Hello, Jaakko.saario, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Jaakko.saario", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it implies a connection to a real person. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Please review specifically WP:REALNAME. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jaakko Saario, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 22:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Nummi (municipality). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Nummi (municipality) and Nummi-Pusula refer to the same region so this detail should be merged into that article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nummi (Uusimaa) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nummi (Uusimaa), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaakko.saario! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nummi (Uusimaa), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ulla Eho-Saario, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaakko.kulta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ulla Eho-Saario, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaakko.kulta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ulla Eho-Saario".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Sjundby Manor is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Siuntio Local History Museum. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Siuntio Local History Museum. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Siuntio Local History Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from Luntoberget to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 17:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice! I've now changed the contributions to have information about the translation. Thanks. -- Jaakko.kulta (talk) 18:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice, but first of all the translated article template you added to the article should be on the talk page, and you additionally need to explain that the article you created is a translation in your edit summary, using the format I outlined above or something close to it so attribution can properly be given. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 18:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting me. I've made the edits now. Please let me know wether they are correctly made or not. Jaakko.kulta (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the attribution note is great but it should be put in your edit summary, done after you make an edit and before you publish it, rather than on the talk page. This is better though. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 18:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah alright now I see. Sorry about that. Don't know why it took me so long to realise what you were saying. Jaakko.kulta (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]