Welcome Landingdude13!

Hey, just wanted to let you know that you don't need to "fix" links that already redirect to the correct page. See the article linked in the section title. Happy editing! TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 02:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm McGeddon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2048 (video game), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 08:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm here to discuss the usefulness of this template. I'm aware that other, similar templates currently exist for currently running series in magazines, such as {{Series in Weekly Shōnen Jump}} and {{Series in Hana to Yume}} (as well as 7 others), but a template of this nature for series that simply appeared in a magazine are rare (the only examples I can think of are the {{Weekly Shōnen Jump - 1968–1979}} family, and that's only for the most notable series for those years). So before you might have been thinking about doing similar templates for Gangan Comics magazines, I would ask that you reconsider the usefulness of the template in its current form, and if perhaps we can't reshape it to be more in line with the first two templates I linked. However, since there appears to only be 3 or 4 series that are currently still being serialized in the magazine that have articles, it may be better to simply delete the template and go with a category instead. I apologize, I didn't notice at first that the templates had already been created by another editor last year. However, I still think that navboxes such as this and {{Comic Flapper}} may not be necessary, and that a category may be a better way to organize all the series that were serialized in these magazines, such as with Category:Dengeki Daioh. Just {{ping}} me here so we can keep the discussion in one place.--十八 10:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Electricburst1996. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2015 in American television, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Per WP:V, content must be verifiable, and it's unclear how Dog With A Blog ending can be verified without a source. Thank you. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 19:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Since you seem new, in this edit I appreciate the change of "2016 video game" to "upcoming video game". However, changing "1986 video game" to "video game" is, for the most part, inappropriate, per WP:REDIRECT. --Izno (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I see that someone has commented exactly like this a year ago. Please don't do that. --Izno (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Landingdude13. There's been a good you are great editor to keep the released volumes of manga updated. However, as far I as remember, you always do only this. Nothing wrong with the edit itself but as long as the prose says "as of November 6, 2015, four volumes have been released" you could have updated it too, right? Sometimes you do update the prose ([1], [2]) but in both cases you do something equally troubling: you update the text but not the source. And this is especially complicated because it makes the article violate WP:V. If possible, you when you update a manga article, you could update infobox, prose, and references - and then you have a complete job. You're not obligated to, I know, and I don't want you to take it as an offense or something like that... it's just a tip as it would be good if you do it to keep the articles in a better state. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please start using edit summaries so editors can tell at a glance what changes you made to an article without having to look at the diff. This would be very helpful, especially because you appear in my watchlist a lot and I can't tell if these edits are routine maintenance or something significant. Opencooper (talk) 12:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I already know about the edit summaries and I know how to put them in. Landingdude13 11:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Landingdude13. I noticed you create a template about an anime studio Trigger, I'm a little impress.

We all know that Trigger is part of Ultra Super Pictures right?, and I was wondering that I gotta show you something, my upcoming template about Ultra Super Pictures (it's not created yet, unless you agreed).

This template's initial visibility currently defaults to autocollapse, meaning that if there is another collapsible item on the page (a navbox, sidebar, or table with the collapsible attribute), it is hidden apart from its title bar; if not, it is fully visible.

To change this template's initial visibility, the |state= parameter may be used:

• {{Landingdude13|state=collapsed}} will show the template collapsed, i.e. hidden apart from its title bar.
• {{Landingdude13|state=expanded}} will show the template expanded, i.e. fully visible.

