently added links to the disambiguation pages S-Class destroyer, Weymouth and Edward Archdale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In HMS Lightning (G55), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page St. John’s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kicked into Touch (cover).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I own the design and images featured on the cover of 'Kicked into Touch' 82.24.3.56 (talk) 10:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Just noticed your message on Eeekster's talk page. Fastily was the admin who deleted the file. You might want to drop a note on Fastily's talk page about having it restored. Hope that helps! Happy editing Long Ben Every. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 11:55 pm, 21 January 2012, last Saturday (1 day ago) (UTC−5)

Thanks for the creation of Charles Armytage-Moore, keep up the good work. Look at the article's talk page please. /\ talk← Aviyal →track) /\ 18:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of ships and sailors of the Royal Navy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gneisenau and Scharnhorst (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Long Ben. Er, it's interesting but rather trivial (and in no way a 'reference' to the article) that there's an omnibus called Tommy Farr in Brighton. Next time I'm over there, I must seek it out from nostalgia--because my dad went to school with Tommy in Clydach Vale. Are you planning to bring all of the named buses into Wikipedia? If so, you might try doing it in an article about Brighton buses, and just linking to the famous names. Anyway, no hard feelings, I have to revert this one because it's quite out of place and IMHO contributes nothing of encyclopedic note to the Tommy Farr article. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 04:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brian, Fair enough - although it was a piece of trivia -it is fact. Brighton & Hove is a very cosmopolitan city and has been celebrating famous (dead) personalities who lived in the city on the front of buses as well in a 'Star pavement walk' in the marina for years. My though was this acknowledgement of a famous Welsh boxer - would add some factual information to the article. I too was born in Wales, and my mother remembers his 'big' pre-war fight in New York, everyone was huddled around the wireless. Long Ben Every (talk) 09:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are the principle editor of SS Volendam. You may recall that an editor expressed concner about close paraphrasing back in December. I see you made some subsequent edits, but IMO, the article and the sources are a not too close for comfort. As you are familiar with the subject matter, would you be willing to take a crack at it? (I am working on the items listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems, and the backlog is literally hundreds of items, so I'd prefer to concentrate my editing on article whether the editor is no longer around.

If you take a look at

http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSS_Volendam&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fhistory%2Fww2peopleswar%2Fstories%2F36%2Fa4296936.shtml&minwords=5&minchars=13

you can see that there are still a number of multi-word phrases appearing in both. Some phrase are inevitable, surely there is more than one way to express the thought in "gave the order to abandon ship and despite rough seas all 18 lifeboats got away safely".

The other source seems to be less of an issue, but here is the report:

http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSS_Volendam&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fhistory%2Fww2peopleswar%2Fstories%2F34%2Fa4297034.shtml&minwords=5&minchars=13 --SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yes I have contributed to SS Volendam -and will have a look at the editing issues. I am involved in other writing at the moment with deadlines -so bear with me if I take some time. Regards Long Ben Every (talk) 16:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

E H D Sewell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Crystal Palace

Iain Moncreiffe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sir Fitzroy Maclean

Thomas Cook's Rugby Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ravensbourne

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bedford Lemere may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], [[Ernest George]], [[Ernest George]], [[Harold Peto]], [[Arthur Blomfield]], [Alfred Waterhouse]] and Edward Blakeway I'Anson who designed [[Winterfold house]] in Surrey.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help re Winterfold House. Regarding your article E H D Sewell, unfortunately there's already an article E. H. D. Sewell about the same guy! Before creating an article it's important always to check whether one already exists under a slightly different name. I suggest that you edit the older article to add any new material from your own article. Once that's been done, since deleting an article can only be done by an admin, I suggest that the easiest thing would be for you to make yours a redirect to that article. JH (talk page) 18:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Winterfold House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Upton, The Great Train Robbery, Box Hill and Shoreham

E H D Sewell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Corunna and Sir John Moore

Cranleigh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Great Train Robbery

Thomas Cook's Rugby Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wimbledon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited E H D Sewell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President Roosevelt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your message. With regards my undoing your edits, there are two things to consider: firstly nothing is ever truly deleted from Wikipedia (removed text can be retrieved by using the "undo" button or by simply copying and pasting from previous versions of the article, which are accessible via the edit history), and secondly, the onus is on you to provide sources for any text that you add, as outlined at WP:BOP. How is anyone supposed to know that you'll be coming back later to add references? The vast majority of editors who fail to cite their sources, never return to rectify their oversight. Also, in my defense, your initial edit was made over two weeks ago, with no further activity since then, so even if I had of waited a few days, it was looking like you weren't coming back. Anyway, I see that you've added some sources now, so thank you for that. Hope there’s no hard feelings. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 10:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC) No hard feeling at all. Kind regards Long Ben Every (talk) 11:11, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Matty.007. Long Ben Every, thanks for creating Buckmaster & Moore!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Just a few issues to iron out, then is good

