User talk:Jeffrey Beall
Quaker Flour Mill
Hi, I am plugging along on a worklist at Talk:List of RHPs in CO. I wonder if you might have any more photos for Quaker Flour Mill in Pueblo? It turns out the original 1869 portion of the building to the rear of front 2-story addition, is asserted to be the oldest building in Pueblo. It would be nice to have some view of any such 3-story part of the building, and there apparently was a 1927 one-story addition, too. Either way, thank you for contributing your photos. --Doncram (talk) 12:31, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- No, I don't but will work on this as I now live an hour away. Hopefully within the next couple weeks I'll have something.Jeffrey Beall (talk) 13:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC).
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doncram (talk) 20:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Fire stations, including Silver Cliff one
Hi, i happen to be working on List of fire stations, including asking at wt:NRHP#Fire stations if other editors know of fire stations that are contributing buildings in historic districts, or otherwise escaped my searching of likely candidates out of NRIS database item names. I just came across this new pic of yours perhaps via a commons category, not sure. It doesn't seem to be NRHP-listed, but it looks clearly notable, including by sign mentioning a museum. Is the building a museum, or is it part of one? Could you perhaps dash off a one or two sentence article about the museum? Museums are obviously wikipedia-notable, I personally think (wp:ITSAMUSEUM). I'd like to include it more fully than I just have, at List of fire stations#Colorado. Also I'd appreciate if you know of any other fire station buildings included in historic districts or otherwise mentionable there. Cheers, --Doncram (talk) 02:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay. Museums are out of my area of expertise, so I'd like to pass on this at this time. Thanks and best wishes, Jeffrey Beall (talk) 01:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC).
Quick question, maybe not a quick answer
In general, would you advise against purchasing/subscribing content from predatory publishers, or is a blanket statement a bad idea (i.e. they should be evaluated like any other publisher)? If you can't answer, or you're uncomfortable answering, I definitely understand. Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- My working definition of predatory publishers only included those that were open access, so there's really nothing to purchase, as the content is freely available. However, the second part of your question hints at including metadata for predatory journals in library databases, and this is a big question. I think one of the roles of librarians is to curate content, so it's important to exclude junk journals from library databases, both open-access and subscription. If a library includes a predatory journal in, say, its online catalog, some may see this as the library giving its seal of approval to the journal. This is an opportunity for librarians to show their stuff and exclude corrupt journals from library databases. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 21:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC).
- As an non-librarian outsider, personally I think seeing who cites predatory journal is useful information, and enables research into predatory journals and also acts as an indicator of journal quality. If a journal cites OMICS dozens of times per year, it's likely not a very good journal and has a crap peer review process. Seeing who predatory journal themselves cite however, is completely useless. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, thank you for the reminder — I'd entirely forgotten that you only looked at OA publishers. Right now, I'm preparing to expand our DDA pool, and figuring that many journal publishers also publish ebooks, I'd decided to look through my list for publishers appearing on some of your lists. I'd found very few, which I attributed to these organizations only doing journals, but having run across a few (e.g. Wessex Institute of Technology Press), I was interested in your opinion. Definitely going to exclude them on cost grounds alone (why should we pay for anything that's OA? I've excluded better publishers for the same reason, e.g. ANU Press), and thank you for the point about seals of approval. I'd not previously considered that point, so I'll definitely remember it, especially when doing non-ebook work such as assisting faculty in my liaison area. And even with ebooks, part of my process for expanding the pool is evaluating DDA-participating publishers (if a publisher has issues, I don't want any of their content to be purchased without librarian input), so it always helps to have additional reasons for making the evaluation decisions. Nyttend (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Excellent. It sounds like you're on the right track. Take care, Jeffrey Beall (talk) 12:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC).
