• Archives 2011-2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1 Samuel 27

added a link pointing to Shur

1 Samuel 28

added a link pointing to Gilboa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 06:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2 Samuel 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abishai.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 06:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2 Samuel 6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City of David.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.JohnThorne (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnThorne! Please be sure to add a public-domain attribution template such as {{PD-notice}} to any citations for public domain sources from which you have copied text, such as Ellicott at the Judges 5 article (I did this one for you). Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 15:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will do that. JohnThorne (talk) 19:51, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judges 18, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 16:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joshua 19, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joppa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 16:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are more religious on wikipedia but wikipedia is not religious you must understand moreover expound to me reason for deleting my edit in wiki page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_Mustard_Seed and if you can't then don't hide truth from others. Realitybehind (talk) 05:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Realitybehind: Please read Talk:Parable of the Mustard Seed before making addition and also please include reliable references for your addition.JohnThorne (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

see this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poppy_seed#Description and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustard_seed it say poppy seed is less than a millimeter in diameter and it say mustard is 1 to 2 millimetres in diameter now you need any more reference. Realitybehind (talk) 12:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Realitybehind: This type of discussion should be stated in the Talk:Parable of the Mustard Seed. There are already some conversation about the material you want to add, such as whether it is really about the physical size. Your addition was deleted the first time because not having any references at all, not about the topic. JohnThorne (talk) 15:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JohnThorne,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 812 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 848 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hosea 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baasha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 08:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hosea 5, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laban.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 09:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2 Chronicles 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiram.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JohnThorne,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000^[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.^[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 15628 articles, as of 12:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I noticed you contributed to a topic regarding Matthew 5:9 here’s the link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_5:9 There’s a passage in the article that reads: “Martin Luther and other early Protestant translators of the Bible preferred the translation "children of God," because they wanted to avoid any confusion as to whether Jesus was the only Son of God. "Sons of God" is, however, the more accurate translation and is used by most modern Bible translations” I was wondering if I could get a citation for this quote as I’m writing a paper and it heavily depends on this being proven. If you could update the Wiki page that would be greatly appreciated! Thank you! 2607:9880:3578:92:C10F:ECC4:DBD0:2DF6 (talk) 02:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2607:9880:3578:92:C10F:ECC4:DBD0:2DF6: Sorry, I am not the user who wrote this part, but you can check the listed references to get the accurate information. JohnThorne (talk) 03:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judges 13, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genesis 4.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 20:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JohnThorne,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination

MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers

The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnThorne,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Aleksandr Dugin on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2020. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi--I changed your edit here. I don't see much benefit in having a separate wikilink for "Bible"--it strikes me as WP:OVERLINKing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Thank you for the edit. JohnThorne (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Job 10, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Genesis 3 and Genesis 2.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. JohnThorne (talk) 02:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JohnThorne,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Thanks so much for the assessment on Guns into Plowshares. If/when you have a minute, could you give me a sense of what’s keeping that article from B class? It’s my first article, so I’m just trying to get a better sense of what more experienced editors are looking for. Gratefully, Brian (talk) 01:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brian: very appreciate the efforts to make a good article. Need images and expansion on the significance of the objects. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 02:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks! Brian (talk) 09:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not as though you're a new editor. Doug Weller talk 11:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 20:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the associated ANI thread. If you want to be unblocked, you need to commit to not copy from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright. User:Moneytrees/Copyright blocks contains some advice on appealing this block. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 20:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. To enforce a community ban (WP:CBAN), I have blocked you indefinitely. Please see WP:UNBAN for your appeal options. Thank you. El_C 12:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JohnThorne,

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Hello, JohnThorne, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Shushugah, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of manuscripts from Qumran Cave 2, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of manuscripts from Qumran Cave 2.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Shushugah}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JohnThorne! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Continental Singers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Book of Genesis chapters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beland (talk) 04:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Exodus 4 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beland (talk) 06:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Book of Exodus chapters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beland (talk) 06:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Book of Leviticus chapters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beland (talk) 06:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Book of Deuteronomy chapters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beland (talk) 07:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Matthew 16 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Beland (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Epistle to the Galatians chapters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Beland (talk) 02:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Epistle to the Galatians has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Beland (talk) 02:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]