Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kyledueck. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! œ^™ 13:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Human sexuality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chlamydia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kyledueck. Since you often watch over and usually edit sexual articles, would you mind weighing in on the above linked discussion? Flyer22 (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kyledueck, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality#Asexuality as a main sexual orientation about the validity of User:Pass a Method adding that asexuality is "a main category of sexual orientation" to the Heterosexuality, Homosexuality and Bisexuality articles. Obviously, comments on the matter are needed. Flyer22 (talk) 14:14, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help if I can. I've also added Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality to my watch list. kyledueck (talk) 00:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Labia page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Labia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conception (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Labia may have broken the syntax by modifying 11 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of the vulva. <br />''Right'': Spreading the labia apart exposes inner areas of the vulva.</br> A) [[Anterior commissure of labia majora|Anterior commissure of labia majora]]</br> B) [[Clitoral hood]]</br> C) [[Labia minora]]</br> D) [[Labia majora]]</br> E) [[Posterior commissure of labia majora|Posterior commissure of labia majora]]</br> F) [[Clitoral glans]]</br> G) Inner surface of labia majora</br> H) [[Vulval vestibule|Vulvar vestibule]]</br> I) [[Urethra]]</br> J) [[Vagina|Vaginal orifice]]</br> K) [[Frenulum of labia minora|Fourchette]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Labia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• Lastly, why not try and strive to create a good article! Anatomical articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It would be helpful for other users if you wrote a little about yourself on your main user page, not too much. Take your time and look at what other users have put on their talk pages. Boxes can be useful. Snowman (talk) 21:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the suggestion, and perhaps I'll do this at some point, but I have no interest in doing so at the present time. I suppose that I don't want to make myself feel too at home here, because editing can take huge amounts of time, and I have many other things to focus on at the moment! kyledueck (talk) 22:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]