- Oh, thank you for the reminder — I'd entirely forgotten that you only looked at OA publishers. Right now, I'm preparing to expand our DDA pool, and figuring that many journal publishers also publish ebooks, I'd decided to look through my list for publishers appearing on some of your lists. I'd found very few, which I attributed to these organizations only doing journals, but having run across a few (e.g. Wessex Institute of Technology Press), I was interested in your opinion. Definitely going to exclude them on cost grounds alone (why should we pay for anything that's OA? I've excluded better publishers for the same reason, e.g. ANU Press), and thank you for the point about seals of approval. I'd not previously considered that point, so I'll definitely remember it, especially when doing non-ebook work such as assisting faculty in my liaison area. And even with ebooks, part of my process for expanding the pool is evaluating DDA-participating publishers (if a publisher has issues, I don't want any of their content to be purchased without librarian input), so it always helps to have additional reasons for making the evaluation decisions. Nyttend (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- As an non-librarian outsider, personally I think seeing who cites predatory journal is useful information, and enables research into predatory journals and also acts as an indicator of journal quality. If a journal cites OMICS dozens of times per year, it's likely not a very good journal and has a crap peer review process. Seeing who predatory journal themselves cite however, is completely useless. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Co NRHPs
Nice pic. Great you got there. You are much the better person for getting there and also contributing/uploading the pic. Argh, i was there in October i think it was, but didn't upload my pics. Your pic is probably better than any of mine, too. Hmm, what is more important is for me to upload multiple pics I got for Nachtrieb-Kelly Ranch, a bit further west on same trip, are you on your way to there too, I wonder? (The owner is very nice, by the way, and would probably be happy to have another visitor. It is harder to access, on private property. I had called ahead a week or two before and gotten permission to visit. I would be happy to share contact info by email.) Again, i bow to you, sir. :) --Doncram (talk) 04:07, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks very much indeed. No, I have no plans to head to Nathrop; this shot was done on a (long) Sunday drive. Take care, Jeffrey Beall (talk) 12:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC).
- I still have yet to upload pics of the ranch, and also for nearby Maxwell Park School, and now it will be harder for me to find them. :( Am sort of trying to turn all of the Colorado counties from blue shades to red shades, at wp:NRHPPROGRESS, in terms of articles created; Routt County's list and Chaffee County's list will change over in the next update of maps there. Glad you've gotten to so many obscure places that it makes creating articles more enjoyable, informed.
- Morley Bridge is near Alpine Pass (currently a redlink, for which I think a geographic place article is justified, draft at Draft:Alpine Pass)... do you happen to know if the pass and the former railroad tunnel underneath it span the Continental Divide or did the railroad pass that at a different point? I see the Alpine Pass ghost town south of the "Alpine Pass western portal" of tunnel labelled in Google maps, and there is a "Continental Divide Trail" zig-zgging around but I don't know where the "eastern portal" would be (perhaps some point near about 38°39′00″N 106°24′20″W / 38.650080°N 106.405569°W?, where there is a car symbol denoting "family outing" point in the Delorme Atlas of Colorado Topographic Maps) or where the actual top of an Alpine Pass is located. I don't know if my non-4wd little car can get me near there, this summer. Maybe you have better maps or knowledge of that exact area? Any help in the related articles would be appreciated. Either way, again, thanks for your pics. --Doncram (talk) 18:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- The article for the Alpine Tunnel says the tunnel (and therefore the pass) crosses the continental divide. There's a GNIS entry for the tunnel, and it gives 38.6477734 -106.4066926 as, apparently, the eastern (i.e. the Chaffee County side) portal. See also the excellent article for Hancock Pass, which is nearby. Also, have a look at this book in Google Books. Best wishes, Jeffrey Beall (talk) 15:48, 9 April 2021 (UTC).
A cup of coffee for you!
Great to have you by your real name! Congratulations on the username change. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |
You may find this interesting. See this Signpost article for a few details. Very open to feedback on it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks!Jeffrey Beall (talk) 10:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC).
An invitation to the Ninth Annual Colorado Wiknic
Who: All Wikipedia users and their families and friends are cordially invited.
What: The Ninth Annual Colorado Wiknic.
When: Sunday afternoon, July 14, 2019, from 12:00 noon to 4:00 pm MDT.
Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive e-mail notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.
Sponsors: The Wikimedians of Colorado and WikiProject Colorado
Your hosts: Buaidh & BikeSally We hope to see you.
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)
PS: The Colorado portal has been nominated for deletion. You may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#Portal:Colorado.
- Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The future of Portal:Colorado
On June 25, 2019, Portal:Colorado was nominated for deletion. (Please see discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Colorado.) We have upgraded the portal and added several new features including selected Colorado articles, biographies, and images. If you believe the Colorado portal is valuable to Wikipedia, please help us upgrade and maintain the portal. Add your suggestions for improvement to Portal talk:Colorado. You may nominate additions at:
- Portal:Colorado/Selected article
- Portal:Colorado/Selected biography
- Portal:Colorado/Selected image
- Portal:Colorado/Selected mountain
- Portal:Colorado/Did You Know
Yours aye, Buaidh talk contribs 17:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Colorado at 17:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notifications, please remove your username from the mailing list.
Did you put your website back online?
I was stunned recently when your scholarlyoa.com blog after going offline over 2 years ago suddenly seemed to be back online. Did you restore the website yourself or is the new content/website created by someone else? IntoThinAir (talk) 01:33, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- No. This is the first I've seen this and don't know who is behind it. Best wishes, Jeffrey Beall (talk) 10:39, 15 July 2019 (UTC).
A barnstar for you!
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Thanks for the fabulous photos. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC) |
Huerfano County high point
The highest point in Huerfano County is the northeast slope of Blanca Peak very near the summit at 14,326 feet (4,367 m). See Blanca Peak-Northeast Slope, Colorado @ peakbagger.com. Best of luck, Your northern neighbor Buaidh talk contribs 03:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. I may have been confused. Thanks for all the great work you're doing on Colorado cities, towns, and CDPs. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 11:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC).
WikiProject Colorado Zoom meeting 05/12/2021
WikiProject Colorado will hold a Zoom meeting at 7:30 PM MDT on Wednesday, May 12, 2021, for those interested in working on Colorado Wikipedia articles. Your suggestions and comments are appreciated. Information about some of the things we need to do is located at Colorado things to do and Requested Colorado articles.
Topic: WikiProject Colorado May 2021
Time: May 12, 2021 07:30 PM MDT
Join Zoom Meeting https://us04web.zoom.us/j/78055623422?pwd=VUtPQVZrZzU1ZWVhZ0F1MExIeUQ2UT09
Meeting ID: 780 5562 3422
Passcode: WP:CO
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Colorado Summer Zoom Meeting
WikiProject Colorado |
WikiProject Colorado will hold a brief online meeting at 7:30 PM MDT on Tuesday, August 10, 2021. See what your fellow users have been up to and share your interests and suggestions. Some requests are listed at Colorado things to do and Requested Colorado articles.
Topic: WikiProject Colorado Summer Zoom Meeting
Time: August 10, 2021 07:30 PM MDT
Join Zoom Meeting https://us04web.zoom.us/j/74506020308?pwd=eTFPSlkzOUg0bTE2SVdXUnl2SVY4Zz09
Meeting ID: 745 0602 0308
Passcode: Colorado
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
2020 United States Census for Colorado
WikiProject Colorado |
I've posted the results of the 2020 United States Census for Colorado at Wikipedia:WikiProject Colorado/2020 Census. You may wish to update your existing Colorado articles with this data.
Yours aye, Buaidh talk e-mail 04:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Colorado at 11:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
Barnstar; thank you!
The Photographer's Barnstar | ||
Out of the hundreds of state legislator articles on WP, I tremendously appreciate you uploading photos to legislators' articles. Very rarely do these articles have photos. Many thanks to you! PerpetuityGrat (talk) 18:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC) |
Brief online meeting of WikiProject Colorado
WikiProject Colorado |
What's up with Wikipedia and WikiProjectColorado? Join us for a brief online meeting at 7:30 PM MDT Tuesday evening, November 9, 2021 at https://meet.google.com/wyz-dfek-fdp
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
WikiProject Colorado online meeting 02/08/2022
WikiProject Colorado |
What's up with Wikipedia and WikiProject Colorado? Join us for an online meeting from 7:30 to 8:30 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 8, 2022, at meet.google.com/ksx-wksh-eba
If you don't want to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Colorado online meeting 05/17/2022
WikiProject Colorado |
WikiProject Colorado will hold a short online meeting from 7:30 to 8:30 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 17, 2022, at meet.google.com/zwd-ojag-enp
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Colorado online meeting 08/16/2022
WikiProject Colorado |
WikiProject Colorado will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 16, 2022, at meet.google.com/bqn-jhaw-ewc. Anyone interested in Colorado is encouraged to attend.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia document request service, and The Wikipedia Library, etc.
