This page is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Hey, Kimikel. What we like to see to support a claim to notability is three instances of significant coverage, two of which are from outside the area/outside industry niche publications. What I feel like I'm seeing is a lot of coverage in Houston, a couple of instances of routine business coverage in San Antonio, and nothing else? Which three sources would best support a claim to notability? Valereee (talk) 19:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Valereee thank you for the quick response. best i can do in that regard is the Conde Nast source, which is based in NYC and isn't an food industry-specific, it's just about travel in general. feel free to correct me if i'm wrong but i feel like that should suffice according to this passage, may not be applicable here just let me know Kimikel (talk) 21:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kimikel, the Conde Nast unfortunately isn't significant coverage. It's a few sentences in a '23 best' article, basically a listicle. We need to see RS covering the restaurant at length. Valereee (talk) 21:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The creator is a pretty new editor. I'd like to give them a chance to either do some research and improve the sources, or do some research and decide to move to user space while they see if sources develop. Kimikel, FWIW, I have probably 40 drafts in my user space, waiting sources to develop. When I create an article, I write the initial draft in user space. When I get to the third instance of sigcov in an independent RS, I move to article space. If I don't find three, I leave it in user space for now. Valereee (talk) 20:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Valereee That's a fair suggestion, thank you for that and for informing me on notability guidelines. I honestly did not know beforehand, so that's very good to know. Kimikel (talk) 20:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
