This is the talk page for discussing the coolest guy on the Intarweb.
Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.	Talk page guidelines Please respect Etiquette, assume good faith and be nice.

Old Talk Page Archives

• 2005
• 2006: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Apologies for the action and reverting on your talk page, blocked user Hdayejr has picked your page to make his comments on, for some reason. Whatever he says should just be taken with a grain of salt, he's got a long history of harassment. Sorry for the chaos. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 07:21, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 07:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. your reply: it is your opinion as to what a spade is, not a fact. Per WP:BLP unsourced contentious material about living people is forbidden throughout wikipedia. Thanks. Ty 06:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was fixing a typo on the page and it said my change was reverted and told me to stop. All I did was change massacure to massacre like it should be. I didn't see this as a frivolous change... though that was before I made my account properly. Does it always revert people's changes if you don't have an account?--Princessnekosama (talk) 07:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The typo I fixed and that was reverted was fixed again. I just was curious as to why I'd have gotten a message saying it was reverted and to stop when it was just a typo. I was wondering if it was because they just did that if an unregistered user did it or not, is all. Here's the link, regardless. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Yu-Gi-Oh%21_anime_and_manga_characters Princessnekosama (talk) 03:04, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• No idea, I was just wondering. I didn't make any such jokes, just a typo, but I got a message saying like 'please stop editing this way and use the sandbox' or something to that degree, just was curious as to the nature of the message. Princessnekosama (talk) 06:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My bad on removing Arthur - you're quite right, if he's in the manga, then he should totally stay on the page. However, check out the section I've just started on the article's talk page for a bit more discussion on what should and shouldn't be on the page. - Chris McFeely (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"fails the everything test". Hahaha! Cliff smith ^talk 16:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The game apparently does have english VA's for everyone this time alongside the japanese ones, with the option supposedly to turn them off individually (and most are complete crap). Though I'm not entirely sure that a list of who's doing which voices is published yet.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 12:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The game's dub is being done by New Generation Pictures (and it is not Complete Crap) the guy who is directing it is Taliesin Jaffe who did the dub for Beck Mongolian Chop Squad as well as Hellsing Ultimate.--Jack Cox (talk) 18:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is not appropriate. Please read WP:NPA and adjust your behavior accordingly. Kevin (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am about to add the "Gay for Bridget" meme into the Bridget article. I see that you have many edits and REVERTS to this article, and there is some of your inflamatory language regarding the internet meme on the article's talk page. So I cannot pretend to assume good faith. If you wish to revert my edits, please contact me first. Roidroid (talk) 16:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• If you have a reliable source (ie. not Urbandictionary or other user-contributed content) I have no issues. JuJube (talk) 17:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is difficult to find such sources for Internet Memes so it may take some time. How are other Internet Meme articles sourced? ps: are you getting this message if i post it on my own talkpage? (and likewise, will i get notified if you reply to something i type on your talkpage?) i do not understand the wikipedia notification system for such things Roidroid (talk) 17:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You listed that they're suspect sockpuppets of Troyrodriguez631, but I think you meant to put Troyrodriguez361. Is that right? I've made the change, but feel free to revert me if that's not what you meant. justinfr (talk) 13:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the part on Faust (Guilty Gear) Dr. Baldhead is implicitly stated in the game, please revert me. Perhaps I misread it, but I thought the article merely said the game implied that. The various musical references seem to vary from highly likely to wildly improbable. Rather than decide how likely each indvidual claim is (and thus engage in my own original research) I'm removing all that are not sourced. Edward321 (talk) 21:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, trivia sections (often masquerading notes, cultural references, or other info) are a real magnet for driveby OR. My instinctive reaction is to nuke them from orbit, but there are occasional bits of useful (and sometimes even sourced) info in some of them. Guilty Gear is better than most - I can see some of the references and I know only slightly more about heavy metal than Opus the penguin. Edward321 (talk) 22:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Trueform Sailor Galaxia.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you know a person who can merge all the episodes of Tom and Jerry Tales into just one page , I would appreciate that. Please don"t delete all the episodes. Tom and Jerry Tales is popular than the other remakes. So it cannot be considered for deletion.Daxterooney5 (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for dealing with the recent vandalism on my talk page. Am I being slow? What is your evidence that he is an evident sock of Willi H2O (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Pelosi open letter, i understand your concerns. My concern is that they will use the Fairness Doctrine to apply to the Internet including Wikipedia. My fear is that 38% of people polled in Rasmussen earlier this month in the US support government regulation on the Interent. I don't want that. This is not conspiracy theory, but fact. That is all I am going on. Chris (talk) 21:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you *had* to get that song in my head, didn't you? :) TravellingCari 05:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Regarding this edit, I must say that I assumed it was vandalism after checking the diff of the user that I reverted and the edit prior to that one. In order to avoid accidental reverts in the future, i've inserted a hidden comment before the statement in question. Cheers! --Fatal!ty ^(T☠LK) 08:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want me or anyone else to pull some kind of stunt like that, then fine. Contact me if you can tell me how to get in contact with Jordan William Johnson.

