Thank you for nominating the above article for FAC, unfortunately it does not meet the "inline citations" requirement for FA status (criterion 1(c) listed here:Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. I recommend that you withdraw your nomination. DrKay 14:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Maharishi central university, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 15:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message on my talk page. Firstly you need to be clear that I didn't delete the page myself, as I am not an administrator (administrators are the only people on Wikipedia with the power to delete pages). I merely flagged it as being a candidate for speedy deletion. An administrator would subsequently have reviewed the page, decided whether or not speedy deletion was an appropriate course of action (it would appear that he / she agreed that it was in this case) and then deleted the page. After flagging your page, I posted the text above, which does point out that if you contested the proposed speedy deletion you could add the {{hangon}} tag to the page, then post your reasons why it shouldn't be speedily deleted on the talk page for the article. You should be aware of this should you find any future page you create being flagged for speedy deletion.

On the second part of your message, the whole point of the {{db-spam}} method of speedy deletion is that the article would have required a substantial re-write to become a suitable candidate for entry into Wikipedia, and I therefore felt that a spam tag was more appropriate, rather than (for example) a {{wikify}} tag, which would have flagged the page as being in need of wikification.

What I would suggest is that you read the following - neutral point of view, notability and spam - they should give you the pointers you need to re-create the article in a more suitable format.

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to leave a comment for me on my talk page. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 17:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to figure out what you were trying to do, when you put the delete tag on the e_Sword article. If it was an RfD it needs to be "3rd nomination" tag. If it was to tell people that there has been an RfD in the past, that information is found on the talk page. jonathon 20:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify what you did with e-Sword, please? It is not, apparently, currently under deletion discussion, so the template is wrong and ought not be there. Would you like me to remove it? Cheers, Lindsay 08:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:TRIVIA, WP:CRUFT, and WP:EPISODE. Regardless of your feelings on the matter, the guidelines are quite clear. Please quit reverting me, as by doing so you are harming the article and thus harming Wikipedia, as well as showing disregard for established consent. Thank you. Dlong (talk) 04:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Burgerspace, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burgerspace. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Powers ^T 14:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Llamabr!
We thank you for uploading Image:Burgerspace.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 16:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Centre" is not a typo, it's the British English spelling of "center". Quale (talk) 02:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I didn't look closely, but I think the article uses "defence", which is a British English spelling. You are right that consistency is the goal. Quale (talk) 03:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• I just took a look at the history of the Van 't Kruijs Opening article, and it looks to me like it was originally written using US English spelling. I think would be reasonable to use US English consistently in this article, and a few links to "Defence"s would need to be piped to use the "Defense" spelling. Maybe I shouldn't have reverted your edit but instead should have made the change to use US spelling throughout. Quale (talk) 03:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request on the talk page I have added a new row for flavors that are no longer available, but am leaving it up to you to separate the WW from the retired! -- The Red Pen of Doom 01:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Emory Healthcare requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 23:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry for my mistake. I removed the warning. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 04:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Either you aren't checking properly, or you have extraordinarily high standards for inclusion. I've just removed tags on 3 articles you just tagged for deletion. Please be more careful. Howdoyouturnthison (talk) 13:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just come here to say something similar. {{db-bio}} can only be used when notability is not asserted. It clearly was asserted in Vittorio Fiorucci.[1] In that case, use a prod or AfD, or consult with the author of the article to see if references are available to back up the assertions, or look for them yourself and improve the article. Adding CSD tags when not merited wastes time and irritates people unnecessarily. Ty 23:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Quantifier Consortium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rocksanddirt (talk) 18:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your old question at Talk:Gregory Maguire. -- AvatarMN (talk) 10:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a very offensive infobox, IMO. I didn't ask whether you prefer to disregard gays, and I'd prefer not to be told. -- AvatarMN (talk) 05:39, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I don't quite understand the offense. Llamabr (talk) 14:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You go out of your way to tell strangers that you aren't open to their being open. That when it comes to homosexuality, they can just shut up. It's obnoxious. Imagine someone said "if you're a Jew I don't want to know it". -- AvatarMN (talk) 05:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to know if you're a jew either. I don't really want to know anything about you, frankly. Llamabr (talk) 03:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever, now you're being intentionally thick. You know what I'm talking about, you're saying there's something about being gay that isn't fit to be out in the open. There's a difference between not caring whether you know something and caring that you not know something. -- AvatarMN (talk) 05:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly. However, I'd put most people into both categories, gays and jews included. For gay people, and possibly jews, it may be important to them that the world recognize their orientation. For my part, however, I couldn't be bothered. All of this originated, I suppose, due to the fact that I was learning how to make infoboxes on the same morning that I stumbled upon DADT. If I were paying closer attention, I would have deleted it after my experiment was over. I'm not convinced that it's an offensive position, though (Bill Clinton seemed satisfied with it; I'm probably ambivelent). Probably if you're offended, you're reading more into it as a statement than is there. Llamabr (talk) 21:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I suppose. It sounds as if you're in fact more in the vein of not caring about the issue of one's sexuality, which is very different from "prefering not to be told", and is perfectly reasonable. But DADT is a lot more complicated, with roots in a belief that it would disrupt troop unity if gays were out. Until 60 years ago, the same argument was used to segregate blacks in the military. It was decided that catering to the bigotry of some of the troops at the expense of the digity of others of the troops was not acceptable. If you don't care whether someone's gay or not, I'm sure you don't support something like that. (And BTW, Clinton wasn't satisfied with it, it was just the best he could pass through the system at the time.) -- AvatarMN (talk) 18:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your good work on the subject article. Articles about diploma mills and suspected diploma mills (of which I have many on my watchlist) are subject to a lot of content deletion by users attempting to whitewash the institutions, so those of us who monitor these articles tend to get a bit trigger-happy when we see deletions that are not explained by edit summaries.
Also, as a general rule, when an article cites a published source that is no longer available online, it is better to mark the URL as "broken" than to delete the content and the source (see Template:Uw-deadlink). In this instance, I concluded that the true source was actually George Gollin's website and not the publication cited, so I fully agreed with your deletion.
Given the trigger-happy attitude of those of us who monitor these pages, I thought it best to tell the whole story in the edit summary. --Orlady (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference: Template:Uw-deadlink is designed for user talk pages. To mark bad URLs in article space, use Template:citations broken (marks a whole section with several bad URLs), Template:citation broken (inline marking for bad URLs), or Template:failed verification (to mark a reference citation that does not support the content). Of course, the syntax for inserting these into articles is in the pattern {{citation broken}} or {{failed verification}} --Orlady (talk) 17:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Notable Philosophy Majors ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prompted by your tagging of Ernest Salter Davies, I've reviewed your recent speedy delete tags. You'll see the results in your watchlist. Whilst most were fine, quite why you nominated a broken redirect for speedy deletion as a test page instead of fixing it, I'm not sure. Rudolph Tegner had a clear assertion of notability for CSD purposes. And, whilst I won't remove the tag you placed on Ernest Salter Davies, I'm surprised that when the article says that The Times has said that he was "for long a leading figure in educational administration and thought in England", you nevertheless think that there's no assertion of notability in the article! Incidentally, you win the prize for being the first person to suggest an article that I've written for speedy deletion for lack of notability. Regards, and happy editing. Bencherlite^Talk 01:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed it, and did remove the tag. The Times and the NYTimes are the two papers where the presence of a full obit is accepted in Wikipedia as unquestionable proof of notability. And in any case an OBE in any class is more than enough to make a speedy impossible. Tegner is also well enough sourced to make a Speedy entirely unreasonable. Please read WP CSD A7 again. When you do tag speedies, or for any other form of deletion, please note that it is required that you indicate this in the edit summary so admins and other editors can easily identify those edits. It is also considered polite to notify the editors who introduced or substantially worked on the articles. Please try to be more careful about speedies in general. DGG (talk) 02:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former philosophy majors, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 23:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The opening of this institution seems to get pushed back year after year. Since we have so little to say about it that isn't speculative, I'm thinking it would be better to delete it until the opening is imminent, and it's been better covered in sources.   Will Beback  talk  01:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd argue that it doesn't have a founder until it's founded. The most recent source I can find for it is an article in the IHT from last August. It says,

