Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, KINGHB190! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kj cheetham (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vexillology Ireland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused about your edit on Labbacallee wedge tomb. Why did you add "Category:Townlands of County Cork" to an article about a wedge tomb??? The Banner talk 14:44, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The category is in reference to the townland of Labbacallee where the tomb is located. As the townland has no page of it's own and the wedge tomb is the only thing of note in it, I used the page for the tomb to add Labbacallee to the Category:Townlands of County Cork. KINGHB190 (talk) 14:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not very logical IMHO. But okay. There are no (or not many) townlands with their own article. Maybe a parish (civil or RC) is a better idea. The Banner talk 15:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will admit that not many townlands have their own pages but since there is a category for townlands in Cork, I feel they should get some representation. KINGHB190 (talk) 15:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is also Category:Civil parishes of County Cork where Glanworth is part off. The Banner talk 16:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but Labbacallee is a rural townland of Glanworth and so should be included in the list of townlands. KINGHB190 (talk) 16:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you using two accounts for writing Draft:Townlands of Fermoy? The Banner talk 16:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, my friend just has a similar username. KINGHB190 (talk) 16:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Townlands of Fermoy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 01:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A couple of notes on the newly created Category:Fermoy Hinterlands:

• WP:CATNAME. The relevant guideline expects that category names/titles use sentence case. As "hinterland" is not a proper noun (or a title or similar), it should not be capitalised.
• WP:CATV. Membership of categories should be verifiable. In many cases the categorisation you have applied appears (absent any explanation or referencing) to be arbitrary and based on your own opinion. The Watergrasshill article, for example, makes NO MENTION of Fermoy (and is effectively as close to Cork city as it is to Fermoy). In what sense is it a "hinterland" to Fermoy? And the Kilmallock article, which also makes no mention of Fermoy and is even further away still (40km or more) in a completely different county (significantly closer to Limerick City than Fermoy), is in Fermoy's "hinterland" in what sense? And based on what sources? And, in terms of Mitchelstown (a relatively large town in its own right), what verifiable sources are we relying upon for categorising as a "subset" of Fermoy? Or Bartlemy or Kildorrery for that matter? Or, frankly ANY of the members of the proposed category?
• WP:ES. Whether explained with a reference or otherwise, please note that editors are typically expected to explain/justify their changes with an edit summary.

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 13:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the reason why I list these places as hinterlands of Fermoy is that they are mentioned as such on the Government of Ireland website (gov.ie). I would have added citations to show this but as far as I am aware you cannot add citations to categories? KINGHB190 (talk) 13:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Areas covered

The areas that this office provides services for are: Fermoy town and hinterlands (Watergrasshill, Rathcormac, Mitchelstown, Kilworth, Glanworth, Kildorrery, Conna, Ballynoe, Araglen, Kilmallock, Castlelyons, Ballyhooly and Glenville)." KINGHB190 (talk) 13:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about this webpage? A single page related to a branch office of the Department of Social Protection (DSP)? That's what we're relying upon for classifying Kilmallock (a town of 1,700 people which is >40km away in a different county) to be within the "hinterland" of Fermoy? Perhaps, absent there being a branch office of the DSP in Charleville or Adare or someplace closer, the Fermoy DSP office considers Kilmallock to be in its "hinterland". But the classification and logistics of DSP branch offices (and whether and where people have to "sign on") is, frankly, a little weak for the classification being applied here. (The DSP is not a local authority for planning or other purposes for example. Absent other more general sources, classifying Kilmallock as being in the "hinterland" of Fermoy, I really don't think that the DSP's use of the term (for their own purposes) "travels" as far as you're pushing it...) Guliolopez (talk) 14:04, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A working area of the DSP is not the same as the hinterland of a town. Why do you not use this source: Townlands in the Civil Parish of Fermoy, Co. Cork? The Banner talk 14:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I note that a profile, with a very similar username to yours, re-added the (queried) category to the Watergrasshill article. Please note that related policies cover coordinating with people outside of Wikipedia. And such coordination, in a manner which is counter to consensus-based editing, is not in keeping with policy. Also note that I've opened a thread at Category talk:Fermoy Hinterlands Guliolopez (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Guliolopez Oh, I am sorry as I was unaware that collaboration was against Wikipedia's policies. It will not happen again. King HB 17:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. To clarify, collaboration (within the project) is well within Wikipedia's policies. It is a core project policy. However, coordination (outside the project) is constrained by several caveats. Guliolopez (talk) 19:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Guliolopez Oh so am I correct in saying that I can collaborate on a project but that we are not to enforce the contents of it onto other pages until agreed upon. That is understandable. King HB 19:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have also responded to your thread on the Fermoy Hinterlands talk page. King HB 19:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is not something that should go through AFC. Create the page yourself or move it to your desired location in the Wikipedia space. AFC is back logged enough with actual drafts.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know how to make pages without sending them through AFC. King HB 18:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind I have figured it out and will make the page myself. King HB 19:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Araglin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 20:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@KINGHB190 much better article, thank you.