Also "Last Chance" I always see that in the subject line everytime. Can't you think of something more original? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roberttheman2008 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a request for comment for user conduct on Roberttheman2008. Feel free to comment or provide any evidence you have in the case. Thank you, MuZemike (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. You should check out what the user left on my talk page. MuZemike (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have anything you wish to edit or add to the RfC, go ahead. I'm heading to work fairly soon, so I will be offline for a bit. MuZemike (talk) 16:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you believe the stuff the person has said in his response? That, is if you can read it. MuZemike (talk) 07:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gashbell11.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. I had hopes of helping better understand how we do things so he would be a constructive rather than vexatious editor. I'm not out to help Robert be vexatious. Of course, he denies the bribery thing. Perhaps he just did not understand how offensive that behavior is to us. I keep reminding myself that it took me a while to learn some things too. (I had my first article deleted and, I got a nonsense warning early on. Not all of us are as bright as we could be at times.) I can understand how every who has interacted with him feels. I had to set my feelings aside myself.

To be honest, I feel frustrated in that I seem not to be getting through. I hope that someone who is not involved with him can come in fresh and make a difference. Not all of his posts make sense to me. He does not seem to understand some basic polices-- see my notes on his talk page and on the RFC and on my talk. Gnfnrf did a fine job at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Roberttheman2008. The RFC needs to run its course. We need to develop a consensus and proceed from there. Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 02:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

• Image:GiganoRadomu.jpg
• Image:GoShudoruk.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In light of the failure to reach consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghan British‎ I've suggested that there be a discussion of the various issues raised, here. Your input would be appreciated. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split the character template back off of the Guilty Gear main directory template and modified it a bit: it'll now include Category:Guilty Gear characters into the article's directly, so in almost all cases that's been removed from them so the template can handle it and save a little space in them. Also the In-universe infobox template got merged with {{Fighting game character}} since it was just reduced to a birthplace param, which had the nice side effect of restoring the bloodtype in some of the articles.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:IILIIDIUK.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. It was tagged at first for deletion as nonsense. I thought it was about a fictional character, so I went looking on Google. I was right, but, alas, she is sadly lacking in notability. Only afterward did I see your tag for G4-- which I referenced in my note to the article creator. Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 17:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A large number of the Guilty Gear character articles are up for merge proposals due to the fact sources just aren't turning up in what research I did. But nobody's really commenting ye or ne on the char list talkpage.

I hate to bother you with it, but since you have watched over them long term...what's your opinion on that matter?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:KafkPonygon.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for helping out with Wikipedia and all, but I've noticed that quite a few of your edit summaries end up insulting people. Even if they're vandals, that still doesn't mean we can insult them freely. Please be more civil in the future. Thank you, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 00:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:WeevilUnderwood.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I declined the speedy as it does not appear, to be an attack and user claims he uses it on his own page. Userficaton might be the answer. Dlohcierekim 02:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can tell, the Manual of Style for video games really doesn't specify one particular guidelines for the info box picture. That said, I'm of a view that the infobox should be the most iconic version of the character, plus, none of the other SF2 character articles use the SF4 artwork, it was only the four boss articles that did. NeoChaosX (talk, edits) 02:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rerudo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"not a big fan of this repetitive nomination rationale, but it's true in this case."

