Hello, LivinAWestLife! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 01:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello LivinAWestLife,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fractal (EDM Artist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 15:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fractal (EDM Artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractal (EDM Artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 12:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Learn from your mistakes. This 'artiste' fails WP:GNG TheLongTone (talk) 12:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Monstercat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Au5, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LivinAWestLife, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. 2601:589:8000:2ED0:1CFD:A2E8:8DDB:FF0F (talk) 15:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fractal (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractal (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk _YO! 20:59, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaia (Fractal album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambient (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The correct place to appeal a deletion is Wikipedia:Deletion review, not the talk page of the deleted article. All talk pages that have no corresponding article will be speedy deleted so it's unlikely that any meaningful discussion will take place there. Sarahj2107 (talk) 06:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Au5 (Musician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Micro (Talk) 13:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Au5, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sarahj2107 (talk) 06:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Au5, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Au5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Exists as Au5

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Au5, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Au5 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Au5 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 01:42, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Austin Collins (Musician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Au5:Draft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 07:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LivinAWestLife,

Thanks for creating List of tallest buildings in North America! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Helpful list of these structures, and well-referenced.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Never Say Die. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
  • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 12:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of tallest buildings in the United States into List of tallest buildings in North America. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Boulder, Colorado has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fujian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jinjiang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Aegean Sea. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, a GA nomination should be started by a major contributor to the article. And from a look, you do not appear in the top editors here, and Philadelphia is nowhere to be found in your top pages edited here. Please consult one of these people before nominating an article. You could also ask for a peer review to find things to fix. Cheers! NightBag10 ^(talk) 13:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have a feeling that you don't like templated messages, so I'll just say this in my own words. Regarding recent edits you made to Monstercat, Wikipedia has always relied on reliable third-party sources for all content. Since there's no third party coverage for early Monstercat releases (at least not until a reliable news feed or documentary releases containing a history of the label that covers individual songs), it's probably best not to include the material for now. See also WP:YOUTUBE.

However, before you ask about the artists section, I'll just say that the Monstercat website is the only verifiable source we have for most artists' inclusion until something else in the current year comes out. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Fredericksburg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 19:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Battle of Fredericksburg you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Battle of Fredericksburg for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Philadelphia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of OCL97 -- OCL97 (talk) 01:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Philadelphia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Philadelphia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of OCL97 -- OCL97 (talk) 02:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lei Yue Mun Plaza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lei Yue Mun Plaza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LivinAWestLife, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Benin City have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 11:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Never Say Die are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

There is no mention of the record company on Dubstep, so it is not a good link for this subject. However, I did notice that quite a few articles mention Never Say Die Records, so I chose one which mentions the record company many times (Eptic) and added it. Feel free to change Eptic for something else, but please make sure that it mentions Never Say Die Records. Leschnei (talk) 13:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I moved it up with the other non-song, non-album music entries. Single-entry sections clutter up the page and make it harder for readers to quickly scan for their article of interest (in my opinion). Leschnei (talk) 13:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey LivinAWestLife! This is A Chicagoan from SSC. It's nice to see you here, I was just checking out the skyscraper WikiProject, since KillerZavatar mentioned in a thread about the new CTBUH site that we could collaborate to improve Wikipedia. Kestreltail (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on MUST DIE! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MUST DIE!. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Folf (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from MUST DIE!, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Alpha, Nevada, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 12:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha, Nevada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ruins of Huanchaca, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LivinAWestLife. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruins of Huanchaca, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LivinAWestLife. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ruins of Huanchaca".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 02:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for creating the 55 Bishopsgate article. However, for consistency we use AGL height on Wikipedia, not AOD. In the article you have given the AOD height of 284 metres, which is as per source but it would be better if a source could be found for the AGL height. Going by either AGL or AOD height it will not be the tallest building in the City of London, unless you are mixing AGL and AOD heights. It also does not say it will be tallest in the City in any of the sources. QuintusPetillius (talk) 20:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will correct that soon. I’ve heard much the same on SkyscraperCity but I couldn’t find a source that used the AGL height. LivinAWestLife (talk) 00:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LivinAWestLife. Thank you for your work on List of tallest buildings in Sapporo. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, wish you a good day as well LivinAWestLife (talk) 10:53, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LivinAWestLife. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of tallest buildings in Kobe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 10:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the Zionism article is subject to a consensus required restriction, meaning that reverted additions cannot be restored without consensus. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 10:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that with your series of edits at Special:Diff/1249128458 and Special:Diff/1249129510 you have violated WP:1RR restriction once and the consensus required restriction twice. Please take care in regards to this matter in the future. TarnishedPath^talk 00:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LivinAWestLife. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of tallest buildings in Kobe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is LivinAWestLife. Thank you. Levivich (talk) 20:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating WP:1RR, as you did at Zionism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Birmingham, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Victoria Square and New Street.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dont start edit war or you will be blocked again. You changing photos as you want in all articles wihtout any discussion and you starting edit war with other users. Stop it. Dasomm (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only person that has had any problem with my updating of articles is you, bud. Maybe you should start a user page on your account so other people can settle out disagreements with you? Not having an account means I also can't determine how much experience you have with editing Wikipedia at all.