• He said it would take more than $100 million to start up the university — which he had wanted to have open two years after construction began — and that kind of money isn't easy to find amid a national banking crisis. Because of that, he said, a more reasonable estimate would be that the university will open in five to 10 years. [2]

So that's anywhere from 2013 to 2018. It seems very premature to be listing which courses they may be offering. Would you object to a PROD?   Will Beback  talk  02:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Maharishi Central University, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable proposed university - opening date postponed for years, orphan, only one minor 3rd party sources

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.   Will Beback  talk  01:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Llamabr. Please use an informative edit summary when you tag something for deletion. Also, I would encourage you to do a quick Google News search before tagging something as CSD A7; see my comments at Talk:Hot Buttered Rum (band)#References. Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I reverted your removal of University of Phoenix from the list in Proprietary colleges because (AFAIK) the U. of Phoenix clearly is a proprietary college, as defined. If you know differently, please document your sources. --Orlady (talk) 04:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the duplicate listing 'splains everything. So sorry for my uninformed intrusion. (In the future, may I suggest that you use the edit summary to avoid misunderstandings like this one?) --Orlady (talk) 04:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Whitney Mutch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable per WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO, unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 14:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Whitney Mutch, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitney Mutch. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MuffledThud (talk) 06:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Llamabr! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Robert Engels - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've added another example to your query here. BrainyBabe (talk) 18:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder that our policy on notability "does not directly affect the content of articles, but only their existence." In other words, material (such as alumni in university articles) do not have to meet WP:N to warrant inclusion in an article. Of course, material must meet some bar of importance or interest to warrant inclusion; that bar is not set by WP:N, though. ElKevbo (talk) 18:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2006-scion-tc.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:53, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Llamabr. You have new messages at Talk:Inclusion and Democracy.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Emory Healthcare requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CharlieEchoTango 22:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nyc-subway-globe-sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:10, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to the Bristol Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Commercial Rooms, 43-45 Corn Street, Bristol BS1 1HT on Sunday 28 July 2013 from 1.00 pm. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Bristol topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:24, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:79xs11-turtle.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:79xs11-woturtle.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bristol st nick market3.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:09, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bristol st nick market1.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:09, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bristol st nick market4.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bristol st nick market2.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:2006-scion-tc.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 17:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathryn Noble is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Noble until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to undo your edit on Nature writing, but links to blogs are not normally valid external links. If there was a book based on the essays, that would be good under "Further reading" I should think. Cheers... Tony Holkham (talk) 22:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Positano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Llamabr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Llamabr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Llamabr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Justice-resp-sens-egal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Justice and Responsibility-Sensitive Egalitarianism, does not have enough reliable sources and citations as written to remain published. Bookdealers and goodreads aare not acceptable sources. As Choice is not readily accessible, please indicate whether it was a especially featured (starred) review, or whether you are using "featured" in the generic sense -and provide another review. It would also help to indicate something about the author--to what extent is he an authority, perhaps , if he has written other books, whether the article should be about him, or whether there should be one about him as well. . (?) . I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 00:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Justice-resp-sens-egal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Llamabr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Justice and Responsibility-Sensitive Egalitarianism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hondros College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hondros College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, The Invention of Sound, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Llamabr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Invention of Sound, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Llamabr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Invention of Sound".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]