Just remember to sign your messages when you post comments, as otherwise it's impossible to know who has posted what. Check out WP:SIGN. Qcne (talk) 20:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure I hardly need to say this, but the briefer and more policy based one's comments are the better. I also recommend not getting drawn into protracted discussions, and having the wisdom where necessary to alter one's opinion in public. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you wanted to usurp an existing username. There is a process on this at Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations I suggest you have a look at the process detailed there. ϢereSpielChequers 18:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @WereSpielChequers: Would usurping it change it to my full username or would I just own the name because that is what I want, I am happy with my current username. King HB 18:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like would I own it as a separate page like I do now because that would be ideal. King HB 18:39, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want my account name to change. King HB 18:45, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can have pages in your own userspace, but not in other people's userspace. Or at least not without their agreement. Because of the copyright implications, we take usernames very seriously. Even if an account has been dormant for 18 years and doesn't have many edits on this wiki (and I haven't checked whether that account has edits on other wikis). So usurping another account to be your username is a big deal but there is a process and sometimes it can be done. But not to create an account that you don't want to use. Now do you want me to move User:Burke to User:KINGHB190/Burke or should I just delete it? ϢereSpielChequers 19:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you move it to User:TheBurke? If not, User:TheBurke190 King HB 19:56, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Or you could delete it and I make the account User:TheBurke myself so that I actually have access to it. King HB 20:06, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like User:TheBurke is available. If you create an account in that name, just sign in here and I will move that page over there. ϢereSpielChequers 20:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have created User:TheBurke190. King HB 20:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The account is up and running. TheBurke190 (talk) 20:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK page has moved. ϢereSpielChequers 20:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Would you like to sign my guestbook? King HB 20:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article House of Burgh you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:House of Burgh for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 09:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KINGHB190:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KINGHB190. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stritch Photography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For clarification, as this mistake has happened before, User:KINGDM76 is not my alternative account, any I have are announced at User:KINGHB190/Alts. He is my friend and I helped him create his account, so we chose a name in the same style as mine. ☘️ King ᚺᛒ ☘️ Talk, Guestbook 18:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't know what you (two?) are at, but editors with an acknowledged connection would ideally *not* be accepting your own or each other's submissions via the WP:AFCR process. Ideally unconnected and "impartial" editors should review new AfC submissions. If interested in getting involved, please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#How_to_get_involved. Guliolopez (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry I was unaware. I though as I am part of WikiProject Articles for Creation that I would be able to accept my own submission. This will not happen again. ☘️ King ᚺᛒ ☘️ Talk, Guestbook 14:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that read links are considered an invitation to write an article, not something bad. But at the same time some red links will never end up in an lasting article, like primary or named clusters of house. It is better to be cautious with the removal of these links. The Banner talk 17:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirchmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cashman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KINGHB190. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia:WikiLeprechaun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Franklin Clinton. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Would you like to sign my guestbook? ☘️ King ᚺᛒ ☘️ Talk, Guestbook

A couple things.

First, per WP:MOVEREDIRECT you should avoid moving pages that are already redirects.

Second Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael De Santa closed as redirect, based on [1] the problems identified have not been addressed. If you ever find sourcing that fixes the problem, in other words three WP:GNG sources, then add the material to Draft:Michael De Santa directly as there is no need to delete the page first. However if you just submit an unsourced page full of plot description as you just did it will simply be declined and waste everyone's time. Content like that is not suited for a standalone Wikipedia page, but sometimes can be incorporated within an article on a broader topic, if sourced. You may consider instead creating a page at fandom or some other alternative outlet.

Regardless, edit-warring against an WP:AFD consensus is prohibited.

Please edit in compliance with policies and guidelines going forward, thank you. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:7DCC:BBFD:FADA:4719 (talk) 21:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not intend to edit-war and was unaware of WP:AFD consensus. I do however feel that if sourced properly a standalone article could be created for Michael De Santa. I am aware that I submitted an unsourced page but that is because it started off as a redirect and I could not move it to a draft. I will not edit-war any further. ☘️ King ᚺᛒ ☘️ Talk, Guestbook 21:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just find it strange that Trevor Philips has a page and the two other GTA V protagonists who are just as (or even more) notable do not. ☘️ King ᚺᛒ ☘️ Talk, Guestbook 21:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If they are WP:Notable then you will be able to find three reliable, independant, secondary sources with WP:SIGCOV so the page complies with WP:GNG, but so far discussions have not identified those sources, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Grand Theft Auto V characters. If you do find those sources, you can replace the redirect with the new content on the draft page and submit it, or request re-evaluation at WP:DRV under purpose 3. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:7DCC:BBFD:FADA:4719 (talk) 21:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will search for reliable sources and see from there. Thank you for your time. ☘️ King ᚺᛒ ☘️ Talk, Guestbook 21:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KINGHB190. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wikipedia:WikiLeprechaun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you're a member of WP:Mythology, would you be interested in a sub project on WP:Anthropology on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KINGHB190. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Townlands of Glanworth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This is a reminder that you're a probationary Articles for Creation reviewer. Because you haven't performed any reviews in the last six months, you may be removed from the list of participants. Don't be a stranger! We'd love to see you take on any number of reviews, but even a single one will be enough to maintain your reviewer status.

Thanks for volunteering, and thanks for the reviews you've done so far! -- asilvering (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]