Hello Ka-ru! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 16:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

I would have had no objections if you only edited the text without removing some of Cixi's historical images which are of valuable high quality. It can do no harm to leave them on the article, why did you remove them? Highshines 03:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 16:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Recent updates have had their "edit summary" filled correctly.Ka-ru 07:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for all your work on Cixi, the article looks much better now. I have tried to normalize the spelling of names to reflect common English usage and get rid of some pictures, the latter with moderate succcess. As you may have noticed, Highshines and his her sock-puppets have started to change names back to where they were before the clean-up, so we need to remain vigilant and check his/her edits.--Niohe 12:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye on things as well. Some people just don't seem to understand the concept of "common usage" in English. ;) Ka-ru 17:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Is there a rule that we must only use works if at least 100 years have passed since the author's death? I thought 70 years were enough – why else would we have {{PD-old-70}}? I'm asking because I've uploaded copies of scans of photographs by Felice Beato, who allegedly probably only died about 99 years ago. Wikipeditor 05:52, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No idea. I assume this question is in reference to one of the Highshines photos where I probably left a comment. If that was the case, then it was simply because Highshines marked the photo as "Public Domain - Artist's life + 100 years". A quick check of one photo shows the copyright label has been changed to something different, making my comments no longer relevant. Ka-ru 06:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Wikipeditor 06:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Yamatohime-no-mikoto. Good job. がんばってね.--ZayZayEM 14:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In order to encourage more participation, and to help people find a specific area in which they are more able to help out, we have organized taskforces at WikiProject Japan. Please visit the Participants page and update the list with the taskforces in which you wish to participate. Links to all the taskforces are found at the top of the list of participants.

Please let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for helping out! ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 08:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your work on Saiō. It's a bit awkward to explain why I enjoyed this article so much.

For reasons too complicated to explain here, I've found myself extraordinarily focused on the integration of a 17th century Japanese chronicle into the texts of relevant 21st-century Wikipedia rticles. In this project, I've been spending an inordinate amount of time cross-referencing two comparable 13th-century and and 14th-century Japanese texts as a way of establishing a plausible context and a verifiable confirmation for serial edits. It was an unexpected pleasure to encounter a situation in which the Meiwa municipal government provided that very same kind of context and confirmation.

In addition, your personal snapshots helped made this project come alive in a way that left me grinning rather foolishly. Strange, I know ..., but there you have it. In this instance, I guess it makes sense to invite you to accept my edits as a curious token of appreciation. Why not?--Ooperhoofd (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your supposed painting by Katherine Carl is actually by Herbert Vos and is at Harvard Museums. Carl's two portraits are at the Summer Palace, Beijing and the Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington, DC. Please correct this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.11 (talk) 12:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please look through the history to find who added the painting and contact them (or you can fix it yourself). It wasn't there when I stopped looking after that article. Ka-ru (talk) 12:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox bay has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 19:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I realized it's functional, just missing documentation. I've taken care of it, although I'm new to templates so documentation help would be useful. Shadowjams (talk) 19:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ka-Ru. Just wanted to say a quick thanks for starting the article on The Jezabels. I was wanting to create one for ages but did not have the confidence or know how to make a page from fresh. So your initial page really got me started in terms of my Wikipedia career hehe. As you can see it's come along way since you first set it going in February. I'm a big fan of The Jezabels and although I am somewhat new to editing on Wikipedia, I have made a large number of contributions to their article. I happen to think it's pretty good, however some detractors (ie User:Duffbeerforme) seem to disagree and believe it is still lacking in verifiable sources. I guess he kind of has a point, but he was a bit of a douche in making it. If you have the desire or the time maybe you could add some contributions to this page that was your creation. For example, I know that one the genres that The Jezabels can be classified as is definately Indie Rock, however I cannot find any secondary sources that say so. The only ones I can find are blogs or their own website. So yeah, thanks again for creating the article on The Jezabels, a great Australian band. Here's hoping that they go places. And it turn, their Wiki page will too. HAHA. cya mate, take care.WideAwakeInTheStarFire (talk) 02:32, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ise Grand Shrineに、Hinokuma Shrine (日前神宮・國懸神宮)について記述しましたが、なぜだめなのでしょうか？ 日本語版の　http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BC%8A%E5%8B%A2%E7%A5%9E%E5%AE%AE にある　「神階が授与されたことのない神社の一社」と　「脚注 4 ^ 神宮で神階が無いのは、伊勢神宮と日前神宮、國懸神宮の3宮だけである。」 にも記述されている内容です。 神階については　http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A5%9E%E9%9A%8E にありますが、英語版にはないようです。

問題があるのなら、ご指摘していただければ幸いです。よろしくお願いします。

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ka-ru. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ka-ru. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Temizusha.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand things sometimes. I'm tired of having people with no idea of an article that I've done a lot of research into, come along and, having read one piece of text from one site, want to change everything. I can list out dozens of sources, but it's all ignored. I thought that was the point of research. I've recently seen changes to parts of the wiki that I know are wrong. The result is that people wanting to find info on certain topics are going to find it harder to find them. The irony is that the whole changes were kicked off based on wanting to change the name of an article. In the end, that name was never added to anything, yet now all the related articles have been renamed and messed up. I think it's time I retire from this site... :( Ka-ru (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not leave any further comments here as this account is now officially dead. Ka-ru (talk) 23:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17 years is a long time! Thank you for your contributions! You'll be very welcome to come back at any time. Polyamorph (talk) 19:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]