Category:Anime and manga navigational boxes

If you like it, is it okay that I can redirect that template you created with mine or just get rid of it. It's your choice and also, my template is based on the Japanese template - ja:Template:ウルトラスーパーピクチャーズ. Landingdude13 14:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't see any problem and I like it. I agree with the offer. Even I shall create this template on AzWiki. Thank you that you asked my opinion.--White DemΩn (talk) 08:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. :) 01:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2016 in American television, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ElectricBurst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 02:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lord Roem. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Yuri on Ice without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 00:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, re: your recent mass edits removing "1986" from The Legend of Zelda (video game), please see the guideline on redirects that are not broken. There was no harm in leaving them as they were, especially as the page is likely to need further disambiguation again some day.  czar 04:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: I made the exact same comment at #Edits regarding TLOZ over a year ago, and someone a year ago before that. I am concerned about this user's behavior on this point, if we've got yet a third user commenting on this issue. --Izno (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Landingdude, I recommend that you voluntarily abstain from these types of edits (mass changes of redirects) for the future, especially as you have opted to not acknowledge prior messages or otherwise explain yourself. If you do think a mass change is warranted, please first discuss it with other editors (if related to video games, at WT:VG). Is this an amicable solution? czar 05:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I got almost carried away since the upcoming video game is announced like years ago until it got a new title right now and well, let's just say that's a little bit concern. -- Landingdude13 20:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So, I came here to inform you about WP:NOTBROKEN, only to see that it seems that you've been being warned about this for years? Is there something you're not understanding about the concept of NOTBROKEN? Because your recent changing of instances of Trails of Cold Steel to ''[[The Legend of Heroes: Trails of Cold Steel|Trails of Cold Steel]]'' is the same sort of thing you've been asked to stop by multiple editors now. Sergecross73 msg me 20:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And yet again over at Blue Sky Studios. There is a reason we prefer redirects. Please, stop it. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:37, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And again here too. I'd ask "did you forget about these conversations" but I don't know why you would - how hard is it to not do things like this? I'd hate to block you over something so trivial, but this had been a year-spanning issue with you when we talked about this last time, 10 months ago. Last warning to stop doing this. Sergecross73 msg me 17:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I won't do it again. Landingdude13 talk 22:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you, then we're fine. I still dont understand conceptually why you keep doing this though. Sergecross73 msg me 22:54, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because I couldn't help it to fix these articles over redirects. It's a thing sometimes. Landingdude13 talk 23:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a fix. No, seriously. Stop thinking of it as one. Stop speaking of it as one. There's a whole lot else you can do that will satisfy the fix-itch. --Izno (talk) 00:04, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- I just wrote out a warning, and deleted it when I saw that that I gave you the exact same final warning about a year ago, and you said you’d stop, and you’ve now violated it again, and not in a general sense, but literally with the exact same articles as last time. Sergecross73 msg me 13:40, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Diamond Is Unbreakable, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Making the claim that someone or something is "named after" someone or something else is the very definition of original research and has no place on Wikipedia. —Farix (t | c) 02:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to JoJolion. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 02:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does this link count as a source? [3] If so, should I add it? --Landingdude13 (talk) 04:25, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis are user-contributed, so they can't be used as sources for anything on Wikipedia. For this sort of thing, we need to know Araki's intent - basically, we need a direct statement from Araki or his company, Lucky Land Communications, saying that a character was named after so-and-so. This can sometimes be found in interviews or in the author notes in the manga volumes. I know there have been JoJo artbooks as well in Japan, but haven't purchased any - it's possible there is some information in them that can be used, too.--IDV^talk 08:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is what your looking for - [4] and you're right, it is possible to find them anyway unless it's on Amazon, eBay, or any Japanese store websites which is a possibility.--Landingdude13^talk 08:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about these specifically, but unless you are fluent in Japanese, the information in the Viz-published JoJonium books is way more accessible.--IDV^talk 09:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Stardust Crusaders, you may be blocked from editing. —Farix (t | c) 11:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I won't do it again.--Landingdude13^talk 20:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Landingdude. I've just seen that my recent edit here (on 2018 in American television), which I thought was merely making a grammatical correction, also removed a good deal of sourced material. I also see that you've restored that material. The removal was unintentional and you have my apologies for creating the extra work. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Family Game Night (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/jeff-franklin-fuller-house-out-behavior-1202713011/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed and some was paraphrased. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weinstein effect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moonlight Act, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hal Cooper (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I assume you changed the outlink in John McCain from Su Jia-chyuan to Su Chia-chyuan because the former is currently a redirect to the latter. Based on sources, I've proposed swapping the redirect and the article, since the three apparently authoritative sources use Jia. See WT:WikiProject Taiwan § Article names and romanization if interested. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 14:22, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meiji Tokyo Renka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiroshi Watanabe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because of violations outlined in this discussion, your account is blocked for 3 days. Sergecross73 msg me 13:43, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When adding categories to articles, please keep in mind the general rule at WP:Categorization: "[E]ach categorized page should be placed in all of the most specific categories to which it logically belongs. This means that if a page belongs to a subcategory of C (or a subcategory of a subcategory of C, and so on) then it is not normally placed directly into C." In accordance with this rule, please check to see if the category you are adding is a subcategory or parent category of a category already listed in the article.