Wikipedia is ultimately about all participants contributing, not one control freak trying to keep a page the same way as it is without proper justification. If you have a problem try to bring up the issue on the Bratislava talk page and see if others want to reach a consensus. LivinAWestLife (talk) 01:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have more then 4000 edits and I contributed mostly to articles about Slovakia and Bratislava so dont tell me I dont have experiences with editing Wikipedia. Your chosement for photos is very poor, you have no eye for nice photos and you trying to downgrade the article. Stop with your disturbing edits.Dasomm (talk) 01:36, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is a lack of good, recent photos. If you're Slovak you could consider taking a new picture of the new skyline. Otherwise having the outdated skyline picture would be a problem for the article's infobox.

My edits are not "disturbing" by the way - it seems like you don't know what that word means in English. LivinAWestLife (talk) 01:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is NOT a photo gallery. Stop adding images to the articles without any good reason. Edard Socceryg (talk) 02:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article already has photos, in case you couldn't tell. There were 7 before, and 7 after. So your reply makes 0 sense. LivinAWestLife (talk) 10:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can tell you barely have any experience with Wikipedia, given your userpage and talkpage are both short, and you don't edit much pages other than a vested interest in the Tehran page for some reason. Please explain why you would prefer the old collage with the Azadi Tower as the first image rather than the one I propose. I wouldn't mind hearing you out. If you don't have a legitimate reason then what you're doing is simply blind edit warring. LivinAWestLife (talk) 10:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LivinAWestLife Azadi Tower is the main icon for the city. Tehran is NOT a western city and nobody knows Tehran because of its skyline. The image you suggested actually is not presenting the city. Edard Socceryg (talk) 23:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide any proof saying that Azadi Tower is the definite main icon of the city. The Wiki page for the tower only states it is one of several famous landmarks in Tehran. Many cities across the globe have many identifiable landmarks but they will still have a picture of the skyline as the first image: New York City, Tokyo, London, Toronto, Milan, Madrid, etc. because it is near universally agreed that an overview of the city represents the city best - not a single monument.

If no one knows Tehran because of its skyline, hardly any non-Iranians will recognize Azadi Tower either. LivinAWestLife (talk) 03:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Azadi Tower article on Fa wiki actually explained that. Btw.. Half of the population of Tehran barely has enough food to eat. According to the official statistics of the city council, a large part of the city's population lives in the slums. Then you suggest the photo of the most expensive neighborhood in Iran as the main photo of the article? This is (kinda) like a propaganda for the Iranian government. If you repeat it again, I will report it to the administrators notice board. Edard Socceryg (talk) 05:49, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using Ad hominem attacks against another editor? I'm no fan of the Iranian government. This is simply the part of Tehran that is most built-up. Every city's downtown is more built-up compared to its poorer parts. Look at Mumbai, which has a lot of slums, but whose main picture is yet again a picture of the skyline. Same for Dhaka. This line of reasoning makes no sense. If it is about wealth then a section of a more common area of Tehran would represent the city more accurately.