I couldn't agree more. MuZemike (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This RFD, which was closed as a retarget, was reopened by the closing admin because I felt a retarget wasn't supported. If you like, please come back and comment on the new target. And I think it's time to archive.  :) --UsaSatsui (talk) 02:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank u for protecting the siachen conflict n operation meghdoot page from pakistani vandals. Please watch it 2 make sure its not vandalised further. best wishes. --60.50.70.65 (talk) 11:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I oso highlighted ur actions here: Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. tq.

And please take this I just found it on d India page

		The India Star
		appreciation for protecting Operation Meghdoot and Siachen conflict pages from vandals. --60.50.70.65 (talk) 11:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found some newspaper references for BIG TV and added them to the article. I think that notability is demonstrated now, so I removed the speedy deletion tag. Anything you can do to improve the article would be welcome, of course.-- Eastmain (talk) 02:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Shouldn't it be moved to Reliance BIG TV since that's what the article says it's called? JuJube (talk) 04:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Possibly, but I'm not sure. The company name is Reliance BIG TV Ltd, but it seems to identify itself mostly as BIG TV. Take a look at the company's website at http://www.bigtv.co.in/ -- Eastmain (talk) 04:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Although I understand why you tagged the page, I decided not to speedy delete it because, while utter nonsense, there is just enough fringe coverage of the thing that, WP:AGF he could be planning to rewrite it. Since there's some latitude given for working on articles in user space, I didn't want to speedy quite yet. I was going to send the user page to WP:MFD, but at the last minute I decided to leave this message for the editor, who still seems to be a new user, on his talk page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to drop me a note. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 19:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This RfC in which you certified the dispute has been closed. You may read the conclusion listed there. Wizardman 14:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JuJube, you've been here long enough to not be templated, so just going to remind you that WP:CIVILITY does apply to all editors. Please refrain from calling other editors idiots and making other personal attacks. Yes, Saintvlas22 has shown some hostility in his tone, but you are NOT helping the situation at all by getting into a verbal brawl with him. Take a deep breath and step away if needed, but no more name calling. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Jujube, please step away from the keyboard. Leaving nasty messages on Saint's talk page is not helping. It's scalating the incivility, and you are just going to get yourself blocked together with Saint. --Enric Naval (talk) 23:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your analogy doesn't really make sense - are you the dog, or the ass? I can't decide. Saintvlas22 (talk) 22:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, JuJube, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

—La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 18:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you have used the rollback tool inappropriately several times recently, including [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] (You also used the tool explicitly to edit war in the last two). Many of these seem to be content disputes, not in response to blatant vandalism. Please review WP:ROLLBACK, specifically this section, and modify your use of the tool accordingly. Continued use of the tool inappropriately will result in its revocation. Thanks. seresin ( ¡? )  23:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to see my response at Talk:Law & Order: Criminal Intent#Patricia Kent. I think this may clear up your confusion about the credits the anon posted. ;) In short, they're fan made and even say so in the Youtube description. Hope this helps! Redfarmer (talk) 01:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, hi. This is Pyramid Productions. You recently commented on my discussion in "List of Internet Memes". I'm not sure how to add links. I've been trying to even before you posted that comment. Care to show a common n00b the ropes? (I know the basics.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.53.249.32 (talk) 00:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page shouldn't be merged, for one he is a MAIN CHARACTER of the series. Should Hiroto Honda or Maximillion Pegasus from Yu-Gi-OH be merged? Yes, Blair Flannigan and Axel Brodie, Atticus Rhodes, Aster Phoenix, Adrian Gecko should be merged sense they appeared in a one season. But Bastion, Chazz, and Alexis should not be merged sense they appeared in all seasons and they are the main characters. Its like merging Minako Aino. (O'erTheRampardos (talk) 01:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up, JuJube. I've found the perfect reference website.