For example, at Rocko's Modern Life: Static Cling, you added the category Category:Animated films based on animated series to the article, which is a subcategory of Category:Films based on television series. It would be appropriate to remove the parent category Category:Films based on television series from the article since you added one of the category's subcategories. I've gone ahead and removed this for you, but please just keep this in mind in the future. Thanks. Aoi (青い) (talk) 02:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Henry Danger episodes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 09:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Puzzle & Action: Treasure Hunt, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 14:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just trying to be helpful, not doing something vandalism.--Landingdude13^talk 03:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ben 10 (2016 TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Per WP:V, content must be verifiable, and it's unclear how Ben 10 ending can be verified without a source. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 16:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I won't. I'll leave it alone.--Landingdude13^talk 23:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Harvey Girls Forever! episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richie Rich.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Amazon Prime Video original programming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Peter DeLuise. DonIago (talk) 20:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll leave the living people alone.--Landingdude13^talk 23:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I undid the recent move from Bill Melendez to Bill Meléndez per WP:COMMONNAME. I explained more at Talk:Bill Melendez. It appears that when he immigrated to the US he Americanized his name and only used Bill Melendez and some variations in most of his professional work. This is supported by most of his credits. I noticed that you are changing the spelling on all of the projects he worked on. We are supposed to spell names as they are credited and your changes do not reflect the credits. I request you undo those changes to go back to the credited names as spelled in the credits. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted them all, just like you said 😊.--Landingdude13^talk 06:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pretty Cure All Stars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuki Hayashi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the reactions to food depicted in the manga series Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma were decided on through free association games? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude, tell this user something that Crunchyroll itself was not previously known as Funimation since this entertainment company started moving all of its content onto this eponymous anime streaming service, it's now owned by Sony's Crunchyroll, LLC in opening sentences and infobox. You can go to intervene on the talk page here. 190.80.229.229 (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, FYI, please be aware of WP:NOTBROKEN. I've seen you going about "fixing" links, but if they still link to the correct article, you don't really need to waste your time on it. Sergecross73 msg me 20:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm now reminded that you were warned and blocked for this between 2017 and 2019, so I'll upgrade this from a suggestion to a more stern to a "stop this immediately". Sergecross73 msg me 20:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll stop. I'll do something else that has nothing to do with article fixing. There you go. Landingdude13 (talk) 20:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I don't understand why you keep falling into this though. Why don't you see this as a waste of time? You're expending effort on something that has no functional benefit. As long as you stop, it's fine, I just don't know why we need you need to be forced into not wasting your own time. Sergecross73 msg me 20:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's just came out of nowhere where I discovered a page about what links here? with pages that link to this article redirect. You're right it is a waste of time of doing this and I thought it's good to increase my edit count. Landingdude13 (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I’ve once again reverted your changes to the article on list of changes due to George Floyd. Unfortunately the sources you appear to be using fail to mention George Floyd as the reason for casting changes taking place. Given that pressure and campaigning to undertake race-accurate casting took place both before and after his death it’s a violation of WP:OR to assign causation ourselves to the recast.

I would suggest the changes might be better suited to a new article purely around racially-sensitive recasting rather than in the article you’re attempting to place them in. Rambling Rambler (talk) 07:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]