• Archives 2011-2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rivers of Sumatra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musi River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. Thanks. JohnThorne (talk) 15:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Under the assumption that your topic ban on biblical topics is lifted and you begin editing again, I'm going to give you a reliable resource you can widely use given the poor state of reliable sources in the majority of the biblical chapters articles. If you click here, you'll be taken to a PDF of the Oxford Bible Commentary (by John Barton and John Muddiamn, 2007), which is around 1,400 pages long and contains academic commentary on all the books of the Bible and apocrypha. This is certainly a resource you should refer to if you want to expand a page or clarify something.Wallingfordtoday (talk) 23:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnThorne,

Thanks for creating List of rivers of North Sumatra! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

When citing an off-line source, please provide more information, like page numbers, date of publication, etc. Please take a look at WP:CIT and WP:CITE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. Thanks, JohnThorne (talk) 16:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. This message is to confirm that your editing restriction on Bible=related topics has been lifted, as per [1]. Happy editing! Fish+Karate 15:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fish and karate: Thank you. JohnThorne (talk) 18:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Alephb. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jeremiah 25, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Coming right off a TBAN for improper use of sources makes this all the worse. Please see the talk pages of Jeremiah 25, Jeremiah 26, and Jeremiah 36 for details. Alephb (talk) 03:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alephb: Thank you for your help in reviewing the changes I made in the articles. It will enable me to improve on the areas I am still lacking. As for the issues of adding page numbers in Jeremiah 25, Jeremiah 26, and Jeremiah 36, I immediately added the missing page numbers after reading your reminders. Very appreciate your time in checking one by one all the contributions I made. It is surely useful to improve my editing and the quality of Wikipedia articles. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 03:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Alephb (talk) 04:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I am reviewing all my edits of my first years on wikipedia about the Yogyakarta and Surakarta region - it will take some time, but I would be very interested in time with very very little help (sikit sikit) re some of the wp:id item crossover issues - my bahasa hampir (forget it) semua - hampir kosong... JarrahTree 00:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: No problem. Glad to help. Let me know what articles to check, so I can participate in the Talk page. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 00:48, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - appreciate that ! JarrahTree 00:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In some cases 14 or 15 year review - the problem is that subsequent editors are probably copyvio and other very tricky non english material - such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kalasan - some individual articles like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plered so few edits subsequent to the creation in (2006 ? wow different planet different headspace ) JarrahTree 01:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not many materials are yet available online for these articles, so it will take time to find offline reliable sources. JohnThorne (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I have absolutely massive heaps in my shed, collected during fieldwork in the 1990s and the earlier shorter visits in 1980s and temporary residence in places in Australia and other places with really great archives - what might happen is some might be valid items for copying into source, or details into data, or even articles about... My favourite haunts in Yogya were old second hand book stores - I think if I got the right story from someone in the know - they (the stalls) and their stock were lost in fires in the Beringharjo area... Also a friend who is dispersing his book and pamphlet collection due to his 'gotta give it all away' stage of life - I have been able to get some more materials via his disperal - it is all a matter of time to regularly upload or copy or whatever. JarrahTree 06:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnThorne, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ {talk} 20:30, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brantas River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abraham Salm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already corrected by other user. Thanks. JohnThorne (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

administrative fiascos and misrepresentation - pity we arent in same location, it would be time for a long coffee - villages and the admin units - some other time maybe, not now... its all to do with why the big edit outsiders lists of things appealed to 'list obsessed' early editors who created lists of villages, and the threshold of notability of admin units or villages has never been clearly established sufficiently to actully check rogue editors who set out to create an article for every non notable village in Indonesia (face smack) gurggle gurggle glump.... JarrahTree 23:46, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure [2] was created to deliberately intimidate notability issues JarrahTree 23:49, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Also big problems for the Indonesian site. Not sure how to handle properly. The Brebes example is definitely a test. JohnThorne (talk) 23:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