www.dipity.com/user/tatercakes/timeline/Internet_Memes

You'll find pretty much every internet meme in history there. Thanks again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyramid Productions (talk • contribs) 21:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You recently contributed to an AfD discussion on an article about ancient Persian history. I have been reviewing the contributions of the editors who have been involved in these and other related articles, and have found a considerable number of issues - bad writing, original research, lack of sourcing or citations, and POV problems. I have posted the results of my review at User:ChrisO/Ancient Persian problems (it's a work in progress, as I'm still going through the contributions). Please feel free to add to it as you see fit and leave any comments at User talk:ChrisO/Ancient Persian problems. I would be interested in any feedback that you might have. Thanks in advance. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:50, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there...is the dance you referred to in the Roger Rabbit Dance AfD supposed to be The Loco-Motion, as opposed to the Locomotive? After all, my little baby sister can do it with ease...it's easier than learning your ABC's...so c'mon, c'mon, c'mon, and do the Loco-Motion with me. (Yes, it is a slow day here). :) Ecoleetage (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, that was a fun video. Thanks for sharing it! And the boots in the video reminded me of this [6] - if you aren't lactose intolerant, you may enjoy this cheese! Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article in which you have had an interest, List of bow tie wearers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bow tie wearers (4th nomination). Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As to James Brown (director), no, i think i recall removing the co-premiere bcz there was no indication of its relevance to him (whether or not the article should survive), and i had already forgotten the title -- now you have me wondering if it's porn! (Which is neither here nor there; we have a standard for what makes a porn star notable, and i would guess most porn directors are more notable than most porn stars.)
I don't know that he is n-n, but it's my best guess based on the pattern i cited. That pattern is also consistent with his being the director that stars push their agents to get to do their vids, and the short subject could be something artistic he did out of self-indulgence or as a chance to make some ageless but not commercial art. And maybe he's got no recent credits bcz he stashed away what he needs to spend 5 years making his magnum opus.
If you have something better on him than what has been offered for the No.Car. mayor i AfD-nom'd (currently in progress, see my contribs of the last few days), take the ProD off and improve the article, or just make a good, verifiable arg on the talk page, and i won't be the one to AfD it. 'Cause i really don't know whether he's worth an article. (Even if i try to sound like i know everything when i'm arguing on an AfD.[smile])
--Jerzy•t 06:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Mention the gushing on his talk page, headed "Pro. Deletion discussion", quote my critique and anything else that feels to you like it bear on the subject in either direction, including the refs the article quoted and his IMDb lk. Then see if you can find anything close to the gushing on-line in a G-search or whatever, and if so add a lk. I think that even a ProD-del'd article's talk page is immune from speedy deletion if it has such a discussion, so if you're not willing to Un-ProD it, that should preserve enuf that the next editor with an interest doesn't have to start from scratch. Also bear in mind that a ProD-del'd article can be revived at any time: ProD is about cleaning up, not making long-term decisions of worthiness.
  Oh, BTW, i assume Russ Meyer and Edward D. Wood, Jr. were bad directors, and i'm suspicious of John Waters (filmmaker). But no question: they're all notable.
  --Jerzy•t 07:10, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  
  • And if the talk page get's del'd, mention it to me; i'll look into the guidelines and undel the talk if it's kosher to do so.
    --Jerzy•t 07:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    