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Matty.007 13:26, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Matty.007 -you interupted the page whilst I was editing. It had only been 'on air' minutes. Give me a chance matie! Long Ben Every (talk) 13:32, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that is a problem with the new pages feed. (But it is good to get an idea of things.) Matty.007 13:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Out of interest, have you heard about Did you know? If you create an article more than 1500 characters, you can attempt to get it on the DYK section on the main page. If you have any questions about this, just ask. Matty.007 13:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks for your advice best regards Long Ben Every (talk) 14:09, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Long Ben Every, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on John Camkin, appears to be directly copied from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Journalist+was+pioneer+of+football+management%3b+OBITUARY.-a060776393. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on John Camkin if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 14:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Yes will do -I'll re-write the copy to improve this Long Ben Every (talk) 14:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Camkin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hinkley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to E H D Sewell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ('An Outdoor Wallah', Autobiography, Stanley Paul, 1945 (comments written in 1935)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:15, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Luckington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bath, Queen Anne style, Robert Vansittart and A46

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Luckington may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• House]]. As a Major-General, he was President of the Luckington branch of the British Legion now {[Royal British Legion]], and took the march past of the Army Cadet Force at a ceremony in April 1948 <ref> Western Daily

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Luckington may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * Captain F W Hartman, together with his wife Dorothy former Lady Dalrymple) lived in '''Luckington Manor''' between 1939 and 1952. Dorothy also owned Home Farm Pinkney and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I note you are a devotee of rugby and beer (and perhaps cricket too), so you are bound to be a good egg. That's the flattery over with !

This is a bit of a long shot, but perhaps you could assist me. I do regular work on [Category:Articles needing link rot cleanup from January 2016] (and in that, ever ongoing, date series), and am trying to keep the number of articles therein to a minimum. I noticed you undertook several edits on the above mentioned article, albeit way back in October 2011. The thing is that the citations listed therein are somewhat short of a full reference. Is there any chance you could revisit this article and try to expand the references, or point me in the right direction(s).

Many thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have sent an email to you direct - will do my best to find sources again and add the information, kind regards Long Ben Every (talk) 15:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some improvements and changed two inline citations for the Harache family article, but I do not know how to make more progress. I work on [Category:Articles needing link rot cleanup from February 2016], but Derek does far more than I do. Worse, from his standpoint, I add linkrot tags with Twinkle when I can't figure out how to fix some references. --DThomsen8 (talk) 23:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have been away, and also very involved in a writing project at the moment, so forgive the slowness of response. I will try to find the sources requested. bear with me,Long Ben Every (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC) There are some reference sources on the following link, ^[1] regards Long Ben Every (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Long Ben Every. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Long Ben Every. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Long Ben Every, thanks for creating HMS Soldado!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please finish this in draftspace, then move it back - it's not ready for the mainspace yet. Thanks for your hard work on this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 13:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

HMS Soldado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Battle of Beachy Head

HMY Saudadoes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Battle of Beachy Head

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any source which says it was commissioned as Soldado? Colledge, J. J.; Warlow, Ben (2006) [1969]. Ships of the Royal Navy: The Complete Record of all Fighting Ships of the Royal Navy (Rev. ed.). London: Chatham Publishing. ISBN 978-1-86176-281-8. does not list it and every other source other than the Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, Volume 23 on Graydon refers to it as Saudadoes Lyndaship (talk) 14:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked for help at [1], you might like to comment there Lyndaship (talk) 17:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Soldado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Beachy Head (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Long Ben,

I've pinged you on the Humanities Reference Desk concerning a question about additions to Daniel Knox, 6th Earl of Ranfurly, Guy Ruggles-Brise, and Vincigliata. Could you chip in there on the source of your information? Thanks, Rojomoke (talk) 09:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Long Ben Every. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TCRFC Book Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC) Have sent email as requested Long Ben Every (talk) 10:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Long Ben Every,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Eustace Liscard for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Gordon Beckles thing is off to a good start, but please fix your references - "DOCTOR" and "STEINER" are really, really inadequate. DS (talk) 15:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, also, keep better track of where your details come from. Cite every sentence as you put it in. DS (talk) 15:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Thanks for your edits to this article. I see that much of what you have added follows "Lost Hospitals of London" very closely and could be construed as a breach of copyright. Please can you bear in mind. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 12:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Thank you for your extensive work on this article. Please can I leave you to add the missing citations to comply with WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:RS etc. Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 16:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christopher Strauli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bergerac. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:JD Feb 10 (2).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused crop of c:File:Long Ben Every, February 2010.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 15:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC) Yes that's fine go ahead and delete file image Long Ben Every (talk) 16:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Albert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am informing you that I stubbed Thomas Brerewood, an article you expanded in 2011, as most of your additions at the time were copied from two of the cited sources. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 06:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]