from memory most villages were NOT includable, unless there was an aspect of significant notability established - problem is whether english language sources could establish that as much as indonesian language sources - I am sure there are at least 100 un-notable villages that need removing... JarrahTree 00:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most villages don't have significant notability in both language sources. For the Indonesian site, the pages serve as placeholders for improvements, as more districts in Indonesia today have built informative websites for each administrative subdivisions. However, it will take a lot of time to transfer the data, even for the Indonesian site. JohnThorne (talk) 00:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Thorne, I think you have not read the Edict of Torda article before assessing it ([3]). Please read it if you want to assess it. Borsoka (talk) 14:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Borsoka: I have thoroughly read the article. It is well written. If you disagree with the assessment, feel free to propose a change. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 16:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, you obviously did not read it. It is quite obvious that you did not even read its lead. No, I do not want to propose a change. I only want to persuade you to read the articles before assessing them in the future. Peace. Borsoka (talk) 16:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Borsoka: I will keep your advice in mind. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 16:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for improving psalms, but changing 23 to twenty-third is against the house-rules, which I often don't like, but cecommend to save yourself trouble. Numbers above twelve in digits unless at the beginning of a sentence. - Nice to meet you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Nice to meet you too! Thanks for the advice. The words are now back to digits for the few that I converted. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 09:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'm happy that I was up when you began ;) - A few users, such as Yoninah, Aleph and I are in the (slow) process of improving psalm articles, see here. If you want to take part, great! The most advanced so far is Psalm 84, the most recent Psalm 75. Psalm 150 could be next, or a small step at a time, such as providing the source text in all of them, or present at least an English title to make clear a reader arrived at the right psalm, - number alone is not enough. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Glad to participate, a small step at a time. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 15:56, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. --Quisqualis (talk) 01:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from New Covenant into Jeremiah 31. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Thank you for the valuable information. I have put the {Copied} template on the talk page of both source and destination, and added a section in the destination talk page to note the copying as well. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Century. Legobot (talk) 04:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, I notice you've been adding hatnotes to the psalm pages (see here). But the hatnote is giving a different number for the Septuagint/Vulgate than we are giving in the lead. In the case of Psalm 13, the corresponding number is 12, not 14. Yoninah (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: The hatnote is to inform the reader that "Psalm 13 in Septuagint/Vulgate numbering would correspond to Psalm 14 in Hebrew numbering," whereas in the lead, there is a note that "In the Greek Septuagint version of the bible, and in its Latin translation in the Vulgate, this psalm is Psalm 12." No contradiction here. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Now I see. Yoninah (talk) 22:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added the hatnote to this page, but it came up with a weird redlink. Please take a look. Yoninah (talk) 22:41, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: The template cannot be used for a special case like this. The text has to be manually written. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 22:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the rivers have gone a walking (again) JarrahTree 04:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Where to? (always away?) JohnThorne (talk) 04:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[4] never here, thats for sure, the Indonesian project attracts everything JarrahTree 04:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's a beautiful country with a lively language. No worries. Couldn't take my eyes off the rivers. JohnThorne (talk) 04:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pope John Paul II. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Was reading your article on The Exodus. Thank you for volunteering your time and knowledge. Your article references historical scholars believing an Israelite exodus from Egypt is more than likely a myth, eg. “Instead, archaeology suggests a native Canaanite origin for ancient Israel.[9]” I am not an Old Testament scholar, but in the book of Genesis, you will read that the Israelites did in fact originate in Canaan. They left Canaan during a drought to seek relief in Egypt. Thank you again for your research and writings. AlissaHT (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@AlissaHT: Thank you for your input. The article The Exodus is a cumulative work of many users. The part you mentioned was not added by me, but it was approved by the community. If you have a better suggestion, you can propose it in Talk:The Exodus so the community can discuss and give approval before the change is applied. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 02:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John, you've used the word 'phoetic' in the articles on Jeremiah 46 to 49, referencing Coogan and O'Connor. I'm not sure what this word means - is it used by Coogan or O'Connor? It doesn't seem to be in Wiktionary or other online dictionaries? Best wishes, BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BobKilcoyne: O'Connor calls the compositions "poems", while Coogan calls them oracles and alludes to "lamentations" or "songs", so I propose a combination of "poetic oracles". Thanks for pointing out the errors It came from a source with misspellings. Now all are corrected. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dissent from Catholic teaching on homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John, I wonder if you could have a look at my query on the Talk Page of Jeremiah 31 regarding use of the word "ancient" in all of the Jeremiah page-by-page articles? Best wishes, BobKilcoyne (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BobKilcoyne: Happy Easter! Please consider my suggestion in the talk page (it is actually in Jeremiah 30). Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 04:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Acts 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cornelius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alexander the Great in the Quran. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnThorne! I have to admit that I'm a bit mystified at your recent reassessment of the James W. Fowler article. There is almost nothing in that article which tells us who Fowler actually was. Nearly all of the personal information is contained within the short lead. Most of the article is about one of Fowlers works... the stages of faith. And the rest of the article is about related works. That is all well and good, and if the article was about that particular work, or Fowler's body of work, it might come close to a "C" classification. But the article title is about a person, not a book or a body of work. And information on the person is barely "Start" class, certainly not "C". I think that it might be best to expand the biography, before considering upgrading the class assessment. Your call. Gulbenk (talk) 21:08, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gulbenk: For the assessment, I am trying to carefully follow the criteria in here, which distinguish the Start class for "unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent" from C class for "more than one reliable source and is better developed in style". Your criteria seem to be closer to the ones for B class. It is often not easy to assess an article, so I am open to any suggestions to consider reassessments. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 21:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1 Thessalonians 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. JohnThorne (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tobias Epos. I wanted to let you know that I added for the second time a bible box to Ecce homo, which you removed. Please note, that there are not only Gospel of John related links to Ecce homo (like John 19:5), but also Matthean links:

1. Matthew 25:6 (redirect)
2. Behold the Bridegroom (redirect)
3. Christ the Bridegroom § See also
4. The Bridegroom (hatnote)

Thanks. Tobias Epos (talk) 16:27, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tobias Epos: The term 'Ecce homo' (from the Greek: idoù ho ánthropos; "behold the man") only exists in John 19:5. The term in Matthew 25:6 is idoù ho nymphios ("behold the bridegroom") which is 'Ecce sponsus' in Latin. If you put the bible box of Matthew back, you should add a term related to this (linked to the Eastern Christianity interpretation article) in the "Phrases/Events" section. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You refer to the article's title only. What's with the article as a whole? What do you mean with "Phrases/Events" section? There are, in addition to the lead section, nine sections:

1. Artistic subject
2. Eastern Christianity
3. Western Christianity
4. Gallery
5. Publications
6. See also
7. References
8. Notes
9. Further reading

Thanks. Tobias Epos (talk) 17:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tobias Epos: Please check the Phrases/Events section of the template of Matthew, where a link "Behold the bridegroom" is added and linked to the 'Eastern Christianity' section in 'Ecce homo'. Hope this clarifies my point. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarified, thanks. Tobias Epos (talk) 20:29, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Appeal to nature. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Xinjiang conflict. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Titus 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Anthony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Black Hebrew Israelites. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I have been trying to find things that can be good translations of Zaphnath-Paaneah can you find that for me and please if you haven't learn middle Egyptian. Logawinner (talk) 22:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Logawinner: Try this or this link. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 23:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I recently started a Genesis 3 article and want help starting it and think you'd be the best help Logawinner (talk) 23:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Logawinner: I suggest that you edit it in your Sandbox first. We can work together on that page. Right now, the text you have placed is moved to the talk page of Genesis 3, and the original text of Genesis 3 is reverted back, because it also points to another article. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 23:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I find that?🤔 Note: nevermind Logawinner (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logawinner (talk • contribs) 00:00, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Logawinner: On the top of the webpage, you can see your username, an image of a bell, an image of a monitor screen, "Talk", "Sandbox", "Preferences", "Beta", "Watchlist", "Contributions", "Log out". Click "Sandbox" to open a blank page. It is like a trial page. Copy the text you have written before, from the talk page of Genesis 3 to the Sandbox page. Edit the article (we will do it together) until it has all the required parts, especially the reliable sources, and sufficiently informative for readers like, for example, Psalm 84. JohnThorne (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Logawinner: Sorry I missed the last change you made ("nevermind"). Glad you found it. JohnThorne (talk) 00:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think with a few minor touch ups it'll be ready I have finished editing. For example please find a photo Logawinner (talk) 03:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Logawinner: After checking the references, many of the links actually point to various Bible versions, some of which are duplicative. These links cannot be used as references. Two of the references are from original researches, which cannot be regarded as reliable sources. One of the references is not related to the article. Therefore, this article still needs reliable sources to the stated information, before it can be considered a proper Wikidpedia article. JohnThorne (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes out it'll be an A or better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logawinner (talk • contribs) 11:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite concerned about this editor - I and others have had to revert probably most of their edits. Doug Weller talk 15:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Logawinner: There are still more texts to add before it can be considered proper to be published. Have patient and work on it step by step. Concerns from other editors should be heeded to make ourselves better editors, so we can produce good articles. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 18:16, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your hard work adding the New Bible Commentary to various articles. Just letting you know: Gordon Wenham, the fourth editor of the volume, also has a Wikipedia article. StAnselm (talk) 09:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you put this here thank you Logawinner (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1 Peter 4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Christian

Acts 11 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Christian

Acts 26 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Christian

Cyrus the Great (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Christian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 17:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1 Corinthians 14 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Albert Barnes