Hi, and don't worry about that Shin Gouki thing, I know what I'm talking about. I was the one who discussed with Tiamat that Gouki is Shin Gouki etcetc years back. I'm just giving people another angle to look at. I also don't want people to think Shini Gouki is another Entity.Machikenka (talk) 12:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you made a mistake in this AFD. While the article has an obvious problem, it's with verifiability rather than notability which are two different things. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Matty-chan (talk) 22:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Yep, you hit the nail right on the head. But you shouldn't feel sympathy for me - I like 4Kids. I watch all but four shows (Fighting Foodons, Ultimate Muscle: The Kinnikuman Legacy, Ultraman Tiga, Chaotic) 4Kids has produced, and I can spot their VAs in a heartbeat. When I heard Akiza's voice, Bella Hudson was the first thing that came to my head. I understand if you don't want me to add that b/c of the OR thing, but it's definitely not Kayzie Rogers. Matty-chan (talk) 22:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Checking the AfD you previously created, they're all blue links again, all have articles to them, and have the same cruft that got them deleted the first time. Nate • (chatter) 07:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Before it's too late to say it, Merry Christmas dude.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. Your objective observations would be of interest. MARussellPESE (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't jump to conclusions that fast. It's not actually in a fan site. I read it on some article on a website. Beejay1234 (talk) 10:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the link for the info. It's not a fansite. http://www.yugiohfans.co.uk/characters.html Check Aki's profile there. Please reply after you do so. Beejay1234 (talk) 09:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reversed your deletion and changed the original NYTimes blog link in my paragraph to the current NYTimes printed article link. Edit for editorial voice if you wish, but claiming the paragraph lacks substance is not proved by the references available, as cited. See the "Discussion" section on NDW for more details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfoo (talk • contribs) 13:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add a new info to articles: Yusei Fudo and Akiza Izinski related to Episode 40 of Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's. For more info about this: check it at yugioh.wikia.com. Please reply. Beejay1234 (talk) 13:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I will only add the info based on what the episodes say. Beejay1234 (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input at the AfD. I was subsequently able to source notability for the organization and with the help of User:PC78 merged all pertinent informations from the 14 satellite articles into the master article. It now seems worthy of Wiki. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your AIV report was fine. I appear to have made an error, scooping it up with about a dozen bad reports. We were apparently under attack from a dynamic IP vandal-bot that would make one vandalization edit, change their IP, make one vandalization edit... and we were getting a very high number of AIV reports for 1-edit vandal-bots with no warnings where blocking would have no effect anyway because of the behavior. I apparently scooped your report up in that mess. My apologies. Toddst1 (talk) 12:43, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly—, I understand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by X30ffx (talk • contribs) 22:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I copied and pasted the message across that string of AFD's. Anything in particular I need to strike out? Pectore^talk 00:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While the obvious socks were blocked, it appears that for in a bizarre twist a user they targeted is being fingered as the sock puppeteer (socks voted to keep while the user in question nominated the article for deletion...). Comments appreciated at User_talk:Terrakyte#Request_for_unblock..--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 07:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wonreilien.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BaberGravidon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know it wasn't AIDS? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.254.95 (talk) 21:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need a reason to remove a nomination of a page for deletion. You cannot just remove them because you feel like it. If there's an issue, then make it clear, otherwise I'll take these articles to AfDMGeorge Pelltier (talk) 01:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, back in 2006 you voted in a unanimous AfD DELETE for TOMS SHOES, which has attempted at least twice to re-emerge with virtually no changes. It is now back again as TOMS Shoes. Here's the current AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOMS SHOES (2nd nomination) —Danorton (talk) 07:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you've been involved in the editing and/or deletion of this page in the past and thought I'd let you know I've added {{advert}}, {{refimprove}}, and {{cleanup-link rot}} tags for reasons I've explained at Talk:360 Architecture. Let me know your thoughts. --Aepoutre (talk) 19:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a major contributor to Sailor Moon, this notice is to let you know that the article recently underwent a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article was delisted as a Good Article for failing the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:Sailor Moon/GA1. Thanks. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright im not trying to be stalky but im also trying to save as many of these pages as possible.--Coldplay Expert 10:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WYGLUK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated "Bakchha" Bhutan's first horror film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (in question) 20:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JuJube! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Yūji Machi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Daisuke Hirakawa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Akiza Izinski. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akiza Izinski. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You will be missed my friend. 24.12.252.195 (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@24.12.252.195 42.201.129.225 (talk) 01:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@24.12.252.195 42.201.129.225 (talk) 01:39, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@24.12.252.195 42.201.129.225 (talk) 01:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Owww!. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 16#Owww! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Boo Buddy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 28#Boo Buddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 19:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JuJube,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sailor Star Song for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the album, song or discography is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article of their own.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 22:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Millenium Eye (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]