Main

Userboxes

Sandbox

Talk

Forge

Contribs

Archives

/a

Care to explain why That's ridiculous. It's not even funny. should redirect to Kingdom of Loathing. The target article does not once mention that phrase. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I looked at the above referenced Categories for Deletion discussion and found out that this is an "injoke" among the players of KoL. Unfortunately, since the joke is not actually mentioned on the KoL article, and there is no visible reason whatsoever for this redirect, I have nominated it for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Injokes are not placed on Wikipedia because they are limited to a specific amount of people. It was linked to KoL, because, why else? James1011R (talk, contribs) - Visit The Forge 16:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:James1011R/Forge, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:James1011R/Forge and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:James1011R/Forge during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:12, 24 November 2011 (UTC) 20:12, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi James1011R. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for 28 North, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. The article contained content. v/r - TP 00:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The page only contained this single sentence that gives no content about 28 North. "28 North was voted best band in Pittsburgh by Pittsburgh Magazine in 2010.", and a single reference, which I added the reflist while tagging it as A3. I used it over no context because A3 > A1.

A3 is not 'greater than' A1. They are completely different. Further, the single sentence was in fact 'content'. So 'no content' wouldn't apply. Please read WP:CSD, specifically "a very short article may be a valid stub if it has context, in which case it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion."--v/r - TP 01:27, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:James1011R/Scrapyard, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:James1011R/Scrapyard and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:James1011R/Scrapyard during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Neutralhomer • Talk • 11:43, 3 December 2011 (UTC) 11:43, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should consider updating your signature so there isn't a broken link to the Forge. Also, consider updating the gray box at the top of your talk page to remove the broken Forge link. 64.166.145.51 (talk) 23:26, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Already done, and done. James1011R (talk, contribs) 03:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is just to let you know that I have declined the speedy deletion of Technical College Balapitiya, as under the rules of WP:CSD#A7, places of education are explicitly exempt from deletion by this category. If you haev any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Stephen! ^Coming... 10:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have put the article in AfD. James1011R (talk, contribs) 12:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey James1011R. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.. Thryduulf (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Internet Explorer 0. Since you had some involvement with the Internet Explorer 0 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 23:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Random Number God. Since you had some involvement with the Random Number God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --ais523 07:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you.. David Adam Kess (talk) 6:08, 09 December 2014 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Great work in Wikipeida! David Adam Kess (talk, contribs) 6:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions of anti-vandalism :) — phenolla 🖋 talk · contribs 05:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have been performing anti-vandalism work on the article which just so happens to include one editor blanking most of the section in a deliberately NPOV violating edit affecting most of the copyright violating section. The concerned edit was a revision. You may look at this diff for more information. James1011R (talk, contribs) 22:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Darn it, whoops! I did end up finding the actual contributor. I guess my eyes drifted to the largest contribution and I didn't notice it was a revert. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:21, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, James1011R. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikipediholism test/modern, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipediholism test/modern and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Wikipediholism test/modern during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Catgirllover4ever (talk) 04:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Game 1 has finished, 11 years in the making. Difficultly north (talk) The artist formerly known as Simply south 15:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]