Lamentations 5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chaldean

Matthew 6:4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Gill

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 14:12, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you change links to Wikipedia's source (internal) to external links bibleref, as in Vier ernste Gesänge? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:07, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: My mistakes. It is corrected now. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthew 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 19:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indonesia/TOC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know you have been an editor for a long time, but you recently seem to have embarked on a phase of hyper-activity, with various issues. Your importance assessments are consistently too high, reaching a peal of craziness at All Saints' Anglican Church, Condobolin, which you rated as "mid" importance for several global projects, but "low" for the Australian project. If you were looking for an example of a low importance article for eg the architecture project, you could not do better than this! You also need to read WP:CITEVAR, as you are "fixing" perfectly good formats. Please slow down and be more careful. Johnbod (talk) 02:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. There are so many articles lacking assessment. Feel free to reassess. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 04:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have better things to do than follow you around. You need to read policies and the criteria for "importance" carefully and follow them. It's far better to have no assessment at all than a ridiculously high one, which makes the higher importance categories useless for others (and these are the only ones anybody ever looks at, and that's not very often). Johnbod (talk) 18:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John, could you please clarify why you removed the information I recently added to Revelation 1? Best, Lydiafookes (talk) 18:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lydiafookes: If you check the edits, I did not completely remove it, but modify it to comply with the rules in Wikipedia. One important thing is the copyright issue: no copying and pasting copyrighted materials. The additions should just reflect the ideas in the sources. Maybe it is better to write big addition first in your Sandbox page (the option is always open from the top menu for all registered users) and work with others on it, before incorporating to the article. Let's work together. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mauritius. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Song of Songs 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 14:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for putting in the work to restore the Hebrew and KJV. Please take a look at what I did on Psalm 21; I think the KJV should be formatted this way. (We need to add a standard line to the lead of psalms like these where the first verse in the KJV is the second in the Hebrew.) Best, Yoninah (talk) 22:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: Yes, I agree. I have done that for Psalm 54, and now have added the leading line for Psalm 145. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 22:45, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I object to full-text Hebrew in all these articles. Please see the RFC on Talk:Psalms. Elizium23 (talk) 22:56, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder. Logawinner (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Image and Reality of the Israel–Palestine Conflict. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Houthi movement. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello To editor JohnThorne:, I noticed you that have done several assessments in terms of quality and importance on some articles, and that in several projects of different nature (philosophy, christianism). I think that you can't assess an article according to a project if you are not part of it. For instance if you want to assess articles according to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Arminianism, I think you need at least to subscribe there ---Telikalive (talk) 09:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Telikalive: Thanks for the reminder. I have subscribed to the project. JohnThorne (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello To editor JohnThorne: As you are now participant in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Arminianism, I just want to let you know tha I proposed "Arminianism" to be part of the vital articles of Wikipedia, Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles/Level/4#Add_Arminianism, if you would like to vote... Regards. ---Telikalive (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I still have no idea how you're assessing things. For instance, you just assessed dcTalk as being of low importance while Don Moen was assessed as mid importance. Before I explain the number of awards—both Grammys and Doves—that each have won or simply been nominated for, and other metrics, I just want to hear your methodology. I thought that I had made earlier request, but can't seem to find it here. I may have made it at the project. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:46, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: The assessment is narrowly based on the instruction here. As I mentioned to you before, I tend to be more cautious, not to give too high unless I know a lot about the subject, but will reassess whenever necessary. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I assessed Moen down, but will comment at the project if I think others need reassessment. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Thanks for the collaboration for assessment. JohnThorne (talk) 02:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ezra 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xerxes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 07:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Halle synagogue shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ezekiel 37, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of David (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 01:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!
Could you please re-assess this article as the assessment was given more than a year ago when the article was not as complete as it is now?
Secondly, while I am a it, this article has not been assessed yet by the WikiProjectRussia of wich you are part of. This article is a split from that article which was assessed "Start-class, Top-importance" by the WikiProjectRussia at the time.
Veverve (talk) 14:54, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment completed. JohnThorne (talk) 01:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Could I ask you if you could do the same with this article? Veverve (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment done. JohnThorne (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (although you have normally received a notification of my thank)! However, I do not understand why Moscow, third Rome is not "B". Veverve (talk) 12:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ole Nydahl. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Swaminarayan Sampraday. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

there is no closing tag </onlyinclude>, please check the result --Туча (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Туча: - It works well. Thank you. JohnThorne (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]