You will find that you have very little ground to stand on if you report this issue. I also wonder why you have such a vested interest in keeping the article this way. Going through the edit long I don't see that you have contributed much to the article besides reverting my changes. In any case, you only have 86 edits - likely a new or infrequent editor. This indicates you don't have much experience with how standards and guidelines are applied on Wikipedia. Again, if you have an issue, bring it up on the article's talk page. LivinAWestLife (talk) 06:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The number of edits I have has nothing to do with this. On the contrary, you have a history of edit wars. You add images to important articles without any discussion. The presence of many of these images in articles makes no sense. Edard Socceryg (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me which of the images I've added make no sense. Go ahead. Name a single other article. LivinAWestLife (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have never added an image unreasonably to an article. I've only done one of the following:

- Replace an old or poor quality lead skyline image with a newer or better one;

- Modernize the image collage format;

- Find a new lead skyline image in the absence of one. LivinAWestLife (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reported your behavior to ANI. Edard Socceryg (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck. You'll find you have no basis to stand on. LivinAWestLife (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey :)

I just checked your user page and saw that you have the lists of tallest buildings in Kobe and Sendai on your 'To do' list. I've been thinking about creating those articles too, along with a few others (for Hiroshima and Kawasaki, for example). I think I'll go ahead with the Hiroshima and Kawasaki articles, and I’d be happy to help with the others if you want.

Cheers! 8Tokyo8 (talk) 22:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I’d be happy to let you do those. LivinAWestLife (talk) 10:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey LivinAWestLife. I saw that you've been active with regards to articles about skyscrapers, and I'd like to seek your advice/arbritration regarding this issue in WP:ANI.

Essentially, an IP address has been making unsubstantiated claims that Johor Bahru is the "nation's second tallest city", while citing the CTBUH database which by itself states that Johor Bahru and Penang each has 3 skyscrapers above 200m. This appears to me to be a misrepresentation of facts, since both urban areas have equal number of buildings above 200m, and in any case, contradicts List of cities with the most skyscrapers. Said IP address has also been making fallacious arguments and personal attacks ever since, insisting on arbritrarily using the 200m limit to measure the "tallest cities".

What's your thought on this? Thanks. hundenvonPG (talk) 18:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll offer some thoughts over there. For a start I will say that "tallest city" is a nebulous concept as there are many different ways you can define it; instead having "largest skyline" as a metric would make more sense and we can just count the number of 150m+ buildings. I'll comment on that thread. LivinAWestLife (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Might not do it immediately though, it's late in my area. LivinAWestLife (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LivinAWestLife.

The ANI case appears to have gone nowhere. I have opened a new DRN on this issue. Feel free to add your feedbacks there. Cheers. hundenvonPG (talk) 08:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @LivinAWestLife, as you can see in the thread, we are not arguing which city has the tallest skyline, but instead is about the number of 200m+ buildings which has nothing to do about which city has taller skyline. 155.69.190.63 (talk) 03:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"not arguing which city has the tallest skyline"

Excuse me, who wrote this?

"Johor Bahru is also currently the nation's second tallest city in terms of number of 200 metres and above skyscrapers."

Denial of your own claims? Funny! hundenvonPG (talk) 04:12, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remain calm and be civil, instead of using the word like ‘Funny？’? There's nothing to be panic of. Stay back and relax so we can discuss in a peaceful manner, okay? As of current version of the page, I didn't see there is any sentence that says "Johor Bahru is also currently the nation's second tallest city in terms of number of 200 metres and above skyscrapers.". All I saw was second highest-ranked that the one you mentioned was the versions way before this discussion? You want to talk about the current version or what? 155.69.190.63 (talk) 04:19, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know that there's significant difference between second tallest city and second highest-ranked? Again, I hope that you will be able to stay calmer and we are here to help you. There's nothing to worry about. And most importantly, we are here to make Wikipedia better, isn't it? If you keep panicking, it is definitely not helpful for us to achieve this goal, right? Let's maintain peace in the discussion page. 155.69.190.63 (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can also see that the Wiki pages for other big cities in the world like Dubai and Tokyo also mention the same thing about the number of 200m+ buildings (not which city is taller), the argument that which city has taller skyline is started by @HundenvonPenang, not me, I am just arguing on the ranking published by CTBUH. 155.69.190.63 (talk) 03:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also on the number of 200m+ buildings, I have recently informed CTBUH authority on the completion of the two new skyscrapers of Space Residency, standing at 230m both. The number will add up to 5 soon. I just received email from CTBUH that they will update the JB list and ranking later. 155.69.190.63 (talk) 03:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:HOUNDING hundenvonPG (talk) 04:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]