Hi, the Wikipedia document request service that I mentioned is at the "Resource Request" section of WikiProject Resource Exchange. There is a "Click here to make a new request" button, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request. It's served by volunteers. FYI, my request for Kupfer article on "Oil Spring", and back and forth ended up taking about a month, given a mistake about pages, but I'm just really glad to have gotten it.
I've also recently started using The Wikipedia Library to do my own searching for old local newspaper articles, and more. U can see literature services provided at The Wikipedia Library: Browse partners; it includes Ebsco (or Ebscohost?, which seems to be what's searched if you just enter a search without selecting a specific resource), ScienceDirect, Jstor, and "Newspaper Archive" (a service comparable to Newspapers.com). This is free to you with no sign-up, no special permissions required, just enter via this Wikipedia Library entry point, which gives u a token or something... maybe there's a limit how many people can be using it?. In the past this might have required getting special permission, I think.
Further there's at least one resource available that does require permission/approval, which I saw mentioned in this diff at User:Cbl62's Talk page. That is to get access to Newspapers.com, which I haven't done yet: go to "Apply here", maybe after already setting up some account.
Hope this helps. Writing this helps me, too, i am gonna copy it and edit it for wp:NRHPHELP.
Hmm, I know that the Denver library offers a lot, that in the past they provided Newspapers.com or similar access. I'd like to know its offerings for my own referencing and for wp:NRHPHELP too.... --Doncram (talk) 02:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks — I knew about all of these except the first one. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Colorado online meeting 11/15/2022
WikiProject Colorado |
WikiProject Colorado will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 15, 2022, at meet.google.com/yoe-aphc-wey. Anyone interested in Colorado articles, history, or photographs is encouraged to attend.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting
Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Colorado Collaboration invitation
WikiProject Colorado |
WikiProject Colorado invites you to participate in our current collaboration to locate and document the following two original 1861 Colorado Territory county seats:
- Parkville, Colorado, the original county seat of Summit County, Colorado.
- San Miguel, Colorado, the original county seat of Costilla County, Colorado.
If you have any questions, please contact User:Buaidh (talk or e-mail).
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Colorado collaboration
WikiProject Colorado |
We wish to thank everyone who contributed to our two prior Colorado collaborations to document the Amache National Historic Site and our three lost original county seats of Parkville, St. Vrain, and San Miguel. We invite you to help with our new collaboration to document the seven following former county seats:
- California Ranch, Colorado near Franktown – Douglas County seat 1864 to 1874
- Dayton, Colorado near Twin Lakes – Lake County seat 1866 to 1868
- Hahns Peak, Colorado – Routt County seat 1878 to 1912
- Lourette, Colorado – Lake County seat 1863 to 1866
- San Juan City, Colorado – Hinsdale County seat February 10, 1874 to 1875
- Ula, Colorado at 38°09′00″N 105°30′07″W / 38.1500°N 105.5019°W – Custer County seat March 9, 1877 to 1878
- Wason, Colorado near 37°53′35″N 106°50′34″W / 37.8931°N 106.8428°W – Mineral County seat March 27, 1893 to 1893
If you have any questions, please contact Buaidh talk e-mail
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 05/09/2023
Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
This piece might interest you. Cheers! Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).
- Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
- Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
- The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ
Administrators' newsletter – September 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).
- Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
. - A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
- Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
- The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
- Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
WMF Research Team
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).
- Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
- Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.
- Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068
- RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
- The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
- An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
WMF Research Team
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).
-
- Ahecht
- DoubleGrazing
- Dr vulpes
- FOARP
- Peaceray
- Queen of Hearts
- Rsjaffe
- SD0001
- SilverLocust
- Sohom Datta
- ThadeusOfNazereth
- Voorts
-
- Ajpolino
- Fathoms Below
- Pppery
- Tamzin
- Worm That Turned
-
- Aervanath
- Christopher Sundita
- Dank
- Dennis Brown
- Dragons flight
- Fastily
- Graham87
- JaGa
- Kbh3rd
- Marine 69-71
- Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington
- Yamamoto Ichiro
Interface administrator changes
- Following an RFC, the policy on restoration of adminship has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
- Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, T5, has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.
- Technical volunteers can now register for the 2025 Wikimedia Hackathon, which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. Application for travel and accommodation scholarships is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.
- The arbitration case Yasuke (formerly titled Backlash to diversity and inclusion) has been closed.
- An arbitration case titled Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.