Welcome to Wikipedia, Kelsey246!! Thank you for your contributions. I am Scope creep and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! scope_creep (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

J. Peterman Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

• Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 19:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, may I ask if you are being compensated in any way for your edits to NRG Energy or any other commercial articles? If so, you are required to disclose your status as a paid editor. Please carefully review Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and let me know if you have any questions. --Laser brain (talk) 15:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Laser brain, I apologize for the late response! I was unaware of the necessity of the Paid-contribution disclosure - thank you for sharing it with me. I am a library science student and was recommended to try editing Wikipedia to understand the rules and hone my research skills. My edits on Wikipedia have been both personal and professional, many have been to build my content research skills. I was compensated for my edits on NRG Energy's page and I will place the appropriate template on my user page. I tried to adhere to all of Wikipedia’s rules I was aware of on research, writing, and tone; any feedback on my edits would be greatly appreciated! Does that fully comply with the Paid-contribution disclosure or is there another step I need to take? I read the Paid-contribution disclosure link you sent, but I want to make sure I’m understanding it fully. Thank you for your help, Kelsey246! (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the response and disclosure! I didn't review your contributions to NRG Energy in great detail, but the tone seems fine in what I read. One thing to look out for is that companies who engage you to edit on behalf of an organization will often provide details they want included in their articles that an unbiased encyclopedia editor might not add. The heading "Community involvement" raises that type of flag. It's the type of material companies love to include on their web sites and wiki articles because it makes them look good—but you also have to ask critical questions about whether such content is "encyclopedic". --Laser brain (talk) 01:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! I see what you mean about "community involvement." Can you explain what you mean by "encyclopedic" or point me to some Wiki guidelines I can read? I'm trying to understand what is "encyclopedic" information and what is considered irrelevant information in an article. Thanks, Kelsey246! (talk) 13:48, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikipedia:Writing better articles is a good read, especially the "Informational style and tone" heading. Most of what's on that page is going to be elementary to someone with your background, but there are a few good tidbits and examples. I like to think of it as such: What is the company notable for? What is their history and what notable events have happened? Those are "encyclopedic" questions. Some less encyclopedic questions are "What have they done that's good?" and its companion, "What have they done that's bad?" which end up producing sections like "Charity work" or "Controversies" which in my opinion should just be worked into the narrative when they are notable enough that independent journalists wrote about them. Hope this helps! --Laser brain (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Laser brain! That makes complete sense and is exactly what I needed to understand the encyclopedic style. I'll give the "Writing better articles" a read through, as well. Thanks, Kelsey246! (talk) 21:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kelsey246!: Now you have declared your a paid for your work, I suggest you start using Wikipedia:Edit requests to request updates to the article. This is the standard process. scope_creep^Talk 21:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Scope creep: I will use the "edit request" template you provided me for any suggestions I have for the NRG Energy page. I have placed a draft through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process for a different article. I have disclosed my paid editing status for this article (Draft:Trimaco, Inc.) on my user page, in my edit summary and on the draft article's talk page, is there anything else I need to do to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines? Thanks, Kelsey246! (talk) 22:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft article is an advertisement, a company brochure. It is completely non notable per WP:NCORP, WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH. There is no notability criteria defined in the article what-so-ever and is 100% against Wikipedia Terms of Use which explicitly state that advertising is illegal. Company articles should have an historical viewpoint and it is the only way it is done. If the article gets down to WP I intend to send it to Afd. scope_creep^Talk 09:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback @Scope creep: I did not intend for the article to read as an advertisement. Do you have any feedback on how the article could be improved? How can I improve the draft so it is valuable as an encyclopedic article to Wikipedia? Thanks,Kelsey246! (talk) 14:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Trimaco, Inc.. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 09:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

adv,corp

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trimaco, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trimaco, Inc., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kelsey246!! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Trimaco, Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kelsey246!. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trimaco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]