Hello, Jpg1954! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 03:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

p.s. I've responded at Talk:Computer virus. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 03:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just posted reply to another editor on my user page that may be the end of trying to contribute -- sorry Michael P. Barnett (talk) 04:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your encouragement. My user discussion just got branched to the extent I thought it least confusing to reply here. In view of Johnuniq's reply there, I am following it with a low key explanation of concerns concerning WP verifiability -- NOT opposing it, but asking how it can be strengthened. I will email the Crystal Growth society and journal people about putting the Bill Bardsley piece somewhere more formal. If I set up a recollections site it would be supplementary -- I will not give up the WP role -- only mentions of Malvern / RRE non substantive -- and I would let you know. I am concentrating on Coulson and Wilkins articles now. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will give my comments and thoughts on the Hetepheres talkpage. I agree with the comment about "hotly debated" issues. Seems a bit much and could be expressed better. Including Reisner's report sounds good. But giving some weight to more modern scholarship is the way to go I think. --AnnekeBart (talk) 00:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes in the article and added more references.--AnnekeBart (talk) 01:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I put a substantive paragraph and a meta-paragraph in the TRE Discussion page as result of chance observation of Reg Jones book in public library. I have a couple of articles with higher priority for me than the dog work on what RRE people did, and these have been put into temporary limbo by hair splitting wiki-legalisms, and the "people cannot be mentioned unless they are wikipedia notable gambit". Was the construction of the Gunn biography an atypically happy WP experience? I will look on my user page for comment Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea if this is typical, as it is the first one I have made a major contribution to (others have been small points).

I suspect it has a lot to do with how many different people have a sense of "ownership" of the subject/article.

It will be interesting to see what happens as a result of Gyromagician's request for formal review. Jpg1954 (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just put material into TRE and some comments in RRE for merger. Having a rough time with other articles. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 02:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jpg1954. You have new messages at Talk:Malvern, Worcestershire.
Message added 16:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FYI Kudpung (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kudpung —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.206.140 (talk) 00:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jpg1954. I just want you to be sure that I know nothing about the above link and who posted it. It geolocates to New Jersey and it may have been sent in good faith as it seems to have been sent to a number of editors who have worked on the same articles asyou and I have. My RfA isn't going as well as expected, but in the light of the unsigned canvassing, it's probably best you stay away from it. Regards, --Kudpung (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I assumed it was some sort of normal notification process. The "unsigned" did not register as a red flag. Good luck.Jpg1954 (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to follow up on Wednesday. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC) If you could email me, it would make it very much easier for me to help get authoritative closure on these. I can be tracked down very easily. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 21:16, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Done Jpg1954 (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks - yes, you're right, it should be St. Michael and All Angels and I have amended the articles accordingly.

Robocoppster (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Robocoppster[reply]

Henry de la River, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 07:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jpg1954. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jpg1954. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jpg1954. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Meacham 50th Anniversary Color 002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 20:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]